👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (652 words)
From: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation®gmail.com>
To: Joshua Cooper Ramo
Subject: Re:
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 20:38:58 +0000
Just keep repeating 4.5 is fair . No explanation , defense . He said no up . We refuse down . Slowly slowly
On Tuesday, November 25, 2014, Joshua Cooper Ramo <e> wrote:
His reaction was "Well, revenues are down 25%. I think it would be hard for your number to go up in a year
when revenues are down. To get to 4.5 would be a very large adjustment from where we are. It would mean
taking away from other people in the firm."
To which I said: "I think 4.5 seems fair to me. The compensation should reflect who is generating the revenue.
Doesn't seems fair to me that in a year when my business is up a bit my comp goes down dramatically."
He said Henry has to decide and he'll talk with him.
Thoughts
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Joshua Cooper Ramo < Ila wrote:
Tks.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:38 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation®gmail.com> wrote:
i woudl just say given its 18 i think 25 % of that is fair at 4.5. if it then goes up, you hsould ask for an
addtional 25 %
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Joshua Cooper Ramo < wrote:
Thanks. Extremely helpful chat.
Question: Looks like the net number may go up by about 2.5 in the next week if another fee gets
triggered on a deal I started, so we'd be at 20 more or less in my business this year. But I won't know for
sure for a week or so. So if I make the call on Wednesday this week, should I say -- seems to me 4.5 is
fair at the 18 number, and about 5.25 at the 20 number?
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
to summarize , 1 I have given it considerable thought , and what I think is FAIR is 4,5 . I have
increased the percentage of the firms biz. 18 vs 24. 18 vs 26 counter BLAH BLAH< I think 4.5
is fair. no further explanation until later. — but as you know reveneue are down etc. , I
think 4. 5 is fair
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
EFTA01001684
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA01001685
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
a45095d47c16c3c53eca45013c8cc6dae99cb5cf71c629375f72f965c7d60207
Bates Number
EFTA01001684
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0