EFTA01250065.pdf
👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (263 words)
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 1:46:00 PM (UTC)
Sent: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 1:46:14 PM (UTC)
Subject: 2021.07.22 note to file re:
From: usa.doj.gov>
To:
This mornin I spoke with regarding I said we'd like to find a time to
meet with and we discussed scheduling a meeting during the next three weeks, when nil' be in New York.
I said I had learned about their Touhy request to our office, and that was being handled by our civil division, but that prompted
me to wonder what the status was of the civil suit. said that l"'ad rejected the offer from the victim compensation
fund and was litigating her case. I indicated that we have previously moved to stay civil cases when we thought that discovery
might interfere with the criminal case, and would consider doing so, and• indicated that he thought there would be
mediation on the case and would have no problem delaying discovery to avoid interfering with our case, so that a stay would
not be necessary. He said his client's priority was not interfering with the prosecution.
Masked what the status was of a potential referral to DANY regarding information had provided regarding third
parties, and said that he wasn't sure whether that was something he had discussed with me ancli I said I would check
with and get back to him.
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York NY 10007
3501.484-008
Page 1 of 1
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17
EFTA 00096016
EFTA01250065
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
aca737e4e70cc277d9115598b35a2e4fd96afe1a163c38d4e389354909c0b21b
Bates Number
EFTA01250065
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
1
💬 Comments 0