EFTA02581579.pdf

DataSet-11 4 pages 996 words document
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (996 words)
From: Corazza, Omella < > Sent: Friday, November 24, 2017 11:14 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: Re: R: Payment for research Thanks to you Jeffrey, and sorry you could not join in Cuba. As you might know, my field of interest is on behavioural addictions (gambling, Internet, shopping, sex) in relation to personality and state of consciousness. Should you have any kind of interest on this matter, let me know. I would be pleased to involve you in one of our international projects. Ornella On 24 Nov 2017, at 11:34, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: thx On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Corazza, Ornella < <mailto >> wrote: Greetings from a freezing London! Here some group pictures from Havana ! Ornella <imagel.jpeg><image2.jpeg> Travelling. Please excuse my brevity and eventual typos. On 23 Nov 2017, at 21:37, Fabio Babiloni < <mailto: > wrote: Dear Gino, Thank you very much for the video. I have some difficult to understand it. I hope you could clarify and sorry for my poor understanding. EFTA_R1_01758115 EFTA02581579 It seems that there is a finger of the experimenter that propose the task to some "hat person" who operate on the body of the "receiver". The receiver is connected to the system you generated that transduces the activity perceived by the receiver. The finger proposes two position (up and down) to the "hat person" that operates to the "receiver". If this is the protocol, it seems that the sensitivity of the slider is somewhat too high. In particular, it seems that the "receive?' sometimes move quickly for the same activity of the "hat person" back and forth to the full scale (+ and -) of the slider. If I correctly understood, and this could not be the case, there is the possibility that such high gain of the slider induces some oscillations by the "receiver" just because he/she will not control too much the movement of the slider. These oscillations (induced by the not complete control of the slider behavior by the receiver) could act as a confound factor in the analysis. In fact, we will see oscillations not due to the "internal" representation of the perception of the receiver but rather by her/his poor control of the slider gain. From this video some considerations arose. Please take them in the good spirit of friendship and as possible contribution to the generation of an efficient experimental setup. I have to say that I am not able at all to realize what you have done so far with the device in some short time© After this disclaimer, the issues: 1. It could be good to regulate the gain of the slider in such a way it could have a slower movement according to the receiver activity. It could allow more time to the receiver to focus on his/her internal feelings and it will decrease the oscillations reported due to the inaccurate control of the device by the receiver. 2. It will be important for the students (the receivers) to familiarize prior to the experience with the device. Otherwise, we will analyze their learning curve of the slider functioning and this is not isomorphic to their perceived impressions and will act as a confound in the analysis. For instance, the experimenter will ask to code with the slider a predetermined sequence of "intensity perceived" in such a way they could master the slider accurately. Such as "give me an intensity 1 (the minimum), now an intensity 10 (the maximum), then an intensity 5, then 7, then 9, etc etc". When receivers will be able to do that with a good accuracy of the slider movement they could be admitted to the experimental test with Alan after. 3. The device at this time seems to be able to code one dimension (or "light" or "energy") perceived by the "receiver" since there is just one slider. However, this could be fine as long as we ask to the receiver to transduce only one of such dimension into the slider movement. Thus, asking to focusing on "energy perception" when compared to "light perception" or viceversa. This will double, however, the experimental duration of the test since we need to investigate separately such aspect of their perception (maybe in two separate days). 2 EFTA_R1_01758116 EFTA02581580 4. The noise of slider could act as a disturb or a cue for the "sender". Not a major issue now but something that have to be considered in a setup in which more than one receiver will interact with the "sender". Thank you again for your efforts All the best from Rome Fabio Prof. Fabio Babiloni, PhD Ass. Editor of IEEE Transaction on Neural System & Rehabilitation Engineering Ass. Editor of IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering Ass. Editor of IEEE Reviews on Biomedical Engineering Editor in Chief of International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism Dept. Molecular Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza Scientific Director of BrainSigns srl, www.brainsigns.com <http://www.brainsigns.com/> Tel: + <tel: *11* * ************ **•**•***•***** ***** **•** ******** ***•*•***•***** Da: Gino Yu [mailto <mailto > Inviato: giovedi 23 novembre 2017 21:55 A: PETER FENWICK < <mailto Cc: labia Babiloni < <mailto Giuseppe Bersani <mailto >; Ornella Corazza <mailto >; Alain Forget < <mailto »; jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» Oggetto: Re: Payment for research Just back. Will see Gio tomorrow. 3 EFTA_R1_01758117 EFTA02581581 Also, see this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ejg4gconen038v/IMG_5363.MOV?dl=0 <https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ejctlgconen038v/IMG_5363.MOV?dl=0> I met with Ray Lee in New York. He has this protocol as well: please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 4 EFTA_R1_01758118 EFTA02581582
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
a88362f3afc967adff2d826ac818c7b18b9a433884df89591c1aeddd0cee45bd
Bates Number
EFTA02581579
Dataset
DataSet-11
Type
document
Pages
4

Community Rating

Sign in to rate this document

📋 What Is This?

Loading…
Sign in to add a description

💬 Comments 0

Sign in to join the discussion
Loading comments…
Link copied!