2015 Review: Financial Reg. Reform

podesta-emails 2,634 words email

D6 P17 D1 P21 V11

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Mike & Co. -- After the GOP captured the Senate in the midterm elections, the main question in the financial regulatory world as 2015 began was whether Congress would rollback key parts of Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) as the GOP-controlled House had been voting to do over the previous four years. How did the two sides fare? What issues were at play? What have we learned and what can be expected in 2016? These questions are answered below as the Shelby bill is considered both as standalone legislation and as a rider on the omnibus appropriations bills and other major financial regulatory legislation of 2015 is reviewed. Best, Dana ------------- In the tug-of-war between the financial industry and supporters of Dodd-Frank, the gains and losses were marginal on both sides in 2015. Once again, the struggle resulted in another stand off between the industry's efforts to ease the regulatory burden of DFA and advocates' bid to expand its protections for workers, investors and increase resources for regulators. Republicans blame leading Democrats in Congress and in the administration; financial reformers who spent all year trying to block regulatory rollbacks are crediting them. The financial industry urged Congress to soften several DFA regulations and sought to do this first through Senate Banking Chair Richard Shelby's bill entitled The Financial Regulatory Improvement Act of 2015. The bill, more than 200 pages and consisting of eight wide titles, addresses wide-ranging areas of reform from changes to a key DFA threshold for enhanced prudential standards to the CFPB's qualified mortgage rule. Sen. Sherrod Brown, the top Democrat on Senate Banking, said Shelby's bill went too far: "Democrats are ready, willing, and able to work with Republicans to get community banks and credit unions the regulatory relief they need right now... Rather than focusing on issues that enjoy broad bipartisan support, this draft bill is a sprawling industry wish list of Dodd-Frank rollbacks. This sweeping proposal holds Main Street financial institutions hostage to a partisan effort to dismantle Dodd-Frank's consumer protections and sensible rules for the large banks and nonbanks that played central roles in the financial crisis." The main provisions of the Shelby bill: • Community Bank Reg. Relief -- Comprising 25 different measures loosening regulations on the country's smallest banks: relief from privacy disclosure requirements; permission for privately insured credit unions to become members of the Federal Home Loan Bank system; an exemption for banks under $10 billion in assets from the Volcker Rule; and a requirement that the National Credit Union Administration hold public hearings and receive comment on its budget. The opening title also included several provisions criticized by Democrats, such as a change to the CFPB's QM rule allowing all loans held in portfolio to be eligible for the rule's safe harbor provisions -- a controversial measure altering how certain "points and fees" are calculated under the QM rule, it removes language regarding affiliated title companies that spurred much of the earlier criticism. It further makes changes banning certain types of loans, such as "no-doc" loans that helped spur the financial crisis. • SIFI Threshold -- The bill would have multiplied the DFA threshold mandating tougher capital and oversight on banks by ten times to over $500 billion in consolidated assets, though regulators would have the discretion to examine any banks over $50 billion to be considered systemic. The Fed Board could make a recommendation to the FSOC to consider a particular bank holding company, though the FSOC would have the ability to launch its own evaluation as well. The FSOC would be able to vote to change the list of criteria over time, and the $500 billion threshold would also be indexed for GDP growth. Shelby was willing to narrow the $50-$500 billion window for deregulation he had first proposed. Democratic aides involved in the discussions said Shelby was willing to go as low as $250 billion. Democrats weren't willing to go above $200 billion. • FSOC Process for Non-Banks -- This title would have codified changes to the FSOC process for designating nonbanks as systemically important, to provide additional transparency to the process. Some in Congress have criticized FSOC's designation process as being too opaque. The FSOC would be required to give detailed explanations for why regulators are considering a designation; provide opportunities for companies to meet with council representatives; analyze a company's remedial plan for removing a SIFI designation and allow for revisions; and offer an explanation if the council moves forward with a formal designation. Regulators would also be required to hold a hearing for designated companies at least once every five years and would have to vote to renew the decision to designate. • Fed Governance Reforms -- The bill would have made several changes to the Federal Reserve System. It would require the head of the New York Fed to be nominated by the White House and confirmed by the Senate. It would also direct the formation of an independent commission to evaluate the structure of the Fed system, including looking at the number and structure of the Fed's 12 districts. The Fed would be required to publish a study every two years on its regulation and oversight of non-banks, a provision that would sunset after 10 years. The GAO would be required to publish a study looking at the agency's regulation of systemically important institutions, with an eye toward issues around regulatory capture. • Swaps/Emerging Growth Firms -- This title addressed several measures related to SEC registration and regulation. Most notably, it would remove indemnification requirements on swap data so that it can be shared with foreign regulators more easily and would establish a "grace period" for emerging growth companies working toward an initial public offering. • Mortgage Finance System -- The bill included several provisions related to the mortgage finance system, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It would prohibit Congress from using guarantee fees to offset unrelated government spending and would ban the sale of Treasury-owned preferred stock in the government-sponsored enterprises without the approval of Congress. It would also direct the FHFA to provide Congress with updates on the establishment of a common securitization platform and would transition the platform to a non-profit available to approved issuers beyond Fannie and Freddie. Finally, it would mandate that the GSEs' risk-sharing levels be at least 150 percent of the previous year's level, with at least half of the total as front-end risk sharing. With such a wide variety of significant proposals, the Shelby bill was an overloaded canoe. Senate Banking reported it out favorably in May, but only on a 12-10 party-line vote, not sufficient to be certain to clear the 60-vote filibuster hurdle to passage in the Senate. Over the months that followed, members and staff met frequently to discuss which elements of the bill had bipartisan support Shelby's participation in these meetings was occasional at best and the discussions never really became negotiations. Committee Republicans Crapo, Moran and Corker did not negotiate in place of Shelby, but they tried to find common ground with a few receptive Democrats on the Banking Committee, including Sens. Warner, Donnelly, Heitkamp, and Tester. By the end of September, the group came up with a rough framework that covered areas where the Democrats appeared willing to move closer to some of Shelby's proposals. The Democrats were able to find some common ground with Republicans on key areas including easing regulations for community banks, creating a new carve-out for regional banks in Dodd-Frank and making changes to the way the FSOC polices big financial firms outside the banking sector. The ideas were presented separately to Shelby and Senate Banking Committee ranking member Sherrod Brown. Brown was not negotiating alongside the moderate Senate Democrats but his staff was kept in the loop. In early November, Brown arranged a meeting between all the banking committee Democrats so the four who had been working with Republicans could update the rest on the discussions. One aide briefed on the meeting said reaction was mixed. Some members showed interest and others showed strong opposition. Then on November 10, Sen. Warren gave a speech on the Senate floor warning her colleagues against going down the same road that led to a controversial Dodd-Frank rollback to weaken restrictions on derivatives trading from being tucked into last year’s spending bill. She called out Democrats who “want to get something done around here for a change... If there's anyone in this chamber, Republican or Democrat, who thinks they can slip goodies for Wall Street into these bills without a fight, they are very wrong," she said, referring to must-pass legislation including the upcoming appropriations bill. In addition to the pushback from Warren and other outside groups, the compromise effort faced public and private opposition from Treasury. Warren and reform advocates were mindful that they lost a round last December, when JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup lobbyists secured a change to Dodd-Frank rules on complex financial instruments known as swaps. “The law isn’t perfect, and some of us think we need more accountability to make sure big financial institutions don’t threaten the economy again, but House Republicans are pushing in the opposite direction.” Meanwhile, back in July, Shelby, a senior member of the Appropriations Committee, had his bill attached as a rider on the Financial Services FY 2016 appropriations bill. But he got almost nothing in the final spending agreement. After months of laying the groundwork, banks and their allies in Congress missed their big shot at moving a wide-ranging legislative agenda in a must-pass spending bill this year before the 2016 election cycle heats up. Among the major financial provisions​ that didn’t make it into the spending package: • Fiduciary Duty -- Per DFA, the Labor Department finally put forth a fiduciary rule in April, the first update of the government’s retirement investment advice regulations in four decades. The rule, which would take effect next year, requires brokers and financial advisers to act in the “best interest” of retirement savers—a higher standard than current regulations, which only require advice be “suitable.” The new rule aims to eliminate the potential conflict of interests between people who offer investment advice and companies that sell financial products at a time when individuals are made responsible for building their own nest eggs through programs like IRAs and 401(k)s that have largely replaced traditional pension funds that guaranteed life-long benefits. The financial industry has said it would raise the compliance costs and drive many financial advisers out of business while making investment advice unaffordable for middle-class savers. • Community Bank Lending Rules -- A number of regulatory changes sought by small, locally focused community lenders, such as an exemption from certain mortgage underwriting rules for mortgages held in a bank’s portfolio. • CFPB Governance​ -- Creating a board, rather than a single director, to govern the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and subjecting the agency’s budget to annual appropriations. • Fed Dividend -- In a surprise, the banking community lost a sizable source of revenue -- the annual Fed dividend paid to member banks, totaling $25 billion. The highway bill passed earlier this month took some of the money that banks receive in dividends from the Fed to help pay for fixing the U.S.’s deteriorating roads. Wall Street was furious over the precedent of having financial firms pay for infrastructure projects and lobbied to get a provision in the spending bill that would have given banks more flexibility to sell their shares in the Fed’s regional banks. Lawmakers rejected the provision. Another piece of legislation that made the cut: a provision that prohibits Treasury from selling the government’s stake in mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac until 2018 without future legislation. The U.S. government bailed out Fannie and Freddie in 2008, and in return received warrants to acquire nearly 80% of the companies’ stock along with a new class of preferred shares. Congress has tried​ unsuccessfully to pass legislation that would replace Fannie and Freddie with a new system, leading some of the companies’ proponents to push the Obama administration to take action on its own and sell the shares. Financial industry lobbyists were all but stymied in their efforts to slip measures helping banks, insurers and private-equity firms into the $1.1 trillion omnibus bill fund. The spending bill did included other minor items, low-hanging fruit for the financial industry. The highway bill passed earlier this month took some of the money that banks receive in dividends from the Federal Reserve to help pay for fixing the U.S.’s deteriorating roads. Wall Street was furious over the precedent of having financial firms pay for infrastructure projects and lobbied to get a provision in the spending bill that would have given banks more flexibility to sell their shares in the Fed’s regional banks but the provision was rejected. Some consolation prizes for industry survived. An omnibus rider banning the SEC from requiring corporations to publicly disclose their political and lobbying expenditures managed to survive. And negotiators included cybersecurity legislation designed to make it easier for the financial firms and others in the private sector to share threat information with the government. Industry also secured a provision that prohibits the Treasury Department from selling the government’s stake in mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac until 2018 without future legislation. The government bailed out Fannie and Freddie in 2008, and in return received warrants to acquire nearly 80 percent of the companies’ stock along with a new class of preferred shares. Five years after a crisis that shook the foundations of finance, Warren has public opinion on her side. A Washington Post/ABC News published October finding that 72 percent of Democrats, 58 percent of Republicans, and 68 percent of independents want the next president to pursue tougher regulations on banks. Public distrust has forced Wall Street — and financial services writ large — to make oblique arguments that don’t tackle head-on the unpopularity of the industry across the entire electorate. Republicans, trying to avoid an explicit alliance with Wall Street, regard their legislation as “reforms of the reforms” that Dodd-Frank made. If 2015 is any guide, and particularly given the politics of a presidential election next year, the prospects for significant financial regulatory legislation in 2016 is remote. --------- Recent Updates: 2015 Review: Fin Reg Reform (Dec. 28) Omnibus Draft Emerging (Dec. 15) Omnibus Situation (Dec. 14) FY 2016 Omnibus Talks (Dec. 10) Customs Bill (Dec. 8) Tax Extender Negotiations (Dec. 6) Brown on HFT (Dec. 4) Shelby 2.0 Update (Dec. 3) HTF Conference Report (Dec. 3) FY 2016 -- Policy Riders (Nov. 30) Dodd-Frank and the CR (Nov. 13) FRB Interest Rate Policy (Nov. 9) Ryan and Tax Reform (Nov. 4) HTF/Pay-fors (Nov. 3) FRB System Risk Rule (Nov. 2) Ex-Im Reauthorization (Oct. 30) Tax Extenders (Oct. 30) Boehner Budget Deal (Oct. 27) Ex-Im Reauthorization (Oct. 26) Debt and Debt Limit (Oct. 22) SEC Nominations (Oct. 20) TPP/Currency Manipulation (Oct. 15) Ex-Im Update (Oct. 9) Fed Dividend (Oct. 7) Debt/Extraordinary Measures (Oct. 6) Jobs Report (Oct. 2) Fiduciary Rule (Oct. 1) FY2016 Budget/CR (Sept. 29) Trade/TPP (Sept. 25) GSE Reform (Sept. 25) Carried Interest (Sept. 23) Bush Tax Cuts (Sept. 15) Puerto Rico (Jul. 23) Shelby 2.0 (June 24)