EFTA02447283.pdf

DataSet-11 8 pages 1,317 words document
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,317 words)
From: Deepak Chopra Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 9:54 AM To: Jeff Epstein Subject: Fw: thought see below 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 Chopra Foundation=/a> <http://www.choprafoundation.org> Jiyo <http://jiyo.com> Chopra Center for Wellbeing <http://chopra.com> =/div> For more information visit: RadicalBeauty.com <http://=adicalbeauty.com/> <http:=/radicalbeauty.com/> <=span> From: Deepak Chopra Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:52 AM To: Rudolph Tanzi Cc: Subject: Re: thought DNA , bacteria, brain --anything humans have given names to are hu=an constructs --the entire universe including what we call "God"=-is human construct. Reality is awareness and its excitations experienced =s observer and observed - classification and description into form and phenomena are human constucts-products of language--linguist=c, mathematical, scientific --useful but not fundamental EFTA_R1_01544244 EFTA02447283 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 Chopra Foundation=/a> <http://www.choprafoundation.org> liyo <http://jiyo.com> Chopra Center for Wellbeing chttp://chopra.com> =/div> For more information visit: RadicalBeauty.com chttp://=adicalbeauty.com/> <http:=/radicalbeauty.com/> <=span> From: Rudolph Tanzi Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:50:29 PM To: Deepak Chopra Cc: Subject: Re: thought Every universe of every being is their own construct. Those with simil=r DNA agree most on the construct. The universe of a bacterium in a dish i= much difference than ours, which is close to that of our dog while the ba=terium's is closer to a yeast. These are all valid universes changing with the DNA-encoded perception of =ach species. On Oct 11, 2016, at 8:40 PM, Deepak Chopra > wro=e: I cannot in all honesty I believe that the universe we experience is totally a huma= construct Deepak Chopra 2013 Costa Del Mar Road </=pan> Carlsbad, CA 92013 New Book: 4=pan>Radicalbeauty.com <http://radicalbeauty.com/> 2 EFTA_R1_01544245 EFTA02447284 chttp://w=w.radicalbeauty.com/> On Oct 11, 2016, at 8:38 PM, > wrote: From: "Sperry Andrews" =1 c=pan class="" style="font-size:12pt"» "Deepak, Sperry, This is PERFECT. Love, Suzanne"=/span> What makes mutual understanding "perfect" ? I find, the challeng= here on this list, and in life, appears precarious at times. Well, yes. Humans are not always stable, get easily frightened. When we are, c=nsciously aware of our non-verbal sensory/emotional experience - which=reliably allows our verbal-analytic minds to integrate their abstract conc=pts with what is intimately being sensed and felt - we seem to agr=e. Yes, but (1) you describe an i=eal ego-free state. (2) It seem to be this is not yet 1 goal for the=whole group so we don't benefit from task unification as we did before the list mergings. Their makes it harder but a=so better. Otherwise, we go round and around in circles - as if=caught up in a dictionary of terms with different meanings for each of us - oft=n times becoming strident about what we wish to share more intelligently v=a mutual understanding. (3) That's the different, opposing agendas. I for one would love to see =s aspire to paradigm change. In the absence of sharing non-verbally - in a fully embodied wa= - as one single Self/Self aware consciousness, we learn from sufferin= - to un-learn these habits. I can see practice achievin= that with basic criteria met first. Sperry, you are an able mediato=. Love Suzanne On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:28 AM, > wrote: Deepak, Sperr=, This is PERFECT. Love, Suzanne Original Message From: Sperry Andrews < I.> 3 EFTA_R1_01544246 EFTA02447285 To: Deepak Chopra < Cc: < Sent: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 6:32 pm Subject: Re: thought With every new instant of perceptual activity, I feel our m=rtal forms more closely approximating what is constant. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Deepak Chopra > wrote: I find it existentially exhilarating =br class=""> Deepak Chopra 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92013 New Book:</=pan>Radicalbeauty.com <http://radicalbeauty.com/> <http://kimberlysnyder.com/wp-content=uploads/2016/09/Radical-Beauty- Book-Cover-1.png> On Oct 6, 2016, at 5:36 PM, > wrote: Hugs, Sperry,=/font> 4 EFTA_R1_01544247 EFTA02447286 With your 1st 5 lines. I have problems with the res= of what you say here. I find it existentially despairing. Love, Suzanne riginal Message From: Sperry Andrews To: ; Carlo Monsanto ELIZABE=H A. RAUSCHER M>; Haramein Jim Belchler ; Karla Galdamez ;; Rudy Tanzi ; Subhash Kak enas 'a atos ; Millard Wohl Sent: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 2:36 pm Subject: Re: thought contemplating math symbolically, when we divide 1by an infinitely large number we most closely approximate O. 1/infinity = O, This " I " experiences being a singular unity tha= is continuously being divided by infinite variations on a theme, re-creating what " I " AM BEing as an awakeness t=at is receiving and reflecting some sense of all that ever was, is and will be, as no body=going nowhere, unborn, deathless, immeasurable, indivisible, timeless cons=iousness. 5 EFTA_R1_01544248 EFTA02447287 On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Sperry Andrews =span dir="ltr" class=""> > wrote= That which is 'not a thing' cannot be divided--contributing=an essential, indispensable, 'eternal' constant to all forms. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:05 AM, > wrote: Hugs, Sperry, Hooray! You acknowledge there is form. Your last sentence, however, for me, does not deal with f=rm enough. The point unfolded to make the ultimate case for in=ivisibility but even points are divisible. Immortal is a theological concept whic= I believe applies (like eternal) only in the sense that atoms recycle. Love, Suzanne Original Message From: Sperry Andrews To: Deepak Chopra < C Sent: Wed, Oct 5, 2016 2:06 pm Subject: Re: thought 6 EFTA_R1_01544249 EFTA02447288 This - below - appears to be so to this " I. " =nbsp;Does any of 'this' make sense to any of 'you' ? Without both hydrogen and oxygen there would be no water--which makes trans=ent life possible. The zen chant we all know, form is formlessness, formlessness is form, can =e experienced by humanity as whole. Without formlessness form would not transform in space over=time. Without form formlessness would be nothing at all. These two ingredients constantly mixing together, perpetuat= their characteristics. Formlessness uniting all as one, while forms attempt to perfect their capacity to be like fo=mlessness-- indivisible, immortal, all knowing consciousness. On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:58 AM,=Deepak Chopra » wrote: "I " is not a person The is no such thing as a person . You are never the same person as a child infant teen ager older man/ woman&=bsp; "I " is the awareness in which the so called person arises and su=sides as an intermittent stream of sensations images feelings and thoughts=. These in turn arise in " I " are known in " I "= and are made out of " I " ." I " is infinite being ( =ormless ' ) having a finite experience as form . The form is an illusion as it is phen=mena - an activity of the formless . All forms are phenomena . All phenome=a arise and subside in every moment of now .The formless is the only reali=y . It is timeless being . You cannot hold on to a time bound phenomenon . It is not a "thing =quot; . Even the " you " that you call " I " is a time=bound phenomenon . Nothing to hold on to and no one doing the holding on = Freedom in Being =3D Yoga Deepak Chopra 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92013 New Book: </=pan>Radicalbeauty.com <http://radicalbeauty.com/> <http://kimberlysnyder.com/wp-content=uploads/2016/09/Radical-Beauty- Book-Cover-l.png> 7 EFTA_R1_01544250 EFTA02447289 On Oct 5, 2016, at 5:33 AM, > wrote: Hugs= Deepak: A thought about <=ont color="#000080" class="">l Am The Universe: There are millions o= people, IN THE MAINSTREAM, who buy, for example, Greg Braden's books abou= cyclical universes. If they feel, accurately, that the universe is =n an irreversibly downward spiral, I don't think they'll be calmed or comforted by a concept claiming what your title claim=. Can you find some wa= to say what you must while adding to it? Much=love, Suza=ne Dr. Rudolph E. Tanzi Joseph. P. and=Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology Harvard Medica= School Vice•Chair, Ne=rology; Director, Genetics and Aging Research Unit Massachusetts =eneral Hospital 114 16th Stree= Charlestown, M=, 02129 c/=iv> http://www.mghmind.org/facult=/Tanzi http://dms.h=s.harvard.edu/neuroscience/fac/tanzi.php 8 EFTA_R1_01544251 EFTA02447290
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
adb44db1e20c13f852a0bc484d442be068e4bacc4ebb6155bbf7e503b6856aaf
Bates Number
EFTA02447283
Dataset
DataSet-11
Type
document
Pages
8

Community Rating

Sign in to rate this document

📋 What Is This?

Loading…
Sign in to add a description

💬 Comments 0

Sign in to join the discussion
Loading comments…
Link copied!