📄 Extracted Text (238 words)
From: Joi Ito <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:47 AM
To: Jeffrey Epstein
Subject: Google/EU
Attachments: signature.asc
I'm sure you saw the news about Google in the EU, but if you haven't, an =xcerpt.
» Today the EU's highest court interpreted the EU's 1995 Data
» =rotection Directive to mean that individuals should have a shot at
» insisting =hat Google and other search engines remove certain search
» results found =pon a search for their names, not because they are
» false, or infringe =opyright, but because they violate a "respect for
» private life" or a "right=to protection of personal data." What does
» that mean specifically? =ot easy to say. Neither the opinion nor the Court's press release is clear =n that.
» Among the many cases pending about it, the one that the Court heard
» =nvolved a Spanish citizen who did not like that people could find
» the public =ecords of a foreclosure sale of one of his properties.
» So that's not =ersonal, secret information that was somehow
» uncovered; it's a public record =r fact made more searchable. And
» it's not in the narrow category of things =ike social security
» numbers that might be in public documents, but for =hich Google and
» other search engines have taken some steps to make them =ot work as
» search terms. (Same with credit card numbers.)
1
EFTA_R1_01310294
EFTA02342838
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
adf3c31767bbcfad4b0ec2141339dcde2490443bce2cf672cddfad21e0175195
Bates Number
EFTA02342838
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0