📄 Extracted Text (3,431 words)
From: Richard Kahn -
To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Alert: The 2017 Tax Reform Act
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:23:09 +0000
Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.
575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022
tel 212-971-1306
fax 212-320-0381
cell 917-414-7584
2
TAX ALERT JANUARY 23, 2018
For further infommtion about this Alert, please
The 2017 Tax Reform Act - contact:
Key Provisions Impacting Alex Gelinas
Partner
Fund Managers and Their
Funds
Steven Etkind
Please feel free to discuss any aspect of this Alert
with your regular Sadis & Goldberg contact or with
any of the partners whose names and contact
information can be found at the end of the Alert.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act"), which was signed into law by President Trump on
December 22, 2017, contains the most sweeping federal tax law changes since 1986. Most
provisions of the Tax Act take effect for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018.
This Client Alert is not intended to be a comprehensive review of this massive legislation.
The Alert focuses on certain provisions of the Tax Act that may have the most significant
impact on asset management firms, their owners, their investment vehicles, and the
investors in such funds. Certain changes made by the Tax Act are permanent but many
EFTA01036338
others are scheduled to expire after 2025 unless extended by further Congressional
legislation.
I. Carried Interest Survives in Modified Form
The Tax Act contains changes to the treatment of "carried interests", but such changes are
not as negative as the prior legislative changes that had been proposed but never adopted.
The granting of a "future profits only" interest in a partnership in connection with the
performances of services to the partnership continues to be eligible for tax-free treatment
under the new law. For certain owners of "Applicable Partnership Interests" (of the sort that
would generally be issued by an investment partnership to the general partner), the Act
applies a three-year holding period requirement for capital gains derived by the partnership
(or from the disposition of the profits interest) to be eligible for the long-term capital gains
tax rate (instead of the generally applicable one-year holding threshold).
The change in carried interest taxation clearly impacts managers of hedge funds more than
managers of private equity funds or real estate funds, which typically have a longer than
three-year holding period for investments in their portfolio companies or real estate assets.
The new tax treatment applies to income realized in tax years beginning on or after January 1,
2018 and existing carried interests are not grandfathered. Thus, it appears that any
unrealized capital gains which have already been allocated to a general partner on the books
of the partnership would be subject to the new tax treatment at the time the partnership
realizes such gains in 2018 or subsequent years.
Note, however, that the Tax Act does not change the current federal income tax treatment of
carried interest allocations of "qualified dividends" to individuals, which are also taxed at
long-term capital gains rates. The capital gains from the carried interest that fail to satisfy the
new three-year holding period requirement are treated as "short-term capital gains" which
are taxable at ordinary income rates.
The "Applicable Partnership Interest" held by the general partner or an affiliate should not
include any portion of the partnership interest that is attributable to capital contributed to
the partnership by the general partner. The exact manner on how such exception will apply
will need to be addressed in future IRS notices or regulations to be issued. Limited partners
holding capital interests in private investment funds are also not affected and therefore retain
the one-year holding period requirement for long-term capital gain treatment.
Note also that the term "Applicable Partnership Interest" does not include an interest held
directly or indirectly by a corporation and it currently appears that such exception includes
holdings by both C corporations and S corporations. It is likely that further guidance will be
issued on this question, as it may be advantageous for certain general partners to convert
their existing entities that hold the carried interest to S corporations, and such general
partners may have until March 15, 2018 to accomplish such conversion.
Managers of hedge funds and other partnerships that do not hold capital assets for more
than three years before their sale may consider whether the carried interest incentive
allocation should be replaced with an incentive fee structure. Also, the reduced after-tax
value of a carried interest partnership allocation may impact the management company's
executive compensation arrangements.
Although an earlier version of the tax legislation would have repealed the exemption in the
Code which provides that a limited partner's income is exempt from self-employment tax, the
final version of the Tax Act does not contain such change in law.
EFTA01036339
II. New 21% Corporate Income Tax Rate and Reduction of the Maximum Rates Applicable to
Individuals
The Tax Act reduces the 35 percent corporate rate to a flat 21 percent corporate rate. There
is no special higher rate for personal service corporations (as existed under prior law). The
new 21 percent rate is effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The
corporate alternative tax (AMT) has also been repealed. Such corporate tax changes are
permanent. In contrast, the highest applicable federal income tax rate for individuals and
other non-corporate taxpayers is reduced from 39.6% to 37%. In addition, the 3.8% "add-on"
Medicare contributions tax on an individual's net investment income remains in effect.
1. Possible Use of a "C" Corporation as a Tax Shelter
Since the new 21% corporate tax rate is now well below the highest rate applicable to high
income individuals, some investment managers may conclude that some or all of their
management entities that are pass through partnerships should convert to corporate form. In
addition, certain partnership funds that are engaged in trade or business, such as active loan
origination or real estate activities may find it advantageous to convert to corporate form.
The advantage to the corporate form of organization is that the C corporation's net income
after taxes is not taxable to its shareholders until it is distributed (e.g., either as a dividend or
as a redemption of stock (i.e., as a capital gain)). Corporations that are engaged in active
businesses are able to retain and reinvest their earnings. Also relevant to choice of entity
decisions is the fact that the Tax Act restricts the ability of individuals to deduct more than
$10,000 in state and local taxes, but corporations can continue to deduct such taxes as under
prior law.
However, there are certain anti-abuse provisions that remain in the Internal Revenue Code
that limit the use of a C corporation as a tax shelter. Lurking in the Code is a provision which
allows the Internal Revenue Service to impose a 20 percent additional "accumulated
earnings" income tax on the "accumulated taxable income" of a corporation if such taxable
income is allowed to accumulate "beyond the "reasonable needs of the business". There is a
$250,000 safe harbor for most corporations, while personal service corporations are allowed
a safe harbor of only $150,000. There is also a 20 percent tax on the "personal holding
company income" (i.e., passive investment income) of certain closely held C corporations (i.e.,
when five or fewer individuals own, in the aggregate, more than fifty percent of the
corporation's stock and at least 60 percent of the corporation's adjusted ordinary income is
personal holding company income (e.g., passive investment income)). These penalty taxes on
corporations have received little attention in recent decades. However, with the enactment
of the sharply lower corporate tax rate, these anti-abuse rules are likely to become a
significant focus of the IRS in its audits of tax returns of privately held corporations.
2. The New Deduction for Qualified Business Income of Pass Through Entities
Congress also wanted to provide an income tax rate reduction for those businesses that are
organized as partnerships or S corporations or which are owned by sole proprietors. In order
to meet this goal, the Tax Act provides an income tax deduction for individuals and other non-
corporate taxpayers equal to (i) 20 percent of their domestic "qualified business income";
plus (ii) 20 percent of any qualifying dividends from real estate investment trusts, qualifying
income from publicly traded partnerships, and gain derived from sale of such publicly traded
partnerships that would be treated as ordinary income. Therefore, such deduction results in
an effective federal income tax rate of 29.6% on such qualifying income for a top bracket
individual. The deduction does not apply to investment income (i.e., capital gains, dividends
(other than certain ordinary income dividends paid by REITs), and most interest income). In
EFTA01036340
addition, it does not apply to reasonable compensation income and guaranteed payments
paid to the taxpayer from the business.
The 20 percent of "qualified business income" deduction described in (i) above is also
generally limited to the greater of either (a) 50% of the W-2 wages paid with respect to the
qualified trade or business, or (b) the sum of 25% of the W-2 wages paid with respect to such
business plus 2.5% of the unadjusted tax basis of all qualified business property of such
business. Thus, if the partnership, S corporation or sole proprietorship does not pay "W-2
wages" and the second limitation is a minor amount or not applicable, the owner or pass
through taxpayer's tax deduction would be a minor amount or zero.
Unfortunately, partners or owners of certain types of professional service businesses,
including financial services providers, investment managers, brokers, consultants, lawyers
and accountants (and others), are not permitted to claim the "qualified business income"
deduction unless the taxpayer's adjusted gross income is below certain levels ($207,500 for
individuals and $365,000 for married couples filing jointly). Even in such case, the benefit of
the available deduction is phased out ratably as the taxpayer's income exceeds $157,500 if
single, or $315,000 if filing a joint tax return. Therefore, fund managers organized as pass
through entities are not likely to, and investment funds organized as partnerships will not,
derive a significant benefit from this deduction.
III. ISSUES FOR PARTNERSHIP FUNDS
1. Repeal of Itemized Deductions Previously Available to Non-Corporate Taxpayers for Non-
Business Investment Expenses
For 2018 through 2025, the Tax Act completely repeals the deductions previously allowed to
individuals and other non-corporate taxpayers for "miscellaneous itemized deductions"
(which were subject to a 2% floor and a phase-out rule under prior law). It is important to
note that for individual investors in partnership funds that are not treated as engaged in a
trade or business, the investor's share of the fund's investment expenses, including
management fees, would now pass through as non-deductible miscellaneous itemized
deductions. If the fund is properly classified as an active "trader" rather than a mere investor,
then such expenses would be completely deductible as trade or business expenses. This Tax
Act change obviously puts considerable strain on the fund manager and its tax advisors with
respect to the trader vs. investor issue. At this time, there is a lack of clear guidance from the
Internal Revenue Service on what level of trading activity is sufficient for a professionally
managed fund to qualify as a "trader fund".
In cases where a partnership fund's expected activities are not likely to qualify for trader
status or another trade or business, the fund's sponsor may find that US high net worth
individuals may now prefer to invest in the offshore corporate feeder fund instead of the
onshore partnership fund. The US income tax reason for this would be that since the offshore
feeder is classified as a corporation for US tax purposes, its net income would be calculated
under the rules applicable to corporations, for which there are no miscellaneous itemized
deductions. Thus, assuming that the foreign feeder is a passive foreign investment company
(PFIC), if the US high net worth shareholder is able to make the "qualified electing fund"
election, the net income the investor would be required to report on his federal income tax
return would be calculated after deducting all of the corporation's expenses, including
management fees and investment expenses.
2. Non-US Partner's Gain on Sale of Partnership Interest may be Taxable as US Trade or
Business Income; New Withholding Requirements apply to the Purchaser or the Fund
EFTA01036341
The Tax Act specifically provides that gains realized by a non-US partner on a sale or exchange
of a partnership interest will be treated as effectively connected US trade or business income
("Ea") to the extent that such partner would have been allocated ECI had the partnership
sold all of its assets. This provision is consistent with the IRS position in Revenue Ruling 91-
32, and overrules a recent Tax Court case which had rejected the position taken in such IRS
Ruling and instead held that since a partnership interest is treated as a capital asset, the
foreign person's gain on its sale could escape US income taxation as a non-business capital
gain.
To the extent that a partnership has any ECI-generating assets (including US real property
interests), a seller of a partnership interest will have to provide a certificate that it is not a
foreign person, and in the absence of such a certificate a purchaser (which could include the
fund) will be required to withhold 10% of the gross purchase price. Further, the Tax Act
provides that if the purchaser does not withhold, the partnership is required to withhold on
distributions to such purchaser to cover the withholding. The Tax Act provides that the new
withholding obligation for purchasers is effective for sales or other dispositions of partnership
interests after December 31, 2017.
3. New Limitation on Deduction of Net Interest Expense
Under prior law, subject to some restrictions and limitations, business interest paid or
accrued by a business was fully deductible. For taxable years beginning after December 31,
2017, the Tax Act limits the deduction for "net business interest" expense for every type of
business, regardless of entity form, to 30 percent of adjusted taxable income. Business
interest paid or accrued after the effective date on indebtedness, including debt that was
incurred prior to the effective date of the Tax Act, is subject to this limitation.
The term business interest does not include investment interest described in Code section
163(d). Operating companies, such as management entities, and investment funds that are
engaged in a business and have outstanding indebtedness could be subject to such deduction
limitation. For this purpose, "adjusted taxable income" is determined at the entity level for
partnerships, and is similar to EBITDA (i.e., net earnings before deducting interest expense,
taxes, depreciation and amortization) for taxable years 2018 through 2021. A more restrictive
20% of EBIT limitation (net earnings before deducting interest expense and taxes) applies for
2022 and later years.
Certain taxpayers are exempted for the new interest deductibility limitation, including small
businesses with average annual gross receipts of $25 million or less for the three prior taxable
years, as well as real estate businesses that elect out of such limitation. The Conference
Committee Report on the Tax Act clarified that interest paid on shareholder loans by a blocker
corporation is "business interest" that is subject to this new limitation. Blocker corporations
for a lending business would have business interest income, which reduces the effect of this
new limitation on net business interest expense (i.e., deductible business interest expense in
excess of business interest income).
4. Deemed Repatriation Tax
One of the major tax raising provisions in the Tax Act is a one-time tax imposed on the
accumulated earnings held in foreign subsidiaries of US companies. This provision is broader
that it may first appear. Under the Tax Act, any 10% US shareholder of a foreign corporation
(determined on December 31, 2017) will be required to include in income, for the taxable
year 2017, its proportionate share of the foreign corporation's undistributed earnings, if the
foreign corporation is either a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) or has at least one 10% US
shareholder that is a corporation.
EFTA01036342
This law change could generate significant phantom income with respect to 10%-or-greater
owned foreign portfolio companies both (i) for US taxable investors (including the general
partner and its owners) in partnership funds organized in the United States and/or for US
sponsors of non-US funds. The Tax Act provides for reduced tax rates on such income for
corporate investors of 8% (for earnings invested in tangible business assets) and 15.5% (for
cash and cash equivalents), and 9.05% and 17.54% for investors taxed as individuals.
5. Tax-Free Section 1031 Like Kind Exchanges Eliminated Except for Real Property
Transactions
The Tax Act eliminates the ability to qualify for tax-free exchange treatment under Code
section 1031 if the property being exchanged is personal property. Consequently, for
transactions occurring after December 31, 2017, exchanges of artwork, equipment, vehicles
or other personal property held for investment or for use in a business, including Bitcoin or
other cryptocurrencies, for like kind property will not eligible for Section 1031 tax treatment.
Exchanges of real property continue to be eligible for Section 1031 exchange treatment.
6. Certain Tax Accounting Rules Have Been Revised
Under prior law, net operating losses (NOLs) could be carried back two years and carried
forward for twenty years. Under the Tax Act, NOLs arising in tax years ending after December
31, 2017 generally cannot be carried back, but can be carried forward indefinitely. However,
only 80% of a company's taxable income is permitted to be offset by NOLs. The remainder of
the unused NOLs will carry forward.
The Tax Act also expands the category of corporations and partnerships that are eligible to
use the cash method of accounting. Certain businesses may derive a tax benefit by switching
from the accrual method to the cash method of accounting.
7. Deferred Compensation
The Tax Act generally leaves the current tax rules for deferred compensation intact. However,
the Act also includes a new deferral provision for certain types of broad-based employee
equity, which may apply to certain private companies.
8. Estate and Gift Tax Changes
In 2017, an individual could give or transfer at death up to $5,490,000 without paying gift or
estate taxes. The Tax Act doubles the federal estate and gift tax unified exemption amount for
estates of decedents dying and gifts made after December 31, 2017, and inflation
adjustments will continue to apply. Therefore, in 2018, an individual has approximately an
$11.2 million exemption, and a married couple has approximately $22.4 million of available
shelter from federal gift and estate taxation. Note that the large exemption which applies to
gifts may be useful in federal income tax planning. For example, large lifetime gifts of
appreciated securities, artwork and other personal property (including possibly, a carried
interest) to relatives who are in lower income tax brackets, or who reside in states with lower,
or no state income taxes could save the family substantial federal income and/or state income
taxes when such property is sold by the recipient of the gift.
Sadis & Goldberg LLP
EFTA01036343
Please feel free to discuss any aspect of this Alert with your regular Sadis & Goldberg
contact whose names and contact information are provided below.
Alex Gelinas,
Daniel G. Viol
Danielle Epst
Douglas Hirsc
Erika Winkler
Greg Hartma
Jeffrey Goldb
Jennifer Ross
Mitchell Tara
Paul Fasciano
Paul Marino,
Richard L. Sh
Robert Crom
Ron S. Geffne
Sam Lieberm
Steven Etkind
Steven Huttle
Yehuda Brau
Yelena Malts
If you would like copies of our other Alerts, please visit our website
at www.sglawyers.com and choose "Library."
The information contained herein was prepared by Sadis & Goldberg LLP for general informational purposes for clients
and friends of Sadis & Goldberg LLP. Its contents should not be construed as legal advice, and readers should not act
upon the information in this Alen without consulting counsel. This information is presented without any representation
or warranty as to its accuracy, completeness or timeliness. Transmission or receipt of this information does not create an
attorney-client relationship with Sadis & Goldberg LLP. Electronic mail or other communications with Sadis & Goldberg
LLP cannot be guaranteed to be confidential and will not create an attorney-client relationship with Sadis & Goldberg
LLP.
Sadis & Goldberg [LP I cc,. Filth Avenue 21st Floor I New York NY tot? 2i 2.114/329.3
Copyright ©2018 Sadis & Goldberg 1.1.P
Sadis & Goldberg LLP, 551 Fifth Avenue, 21st Floor New York NY 10176
SafeUnsubscribe"4
Forward this email I Update Profile l About our service provider
Sent by
EFTA01036344
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
b076d3e95cebbe74b7c0ac3264c08ae48b74c3139826f0f97caaade0fc83ec70
Bates Number
EFTA01036338
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
7
Comments 0