EFTA01362656.pdf
👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (239 words)
Who will be ACO for these clients (for co-covered clients we have a GM ACO, but this will not be the case for
these clients)
Does this initiative undermine the co-covered model which has been operating up until this point.
How will KCP booked trades be identified?
What S&A checks will be performed by KCP? Where will they be documented? Who in compliance will review?
(markets or KCP)
What will be the ongoing monitoring of trades executed by KCP?
Do the KCP folks need to be subject to certain of the Markets supervisory controls?
Do the KCP folks need to receive the same training (Compliance/Business) as Markets people
More fundamentally. I think the SLA needs to be reviewed and consider re-executing under the new management
structure. Specifically Yanni Pipilis and Stefan Hoops need to be party to the agreement. Furthermore, if Yanni stated to
Todd that KCP need to own the product (as opposed to client) appropriateness, then this is a fundamental change in what
is currently drafted in the SLA.
I have cc'ed lain who runs Mercury for Markets and can comment on the ACO situation
Also cc Cliff who is the BM for our WIS desk who is familiar with the existing status quo and will be the point person for
ICG.
Thanks.
Kind Regards,
Katherine
Katherine Stead
Director
Global Head, ITC BCU
Tel:
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. GRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0052160
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00198344
EFTA01362656
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
ad8760f78770ee26bb3c33107cc4d3ba8066d6b5040e3dcfc65f978a9f528b9a
Bates Number
EFTA01362656
Dataset
DataSet-10
Type
document
Pages
1
💬 Comments 0