📄 Extracted Text (4,416 words)
Nardello
Co.
Nardello & Co. LLC
565 Fifth Avenue
New York. NY 10017
Tr
Fr
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
MEMORANDUM
To: Brad S. Karp, Esq.
Lorin L. Reisner, Esq.
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
FROM: Nardello & Co. LLC
RE: Draft Transcript of Meeting with
DATE: August 14, 2015
Th folio is a draft transcript of a recording of a conversation between John Doe (JD) and
(E) which took place on August 14, 2015 at Le Bernardin, 155 W. Sr Street, New York, New
York between approximately 12:30 pm and 1:45 pm. The recording was made with the consent of JD.
Notations of "UI" represent speech that was unintelligible during our initial review.
The first section below is a summary of conversation between the two individuals which did not appear to
be immediately material, but provides additional background. The second section is a verbatim transcript
of the material portion of the conversation.
The summary and transcription are subject to revision.
Summary
Time Stamp Speakers Conversation
0 to 22:43 Various Preamble and JD travelling to the restaurant.
22:43 Various JD enters the restaurant.
22:50 JD, The meeting begins.
22:50-24:35 JD, Small talk about hotel, her outfit and the restaurant.
24:35-25:05 JD, says that someone once proposed to marry her once at this restaurant.
says that she turned down the proposal, noting that the proposer was
from a wealthy family. says, "I chose you," referring to JD.
25:05-29:40 JD, JD and . engage in small talk about restaurants. They order food and
■ asks whether JD feels better.
29:40-30:05 JD, ays that was she "hoping" to back to Moscow tomorrow but was
invited to go to the Hamptons.
EFTA00590667
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR Nardello
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
Time Stamp Sp Conversation
30:05 -32:25 JD, 'says that she went to opera last night. ID and ■ discuss opera. They
order wine and lunch, and talk about sushi.
32:25 — 32:58 JD, ■ states that JD collects Chinese art and has a good collection. They talk
about the Chinese art market. ■ asks if JD bought any art recently.
32:58 — 36:35 JD, More art talk, state of the art market and talk of valuation of biotech
companies. • asks "You don't invest in technology?" They talk about
the tech market
36:35- 37:00 JD, JD asks "You're not on Facebook?" "No," she responds. "Nor am I," he
states. ■ claims that she does not understand the point of social media,
"it's the place to show all your weaknesses."
37:00 — 39:00 JD, ■ asks if JD is going to the Hamptons. JD says "yes," and discusses his
sister's health problems. JD is taking his sister and her husband to the
Hamptons so they can spend time together. Further discussion of the
illness of JD's sister and wife.
39:00 — 41:30 JD, discusses how she has started to work out again and JD says that he is
workin0 out too. ■ has lost a lot of wei ht JD notes. ■ claims that its
stress. says she is trying to eat better.. suggests erring a vegan
cook. asks if he drinks everyday. They discuss how . is not a big
drinker.
41:30 — 46:00 JD, asks him what he thinks about London and the British economy.
Further discussion of the US and UK economies. Lunch begins. JD and
■ talk of the Russian economy, investing in China, etc.
46:00 — 47:10 JD, Another course is served and little conversation occurs as JD and ■ eat.
47:10 — 48:00 JD, JD asks how much time ■ can spend in the UK. ■ states that she is
not sure and that she has to start doing something about it. She states that
she does not have a place in Moscow and says that she stays in hotels.
48:00 — 50:25 JD. ■ mentions Nicholas Berggruen. JD knows him, says that he saw
Berggruen recently and that he is an interesting character who has put
together a think tank in California. They talk about how Berggruen
collects art.
50:25 — 51:18 JD, ■ and JD eat lunch.
***
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
2
EFTA00590668
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR Nardello
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
Co.
Transcription
Time Stamp S . eaker Conversation
51:27 JD Let me give you some thoughts.
r J Mmhm.
JD I've tried to listen very carefully...
. Mmhm.
JD ...to a lot of what you've said in our previous meetings this summer. You've
told me that you've suffered a lot. And as someone I care about, and as
someone that I've always respected, um, I'm sorry you've suffered. I don't
believe I've had much to do with your suffering. I've never bad-mouthed you
to anybody. I've never in fact talked about you to anybody. Urn, I've always
tried to treat you with respect and, frankly, felt real affection for you, um, in
the times we've spent together. Um, I think you're somebody with a first-
grade brain, you're beautiful, you're interesting. Um, so I think, I'm not sorry
we've spent time together, urn, on and off. Um, but, urn, I would never do
anything, um, to hurt you or your son. In fact, I really tried to bend over
backwards, urn, to be kind and generous to you. And, you know, frankly...
Long pause.
53:56 JD So when you came here in June and started, you know, with a script of how
I've ruined your life and kept you from jobs and defamed you and went to my
friends in a cabal, I'd have to say it was pretty shocking to me. I've never
viewed you before this as, urn, as somebody that would come to me, um, kind
of 180 degrees different than, um, the basis of...
Long pause.
55: 17 JD Of the time we did spend together, you know and then, clearly, when you
came out and said that you planned to go public and ruin my life and my
family and my business unless I paid you 100 million dollars, um, it kind of
said to me that you've changed, a lot. I don't know who you've fallen, what
group you've fallen into in Moscow and London, urn, but it's, it's something
that, that is, urn, foreign to me in terms of the way I always viewed you. Um,
and I'm also sorry for that. Um, cause as I said you're somebody that I've
had real affection for and had real respect for. But, um, I can't say I respect
what it's at now, um, extortion. But it is what it is, and we are here. Um, the
way I kind of view it, this can go in three different directions. Um, either we
can come to a mutually satisfactory, um, economic solution, um, number one.
Uh, number two, urn, you can file a suit and you go public. Um, or number
three, um, you know there can be, um, you know, possible other consequences
of that. So let me kind of outline the way I see all three.
57:40 Mmhm.
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
3
EFTA00590669
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR Nardello
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
Co.
Time Stamp Speaker Conversation
JD Um, and then, and then you know, you'll just have to choose what you want
to do, urn, and the chips will fall where they fall, urn. I want you to be
comfortable, urn, and I want you and your son to have a comfortable, uh,
existence. Urn, so, you know, I also think it's important that you feel
that...Just wait one minute [speaking to waiter].
Waiter brings food, speaking to waiter.
58:59 JD That you feel that I'm serious and that I have listened to you and that, um, and
that I care about you, even though I view it as extortion. Urn, so you know in
the past, I kept looking at numbers which sort of compared favorably to what
I had done for you when we were together and...
JD Speaking to waiter.
59:42 JD And therefore felt when I was talking about, you know, 600 over three years,
five years, would that compare to 350 when we were together. Now we're not
together and that seemed like pretty reasonable. You've made it clear to me
that, urn, that is not what you have in mind.
JD Urn. And I really want to put this behind us. I have other things I have to deal
with right now, like my sister, and my wife, and a lot of illness and a lot of
other things, and frankly I don't want to deal with you or with this. Um. So it
is worth it to me to try to put this behind me, um, with you in a way, um you
know that we can both hold our heads up. Um.
1:00:47 JD What I would be willing to do is provide for you for the next 12 years at a
million dollars a year and also to give to you in an account two million
pounds, urn, which would be used exclusively to buy -- to invest in British
securities, so that for a period of time, like three or four years, so that you can
get at least the five year [RJ]visa in the UK
JE That is a 15 million dollar package, um, versus two million dollars basically
that [Ul] I gave you and the million I lent to you when we were together. Urn,
so that...
01:02:06 ■ Can I?
JD Please.
JD So that you have -- you can live very, very well with your son, whether it's in
Moscow or London or wherever.
Mmhm.
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
4
EFTA00590670
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR Nardello
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
Co.
Time Stamp Speaker Conversation
JD It's a million dollars, and -- which is tax free -- and I'll have to pay a gift tax
on 50%, and that'll take Sasha through his college years, um, pay for his
education, and keep you comfortable and secure for a long period of time.
That's pathway number one.
Mmhm.
01:02:56 JD Pathway number two is you file a suit, go to the press...
Mmhm.
JD ...that we had an affair on and off for five years. My guess is it gets thrown
out. Maybe not. Probably. Um .Causes me some embarrassment.
01:03:21 Mmhm.
My wife will be pissed off, she'll end up forgiving me. Urn. My business, it's
a 10 billion dollar business, it's gonna survive. Um. Life will go on. You
know. I've gone through the suicide of my father...
Mmhm.
JD ...I've gone through the bankruptcies of Drexel.. .
Mmhm,
JD I've gone through the US government suing me for six billion dollars post -
Drexel, personally...
Mmhm.
Urn. And -- and I'll get through this....
01:03:58 Okay.
JD Um. And you'll end up getting nothing.
■ Mmhm.
01:04:04 a There's a possibility, yes.
JD So, there's, one, there's a possibility, a good possibility you'll end up with
nothing. You know, you brought up a few times in our last conversation, you
know, this Benjamin Wei case...
Mmhm.
JD Um. The Wall Streeter, paid 18 million dollars for this woman to go to bed
with him four times. You know — there are three things that you should be
aware of about that case...
■ Mmhm.
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
5
EFTA00590671
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR Nardello
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
Co.
Time Stamp Speaker Conversation
01:04:35 I JD Number one, he was her employer, so it's employment contract abuse.
■ Mmhm.
JD Um. Number two, he wrote a blog publicly defaming her.
Mmhm.
01:04:50 JD And number three, any lawyer — she hasn't received anything yet — it's on
appeal, and any lawyer will tell you, because it was a two million award and
16 million in damages, that the courts will reduce the damages to probably
two or three million. So, if she gets anything it'll be five million dollars. And,
um, versus the 15 million package that I (Uri
01:05:25 JD And the last thing you should know — and it's — I want to underscore this — it's
not a threat — um, but, you know, if you do take this frivolous case public...
-. Mmhm.
JD ...it will give me no choice but to, you know, go to the authorities and pursue
a criminal case...
01:05:56 ■ Mmhm .
JD ...against you. Um. And you'll likely end up in jail. Um. Now, I want to
reiterate, I don't like pathway number two or three. I don't think it's good for
you, I don't think it's good for me. And so I hope and I pray, um, that
pathway number one is the door, um, that will make the most sense for you.
um, because I'm really trying very hard here. And I also just, you know, I
want you to, you know, I did go...
. Mmhm.
JD ...to my lawyer to talk about...
Mmhm
JD what has been said. Um. And this is just -- this is from -- he was the ex-head
of the criminal division of the US Attorney...
01:06:50 Mmhm.
JD Um. Who wrote to the files so there's no intention of using it. Um. But
basically just saying based on our conversations before you have committed a
crime both under federal statutes and under New York statutory law. Um.
■ Okay.
JD Um. And it's a crime that you go to jail for. I don't want that to happen. Urn.
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
6
EFTA00590672
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR Nardello
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
Co.
Time Stamp Speaker Conversation
But — but — actions have consequences...
■ Mmhm.
1:07:33 JD ...And I'm trying very hard to give you something super generous to provide
for you and to provide.
1:07:34 JD I mean, when I've talked to people, lawyers, they say they've never heard of
numbers like this. They don't know of any case that's been resolved here for
anything more than single digits.
Mmhm.
JD Um, so again, I don't know where the 100 million in your head comes from.
1:07:57 -. I've been with you for a very long time.
JD We had an affair on and off for five years, that's not a marriage. You knew I
was married.
■ For me it was like a marriage.
JD Mmhm.
I feel like it was like a marriage to me. It was my, my life.
JD And you broke it off a number of times.
1:08:17 ■ Um, I, I feel uncomfortable talking to you right now, because of this. I don't
want to get more in trouble. Uh, I will not agree to anything less than $100
million and I think you owe it to me because I've been with you for a very
long time and, um...
JD But where does that 100 million come from? Where does a number like that
come from?
1:08:41 • Because I think I'm entitled to half of what you earned for the time that we
were together.
JD We weren't married, we didn't live together.
■ Well it's like a marriage.
JD How is it like a marriage if we didn't live together?
■ For me it was like a marriage. Because I didn't see any other people, I didn't
work, you supported me. Uh, we had relationships. To me, it's like a
marriage.
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
7
EFTA00590673
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR Nardello
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
Co.
Time Stamp Speaker Conversation
JD Mmhm.
1:09:05 -. And in the marriage I would get half of what you earned. That would be a
couple of billions. And I'm not asking you for that, even though I think I
totally deserve it. I gave you seven years of my life. You were a very difficult
person, you were abusive, and it was really, it was very difficult for me to be
with you but I was there for you. And now after all of that, my reputation is
ruined. My reputation is not 12 million to me. My reputation costs me more,
and my future and my son's future.
1:09:39 JD 15 million.
-. Uff, 15.
JD Mm...But I never talked about our relationship. You did.
1:09:52 ■ To whom?
JD Alisa.
■ What did she tell you? I don't know. Why do you keep bringing her up? I
never told her anything. What did she tell you? You know she's a
pathological liar. Why do you even talk to her? You don't know that?
JD I haven't talked to her in a long time, but I remember she always used to ask
me, "How are things with Guzel?"
What did she tell you? Why are you so worried about it? I don't know what
she told you.
1:10:13 JD She didn't tell me...
■ She's a pathological liar, you should ask other people. So whatever she says,
it doesn't make any sense.
JD And you think, for having an on-and-off affair with me...
■ Mmhm.
JD For five years, that that's akin to a marriage?
1:10:32 • Yes.
1:10:34 JD And therefore you would make a case that unless I pay you a hundred million
dollars, that this is what you're gonna file suit and go public with?
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
8
EFTA00590674
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR Nardello
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
Co.
Time Stamp Speaker Conversation
Er, no. My reputation is damaged...
JD Alright.
■ And I want to clear up my reputation. But I'm willing to meet you half way
considering your status and your family. Um. If you will tell me with this, you
know, hundred, that you respect me and you understand that I went through a
lot of hardship because of our relationship, and I've been with you, and it's
been like a marriage to me, and that you respect me and my family and my
future. Then that.
01:11:22 JD Well I want you to think very hard before you walk away from a million a
year for 12 years and getting a UK visa that—
■ I'm telling you — I'm telling—
JD --the other roads...
Mmhm.
JD ...will land you with probably nothing.
i ll That's fine -- that's fine with me.
JD And — and will probably land you in jail.
01:11:43 -. That's fine.
JD Okay. I mean—
I - I thought about it very well. I will not agree with you.
01:11:51 JD Mmhm. Okay. It's not a very rational decision but — you — it's certainly your
choice.
[Long pause.]
01:12:46 JD Guzel, you wanted an apartment near your child's school...
.-- Mmhm.
JD ...You got an apartment near your child's school.
ill Mmhm.
JD You asked me to respect you and not to please come visit it...
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
9
EFTA00590675
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR Nardello
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
Co.
Time Stamp Speaker Conversation
Mmhm.
JD ...I respected you and didn't come visit it.
01:13:01 ■ We can do this forever -- like, what you've done, and what I've done -- you
don't know—
JD So I don't understand how you were abused.
You don't know what happened.
JD We went on holidays when you wanted...
-. ...I wanted to go to your apartment too. All the time. You never invited me to
your apartment!
JD Because I was married...
Well, and I had a child.
JD ...And you knew I was married, and you knew I had a family-
--and you -- and you—
JD --I was totally up front about that.
01:13:26 ■ --and you knew that you were married, why did you sleep with me? There are
consequences to what you do to woman and to their lives.
01:13:37 JD We were two consenting adults that had an affair..
■ And it just lasted a little bit too long and you got a little bit too involved.
[Long pause.)
1:14:05 . My reputation is important to me and my life is important to me and the seven
years I gave you are important to me. They're worth something. They might
be not worth anything to you but they're worth something to me.
JD And that's where the $100 million comes from. Because we had an on and off
five year affair...
Seven.
JD No, it wasn't seven.
--. Maybe now it's eight. I stood by you for seven years. I stood by you, I let you
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
10
EFTA00590676
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR Nardello
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
Co.
Time Stamp Speaker Conversation
do whatever you wanted. You did whatever you wanted to do...
JD Stop...What did I want to do? We saw each other, like, once a month.
You would promise me to get a job, you never got me a job and (UI).
JD No, I didn't promise you, I promised that I would try, which I did try. Where
did you interview? What did you do to try to get a job? You were in school
for three of those years.
I guess it is pointless (UI).
JD Guzel, number one, I don't have that type of money, ok? I have a lot of art
loans.
-. No, you don't have that much money, of course you don't...
JD I don't have that type of cash. But this is total extortion.
■ No, it's not extortion: you have an obligation to me because we have been
together for so long.
JD I mean, you're turning this into a palimony case. You know what palimony
is?
■ You know what, I'm not very smart with words...
JD You're really smart and I've always respected your mind. You're about as
smart as I've ever seen.
1:16:20 I've been very clear about what I think is fair. You might disagree with me,
you know, you're entitled to have your own opinion about things. I just...you
can talk to my lawyers, I guess.
JD Well, maybe the best thing would be to have a mediator get involved.
No, at first, I'm gonna go public, see what kind of lawyer I can get, then um,
because I want a really good lawyer.
JD Well, as I said, you're moving backwards, you could end up with nothing,
also a lawyer takes a third to a half.
1:17:00 ■ I'm willing to take the risk. I feel very strongly that you have an obligation to
me, that I was like a wife to you, I spent many years...
JD No, you weren't like a wife to me..stop it. This is insulting. This is offensive.
You were not like a wife to me. You never were. Stop it. We had an affair, off
and on and saw each other once a month when you wanted to get together.
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
I1
EFTA00590677
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR Nardello
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
Co.
Time Stamp Speaker Conversation
Well, next time you think when you fuck someone. Ok? You can't fuck
someone's life. You can't do that.
JD We were two consenting adults who had an affair together.
Ok, as an adult, I have an obligation to protect my family. My life has been
ruined.
JD For $100 million?
1:17:50 ■ My life has been ruined [emphasizes each word]. Absolutely. In every aspect
of it.
JD Because my buddies Bloomberg and Mort Zuckerman and Len Blavatnik
were all in a cabal to defame you?
Everything (repeats).
JD Why would I do that?
I feel my son uncomfortable sending him to another school. He doesn't want
to go to another school interview. It's totally unacceptable and wrong to me.
JD And you think I caused that?
1:18:30 -. Maybe that wasn't exactly you, but it was because of our relationships. This
relationship caused that.
JD Who knew about our relationship?
I don't know. But, even if they didn't know we had a relationships, and you
have a responsibility.
JD And my responsibility is for a $100 million or else you sue me?
1:19:00 Yes, because I am dealing with a lot of difficulties because of you! Because
you're such a high profile person who if they're not lazy (UI) they think they
have to bring me down. Nobody would touch me if it was some Jewish
woman.
JD Why does anyone want to bring you down? Why do you have it in your head
that everybody out there is trying to bring you down? Why would I want to
bring you down?
■ Ok, right now, I'm like, very, I feel very numb and terrible about what
happened with my life and you. I feel numb because of the way you talk to me
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
12
EFTA00590678
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR Nardello
WORK PRODUCT COMMUNICATION
Co.
Time Stamp S ' esker Conversation
and are treating me.
JD I just told you I have real affection for you and respect you and have just
given you a $15 million in (UI).
You just said "I saw you once a month."
1:20:00 JD Well, I'm just telling you the truth. We saw each other on and off, you cut it
off twice in five years.
This is not what I believe in.
JD Whatever you asked for, I gave you. You asked for money, you got money;
you asked for loans, you got loans; you asked to go on vacations, you went on
vacations. How were you mistreated by me?
. Thank you so much you allowed me to go on vacation.
JD Well, I am trying very hard to provide for you and your son for a long period
of time with a lot of money. And if you don't get that and understand
that...[waiter appears to interrupt]. I mean who gets $15 million?
1:21:20 ■ I can't do this anymore. Let me go and talk to lawyers.
JD You have to do what you have to do. I'm happy to have your lawyers talk to
my lawyers, I'm happy to have a mediator get involved...
No...
JD I think I'm being very understanding and generous...
-. Ok.
JD It's a hurtful path for me that you would take, it's going to be a disastrous
path for you.
1:22:07. ■ I'm going to go. Goodbye [. leaves].
***
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
13
EFTA00590679
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
a56ef191a0b29da530aa8949e8a01dce9843f032097899f5c8de813cf6d85cf0
Bates Number
EFTA00590667
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
13
Comments 0