podesta_email_18428.txt

podesta-emails 4,996 words email

D6 P17 V9 V11 P23

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Wednesday November 19, 2014 Afternoon Roundup:* *Tweets:* *Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: "As Secretary of State, [ @HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton>] put women's economic participation on the foreign policy agenda" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/melanne-verveer/driving-growth-through-wo_b_6179734.html … <http://t.co/nDPrpUb0yi> [11/19/14, 11:32 a.m. EST <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/535108295841689601>] *Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: .@melanneverveer <https://twitter.com/MelanneVerveer> writes about @HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton> and "Driving Growth through Women's Economic Participation" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/melanne-verveer/driving-growth-through-wo_b_6179734.html … <http://t.co/nDPrpUb0yi> [11/19/14,11:11 a.m. EST <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/535102956954062849>] *Headlines:* *New York Times: First Draft: “As One Clinton Super PAC Winds Down, Another Ramps Up” <http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2014/11/19/?entry=5933>* “Mr. Brock is expected to tell donors that Correct the Record, originally conceived as a way respond to criticism of the potential candidate until a campaign is officially underway, has decided to continue operating through the November 2016 general election. The group plans to push back on Republican attacks on Mrs. Clinton and serve as a counterweight to third party groups that have already started to dig up opposition research on Mrs. Clinton, her husband and the family’s philanthropic foundation. One person included in the meeting described the group’s mission as 'tamping down conservative media efforts to resurrect old scandals and gin up new ones.'" *Politico: “De Blasio on Clinton: Focus on income inequality” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/bill-de-blasio-hillary-clinton-113025.html>* “New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio says Hillary Clinton should start speaking to income inequality issues, calling it a ‘necessary’ move for the likely Democratic presidential contender.” *Wall Street Journal: “De Blasio Urges Clinton to Lean Left in a Presidential Run” <http://online.wsj.com/articles/de-blasio-urges-clinton-to-lean-left-in-a-presidential-run-1416416331>* “‘A lot about her history and origins suggest it’s natural for her. If you go back to the work she did originally, it gets to these same issues, what she did with the Children’s Defense Fund, what she did on family medical leave, what she did on health-care reform,’ Mr. de Blasio said of Mrs. Clinton.” *Bloomberg: “How Hillary Clinton Has Dodged the Keystone Question” <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-19/after-senate-defeat-keystone-hangs-over-hillary-clinton>* “As the White House deliberates, the former secretary of State and Democratic presidential front-runner has stayed particularly quiet about whether she supports constructing the 1,179-mile pipeline to transport oil sands from Alberta to Gulf Coast refineries.” *FiveThirtyEight: “Clinton Probably Can’t Expand The 2016 Map (And If She Does, It Won’t Matter)” <http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/clinton-probably-cant-expand-the-2016-map-and-if-she-does-it-wont-matter/>* “Ready for Hillary’s logic appears to rest on the idea that President Obama has underperformed in these states, so those states’ GOP-lean in the past two presidential elections is misleading. But they’re red through and through.” *Vox: “Are Democrats out of new ideas?” <http://www.vox.com/2014/11/19/7245775/democrats-new-ideas>* "I asked Neera Tanden, the CAP's president, and a former policy staffer for both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, whether Democrats were intellectually exhausted. No, she said, but the thinking on the left had become too small; as a side-effect of being in power, Democrats had become too obsessed with ideas that could plausibly pass. 'The difficulty for progressives in the last few years has been that trying to think up ideas that can make it through the House Republicans has limited the debate.'" *Washington Post blog: The Fix: “Is the GOP bench now more diverse than the Democrats’? Not really.” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/11/19/is-the-gop-bench-now-more-diverse-than-the-democrats-not-really/?tid=hpModule_ba0d4c2a-86a2-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394>* “In electing President Obama, Democrats broke one diversity barrier, and with Clinton, they seem poised to break another. And in 2016, the most viable options for the top of GOP ticket in 2016 still remain mostly white and all male.” *Articles:* *New York Times: First Draft: “As One Clinton Super PAC Winds Down, Another Ramps Up” <http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2014/11/19/?entry=5933>* By Amy Chozick November 19, 2014, 10:25 a.m. EST As supporters of Ready for Hillary, a “super PAC” pushing a 2016 presidential run by Hillary Rodham Clinton, gather in New York on Friday to discuss how the group will wind down ahead of a likely campaign, another group will convene a private meeting to explain to major donors how it plans to ramp up in the coming months. About 40 donors are expected to attend an event hosted by Correct the Record, part of a Democratic super PAC that defends Mrs. Clinton against attacks, including Republican criticism of her handling of the assault on a U.S. mission in Benghazi. James Carville and David Brock, who founded Correct the Record and its parent group, American Bridge, have taken the lead on defending Mrs. Clinton’s record as secretary of state, are both expected to deliver remarks. Others expected to attend include Tom Lee, Bob Rudin, Doug Band and Michael Kempner, according to one person involved in the event who could not discuss the private meeting for attribution. Representatives of Correct the Record declined to comment. Mr. Brock is expected to tell donors that Correct the Record, originally conceived as a way respond to criticism of the potential candidate until a campaign is officially underway, has decided to continue operating through the November 2016 general election. The group plans to push back on Republican attacks on Mrs. Clinton and serve as a counterweight to third party groups that have already started to dig up opposition research on Mrs. Clinton, her husband and the family’s philanthropic foundation. One person included in the meeting described the group’s mission as “tamping down conservative media efforts to resurrect old scandals and gin up new ones.” *Politico: “De Blasio on Clinton: Focus on income inequality” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/bill-de-blasio-hillary-clinton-113025.html>* By Maggie Haberman November 19, 2014, 11:49 a.m. EST New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio says Hillary Clinton should start speaking to income inequality issues, calling it a “necessary” move for the likely Democratic presidential contender. He also described Sen. Elizabeth Warren was an “indispensible” voice within the Democratic Party and praised one of Clinton’s potential GOP rivals in 2016, Sen. Rand Paul, as “authentic.” He later said that he wanted to help “set the table for a candidate, whatever candidate” to address the core issues of the new Democratic progressivism. The comments came during an interview Wednesday in Washington, D.C., with POLITICO’s chief White House correspondent Mike Allen, who also asked the first-term mayor about whether he smokes pot, why he is chronically late and whether the Rev. Al Sharpton plays too big a role in shaping his thinking. De Blasio’s appearance came as aides to the former political operative have tried to boost him as a national progressive leader. He was to speak later Wednesday at a gathering hosted by the Center for American Progress. Asked by Allen whether there is a space to the left of Hillary Clinton and why she had not filled it, de Blasio replied: “I think there is a lot of room for a Democrat to speak to these issues. I think it could be [Clinton]… Look, I think she should. I think it’s necessary. I think a lot about her history and origins suggest it’s natural for her.” De Blasio, who was Clinton’s campaign manager in her 2000 Senate run, said she was a good populist messenger in places such as Ohio during the 2008 presidential primaries. Still, the remarks were striking for de Blasio, who had been seen by many as a potentially strong ally on the progressive left for Clinton and who has often praised her. He said he’d be “honored” to discuss his views with her or anyone else. “I don’t want to talk about somebody who’s not a candidate,” he said when pushed about Clinton. He added that he would discuss “what should the Democrat do. The Democrat should speak to income inequality, should be willing to challenge the status quo … (and) should marry that with the grassroots organizing strategy that epitomizes the message.” He praised Warren, who is poised to be a nuisance for Clinton on the topic of income inequality, saying, “I think she’s saying some really important things… [she’s] one of the indispensible voices” in the party. Warren has said she’s not running for president, though some on the left are still hoping to convince her otherwise. As for Paul, the Kentucky senator, de Blasio said, “I do think he evinces a certain authenticity.” The mayor also addressed questions about stories focused on his wife’s former chief-of-staff, Rachel Noerdlinger, and her personal problems. “She decided it was time to attend to family members and I think that was right for her to do,” he said. When questioned about the criticism that he used his own family in his campaign and then declared families “hands off,” De Blasio said his family had “accepted” the public scrutiny that comes with being a political candidate. “I think that is very, very different than someone you appoint to a job,” he said. As for whether he smokes pot, the mayor said simply, “No,” then added that he hadn’t smoked since college. And as far as Sharpton, who some New York police brass have said holds too much sway over the mayor, de Blasio said the African American reverend and TV personality is simply a person who offers advice. *Wall Street Journal: “De Blasio Urges Clinton to Lean Left in a Presidential Run” <http://online.wsj.com/articles/de-blasio-urges-clinton-to-lean-left-in-a-presidential-run-1416416331>* By Michael Howard Saul November 19, 2014, 11:58 a.m. EST WASHINGTON—New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio on Wednesday encouraged Hillary Clinton to embrace the message of income inequality and other left-leaning issues if she decides to run for president. “The Democrat should be willing to challenge the status quo,” Mr. de Blasio said at a breakfast forum when asked about the 2016 presidential campaign. “The Democrat should be willing to challenge wealthy and powerful interests and should marry that with a grass-roots organizing strategy that epitomizes the message.” Mr. de Blasio’s spin on the national stage Wednesday suggests he hopes to play a high-profile role as a liberal voice in the 2016 presidential campaign. Earlier this week, Mr. de Blasio dismissed the notion that he would be a presidential candidate himself, saying he plans to run for re-election to City Hall in 2017. Mr. de Blasio, who served as Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager on her successful 2000 bid for U.S. Senate in New York, said there is space for a left-leaning Democrat in the 2016 presidential campaign and “it could well be Secretary Clinton.” “One way or another the Democrats have to speak to these issues,” he said, pointing out that Mrs. Clinton, a former secretary of state, has a strong background on liberal policy issues. When she ran for president in 2008, Mrs. Clinton was viewed as more of a moderate Democrat, opening up a space on her left for Barack Obama in the primary. “A lot about her history and origins suggest it’s natural for her. If you go back to the work she did originally, it gets to these same issues, what she did with the Children’s Defense Fund, what she did on family medical leave, what she did on health-care reform,” Mr. de Blasio said of Mrs. Clinton. Asked how confident he is that Mrs. Clinton would move to the left in a 2016 campaign, Mr. de Blasio, replied, “I’m hopeful. Look, I think she should. I think it’s necessary.” A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Mr. de Blasio said he hasn’t spoken to Mrs. Clinton about his thoughts on 2016 in any detail but that he would be “honored” to speak with her further, or for that matter with any of the 2016 Democratic contenders. Mr. de Blasio pointed out that Mrs. Clinton was at the State Department in the aftermath of the economic crisis, so “I don’t think we’ve had an opportunity to hear her in this new reality.” Mr. de Blasio has a long, storied relationship with the Clinton family, having worked in President Bill Clinton ’s administration as an official at the Department of Housing and Urban Development. He grew closer to the family during the 2000 Senate campaign; both Clintons attended Mr. de Blasio’s inauguration at City Hall in January. At the Politico-sponsored breakfast Wednesday, Mr. de Blasio described U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who is discussed as a potential left-wing challenger to Mrs. Clinton in 2016, as “one of the really indispensable voices in our national debate.” He declined to discuss Ms. Warren in the context of 2016, pointing out that she hasn’t announced a candidacy for president. On the Republican side, Mr. de Blasio suggested he is most concerned about Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky as a potential threat to Democrats in 2016. “He evinces a certain authenticity that any good Democrat should worry about,” Mr. de Blasio said. *Bloomberg: “How Hillary Clinton Has Dodged the Keystone Question” <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-19/after-senate-defeat-keystone-hangs-over-hillary-clinton>* By Lisa Lerer November 19, 2014, 8:22 a.m. EST [Subtitle:] As Washington debates, the former secretary of State stays mum. Just about everyone in politics seems to have an opinion about the Keystone XL pipeline—except Hillary Clinton. On Tuesday night, the Senate narrowly rejected a bill that would have approved the construction of the pipeline, setting the stage for another showdown early next year. If it gets though the incoming Republican-controlled Senate, the legislation will head to the White House and force President Barack Obama to finally make a decision on the project, after a six-year review period. As the White House deliberates, the former secretary of State and Democratic presidential front-runner has stayed particularly quiet about whether she supports constructing the 1,179-mile pipeline to transport oil sands from Alberta to Gulf Coast refineries. That hasn't changed, even as debate within the Democratic party over whether to authorize the project burst into public view this week. After Delaware Senator Tom Carper decided Tuesday to allow a vote on the pipeline in the Senate, environmental activists took over his Washington lobby in protest by singing songs and chanting. All the noise isn't prompting a peep out of Clinton. Here's how she answered a question on the project in a June interview with Canada's Globe and Mail newspaper: "Our relationship is so much bigger and more important than any one decision—even one as important as this is. Canada is critical to who we are and what we hope to do together in the future. We have no better relationship. [But] this particular decision is a very difficult one because there are so many factors at play. I can’t really comment at great length because I had responsibility for it and it’s been passed on and it wouldn’t be appropriate, but I hope that Canadians appreciate that the United States government—the Obama administration—is trying to get it right. And getting it right doesn’t mean you will agree or disagree with the decision, but that it will be one based on the best available evidence and all of the complex local, state, federal, interlocking laws and concerns." When pressed on her "personal views," she replied: "I can't respond." She gave no additional details during an appearance in Ottawa last month. Clinton is certainly familiar with the issue: The State Department, which she headed during Obama's first term, has spent years conducting an environmental assessment of the project, putting the agency at the center of the debate. Staff there have suspended their review until a court challenge in Nebraska over the route’s path in that state is settled. And Obama has said he will not make a final decision on the project until the State Department review is complete. There's little upside for Clinton in detailing her views. If she backs the pipeline, she risks angering environmentalists, a key part of the Democratic base that strongly opposes the project. That includes climate activist Tom Steyer, a wealthy investor who poured $58 million into this year's midterm elections and plans to spend big again next cycle. But coming out against Keystone could alienate moderate voters in such energy-sensitive states as Ohio, Kentucky, Louisiana and West Virginia. While the latter three have leaned Republican in recent years, Clinton advisers think her appeal with white, working-class voters could make those areas somewhat competitive in 2016. Perhaps most importantly, taking a position now locks Clinton into a debate that could look entirely different a year from now, when she's likely to be in midst of a presidential election. *FiveThirtyEight: “Clinton Probably Can’t Expand The 2016 Map (And If She Does, It Won’t Matter)” <http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/clinton-probably-cant-expand-the-2016-map-and-if-she-does-it-wont-matter/>* By Harry Enten November 19, 2014, 7:30 a.m. EST Ready for Hillary, a Super PAC supporting a Hillary Clinton White House run in 2016, thinks she can expand the electoral map. First, it wants to target Arkansas, Indiana and Missouri because of her white, working-class appeal. Second, it’s aiming for Arizona and Georgia because the group thinks the states are trending toward Democrats demographically. It’s possible, but unlikely. If anything, the first three states have become less sympathetic to Democrats in recent years. And there’s no evidence that Clinton is the exception. Georgia and Arizona have become more diverse, but they’ve yet to become more Democratic. Ready for Hillary’s logic appears to rest on the idea that President Obama has underperformed in these states, so those states’ GOP-lean in the past two presidential elections is misleading. But they’re red through and through. Gallup has provided party identification data for each state since 2009. (We only have 2014 data for Arkansas and Georgia, which had key Senate races.) I took the Democratic advantage in party identification over Republicans in each state and compared it with the Democratic edge nationwide to see how these states compare to the nation. In all five states, the Republican lead in party identification is at least 5 percentage points greater in the past two years than it was nationwide. It’s not just that voters in these states dislike Obama. They dislike Democrats. In the first “bucket” Clinton targets — Arkansas, Indiana and Missouri — voters were about as Democratic-leaning as the nation in 2009. Since then, however, voters there have shifted away from the Democratic brand. The Republican lead in party identification among Arkansans, Hoosiers and Missourians is now about 10 percentage points greater than it is nationwide. Republicans hold more than 60 percent of the seats in both houses of the state legislatures in these states. And the GOP majorities in all three states increased after the 2014 elections. So, it’s not like Clinton can localize these races. These states are solidly Republican from the top down. Arizona and Georgia have long been listed by Democrats as potential pickup opportunities because of each state’s growing racial diversity. And it’s possible they’ll become presidential battlegrounds. But there isn’t any sign that will happen in the next two years. Voters in Arizona and Georgia leaned more Republican than the nation five years ago, and they continue to do so. If these states were becoming more Democratic, you’d expect at least some movement toward the Democrats in terms of party identification. There hasn’t been any. And like in the first bucket states, Republicans hold clear majorities in both houses of Arizona and Georgia’s legislatures. None of this is to say that Clinton can’t win these five states in 2016. But if she does, then chances are she will have already won the White House — Arkansas’s, Indiana’s, Missouri’s, Arizona’s or Georgia’s electoral college votes would be superfluous. *Vox: “Are Democrats out of new ideas?” <http://www.vox.com/2014/11/19/7245775/democrats-new-ideas>* By Ezra Klein November 19, 2014, 9:30 a.m. EST The last few years has been a period of policy ferment on the right in a way it hasn't been on the left. The Republican Party is thick with ambitious young politicians arguing over big ideas. Rep. Paul Ryan's budgets have taken over the GOP. Sen. Rand Paul has begun a war with the neoconservatives. Sen. Mike Lee has been fighting to move Republicans beyond supply-side tax reforms. There is less energy in the Democratic coalition. The Obama administration has been a factory of policy ideas but now its agenda is stalled — and it's not clear what comes next. "For Democrats, the election should in part be a warning about their overwhelming intellectual exhaustion," wrote Yuval Levin, a leader among conservative reformers, in a triumphalist, but sharp, post-election analysis. On Wednesday, the Center for American Progress, which is the most influential of the liberal think tanks, is holding its annual policy meeting (you can stream it here). The line-up is a who's who of ambitious Democratic comers: Julian Castro, the newly minted Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, gives the morning keynote; Kamala Harris, the attorney general of California, gives the midday keynote; John Hickenlooper, the narrowly reelected governor of Colorado, gives an afternoon keynote; and Elizabeth Warren, the senator from Massachusetts, gives a second afternoon keynote. (If you think that's a lot of keynotes for one day, well, welcome to Washington.) I asked Neera Tanden, the CAP's president, and a former policy staffer for both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, whether Democrats were intellectually exhausted. No, she said, but the thinking on the left had become too small; as a side-effect of being in power, Democrats had become too obsessed with ideas that could plausibly pass. "The difficulty for progressives in the last few years has been that trying to think up ideas that can make it through the House Republicans has limited the debate." But now, she continued, "we'll have to think beyond the Obama era, beyond the congress of today, to what we should be doing in the long term." *The middle-class squeeze* "We did this report," Tanden says, "that showed that if you look at the prototypical family — double earner, two kids — their wages have stood still since roughly 2000, but their cost of living has gone up by about $10,000 because of things like child care and health care. We have had tax policy that has ameliorated that challenge by about $5,000. But they still have $5,000 less than they did before. So you can see why they're getting kind of irritated." Tanden argues that this is the key issue going forward: the vise of stagnating wages and rising costs. And on it, "Republicans have heretofore put forward ideas that are counterproductive. But Democrats have put forward ideas that are insufficient." A possible venue for intellectual renewal is the 2016 primary. And you can count me among the doubters that Hillary Clinton's path to the nomination will be the smooth coronation some expect, but still: the anti-Hillarys in the field are limited in their appeal, and Clinton's dominance is likely to make it unusually difficult for more marginal candidates — who are often the most intellectually exciting participants in primaries — to be heard. But Tanden doesn't buy the premise that primaries are an engine of policy renewal. Look back to 2008, she says. "While there were some disagreements, they were on the margins. These were character-led debates. At the end of the day, the three top contenders had broad agreement on policy issues." *The Democrats' problem in the states* The real innovation for Democrats, she argued, is happening at the state level. She ticked off New York City Mayor Bill DeBlasio's support of universal pre-kindergarten as an example, and Harris's efforts to create new coalitions around criminal-justice policy, and Hickenlooper's work on educational equity. But that speaks to Democrats' problems. After the 2014 election, Democrats control the state legislatures in only 11 states, while Republicans control 30 (the remainder have one chamber held by Democrats and another by Republicans). Similarly, Republicans hold 31 governorships to the Democrats' 18. Democrats don't have enough traction in the states for it to be a powerful engine of policy innovation. Their bench is weak. The other difficulty for Democrats is that the media likes ideas to be, or to seem, "new". But the Obama administration has, at one time or another, pushed most of the policies in the liberal playbook. They've proposed universal pre-k, for instance, and they've backed a raft of ideas to cut inequality. They've also passed versions of some of the big ideas that animated the Democratic coalition, like health reform. The result is that even if Obamacare is imperfect and universal pre-k didn't pass, it's going to be hard for Democrats to offer an agenda that looks new — much of what they propose will be dismissed as Obama-era retreads, even if the underlying idea is sound. It's possible that Democrats don't need much in the way of a new vision to win in 2016. It might be enough for Hillary Clinton to simply unify the Democrats' larger presidential coalition against the Republicans. But historically, it's rare for parties to win a third consecutive term in the White House, and it's particularly rare for it to happen at a moment when the public is deeply unhappy about the direction of the country. The Clinton team knows this, and so too do the Democratic Party's top strategists and thinkers. The question is whether they know how to fix it. *Washington Post blog: The Fix: “Is the GOP bench now more diverse than the Democrats’? Not really.” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/11/19/is-the-gop-bench-now-more-diverse-than-the-democrats-not-really/?tid=hpModule_ba0d4c2a-86a2-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394>* By Nia-Malika Henderson November 19, 2014, 8:00 a.m. EST Tim Mak at the Daily Beast raises an interesting point in a piece headlined "The Republican Rainbow Coalition is Real": That the GOP has managed to amass more top-flight minority candidates for president (or vice president) than Democrats have. Mak conjures the image of Hillary Clinton surrounded on a debate stage by other white candidates like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and outgoing Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley. The GOP side, on the other hand, could -- and likely will -- be significantly more diverse. Mak writes: Then picture the Republican presidential debate stage: two Hispanic Americans, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio; an African American, Ben Carson; and an Indian American, Bobby Jindal. Add to that Jeb Bush, a Spanish-speaking former governor with a Mexican-born wife; and Rand Paul, a senator who has made appealing to black voters a central part of his political identity. At its highest levels, the Republican Party is building a noticeably more diverse group of talent — call it the GOP’s Rainbow Coalition. Mak is obviously focusing on ethnicity as a marker of diversity -- not so much gender -- with Bush and Paul making the cut through marriage and outreach efforts, respectively. That is a certain form of diversity math. And speaking of math, it's probably best to subtract Ben Carson from the mix, because he is just not top-flight candidate for 2016 -- if by top-flight we mean candidates with a reasonable shot at, you know, winning. Part of Mak's argument is that the Republican National Committee's diversification efforts -- first led by then-Chairman Ken Mehlman in the mid-2000s -- are finally paying off, with a crop of minority politicians now in the pipeline and ready to move on to the national stage. People like Rep.-elect Mia Love (Utah), Sen. Tim Scott (S.C.) and Rep.-elect Will Hurd (Texas) are now in the GOP fold as a result, Republicans argue. Since in some ways this is about numbers, let's play around with them a bit. In 2016, Democrats seem to be Hillary or bust. But what if we subtract Hillary? Who is added to the picture then? Take a look at this roster for an event on Wednesday at the Center of American Progress, a liberal think tank: Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.), California Attorney General Kamala Harris, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julian Castro, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (using Mak's metric for diversity, he has a black wife), and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (outreach efforts to minority voters, ala Paul, and has claimed some Native American ancestry). Then, just because, let's add outgoing Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick to the mix as well, given that he has been a governor and gave a barn-burner of a speech at the 2012 Democratic National Convention. (He is no less credible a 2016 candidate than Jindal, if we are comparing resumes, though he has been pretty unequivocal that he won't run in 2016.) That's a fairly diverse bench, never mind adding any of the Democratic women senators like Kirsten Gillibrand or Amy Klobuchar. And it's just as strong as the GOP bench in terms of diversity. Beyond 2016 candidates, Love and Hurd are new faces on the GOP side. And when they are sworn in, they will join people like Reps. Tulsi Gabbard (Hawaii), Donna Edwards (Md.) and Joaquín Castro (Tex.) -- Julian's twin brother -- who are part of a pretty diverse bench of House Democrats. Black and brown Republicans stand out largely because they remain exceptions not rules in the GOP. Democrats, in terms of voting coalitions and elected officials, are simply a more diverse party than the GOP. Republicans have certainly been better at electing minorities to statehouses of late -- among them Jindal, Nikki Haley (S.C.), Susana Martinez (N.M.) and Brian Sandoval (Nev.). And there is a real question about whether Democrats fail to groom and court minority candidates for statewide offices or just go with the white guy. In other words, do Democrats actually grow their bench of minority (excluding women) candidates? So far the answer is no. Perhaps Love and Hurd's trajectory will be different, and when Senate seats come open in their home states, the party will look to them to make the same type of leap that Tom Cotton, Cory Gardner and Bill Cassidy made in running for the Senate from their respective House seats. Still, in electing President Obama, Democrats broke one diversity barrier, and with Clinton, they seem poised to break another. And in 2016, the most viable options for the top of GOP ticket in 2016 still remain mostly white and all male.