📄 Extracted Text (3,666 words)
Heiman 8thisrmelsteln, P 03:03:19 p.m. 02-04-2010 2/15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 3,
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
PLAINTIFF JANE DOE 3'S ANSWERS TO
DEFENDANT'S SECOND INTERROGATORIES
Plaintiff, JANE DOE 3, by and through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant
to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby responds to Defendant, JEFFREY
EPSTEIN'S Second Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as follows:
General Objections
1. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that the
Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client
privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege or immunity,
whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and
protections to the extent implicated by each Interrogatory, and excludes privileged and
protected information from any responses to Defendant's discovery. Any disclosure is
inadvertent and is not intended to waive those privileges or protections, which are
specifically reserved.
2. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that same are
vague, ambiguous, incomprehensible and/or overly broad.
EFTA01076698
MOM Herman &Merme'stein, P 03:03:44 p.m. 02-04-2010 3/15
Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
Page 2
3. Plaintiff objects to Defendants' Interrogatories to the extent that the
Interrogatories seek to impose obligations beyond those imposed by applicable law and
the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
4. The foregoing general objections are incorporated into each of the specific
objections and responses that follow. The stating of a specific objection or response
shall not be construed as a waiver of Plaintiff's general objections. Plaintiff reserves the
right to supplement these responses and to make further objections. Plaintiff's
responses shall neither waive nor prejudice any objections that Plaintiff may later
assert.
5. Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement or amend its Responses and
Objections to Defendant's Discovery as and if additional information becomes available.
6. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's interrogatories on the grounds that the total
interrogatories propounded on Plaintiff by Defendant, including discrete subparts, far
exceed 25, in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P 33(a)(1). By answering the interrogatories
herein, Plaintiff does not waive this objection, but only provides information in the
interests of cooperative discovery and to avoid a discovery dispute. To the extent that a
discovery dispute arises pertaining to these answers to interrogatories, Plaintiff reserves
the right to assert this objection to the entirety of Defendant's Second Interrogatories.
ANSWERS
1. List the names, business addresses, telephone and cell phone numbers, dates of
employment, immediate supervisor (name and address) and rates of pay
regarding all employers, including self-employment, for whom you have worked
since you answered the First Set of Interrogatories propounded by Defendant on
or about December 10, 2008; this includes listing any and all sources of income
you have received.
EFTA01076699
03:03:58 p.m. 02-04-2010 4115
NEM Herman &Mermelstoln, P
Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
Page 3
ANSWER:
$13.00/hour plus tips
July 2009-Present
2. Identify each physician or medical provider (including mental health
professionals, drug or alcohol counselors and therapists) with whom you have
consulted or who has treated or examined you, and identify each facility
(including drug or alcohol treatment facilities, whether inpatient or outpatient)
where you have received any consultation, examination or treatment that is in
any way related to this case; and state as to each the date of consultation,
examination or treatment and the injury, condition or other reason for which you
were examined or treated since you answered the First Set of Interrogatories
propounded by Defendant on or about December 10, 2008.
ANSWER:
Dr. Ryan C. Hall
2500 W. Lake Mary Blvd.
Lake Mary, FL
Examined Nov. 2009
Independent Medical Examination
3. List separately the names, addresses and phone numbers of all males, excluding
Mr. Epstein, with whom you have had sexual activity since you answered the
First Set of Interrogatories propounded by Defendant on or about December 10,
2008 up through the current date. Describe the nature of sexual activity, the
date(s) and whether you received money or other consideration from the person.
ANSWER:
None.
4. Are you now, or have you ever been a member of a social networking website
such as MySpace.com, Facebook.com, Bebo.com, Flickr.com or any similar
websites?
EFTA01076700
Herman SINIermelsteln, P 03:04'11 p.m. 02-04-2010 5 /15
Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
Page 4
a. If so, please list all social networking websites of which you are currently a
member; list all social networking websites of which you were previously a
member and state the date you joined each site and the date you
cancelled your membership with each site.
b. Also, please list all usernames, screen names or "handles" you used for
each social networking site of which you were ever a member. Also,
please provide all uniform resource locators ("URL") for each social
networking website of which you are, or were previously a member (I.e.
myspace.com/janedoe).
ANSWER:
Yes.
Plaintiff is currently a member of Facebook. She joined approximately 1 year
ago. http://www.facebook.com/voli.mendez.lopez
Plaintiff was previously a member of MySpace but cancelled her membership at
approximately age 19. She does not recall her handle or URL.
5. Are you now, or have you ever been a member of an online dating website such
as match.com, eharmony.com, cupid.com or any similar website?
a. If so, please list all online dating websites of which you are currently a
member; list all online dating websites of which you were previously a
member and state the date you joined each site and the date you
cancelled your membership with each site.
b. Also, please list all usernames, screen names or "handles" you used for
each online dating website of which you were ever a member. Also,
please provide all URLs for each social networking website of which you
are, or were previously a member (i.e. match.corNjanedoe).
ANSWER:
A friend registered Jane Doe No. 3 for wealthymen.com, but she has
never personally used the site and does not know the username,
password, or "handle" for the account. She has not been a member of
any other dating websites.
EFTA01076701
03.04:24 p.m. 02-04-2010 6/15
UMW Herman 8gMermtisteln, P
Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
Page 5
6. Do you, or have you ever kept, a diary or journal since 2002? If so, please state
whether the diary or journal was/is kept in hard copy or whether it was/is kept on
a computer or other electronic device.
a. If the diary or journal was kept in hard copy, describe its physical attributes
(i.e. book, collection of loose paper, day planner) and state its current
location.
b. If the diary or journal was/is kept on a computer or other electronic device,
please identify the computer or electronic device, including the make and
model; identify the owner of the computer or electronic device; and state
the current location of the computer or electronic device. If the current
location is unknown, please state the last known location of the computer
or electronic device.
c. Identify all individuals, Including their full name, current address, home
telephone number and cellular telephone number, that have read any
portion of the diary or journal.
d. Please state whether any copies were made of the diary or journal, If so,
state the number of copies made and identify all individuals, including their
full name, current address, home telephone number and cellular
telephone number, who have, or at any time had, a copy of the diary or
journal.
ANSWER:
Plaintiff kept a diary in middle school and her freshman year of high
school. It has since been destroyed. It was a general composition
notebook. It was never kept on a computer. To Plaintiff's knowledge, no
one read any part of the journal, nor were any copies of the journal made.
10. Please identify all computers you have used since 2002 and identify the owner of
each computer; state the make, model and current location of each computer; if
the current location of a particular computer is unknown, state each location in
which you used last used each computer.
ANSWER:
Plaintiff objects to this request as overly broad, unduly burdensome, and not
reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. It is an unwarranted and
baseless fishing expedition, and invasion of privacy. The apparent purpose of
this request is to harass and intimidate the Plaintiff.
EFTA01076702
Herman &Mermeisteln, P 03:04:45 p.m. 02-04-2010 7/15
Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
Page 6
11. Please identify your five closest friends for the years 2006 — 2010, including their
full name, current address, home telephone number and cellular telephone
number.
ANSWER:
Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as vague, overly broad, unduly burdensome,
an unwarranted invasion of privacy and not reasonably calculated to lead to
admissible evidence. Subject to and without waiving said objections, Plaintiff
states:
1. Samantha Brennan
R I Palm Beach, FL 33411
No home p one
2. Brittany Gutierrez
I Palm Beach, FL 33411
o ome p one
3. Arlene Wilson
West Palm Beach, FL 33410
No cell phone
No home phone
4. Jennifer Sicilano
Atlanta GA
o ome p one
Plaintiff does not have a fifth person that she would consider "a close friend"
during that time period.
12. Do you intend to call at trial other females who went to Mr. Epstein's residence?
If so, please identify each individual, including their name, current address, home
telephone number and cellular telephone number, and identify her counsel. Also,
please state the substance of each witness's testimony.
Answer:
Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as vague, overly broad, unduly burdensome,
cumulative, and calling for speculation. Subject to and without waiving said objections,
Plaintiff states:
EFTA01076703
Herman 8,P4ormelsteln, P 03:04:58 p.m. 02-04-2010 8/1S
Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
Page 7
Plaintiff has not yet identified all of the witnesses she intends to call at trial. The
witnesses who went to Epstein's residence include:
Jane Doe No. 2
Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.,
While still a minor, Jane Doe No. 2 was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by
Jane Doe No. 3 wherein she was sexually assaulted by Defendant Epstein in a
manner during a massage wherein she was paid $200.00. See transcript of Jane
Doe No. 2's deposition.
Jane Doe No. 4
Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
While still a minor, Jane Doe No. 4 was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by
an agent and employee of Defendant Epstein, wherein she was
repeatedly sexually assaulted during the course of a massage wherein she was
paid $200.00 for each sexual assault. Additionally, skill hat she was
called by Defendant Epstein's employees, and
when Defendant Epstein wanted Jane Doe No. 4 to come to his home
for sexual activity. See transcript of Jane Doe No. 4's deposition.
Jane Doe No. 5
Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.,
As a minor, Jane Doe No. 5 went to Defendant Epstein's home as the result of a
conversation with an agent of Defendant Epstein who attended school with Jane
Doe No. 5. While at Defendant Epstein's home, she was sexually assaulted by
Defendant Epstein during the course of a massage wherein she was paid
$200.00. See transcript of Jane Doe No. 5's deposition.
Jane Doe No. 6
Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
As a minor, Jane Doe No. 6 was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by E.W.
to provide him with a massage. During the course of the massage, she was
sexually assaulted by Defendant Epstein and was paid $200.00. See transcript
of Jane Doe No. 6's deposition.
Jane Doe No. 7
Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
As a minor 7 was brought to Defendant Epstein by his employee
and agent, to give Defendant Epstein a massage. She will
called on the telephone by Defendant Epstein's agent and employee,
when Defendant Epstein wanted her to come to his home for a massage.
During the course of the massages, Jane Doe No. 7 was sexually assaulted by
Defendant Epstein. She was paid $200.00 each time. See transcript of Jane
Doe No. 7's deposition.
EFTA01076704
Herman Worms!stein, P 03:05:19 p.m. 02-04-2010 9115
Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
Page 8
Jane Doe No. 8
Address previously provided by Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
As a minor, Jane Doe No. 8 was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by C.M.A.
to give Defendant Epstein a massage. During the course of the massage,
Defendant Epstein sexually assaulted Jane Doe No. 8. She was paid $200.00
for the massage/sexual assault.
S.R.
Home address unknown
c/o Brad Edwards, Esq.
Upon Information and belief, Rivera was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by
his employee and/or agent to give Defendant Epstein a massage wherein he
sexually assaulted Rivera on at least one occasion. She will also likely testify
that she knew Jane Doe No. 6 and introduced her to Courtney Wilde, who
brought Jane Doe No. 6 to Defendant Epstein's home for a massage.
Jane Doe
Home address unknown
c/o Brad Edwards, Esq.
Upon information and belief, Jane Doe was invited or bought to Defendant
Epstein's home by his agent/employee to give him a massage wherein he
sexually assaulted Jane Doe on at least one occasion. See transcript of Jane
Doe's deposition.
E.W.
Home address unknown
c/o Brad Edwards, Esq.
Upon information and belief, Wilde was brought or invited to Defendant Epstein's
home by his employee and/or agent to give Defendant Epstein a massage
wherein he sexually assaulted Wilde on at least on occasion. She will also likely
testify that she knew Jane Doe No. 6 and brought Jane Doe No. 6 to Epstein's
home at his request, and that Defendant Epstein paid her to bring other girls.
See transcript of E.W's deposition.
LM.
Home address unknown
do Brad Edwards, Esq.
Upon information and belief, L.M. was bought or invited to Defendant Epstein's
home by his agent/employee to give him a massage wherein he sexually
assaulted L.M. on at least one occasion. She will also likely testify that she was
paid by Defendant Epstein to recruit and bring other underage girls to his home
for "massages" wherein he sexually assaulted the underage girls. See transcript
of L.M.'s deposition.
C.M.A.
Home Address Unknown
EFTA01076705
Herman &Mermelsteln, P 03:05:37 p.m. 02-04-2010 10 Ms
Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
Page 9
c/o Spencer Kuvin, Esq.
Upon information and belief, C.M.A. was bought or invited to Defendant Epstein's
home by his agent/employee to give him a massage wherein he sexually
assaulted C.M.A. on at least one occasion. She will also likely testify that she
was paid by Defendant Epstein to recruit and bring other underage girls to his
home for "massages" wherein he sexually assaulted the underage girls. See
transcript of C.M.A.'s deposition.
ome aaaress unknown
Upon information and belief, was bought or invited to Defendant
Epstein's home to ive him a massage by his agent/employee wherein he
sexually assaulted on at least one occasion. She will also likely testify
that she was paid dant Epstein to recruit and bring other underage girls
to his home for "massages" wherein he sexually assaulted the underage
in I in but not limited to, Jane Doe Nos., 3, 4, and 7. See transcript of
deposition.
Jane Doe No. 101
Home Address Unknown
do Katherine Ezell, Esq.
Upon information and belief, Jane Doe No. 101 was invited or bought to
Defendant Epstein's home by his agent/employee to give him a massage
wherein he sexually assaulted Jane Doe No. 101 on at least one occasion.
Jane Doe No. 102
Home address unknown
do Katherine Ezell, Esq.
Upon information and belief, Jane Doe No. 102 was invited or bought to
Defendant Epstein's home by his agent/employee to give him a massage
wherein he sexually assaulted Jane Doe 102 on at least one occasion.
Jane Doe No, 103
do Katherine Ezell, Esq.
Upon information and belief, Jane Doe No. 103 was invited or bought to
Defendant Epstein's by his agent/employee home to give him a massage
wherein he sexually assaulted Jane Doe 103 on at least one occasion.
D.H.D.
do Katherine Ezell, Esq.
D.D. went with Jane Doe No. 5 to Defendant Epstein's home to give him a
massage wherein she was sexually assaulted. Upon information and belief, she
was also brought/invited to Defendant Epstein's home on subsequent occasions
to give him a massage wherein she was sexually assaulted. D.D. will also likely
testify that she was still a minor when the sexual assaults occurred.
EFTA01076706
Herman &Mermelsteln, P 03:05:56 p.m. 02-04-2010 11 /15
Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
Page 10
S.E.
Home address unknown
do Katherine Ezell, Esq.
S.E. is likely to testify that she was brought or invited to Defendant Epstein's
home by his agent/employee to give him a massage wherein he sexually
assaulted her on at least one occasion. She will likely testify that she was still a
minor when the sexual assault(s) occurred.
K.M.
Home address unknown
K.M. is likely to testify that she was friends with Jane Doe No. 5 and and
knew them to have gone to Defendant Eptein's home on at least one occasion to
give him a massage, and that they stated Defendant Epstein touched them in a
sexual manner. K.M. is likely to testify that she too went to Defendant Epstein's
home to give him a massage and during the course of that massage, Defendant
Epstein touched her in sexual manner while she was still a minor.
A.H.
Home address unknown
A.H. is likely to testify that she was repeatedly sexually assaulted by Defendant
Epstein at his home during the course of massages. She is also likely to testify
that Defendant Epstein forced her to engage in sexual intercourse with him
against her will, and that she was forced to engage in sexual activity with
Epstein's employee/agent, against her will. She is likely to
testify that she was a minor w en ese evens occurred.
A.D.
Home Address Unknown
A.D. is likely to testify that she was brought or invited to Defendant Epstein's
home by his employee/agent to give Defendant Epstein a massage wherein she
was sexually assaulted on at least one occasion. A.D. is likely to testify that she
was a minor when these events occurred.
omo a ress unknown
L.M. is likely to testify that she was friends with Jane Doe Nos. 3, 4, and 7, and
knew them to go to Defendant Epstein's home to give him massages. She is
also likely to testify that she was brought or invited to Defendant Epstein's home
by an agent of Defendant Epstein to give him a massage wherein she was
sexually assaulted. She is likely to testify that these events occurred when she
was a minor.
J.L.
Home address unknown
J.L. is likely to testify that she was friends with Jane Doe No. 3 and knew Jane
Doe No. 3 to have gone to Defendant Epstein's home to give him a massage.
EFTA01076707
Herman &PAorrnelsteln, P 03:06:15 p.m. 02-04-2010 12/15
Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
Page 11
J.L. is also likely to testify that she was brought or invited to Defendant Epstein's
home by his agent to give him a massage wherein he sexually assaulted her.
She is also likely to testify that these events occurred when she was a minor.
J.S. is likely to testify that she was friends with Jane Doe No. 3 during the
• riod, and that she was brought to Defendant Epstein's home by
to give him a massage wherein he touched her in a sexual
manner. e is also likely to testify that she was a minor when these events
occurred.
RE. is likely to testify that she was friends with Jane Doe No. 7 and was brought
to Defendant Epstein's house to provide him with a massage, wherein she was
sexually assaulted by Defendant Epstein. She is also likely to testify that she
was a minor when these events occurred.
B.B.
Address unknown
do Spencer Kuvin, Esq.
B.B. is likely to testify that she was brought or invited to Defendant Epstein's
home by his agent or employee to give him a massage wherein she was sexually
assaulted on at least one occasion. She is likely to testify that she was a minor
when these events occurred.
Jane Doe II
Address unknown
do Sid Garcia, Esq.
Jane Doe II is likely to testify that she was brought to or invited to Defendant
Epstein's home by his agent or employee to give him a massage wherein she
was sexually assaulted by Defendant Epstein. She is also likely to testify that
she was a minor when these events occurred.
EFTA01076708
Herman &Kum!stein, P 03:06:29 p.m. 02-04-2010 13/15
,,Fier
4f4W2t3",:fiiii,y49-iit4fitst;10.41
VERIFICATION
Bypaa enora,
STATE OF FLORIDA
ss
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
ORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 2-; day of Mttli th , 2010 by
Infril !Orr* who is personally known to me or has produced the
foil 'mg identification which is current or has been issued
within the past five years and bears a serial or other identifying number.
a rilTYlnitY) O)rirerron
Print Hemet,
1.04nei A hp .454,AA.,0---
Signature
NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF FLORIDA
Commission Number: DDBLolO55
My commission expires: Feb 15,7-015
(Notarial Seal)
SAMANTHA M. BRENNAN
*-7- my COWIS&O.1 DilitI0C4
:EXPeCn F.-truce, lb. 2015
(bill m.4 :alewives,*
10
EFTA01076709
Herman WarmeirteIn, P 03:06:46 p.m. 02-04-2010 14 /15
Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
Page 13
April , 2010 Respectfully submitted:
MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ P.A.
18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
Miami, Florida 33160
www t rne .com
Tel:
Fax: 5- 1-0877
By:
Florida Bar No. 947245
Adam D. Horowitz
Florida Bar No. 376980
essica D. Arbour
Florida Bar No. 67885
EFTA01076710
Herman &Merme P 03:06:54 p.m. 02-04-2010 15 /15
Doe No. 3 v, Epstein
Page 14
Certificate of Service
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been sent via U.S.
ay of April, 2010.
Mail and facsimile to the following addressees this 2---6-
Robert D. Critton, Jr, Esq.
Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
303 Banyan Boulevard
Suite 400
I ach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
Go-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
ach, FL 33401-5012
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
EFTA01076711
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
b1d58898200b91ed0e81c56fa15ffd8cc0408501ca5c5be8a99273acbc527881
Bates Number
EFTA01076698
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
14
Comments 0