📄 Extracted Text (904 words)
From: John Pinette
To:J<1
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:27:33 +0000
We don't have to respond to any of them. And can select which facts we confirm. The restrictions of the NPA is
probably a good thing to remind the writer about. At this point, it's in editing, but that doesn't mean it can't be
amended. We should include it in the answers, with a note that the presumptions are pervasive -- without getting
into cases.
I was thinking tomorrow AM (Eastern time) if we wanted to do a call when it's not so late for you.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:25 PM J < > wrote:
im in paris . do we respond to all , do we tel them that these are one sided allegagtions and under my npa i
was not allowed to challenge them ?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:21 AM John Pinette < > wrote:
Remarkable they sent it -- what are you thoughts on how to work through it? Phone call?
On The, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:16 PM J < > wrote:
Forwarded message
From: Martin G. Weinberg
Date: Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:54 PM
Subject: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE
To: J<
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza
Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
- Office
- Cell
This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of
Martin G. Weinberg, El., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If
you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this
message is prohibited.
EFTA01035477
From: Helfand, Zach
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 3:55 PM
To: Martin G. Weinberg <E >
Subject: Re: New Yorker magazine fact checking
Hi Marty,
Attached are the queries related to Mr. Epstein that we would like to check with him.
Thanks,
Zach Helfand
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 7:44 PM Martin G. Weinberg <I I> wrote:
Zach, I am perfectly willing to assist The New Yorker in checking their "facts" before publishing potentially
erroneous information about Mr Epstein, but only when the information you want reviewed is presented in
writing. I do not understand why that would not improve the verification process, eliminating multiple calls, and
provide more precision. So I understand your preference, but please respect mine. The goal is objectivity and
accuracy which a written exchange will promote. Thanks, Marty Weinberg
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza
Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
- Office
- Cell
This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of
Martin G. Weinberg, M., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If
you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this
message is prohibited.
From: Helfand, Zach
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 6:57 PM
EFTA01035478
To: Martin Weinberg •>
Subject: Re: New Yorker magazine fact checking
Thanks, Marty. Our policy is to conduct fact-checking over the phone, whenever possible. Would you
be available for a phone call?
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:20 PM Martin Weinberg wrote:
Zach, how about emailing the details regarding Mr Epstein that you want me to review, thanks, Marty
Weinberg
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza
Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
- Office
- Cell
This Electronic Message contains information from
the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, M., and may be privileged. The information is intended for
the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
On Mon, 3/18/19, Helfand, Zach < wrote:
Subject: New Yorker magazine fact checking
To:
Date: Monday, March 18, 2019, 5:03 PM
Dear Mr.
Weinberg:
My name is Zach Helfand. I work in the
fact-checking department at The New Yorker magazine. I'm
checking a piece by Connie Bruck on Alan Dershowitz, in
which your client Jeffrey Epstein is mentioned at some
length. I'd like the opportunity to verify the details
in the piece with Mr. Epstein. Would it be possible to
arrange a fact-checking call?
Thanks,
Zach HelfandThe New
York0
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
gAvast logo
EFTA01035479
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
JOHN PINETTE
TEL:
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
JOHN PINETTE
TEL:
EFTA01035480
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
ae7aac9086f6af795fd1545d9e9c126d3f334128b097f8faf4d9f5fe5dd82245
Bates Number
EFTA01035477
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
4
Comments 0