EFTA00205761.pdf

Subject: RE: Re: Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:02:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Nobody knows. At the very first hearing -- 3 years ago — the judge said the most he could do is order us outside to "confer." Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 3:56 PM Subject: Re: What if the court disagrees and says we violated cvra - what's the remedy? A declaratory judgment? He can't set the np aside and he definitely can't get money. Ori inal Messa e le Subject: RE: :54:03 2011 Setting aside the non-pros and prosecuting him as though the Non-pros had never been signed. 111111M Subject: Re: Suggest what thing? Sent: Mon Sep 26 15:48:05 2011 Subject: RE: EFTA00205761 No. He already served his sentence in state court and performed all his other obligations under the Non-Pros (including paying damages to 30-some girls). I argued it would be a Due Process violation to even suggest such a thing. ----Ori inal Messa e ' Have we conceded that a showing that we violated the CVRA would justify reoopening/setting aside the nonpros? Sent: Mon Sep 26 15:23:17 2011 Subject: RE: Ideally to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein and then to somehow convince us (probably through public pressure via the press) to prosecute him. What is the relief jane does want in the cvra case? EFTA00205762