👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,317 words)
From: Deepak Chopra
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 9:54 AM
To: Jeff Epstein
Subject: Fw: thought
see below
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Chopra Foundation=/a> <http://www.choprafoundation.org> Jiyo <http://jiyo.com> Chopra Center for Wellbeing
<http://chopra.com> =/div>
For more information visit: RadicalBeauty.com <http://=adicalbeauty.com/> <http:=/radicalbeauty.com/>
<=span>
From: Deepak Chopra
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:52 AM
To: Rudolph Tanzi
Cc:
Subject: Re: thought
DNA , bacteria, brain --anything humans have given names to are hu=an constructs --the entire universe including what
we call "God"=-is human construct. Reality is awareness and its excitations experienced =s observer and observed -
classification and description into form and phenomena are human constucts-products of language--linguist=c,
mathematical, scientific --useful but not fundamental
EFTA_R1_01544244
EFTA02447283
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Chopra Foundation=/a> <http://www.choprafoundation.org> liyo <http://jiyo.com> Chopra Center for Wellbeing
chttp://chopra.com> =/div>
For more information visit: RadicalBeauty.com chttp://=adicalbeauty.com/> <http:=/radicalbeauty.com/>
<=span>
From: Rudolph Tanzi
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:50:29 PM
To: Deepak Chopra
Cc:
Subject: Re: thought
Every universe of every being is their own construct. Those with simil=r DNA agree most on the construct. The universe
of a bacterium in a dish i= much difference than ours, which is close to that of our dog while the ba=terium's is closer to
a yeast. These are all valid universes changing with the DNA-encoded perception of =ach species.
On Oct 11, 2016, at 8:40 PM, Deepak Chopra > wro=e:
I cannot in all honesty
I believe that the universe we experience is totally a huma= construct
Deepak Chopra
2013 Costa Del Mar Road </=pan>
Carlsbad, CA 92013
New Book: 4=pan>Radicalbeauty.com <http://radicalbeauty.com/>
2
EFTA_R1_01544245
EFTA02447284
chttp://w=w.radicalbeauty.com/>
On Oct 11, 2016, at 8:38 PM,
> wrote:
From: "Sperry Andrews" =1 c=pan
class="" style="font-size:12pt"»
"Deepak, Sperry, This is PERFECT. Love, Suzanne"=/span> What makes mutual understanding "perfect"
? I find, the challeng= here on this list, and in life, appears precarious at times. Well, yes. Humans are not always
stable, get easily frightened.
When we are, c=nsciously aware of our non-verbal sensory/emotional experience - which=reliably
allows our verbal-analytic minds to integrate their abstract conc=pts with what is intimately being sensed and felt - we
seem to agr=e. Yes, but (1) you describe an i=eal ego-free state. (2) It seem to be this is not yet 1 goal for the=whole
group so we don't benefit from task unification as we did before the list mergings. Their makes it harder but a=so
better. Otherwise, we go round and around in circles - as if=caught up in a dictionary of terms with different meanings
for each of us - oft=n times becoming strident about what we wish to share more intelligently v=a mutual
understanding. (3) That's the different, opposing agendas. I for one would love to see =s aspire to paradigm change. In
the absence of sharing non-verbally - in a fully embodied wa= - as one single Self/Self aware consciousness, we learn
from sufferin= - to un-learn these habits. I can see practice achievin= that with basic criteria met first. Sperry, you are
an able mediato=. Love Suzanne
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:28 AM,
> wrote:
Deepak, Sperr=,
This is PERFECT.
Love,
Suzanne
Original Message
From: Sperry Andrews < I.>
3
EFTA_R1_01544246
EFTA02447285
To: Deepak Chopra <
Cc: <
Sent: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 6:32 pm
Subject: Re: thought
With every new instant of perceptual activity, I feel our m=rtal forms more closely
approximating what is constant.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Deepak Chopra
> wrote:
I find it existentially exhilarating =br class="">
Deepak Chopra
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92013
New Book:</=pan>Radicalbeauty.com <http://radicalbeauty.com/>
<http://kimberlysnyder.com/wp-content=uploads/2016/09/Radical-Beauty-
Book-Cover-1.png>
On Oct 6, 2016, at 5:36 PM,
> wrote:
Hugs, Sperry,=/font>
4
EFTA_R1_01544247
EFTA02447286
With your 1st 5 lines. I have problems with the res= of what you say here. I find
it existentially despairing.
Love,
Suzanne
riginal Message
From: Sperry Andrews
To:
; Carlo Monsanto
ELIZABE=H A. RAUSCHER M>; Haramein Jim
Belchler ; Karla Galdamez ;; Rudy Tanzi
; Subhash Kak
enas 'a atos ; Millard
Wohl
Sent: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 2:36 pm
Subject: Re: thought
contemplating math symbolically,
when we divide 1by an infinitely large number
we most closely approximate O.
1/infinity = O,
This " I " experiences being a singular unity tha= is continuously being divided by
infinite variations on a theme,
re-creating what " I " AM BEing as an awakeness t=at is receiving and reflecting
some sense of all that ever was, is and will be, as no body=going nowhere,
unborn, deathless, immeasurable, indivisible, timeless cons=iousness.
5
EFTA_R1_01544248
EFTA02447287
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Sperry Andrews =span dir="ltr" class="">
> wrote=
That which is 'not a thing' cannot be divided--contributing=an essential,
indispensable, 'eternal' constant to all forms.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:05 AM,
> wrote:
Hugs, Sperry,
Hooray! You acknowledge there is form.
Your last sentence, however, for me, does not deal with f=rm enough.
The point unfolded to make the ultimate case for in=ivisibility but even points
are divisible.
Immortal is a theological concept whic= I believe applies (like eternal) only in
the sense that atoms recycle.
Love,
Suzanne
Original Message
From: Sperry Andrews
To: Deepak Chopra <
C
Sent: Wed, Oct 5, 2016 2:06 pm
Subject: Re: thought
6
EFTA_R1_01544249
EFTA02447288
This - below - appears to be so to this " I. " =nbsp;Does any of 'this' make sense
to any of 'you' ?
Without both hydrogen and oxygen there would be no water--which makes
trans=ent life possible.
The zen chant we all know, form is formlessness, formlessness is form, can =e
experienced by humanity as whole.
Without formlessness form would not transform in space over=time. Without
form formlessness would be nothing at all.
These two ingredients constantly mixing together, perpetuat= their
characteristics. Formlessness uniting all as one,
while forms attempt to perfect their capacity to be like fo=mlessness--
indivisible, immortal, all knowing consciousness.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:58 AM,=Deepak Chopra
» wrote:
"I " is not a person
The is no such thing as a person .
You are never the same person as a child infant teen ager older man/
woman&=bsp;
"I " is the awareness in which the so called person arises and su=sides as an
intermittent stream of sensations images feelings and thoughts=. These in turn arise in " I " are known in " I "= and are
made out of " I " ." I " is infinite being ( =ormless ' ) having a finite experience as form . The form is an illusion as it is
phen=mena - an activity of the formless . All forms are phenomena . All phenome=a arise and subside in every moment
of now .The formless is the only reali=y . It is timeless being . You cannot hold on to a time bound phenomenon . It is not
a "thing =quot; . Even the " you " that you call " I " is a time=bound phenomenon .
Nothing to hold on to and no one doing the holding on = Freedom in Being =3D
Yoga
Deepak Chopra
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92013
New Book: </=pan>Radicalbeauty.com <http://radicalbeauty.com/>
<http://kimberlysnyder.com/wp-content=uploads/2016/09/Radical-Beauty-
Book-Cover-l.png>
7
EFTA_R1_01544250
EFTA02447289
On Oct 5, 2016, at 5:33 AM,
> wrote:
Hugs= Deepak:
A thought about <=ont color="#000080" class="">l Am The Universe:
There are millions o= people, IN THE MAINSTREAM, who buy, for example, Greg
Braden's books abou= cyclical universes. If they feel, accurately, that the universe is =n an irreversibly downward spiral,
I don't think they'll be calmed or comforted by a concept claiming what your title claim=.
Can you find some wa= to say what you must while adding to it?
Much=love,
Suza=ne
Dr. Rudolph E. Tanzi
Joseph. P. and=Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology
Harvard Medica= School
Vice•Chair, Ne=rology; Director, Genetics and Aging Research Unit
Massachusetts =eneral Hospital
114 16th Stree=
Charlestown, M=, 02129
c/=iv>
http://www.mghmind.org/facult=/Tanzi
http://dms.h=s.harvard.edu/neuroscience/fac/tanzi.php
8
EFTA_R1_01544251
EFTA02447290
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
adb44db1e20c13f852a0bc484d442be068e4bacc4ebb6155bbf7e503b6856aaf
Bates Number
EFTA02447283
Dataset
DataSet-11
Type
document
Pages
8
💬 Comments 0