📄 Extracted Text (663 words)
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
Virginia L. Giuffre,
Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS
v.
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
________________________________/
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE DEFENDANT FROM CALLING
PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEYS AS WITNESSES AT TRIAL
Sigrid McCawley
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
(954) 356-0011
Pursuant to FRE 401 and 403, as well as Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(l), Plaintiff Ms. Giuffre
respectfully submits this motion in limine to preclude Defendant Maxwell from calling Ms.
Giuffre’s attorneys, Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards, during the trial.
This is a transparent ploy to attempt to disrupt Ms.
Giuffre’s legal team and should be precluded.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In the upcoming four-week trial of this matter, Ms. Giuffre will primarily rely on three
attorneys with significant trial experience: David Boies of Boies, Schiller & Flexner (New York
office); Bradley J. Edwards of Farmer, Jaffe Weissing; and Sigrid McCawley, Boies, Schiller &
Flexner (Fort Lauderdale, Florida, office). Paul Cassell, who maintains his office at the University
of Utah College of Law is expected to handle significant motions during the trial.
LEGAL STANDARDS
“The purpose of a motion in limine ‘is to aid the trial process by enabling the Court to rule
in advance of trial on the relevance of certain forecasted evidence ... without lengthy argument at,
or interruption of, the trial.’ Palmieri v. Defaria, 88 F.3d 136, 141 (2d Cir. 1996) (internal
quotation marks omitted). The power to rule on motions in limine lies within the district court's
‘inherent authority to manage the course of its trials.’ Carofino v. Forester, 450 F. Supp. 2d 257,
270 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). This includes the authority to prohibit irrelevant and prejudicial arguments
or references at trial. See, e.g., In re WorldCom, Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 02 Civ. 3288 (DLC), 2005
WL 578109, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2005). Only relevant evidence is admissible. Fed. R. Evid.
1
402. Evidence is relevant if ‘it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would
be without the evidence.’ Fed. R. Evid. 401. ‘If an item of evidence tends to prove a fact that is of
consequence to the determination of the action, it is relevant. If it does not tend to prove a material
fact, it is irrelevant.’ Arlio v. Lively, 474 F.3d 46, 52 (2d Cir. 2007) (internal citation omitted). ‘A
material fact is one that would affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.’ Id.”
Ferring B.V. v. Allergan, Inc., No. 12 CIV. 2650, 2016 WL 6441567, at *1 (Sweet, J.) (S.D.N.Y.
Oct. 28, 2016).
ARGUMENT
2
3
CONCLUSION
Dated: March 3, 2017
Respectfully Submitted,
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
By: /s/ Sigrid McCawley
Sigrid McCawley (Pro Hac Vice)
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
(954) 356-0011
David Boies
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Bradley J. Edwards (Pro Hac Vice)
FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING,
EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L.
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
(954) 524-2820
Paul G. Cassell (Pro Hac Vice)
S.J. Quinney College of Law
University of Utah
383 University St.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
(801) 585-52022
2
This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only
and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah for this private
representation.
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on 3rd day of March, 2017, I electronically filed the
foregoing document with the Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system. I also certify that the
foregoing document is being served this day on the individuals identified below via transmission
of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.
Laura A. Menninger, Esq.
Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq.
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C.
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80203
Tel: (303) 831-7364
Fax: (303) 832-2628
Email: [email protected]
[email protected]
/s/ Sigrid S. McCawley
Sigrid S. McCawley
5
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
af54fac307637351704e50fd21ec2bd95402f7f5bbf4bb6d9115ff7f3304ef96
Bates Number
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.685.0
Dataset
giuffre-maxwell
Document Type
document
Pages
6
Comments 0