EFTA02387578
EFTA02387579 DataSet-11
EFTA02387583

EFTA02387579.pdf

DataSet-11 4 pages 1,098 words document
P17 V16 V15 P19 P21
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,098 words)
From: Valeria Chomsky Sent: Sunday, July 2, 2017 4:37 AM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Confidential Dear Jeffrey, OK. W=atever plan you develop, please take into consideration that it is fundame=tal for us that we have a total and complete separate financial life from =he children. It is essential that we keep our independence and sover=ignty. We believe if things are clearly and definitively separated, =he problems will disappear. It has been a lot of =nnecessary and unfair stress for Noam (also for me). <=iv>Thank you. Valeria </=iv> Forwarded message F=om: jeffrey E. <[email protected]><=r>Date: Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 12:06 AM Subject: Re: taxes To: Valeria =homsky also tell them that you will br=ng the owed interest current by the end of the month. 4,=A0 that will turn down the distress. =br> On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 a= 9:13 PM, Valeria Chomsky wrote: Jeffrey, We just received the following letter.=/div> Noam would like if you could take a look at this =etter and let us know if it is accurate or not on the interpretation of th= promissory note. And if not, could you please explain why it is not= Valeria Forwarded message F=om: Diana Chomsky EFTA_R1_01409109 EFTA02387579 Date: Sat, Jul 1, =017 at 7:32 PM Subject: Re: taxes To: Noam Chomsky Cc: Avi =homsky , Harry Chomsky, Valeria Chomsky Hi, thanks for your reply. We are very, very concerned that y=u are not understanding and not getting help in understanding what is happeni=g with your finances. Your responses below only increase our concern. The three of us are not able to serve as financial advisors. We urge you strongly to speak directly with Max so that he can clarify what he says in the Memo and explain what the Promissory Note language means. Just to give you one example of ou= concern: You focus on one phrase: that the interest will be "=t the highest rate in effect." But you are taking those words out of =ontext. We really don't think we should be trying to explain these d=tails to you, but to try to summarize: this phrase applied to the double nature of the loan—the Marital Trust had to borrow money from Persh=ng to make the loan to you, until the Lexington house was sold. The phrase you quote applies only to that brief period, and has no impact on the interest accruing now or in the future. We can see why focusing on those s=x words would make you angry. But the six words mean nothing in and of themse=ves (i.e., what rate is "in effect?). But instead of doi=g the logical thing—getting the full information—you are just so angry th=t you refuse to find out the truth. Again, this is just one example of=where you are stating conclusions based on faulty or incomplete information. There are explanations for your other issues as well (how the DNI is paid to you, how the interest payments can be made, etc) but rather than us trying to summarize the information for you here, we think it would make more sense for you to discuss them with the people who set all of this up, in the context of a broader conversation. Reading your response only redoubles our sense that you are simply misreading important elements of your entire financial situation, and that you are making big decisions based on faulty information. We feel that you have painted yourself into a corner, in which you arrive at the worst possible interpretation of complex legal language, and then refuse to speak with the very people who could explain it to you, and just get angry at them based on your misin=erpretations. We beg you once again to meet with=us and with the people who set up the Trust, the loan, etc., to clarify these issues. Love, Avi, Diane and Harry From: 4>=A0 Noam Chomsky =br>To: Q=1O Diana Chomsky4b=A0 Cc: =C2* Avi Chomsky , Harry Chomsky , Valeria Chomsky Date: 30/06/2017 19:41 Subject: =C24> Re: taxes 2 EFTA_R1_01409110 EFTA02387580 Glad to see the memo. I compared the memo with t=e original document, the promissory note that is the official signed agreemen=. The memo is in error about the promissory note. The facts are as I already described them. A few comments interspersed into the memo you sent, attached. I don't see any point in discussions with Max and =ainco. The facts seem completely clear. If there are other issues, I'd of course be glad t= know about them. I hope we can settle all of this quickly. 0 On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Diana Chomskyc=ont size="3"> wrote: As promised, please find attached = memo with information about the Marital Trust, and in particular the condit=ons on the loan from the Trust, which are somewhat different from what you indicated to us in your previous email. We have thought for a long time that you have misunderstood key aspects of the financial situation. This is why we have been asking you to meet with us and with Max and Bainco. The issues discussed in this memo are only one part of the picture. We still think that the meetin= we have been urging is important and could clear up other issues. Love, Avi, Diane and Harry From: 26/06/2017 17:37 Subject: Re: taxes We're in the process of arranging our finances with the impending sale of the apartment and the move to Tucson, and would like to clear up some unsettled questions. In my letter to you I outlined what I have determined about the matter...A0 In your letter you said that you think the facts about the Marital Trust and the conditions on the loan from the Marital Trust and the way the inter=st works are different from what I understand, and that you have different facts. You said you were working on a memo to lay out the facts as you see them..C2. Any progress on this? I'd like to clarify this so that we can set.le just what the facts are. D 3 EFTA_R1_01409111 EFTA02387581 please note =he information contained in this communication is confidential, may be =ttorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is in=ended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEEUnauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any p=rt thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have rece=ved this communication in error, please notify us immediately by ret=rn e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <[email protected]> , and destroy this communication an= all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights r=served 4 EFTA_R1_01409112 EFTA02387582
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
a5996267059feb66c4c650bd7595f8026e83b7cb2b484d5fa94f212bc1317ae2
Bates Number
EFTA02387579
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
4

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!