📄 Extracted Text (689 words)
From: Martin Weinberg
To: "jeffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.com>, Martin Weinberg
Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 18:26:47 +0000
Attachments: 3771 -
Jane_Doe 1_8L2's_First_Requestior_Production_to_the_GOV_Regardinginformation.
pdf
See par 16-19 in the attached. Complaint in Dec 2010. I recall OPR rejected the Cassell Complaint
and in some pleading there was a reference to OPRs reluctance to review given overlap of issues
pending in ongoing litigation. In March of 2011, there was the Acosta letter. In Aug of 2011 there was
a hearing where the petitioners say the recusal or OPR issue was mentioned. I will send you more
materials as I access them.
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
This Electronic Message contains
information from the Law Office of
Martin G. Weinberg, P.C.,
and may be privileged. The
information is intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you
EFTA01001366
are not the addressee, please note
that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the
contents of this message is
prohibited.
On Saturday, November 15, 2014 10:46 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
slomans self report was in o8
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Martin Weinberg c> wrote:
My memory is that OPR declined to investigate based on the Cassell Dec 2010 complaint finding
that the complaint was the subject of ongoing litigation and that the recusal came later and was
based not on Cassell's complaint but on other matters (maybe referred to OPR by Sloman, see last
nights pleading and dkt 260, attached, where they refer to a separate time period in Aug 2011. We
can track it down - thru their privilege logs (dates), perhaps the unsealed pleadings from last year
where we first learned of the officewide recusal. I am quite certain the recusal did not emanate from
the Cassell OPR complaint from Dec 2010.
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
EFTA01001367
This Electronic Message contains
information from the Law Office of
Martin G. Weinberg, P.C.,
and may be privileged. The
information is intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you
are not the addressee, please note
that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the
contents of this message is
prohibited.
On Saturday, November 15, 2014 10:32 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
it says that the opr declined to investigate. ?? why then the office recusal
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Martin Weinberg c > wrote:
The 12-19-07 letter at pg 2 references the USAO view of CVRA (referred to in last nights pleading
at pg 10). See also the 12-6-07 Sloman letter also relied on to set forth the USAO position on
CVRA.
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
EFTA01001368
This Electronic Message contains
information from the Law Office of
Martin G. Weinberg, P.C.,
and may be privileged. The
information is intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you
are not the addressee, please note
that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the
contents of this message is
prohibited.
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
EFTA01001369
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA01001370
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
b86fa8d1bfdb4b66b4b4de6e9c47e0738e4b7bc5c9925aeff4161348a876d51d
Bates Number
EFTA01001366
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
5
Comments 0