EFTA01001361
EFTA01001366 DataSet-9
EFTA01001371

EFTA01001366.pdf

DataSet-9 5 pages 689 words document
P17 V16 P19 P23 D5
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (689 words)
From: Martin Weinberg To: "jeffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.com>, Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 18:26:47 +0000 Attachments: 3771 - Jane_Doe 1_8L2's_First_Requestior_Production_to_the_GOV_Regardinginformation. pdf See par 16-19 in the attached. Complaint in Dec 2010. I recall OPR rejected the Cassell Complaint and in some pleading there was a reference to OPRs reluctance to review given overlap of issues pending in ongoing litigation. In March of 2011, there was the Acosta letter. In Aug of 2011 there was a hearing where the petitioners say the recusal or OPR issue was mentioned. I will send you more materials as I access them. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you EFTA01001366 are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. On Saturday, November 15, 2014 10:46 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: slomans self report was in o8 On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Martin Weinberg c> wrote: My memory is that OPR declined to investigate based on the Cassell Dec 2010 complaint finding that the complaint was the subject of ongoing litigation and that the recusal came later and was based not on Cassell's complaint but on other matters (maybe referred to OPR by Sloman, see last nights pleading and dkt 260, attached, where they refer to a separate time period in Aug 2011. We can track it down - thru their privilege logs (dates), perhaps the unsealed pleadings from last year where we first learned of the officewide recusal. I am quite certain the recusal did not emanate from the Cassell OPR complaint from Dec 2010. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 EFTA01001367 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. On Saturday, November 15, 2014 10:32 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: it says that the opr declined to investigate. ?? why then the office recusal On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Martin Weinberg c > wrote: The 12-19-07 letter at pg 2 references the USAO view of CVRA (referred to in last nights pleading at pg 10). See also the 12-6-07 Sloman letter also relied on to set forth the USAO position on CVRA. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 EFTA01001368 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of EFTA01001369 JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01001370
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
b86fa8d1bfdb4b66b4b4de6e9c47e0738e4b7bc5c9925aeff4161348a876d51d
Bates Number
EFTA01001366
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
5

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!