📄 Extracted Text (554 words)
•
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
PEETEENTH-Rdbleirten't Las
IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY
FLORIDA, CRIMINAL DIVISION
STATE OF FLORIDA,
vs. Case Nos.2006-CF9454 AMC
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 2008-938 ICF AXX
Defendant.
NONPARTY E.W.'S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER
SEAT JNG RECORDS AND
UNSEAL RECORDS
E.W., a nonparty, moves pursuant to the Rides of Judicia
l Administration Rule
2.420(d)($) to vacate the order sealing records and unseal two
documents in these ftles• on
the following grounds:
1. EW is a victim of sexual abuse by defendant who was
convicted of procuring a
person under 18 fbr prostitution and felony solicitation
1a of prostitution. See attached
judgments of conviction (Exhibit "A".) B.W. presently
has a pending civil action in this
U court against defendant for damages. Case number 502008
CA028051OOOOCMB AB.
2. On June 30, 2008 and August 25, 2008, this Court
sealed two documents, a
11
non-prosecution agreement and an addendum to non
-prosecution agreement. See
attached copies of envelopes containing the sealed docum
11 ents and also an Agreed Order
Sealing Document In Court File entered July Z 2008
(Exhibit "a")
U 3. The sealing of these doctnnents was done withou
t written motion required by
U Rule 2.420(d)(1) or notice to the public, the media, the
of defendant required by Rule 2.420(d)(2). The Agreed
record newspaper and the victims
U Order does not set forth the
U 09112/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFPIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00332121
EFTA 00204847
EFTA02729831
f,
grounds set forth in Rule 2.420(d)(3). The clerk of court did not
post a copy of the notice
of the order as required by Rule 2.420(dX4).
4. The sealing of these documents was also done contrar
y to the Administrative
Orders of this Court, AO 2.104, 2.032, 2.303 and 11.046.
5. The request to seal the first document was made orally
at the plea hearing on
June 30, 2008. A copy of the relevant portion of the transcript
is attached (see pages 38-
40) (Exhibit "C".)
6. It is against public policy for these documents to have
been sealed and hidden
from public; scrutiny. As a member of the public, B.W. has
a right to have these
documents unsealed. Furthermore, these documents are relevan
t and material to E.W.'s
civil action against defendant. As stated in the plea colloquy,
they were an inducement
for defendant to enter into his guilty pleas. They are
proper objects of discovery.
However, unless they are unsealed, H.W. is unable to obtain
them or utilize them in her
case.
7. Pursuant to Rule 2.4200)(5), the Court must hold a hearing
on this motion in
open court.
WHEREF0R13 movant requests the Court vacate the order
sealing records and
unseal the two documents.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Y CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoi
ng has been served
via T.J.S., Mjit and Facsmile this otiday of May, 2009 to: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.,
Aiterbury Goldberger et al., 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite
1400, West Palm Beach, FL
33401.
2
09/12/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFPIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00332122
EFTA 00204848
EFTA02729832
ROTHSTBINitOSBNFEtui. Au-Liar
Attorneys for Plaintiff
401 Bast Las Olaa Blvd., Suite 1650
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394
Telephone (954)522-3456
Telecopier (954) 527-8663
By
Bradley J. Edwards
Florida Bar No. 542075
bedwardserra-law.com
Berger
Florida Bar No. 197701
wberterfarra-law.com
3
09/12/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFPIDEN
IDE TIAL
SDNY_GM_00332123
EFTA_00204849
EFTA02729833
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
b8243cfc69cd6a890b91009654dbe7c82d50f126e4f4594822b50f720b991158
Bates Number
EFTA02729831
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0