EFTA01660189.pdf

From: "MIS (MM) (FBI)" To: ' (MM) (FBI)" Subject: FW: RE: Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:10:47 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 4 .pdf Classification: UNCLASSIFIED TRANSITORY RECORD From: (RMD)(FBI) Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 11:28 AM To: MIS (MM) (FBI) Cc: (Mail = Subject: .. : --- UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED TRANSITORY RECORD -1= Attached is the first proposed release regarding this case, which consists of the first main section and the al sub-file. Please let me know if you have any concerns. Regarding the local police documents, these were processed to mirror the release already made by the State of Florida as per another email exchange with IM and yourself. I'll have to send the sections separately given profile restrictions From: (MM) (FBI) Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 11:53 AM To: (RMD)(FBI) Cc: . MM FBI) Subject: RE: RE: --- UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED That's fine if we'll have time to review before release. We only have a couple of other directions to follow up on and it is related to developing a separate subject involved with Epstein. By the time the FOIA processing is completed we should have those outstanding leads resolved. Thanks. EFTA01660189 From (RMD)(FBI) Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 11:42 AM To: (MM) (FBI) Subject: FW: RE: --- UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Jason, The attorney for OIP who made the initial inquiry regarding this case sent me an email informing me that she will recommend overturning the 137A1 exemption for this file (and thus making it subject to FOIA processing) if she does not receive a 'harm rationale" today. In the event the file is processed it would still be available for division review (Miami, Tampa, or both) of RMD's proposed redactions before any release was made. From: (RMD)(FBI) Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 8:40 AM To: MIIIIMMINNIRMM) (FBI) Subject: RE: RE: -- UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Jason, OIP is now telling me they need an articulation of harm in regards to processing the file for FOIA. If you could provide that (such as: it would discourage witnesses, hamper the gathering of leads, endanger informants, etc.) that would be great. Otherwise please let me know who I can contact in Tampa who might be able to help. Thanks, From (MM) (FBI) Sent: Tuesda March 19 2013 3:35 PM To: (RMD)(FBI) Cc: . MM FBI) Subject: RE: RE - UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED EFTA01660190 Associate Deputy Attorney General David Margolis approved the office wide recusal of the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) for the Southern District of Florida from the investigation and assigned the matter to the USAO for the Middle District of Florida. Investigation is ongoing. Jason From: Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 2:52 PM To: Subject: RE: UNCI AcSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED This is in regards to Jeffrey Epstein, a main subject of the file above. Mr. Epstein has made three Freedom of Information Act requests for his FBI file since 2010 and has appealed our latest denial in December 2012 to DoJ's Office of Information Policy. As such I am required to verify that the case remains pending. For RMD to be able to deny processing the file there must be potential prosecutive action remaining, such as continuing appeals, rather than simply remaining pending awaiting destruction of evidence. Thanks, Legal Administrative Specialist RIDS/FOIPA Unit 4 Records Management Division Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED EFTA01660191 EFTA01660192