📄 Extracted Text (281 words)
From: Lawrence Krauss < >
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 9:03 PM
To: jeffrey E.
Cc: nancy dahl; Lawrence Krauss
Subject: Justin.. bill
I =ust had the conversation I was dreading.. I tired a variety of =egotiation tactics and after trying 2 or 3 different ones, I
made some =eadway.. He has agreed to cut 10% off the bill. or $4k, . =ringing it down from $39.2K to about $35K..
which is frankly better =han I thought I would do.. (I first suggested $30K and told him that I =ad planned at most $25K
for the appeal letter.. and I should have =ade that clear to him in advance. Anyway, I was happy he did =ven this since
when we began initially talking about specific items at =he $500 level he balked at each one. We also agreed that going
=orward nothing significant would be done without discussion of =otential cost and approval by me. He did say that
while we =ould discuss specifics when the time comes he thought the appeal =earing, if we do that with him, is likely to
cost up to $50K. =nbsp;
Anyway, =hat is where it stands.. Of the $35K I am going to pay him at =he end of the month, $15K is retainer, which I
will of course get back 4 we let him go.. so I will only be out $20K in available funds for =oving forward if we do it with
someone else or alone.
LM K
Lawrence M. Krauss
Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics =epartment Arizona State University, P.O. Box =71404, Tempe, AZ
85287-1404
Research Officer I Assistant (Jessica):
I twitter.comnkraussl I www.lawrencemkrauss.com
1
EFTA_R1_01828487
EFTA02621533
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
b440ae42f9d5ba614e5393b415a5e9939d21ed5069f14bbc601134204208dd7c
Bates Number
EFTA02621533
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0