EFTA01114351
EFTA01114353 DataSet-9
EFTA01114355

EFTA01114353.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 419 words document
P17 D5 P23 V16 D4
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (419 words)
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Defendant, BRADLEY EDWARDS' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint served August 23, 2011. The Court reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, the Defendant's Motion, the Plaintiff's Response, and other Memorandums filed both in support and opposition to the Motion. The Court has also reviewed the various authorities cited by the parties. Based upon review of the above, as well as being otherwise fully advised in the in premises, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: It is well established upon Motion to Dismiss that this Court is limited to a review of the four corners of the Complaint and the well pled allegations therein. A Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a cause of action admits the well pled facts in the Complaint and reasonable inferences therefrom and the allegations must be construed in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff. Applying this standard to the four corners of the Complaint filed by the Plaintiff, the Court finds that the allegations are sufficient to plead a cause of action for "abuse of process" against the Defendant EDWARDS. The overwhelming majority of the Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss deal with the truthfulness of the allegations against the Defendant, affirmative defenses that may be available to the Defendant, EDWARDS, as well as the references outside the four corners EFTA01114353 of the Complaint. These matters are more appropriately the subject matter of a Motion for Summary Judgment and/or defense at trial. Based upon the foregoing, the Motion to Dixtiss is hereby denied. 'f in DONE AND ORDERED this - Hay of October, 2011 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. aet DAVID F. CROW CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Copy furnished: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 JOSEPH L. ACKERMAN, JR., ESQUIRE, 777 S. Flagler Dr., 901 Phillips Point West, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, 250 Australian Ave. S., Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 MARC NURIK, ESQUIRE, One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 GARY M. FARMER, JR., ESQUIRE, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQUIRE, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000, Suffolk, MA 02116 EFTA01114354
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
b086444313eb38872c6c97f1b4c6754a833e6648c1127a1b7bad3229d25409f1
Bates Number
EFTA01114353
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!