EFTA02538927.pdf

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:47 AM To: Erdoes, Mary E Cc: Staley, Jes; Shenker, Nina O Subject: Re: fyi info needed, -- managed acct NAV at 10/05 10 /06. realized value,= .. redemption schedule, we have documnets that schulte had a me=ting to disclose wrongdoing sept 06 BEFORE my withdrawal request and the d=scussions why I should not redeem my entire 140 million. but reduce it to =0million. Managed acct should have had virtually the same assets as the Fu=d. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Erdoes, Ma=y E <mailto: > wrote: Jeffrey- Yes, we are going to have Condren step in here on this issue as=well as the Bear issues. We will have everyone get together this week, if=possible, and then we will see what to do from there. Mary From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» To: Erdoes, Mary E; Staley, Jes Sent: Mon May 30 03:36:28 2011 Subject: fyi I think you should ask Wendall to recall the meeting he had with Sussman an= Glenn. Glenn was unequivocal., adamant ,and loud in front of them b=th - that had he known about ziwrn taking money for the airplane ( form=the Highbridge acct no less , in dec of 04).. he would have immediatley t=ld me to take all my money out . He said he would have taken all his money=out .. We only receintly received the doc re garding the schulte =eeting„ ( shulte was called in in investigate the problem ), where tho=gh my oral redemption request was in oct, and the written reduced demand o= NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that infor=ed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows this!)/ =1 am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However, the legal is =bundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only=what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condr=n that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as=a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desir= , never to file suit. that should not be a factor in a fair resolution of=both issues. Im not sure if Condren can say Jeffreys claim is worth x- =illion if he were to file a claim , and only x minus, now that we know h= is unlikely to file * ****** ********** ********* * ******* *** ********* x•****** ***** T=e information contained in this communication is confidential, may be a=torney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is int=nded only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of EFTA_R1_01686944 EFTA02538927  Jeffrey Epstein Unau=horized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part th=reof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received t=is communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or=by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies t=ereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email. ********* ***** ***** *****•**•** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be =ttorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is in=ended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any par= thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have receiv=d this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachm=nts. copyright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01686945 EFTA02538928