EFTA02649849.pdf

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 10:28 PM To: Larry Visoski Subject: Re: Royal Jet BBJ No fee amounts in agreements)?? On =ed, May 17, 2017 at 6:24 PM Larry Visosk rote: <=iv> From Bob Sent from my iPhone Begin forw=rded message: Fr=m: Robert Peerles Date: Ma 17 2017 at 1:32:14 PM =DT To: ' Subject: Royal Jet BBJ </=iv> Dear Larry,=/span> Please have a look at the=attached draft agreement and see if it meets the approval of Mr. Epstein a=d his attorneys. I did have a lengthy conv=rsation earlier today with ROYAL JET and I will come back to you with a fu=l report , in the morning your time. Hope you have a safe flig=t today. Very best regards<=> EFTA_R1_01889765 EFTA02649849 Bob P. Robert Peerless OPUS AERONAUTICS le Prince de Galles 10, Avenue Grande Bretagne MC-98000 Monaco www.opusaero.com <http://www.opusaero.com> From: Lar Sent: 17 May 2017 13:15 To: Robert Peerless Subject: Re: Royal Jet BBJ <=pan lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma"=,"sans-serif""> This was some of the last correspondence with Mike, =oyal Jet Legal. 2 EFTA_R1_01889766 EFTA02649850  Dear Darren,=/u> Further to the emails below, we have now discussed t=e points raised with Royal Jet. To keep matters moving forward, please find attached=a revised draft of the Aircraft Purchase Agreement (in clean and red-line =gainst the last draft) (which remains subject to the further review of Roy=l Jet). Please note the following: 1. : Royal Jet have agreed that all 3 engines may underg= the boroscopic examinations at the same time prior to the main pre-purcha=e inspection. Royal Jet will require that, at the least, those examinations follow the i=spection process for the aircraft itself in that the engines should be acc=pted if they are in the Delivery Condition (rather than there being a wide= discretion). Note that Royal Jet are incurring costs in grounding two aircraft to complete these examin=tions and potential swaps and that the inspection process is already in th= Purchaser's favour given it is rare there is no discrepancy requiring=rectification. 2. : Royal Jet accepts that the Purchaser will not have=complete control over Etihad, so we have made the requirement to commence =he inspection by 18 December=/span> subject to the availability of Etihad. As a general poin=, it is important that we finalise the Aircraft Purchase Agreement and con=irm this slot quickly so we do not lose it. 3. : Boroscopic examinations of the engines are now exc=uded from the main pre- purchase inspection given they will already have be=n carried out. 4. : Royal Jet will permit further flight tests to be c=rried out, but if they are not necessary as per manufacturer's mainten=nce manual for release to service then the Purchaser should pay for them. 5. : Royal Jet has agreed to remove the time limit on p=ovision of the inspection report (so it will simply be provided "a= soon as is reasonably practicable"). 6. : Given we have not made any progress in inserting =n actual amount for the combined single limit, in order to move this forwa=d, we have simply made reference to a market standard amount. 3 EFTA_R1_01889767 EFTA02649851  7. : We have corrected the typos referenced below.<=u> We will forward the aircraft specs and inspection sc=pe to you once received from Royal Jet. Once those are inserted, we =hould be able to put the Aircraft Purchase Agreement into execution form a=d proceed with signing. We look forward to hearing from you.</=> Kind regards, Mike Sent from my iPad On May 15, 2017, at 10:32 PM, Robert Peerles wrote:<=p> Hi Larry, </=> All agreed...4)=A6...Thank-you. </=> I will try to send you a =imple letter agreement tomorrow And then we should disc=ss a good strategy and you need to fill me in on your past dealings. <1=> Looking forward to coming=to a successful conclusion and securing you the purchase of a good BBJ. </=> Best=/p> </=> Bob P.</=> 4 EFTA_R1_01889768 EFTA02649852  </a <1=> <1=> Robert Peerless OPUS AERONAUTICS Le Prince de Galles 10, Avenue Grande Bretagne<=u> MC-98000 Monaco www.opusaero.com < P: www.opusaero.com> <1=> </a </a </a From: Lvjet Sent: 15 May 2017 13:24 To: Robert Peerless Subject: Re: Royal Jet BID Bob, Mr. Epstein is happy to enter=into an agreement with you, your interests need to be aligned, h= doesn't want to get a better price and pay you less of a commission, it should be the reverse. So the proposal is as follows: =u> $16M -$16.4M you get $250k.=C2* $16.4M - $16.6M you get $200k= EFTA_R1_01889769 EFTA02649853  $16 6M - $16.8M you get =150k. above $16.8M you getQ=AO$100k. best, Larry Ori inal Messa e To: Larry Visoski Sent: Mon, May 15, 2017 6:57 am Subject: Royal Jet BBJ Hi Larry, Good morning from sunny Monaco. First off let me reiterate the following. I have always prided myself in gi=ing people the "Best "advise that I know how. Next , I have alwa=s prided myself in honesty and transparency and lastly I'm probably th= hardest working aircraft broker that you will ever meet. However I only work hard for money and that's what separates me from mo=t other brokers I really have no real love for aviation and you would=be hard pressed to find me at any air shows or conventions and for sure yo= will never read very much about me in the Internet. We are just known for working hard , producing results an= getting deals done and being remunerated handsomely for our success's=. I pride myself in giving good advice, which is what I did with Mr. Epstein.=br> 1. The BEST deal in the world on a "good " pre-owned BBJ is Royal=Jet YG- 038 bar none. 2. The nicest BBJ at a very fair price ( off-market ) is YG-062 ....Alberto=Pinto designed 3. The Best deal in the world on any aircraft anywhere was Boeing 757-200 S=N 24923 ( Which is why we sold it within 24 hours after Mr. Epstei='s rejection last week. ) Therefore I would be proud and privileged to represent your interests in tr=ing to get a deal done with Royal Jet. My fee would equal 1% of the aircra=t upon selling price to be paid simultaneously at closing by Buyer. Of cou=se we would need to close a successful transaction in order to be paid. I would also need to see the original L.O=1. containing all of the terms and conditions discussed with Royal Jet , I=st time around. I have some very strong connections with Royal Jet and I f=el confident that I could add a lot to the deal. Thanks' in advance for your considerations and I will await your respon=e. I'm out for a private lunch today with the Prince so all my phones will=be turned off for the next 2 hours. Wish you all the very best Bob P. 6 EFTA_R1_01889770 EFTA02649854  Robert Peerless OPUS AERONAUTICS Le Prince de Galles 10, Avenue Grande Bretagne MC-98000 Monaco www.opusaero.com <http://www.opusaero.com> <=r> Original Message From: Larry Visoski Sent: 14 May 2017 21:12 To: Robert Peerless Subject: BBJ Jeffrey is asking if you prefer not to be involved in BBJ purchase? Sent from my iPhone --= =C240 please note The information co=tained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client pr=vileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for JEE Unauthorized use= disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is str=ctly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this commu=ication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e=mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereo=, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved </=iv> --001a114eac8476a0b3054fbfce93-- conversation-id 43968 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1495060104 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 6 remote-id 714841 7 EFTA_R1_01889771 EFTA02649855