podesta_email_20115.txt

podesta-emails 2,328 words email

V16 P17 P22 P21 D5

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Sending now from Robby On Friday, July 3, 2015, Robby Mook <[email protected]> wrote: > Good here > > > > On Jul 3, 2015, at 11:34 AM, John Podesta <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > Statement looks good. > > On Friday, July 3, 2015, Brian Fallon <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> yep, lily and i have only talked to amy so far, but believe pat is doing >> a good deal of the writing. >> >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Jennifer Palmieri < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Brian - if okay with you, I want to call pat to talk with him off the >>> record for more context. It is an election, not a coronation; lots of >>> different views among dem primary voters - this is not like 08 where Obama, >>> HRC and Edwards were all going for same type of voters so should expect >>> that there would be room for someone like sanders. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Jul 3, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Brian Fallon <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> OK, tweaked statement to include "all in," "tough proving grounds" and >>> "expect to win": >>> >>> "We take nothing for granted in Iowa because the caucuses are always >>> such a tough proving ground, but Hillary Clinton's regular travel to the >>> state, and the organization we have established on the ground, show how >>> committed we are to prevailing there. We always expected a competitive >>> contest in Iowa, but we are all in, and we intend to win." >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:27 PM, John Podesta <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> All in, intend to win, know Iowa caucuses are tough proving grounds >>>> On Jul 2, 2015 7:43 PM, "Robby Mook" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On the one hand I definitely want to dispel any thinking that we would >>>>> abandon or retreat from Iowa. That's bad. >>>>> On the other hand, I like increasing expectations on Bernie. >>>>> So...yes we should do quote saying we are all in and know it will be >>>>> tough. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 2, 2015, at 7:28 PM, Brian Fallon <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Folks - Please see below thread. NYT is fascinated with doing a piece >>>>> for Monday suggesting "Clinton allies begin pondering chance of Iowa loss." >>>>> I think they consider this to be a newer, edgier take on the Berniementum >>>>> stories that have already been done. >>>>> >>>>> Amy claims they have heard whispers from "Clinton allies" that we need >>>>> to start preparing for this possibility. I have told her that in addition >>>>> to this being an absurd overreaction to a poll that showed her ahead by 19 >>>>> pts, there is no such thing for us as "preparing for an Iowa loss," because >>>>> we already are investing heavily in the other early states -- not to >>>>> mention deploying organizers/doing house parties etc in Super Tuesday >>>>> states and beyond -- at the same time we are prioritizing Iowa. I told her >>>>> that she should not mistake some folks' attempts to try to be helpful by >>>>> raising expectations on Bernie (Maria Cardona did say on CNN this week that >>>>> he might win Iowa), as a reflection of the actual campaign's true thinking >>>>> on the state of the race there. >>>>> >>>>> All of that said, I think it wise to provide a strong, on-the-record >>>>> quote from HQ that dimisses the idea that we are bearish on Iowa and are >>>>> plotting any contingency scenarios that presume a loss there. It could be >>>>> from me, but I think it might be better to have it from Robby or Podesta. >>>>> Below is a draft for consideration: >>>>> >>>>> "While we have always expected a competitive primary contest and >>>>> continue to take nothing for granted, this campaign is built to win in >>>>> Iowa. Hillary Clinton's regular travel to the state, and the organization >>>>> we have already established on the ground, shows how committed we are to >>>>> prevailing there." >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>> From: *Lily Adams* <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: Thursday, July 2, 2015 >>>>> Subject: Fwd: NYT + Iowa >>>>> To: Brian Fallon <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: Nick Merrill <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hey, so a few things from my conversation with her. >>>>> >>>>> She said all the organizational points were very helpful and that >>>>> she'll use them. I also pushed her on the other stuff from the Q poll and >>>>> made her clarify that the only polling proof point she was using was this >>>>> one poll. She said she certainly wouldn't accuse us of taking Iowa for >>>>> granted but asked if we'd ever contemplated a scenario where we lose Iowa. >>>>> I said that no, we've built a team and operation here to win here. >>>>> >>>>> Brian - she'd like to talk to you about the FEC/fundraising point but >>>>> also said that it would be helpful for you or someone nationally to weigh >>>>> in on whether there was any conversation anywhere in the campaign about >>>>> what happens if we don't win Iowa. She says both she and Pat have heard >>>>> this. Can you assure her there is not and that we're focused on winning >>>>> Iowa? I think this is one thing that's got to get swatted down because >>>>> it'll send people here into a frenzy. Happy to chat this part over but is >>>>> important to us here. >>>>> >>>>> She would like a quote from Matt so are you guys OK with sending her "We've >>>>> always known that this would be a competitive primary, and we've said that >>>>> from day one. A competitive race will mean a healthy and spirited debate >>>>> about the issues, which we welcome. It's what's best for the party, for the >>>>> country, and an opportunity for Hillary Clinton to put forth her ideas and >>>>> let Iowans decide." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Lily Adams <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Can do. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we can do the quote from Matt and agree that makes sense. >>>>>> I'll see what she needs. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Brian Fallon < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On background, I would: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1) Talk them through some of the finer points of the Q poll, noting >>>>>>> that she remains a clear frontrunner notwithstanding the tightening and >>>>>>> showing how her fav and trustworthy numbers remain terrific with Dem >>>>>>> caucusgoers, notwithstanding attacks on emails, etc. >>>>>>> 2) Talk up the proof points/metrics on how our organization in Iowa >>>>>>> is unrivaled. You would know these better than me. >>>>>>> 3) Talk up her visits there as a show of her commitment there, etc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Off record, and not necessarily specific to Iowa, what I have been >>>>>>> saying on Berniementum inquiries: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1) When we said we expected a competitive primary in April, it was >>>>>>> not a meaningless bromide. We always expected the contest to tighten, and >>>>>>> in fact, always thought it would come from Bernie specifically. >>>>>>> 2) The reason we expected it from Bernie was because he was the >>>>>>> natural person to consolidate the Warren supporters. That largely explains >>>>>>> what is happening now. >>>>>>> 3) Moreover, national surveys of Dems consistently show two-thirds >>>>>>> of Dems want a competitive primary, notwithstanding their strong support >>>>>>> for Clinton, which is a natural factor in the tightening we are seeing. >>>>>>> Dems do not want a coronation. >>>>>>> 4) In early states, HRC is a strong second choice option even among >>>>>>> those more liberal Ds who lean Sanders, proving she is in good standing >>>>>>> even with the more progressive types. >>>>>>> 5) Her standing with progressives will only improve in coming weeks >>>>>>> as she outlines bold stands on progressive issues, and the attacks/contrast >>>>>>> between her and GOP raise the stakes in this election and appeal to these >>>>>>> Dems' partisan nature. >>>>>>> 6) We expect to win in the early states, but have built the campaign >>>>>>> for the long haul (had organizers in all 50 states, etc). That's what it >>>>>>> means to take nothing for granted. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I might suggest we make the quote from Matt Paul, if you think that >>>>>>> makes sense. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lastly, today's FEC numbers should not be a proof point for >>>>>>> Bernie-mentum. If you sense they are going to say that 15m versus her 45m >>>>>>> is evidence of his momentum, let us know and we can try to argue back the >>>>>>> money side from HQ. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Lily Adams < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Brian - let me know what you'd like me to give them. I assume you >>>>>>>> just want me to talk to them on background and some off the record & then >>>>>>>> give the quote from one of you all? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Nick Merrill < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think that's bueno too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Lily Adams < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> something like that quote is fine with me. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think on background though it's worth walking her through the >>>>>>>>>> metrics besides the ones on expectations. We have a committed supporter in >>>>>>>>>> all 1,600+ precincts, an team that's in all parts of the state, etc. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Nick Merrill < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It might be worth one of us going on record and expanding on why >>>>>>>>>>> we look forward to a competitive primary. Something like >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We've always known that this would be a competitive primary, and >>>>>>>>>>> we've said that from day one. A competitive race will mean a healthy and >>>>>>>>>>> spirited debate about the issues, which we welcome. It's what's best for >>>>>>>>>>> the party, for the country, and an opportunity for Hillary Clinton to put >>>>>>>>>>> forth her ideas and let voters decide on who is best to lead America." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Lily Adams < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sure happy to. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --------- >>>>>>>>>>>> Lily Adams >>>>>>>>>>>> cell: (202) 368-4013 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 2, 2015, at 2:31 PM, Brian Fallon < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Lily, do you want to take first pass at talking through our >>>>>>>>>>>> points? I will loop you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Chozick, Amy <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:23 PM >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Fwd: NYT + Iowa >>>>>>>>>>>> To: Brian Fallon <[email protected]>, Nick Merrill < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys. I got Jesse's out of office. What is that all about?? >>>>>>>>>>>> Please see below. Would appreciate any and all guidance. >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Chozick, Amy <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: NYT + Iowa >>>>>>>>>>>> To: Jesse Ferguson <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey there. Pat Healy and I are teaming up on a story about >>>>>>>>>>>> Iowa, Bernie's latest poll #s and fundraising and what it means for >>>>>>>>>>>> Clinton. I was curious to get your thoughts. I'll include that no >>>>>>>>>>>> non-incumbent has ever won more than 50% in Iowa. But I have also heard >>>>>>>>>>>> from people who are close to HRC and the campaign who say there is a >>>>>>>>>>>> scenario in which she could be behind in the polls in Iowa in August and >>>>>>>>>>>> could potentially lose there. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I know we've got 200 plus days (as per the countdown on the >>>>>>>>>>>> "Iowa" conference room says) but would you say the campaign foresees a >>>>>>>>>>>> scenario in which she could lose Iowa? You're obviously >>>>>>>>>>>> doing everything you can to win there, but I wanted to run it by you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm at the office (212-556-7440). We are planning for the >>>>>>>>>>>> weekend or Monday, but would be good to talk today, if you have time. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> Amy >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Amy Chozick >>>>>>>>>>>> Reporter >>>>>>>>>>>> The New York Times >>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 212-556-7440 >>>>>>>>>>>> Cell: 718-715-8661 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Amy Chozick >>>>>>>>>>>> Reporter >>>>>>>>>>>> The New York Times >>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 212-556-7440 >>>>>>>>>>>> Cell: 718-715-8661 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Lily Adams >>>>>>>>>> Iowa Communications Director >>>>>>>>>> Hillary for America >>>>>>>>>> c: 202-368-4013 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Lily Adams >>>>>>>> Iowa Communications Director >>>>>>>> Hillary for America >>>>>>>> c: 202-368-4013 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Lily Adams >>>>>> Iowa Communications Director >>>>>> Hillary for America >>>>>> c: 202-368-4013 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Lily Adams >>>>> Iowa Communications Director >>>>> Hillary for America >>>>> c: 202-368-4013 >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>