EFTA01371377
EFTA01371378 DataSet-10
EFTA01371379

EFTA01371378.pdf

DataSet-10 1 page 476 words document
P17 V11 V15 P21 V16
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (476 words)
Page 38 208 So. 3d 227, *; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17683, **; 41 Fla. L. Weekly D 2658 Real Property Law > Financing > Mortgages & Other Security Instruments > Foreclosures Civil Procedure > Justiciability > Standing [HN4] Florida courts have repeatedly held that borrowers cannot defeat a foreclosure plaintiffs standing by relying upon trust documents to which the borrower is not a party. COUNSEL: Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., and Michael K. Winston, Dean A. Morande, and Alana Zorrilla-Gaston (West Palm Beach), for appellant. W.J. Barnes, P.A., and Jeff Barnes (Boca Raton), for appellees. JUDGES: Before SUAREZ, C.J., and SHEPHERD and SCALES, JJ. OPINION BY: SCALES OPINION r228J SCALES, J. Appellant, plaintiff below, Citibank, N.A., as trustee for the BSARM 2007-2 trust (the "Trust"), appeals a final judgment involuntarily dismissing the Trust's foreclosure complaint post-trial. The trial court entered final judgment against the Trust based exclusively on Appellees' expert witness who testified at trial that the Trust was not, and never had been, the holder of the subject note. We reverse because the trial court impermissibly relied upon the expert's legal conclusions rather than competent, substantial evidence. I. Facts In September of 2006, the now defunct Orion Bank loaned Appellee Martin Olsak $540,000. Orion Bank's loan was memorialized with a promissory note (the "Olsak Note"), and secured with a mortgage (the "Olsak Mortgage") encumbering Olsak's real property in Key West, Florida. After Olsak defaulted [".2] on the note and mortgage by failing to make a required installment payment, the Trust -- which had allegedly acquired the Olsak Note and Mortgage — filed a foreclosure action in Monroe County Circuit Court in June of 2009. Prior to trial, the Trust filed with the Court the original Olsak Note payable to Orion Bank. The Olsak Note was endorsed by the loan's servicer, Wells Fargo, as Orion Bank's attorney-in-fact, and then endorsed in blank by Wells Fargo. The Trust introduced into evidence a September 2006 mortgage assignment showing that the Olsak Mortgage and Olsak Note were assigned by Orion Bank to Wells Fargo on the same day the loan was originated. In addition, the Trust introduced into evidence a Wells Fargo "screen shot" purportedly showing that the loan was placed into the Trust on June 28, 2007. Olsak called one witness, Richard Kahn, a mortgage foreclosure fraud investigator and securitization auditor. Over the Trust's objections, Kahn, a non-lawyer whom the trial court treated as an expert witness, gave opinion testimony that the Trust documents did not allow for the Trust to acquire a note, like the Olsak Note, that had been endorsed in blank. p2291 Kahn also testified that the [""3] Olsak Note endorsements violated IRS provisions related to real estate mortgage investment conduits ("REMICs") such as the Trust. While For internal use only CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0064717 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00210901 EFTA01371378
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
b673297b86beabd80b2246c5655944c0f24175252417d1811e188941e1ff8081
Bates Number
EFTA01371378
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!