◀ gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1257.22
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1257.23 giuffre-maxwell
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1257.5 ▶
👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,653 words)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------X
......
.........................................
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE,
Plaintiff,
v.
15-cv-07433-RWS
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
--------------------------------------------------X
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY
OR, ALTERNATIVELY, TO STRIKE
PLAINTIFF’S MISREPRESENTATIONS OF FACT TO THE COURT
Laura A. Menninger
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
HADDON, MORGAN, AND FOREMAN, P.C.
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, CO 80203
303.831.7364
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (“Ms. Maxwell”) files this Motion for Leave to File a Sur-
Reply or, Alternatively, to Strike Plaintiff’s Misrepresentations of Fact from her Reply In
Support of Motion For Protective Order And To Direct The Defendant To Disclose All
Individuals To Whom Defendant Has Disseminated (sic) Confidential Information (Doc. #388),
and states as follows:
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff’s Reply makes material misrepresentations of fact. Those misstatements cannot
stand in a filed, albeit redacted, pleading. Ms. Maxwell has never
That is a misstatement of fact
compounded by Plaintiff’s intentional omission of the previous page of deposition testimony
which exposes the falsehood. Similarly, Detective Joe Recarey never “testified that Defendant
procured underage girls for Epstein.” (Reply at 4) To the contrary, he testified that all of the
underage girls he interviewed never mentioned Ms. Maxwell at all.
These are but a few of the misrepresentations of fact contained in Plaintiff’s Reply.
Accordingly, Ms. Maxwell seeks leave of the Court to file a Sur-Reply or, alternatively, moves
the Court to strike from Plaintiff’s Reply the misstatements of fact.
PLAINTIFF’S MISSTATEMENTS OF FACT
1.
1
2. “Ms. Giuffre was the child victim of sexual abuse, which is undisputed.” (Reply
at 9) If there is one thing this litigation makes clear, it is heavily disputed that Ms. Giuffre was
the child victim of sexual abuse. Ms. Maxwell has absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Ms.
Giuffre was the child victim of any sexual abuse. As she testified at her deposition:
2
Q. Do you know what happened during the massage appointments with Jeffrey
Epstein and Virginia Roberts?
A. No.
Q. Were you ever present to view a massage between Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia
Roberts?
A. I don't recollect ever seeing Virginia and Jeffrey in a massage situation.
Q. Do you ever recollect seeing them in a sexual situation?
A. I never saw them in a sexual situation.
Q. Did you ever participate in sex with Virginia Roberts and Jeffrey Epstein?
A. I never ever at any single time at any point ever at all participated in anything
with Virginia and Jeffrey. And for the record, she is an absolute total liar and you
all know she lied on multiple things and that is just one other disgusting thing she
added.
(4/22/16 Tr. at 75-76). The Palm Beach State’s Attorney’s Office, the Palm Beach Police
Department and the Royal Palm Beach Police Departments all likewise have never concluded
that Plaintiff was a “child victim of sexual abuse.” Rather their reports reflect Plaintiff’s false
allegations of being a “child victim of sexual abuse” in situations such as getting in trouble for
running away from home, getting in trouble for not attending school, getting in trouble for using
alcohol and marijuana. There is absolutely nothing “undisputed” about Plaintiff’s claim of
victimhood.
Furthermore, Plaintiff left unredacted her assertion that it is “undisputed” that Ms.
Roberts was the child victim of sexual abuse, leaving the mis-impression with the public that Ms.
Maxwell has in some way conceded that to be true. She has not.
3. “Detective Joseph Recarey … testified that Defendant procured underage girls
for Epstein” (Reply at 3, n.4). In fact, Detective Recarey testified that none of the underage girls
interviewed in connection with his investigation into Epstein claimed to have been hired by
Maxwell; in fact, none of them mentioned Ms. Maxwell at all. The two women he interviewed
who were hired by Ms. Maxwell both said they gave professional, adult massages to Epstein.
3
Q. So out of your entire report, the only two people who ever said anything about
Ms. Maxwell were , who I believe was 23 when you interviewed her?
A. Right, but she was -- She was -- she had worked there for quite some time, so
you would have to back up, I think, a year or two.
Q. She was an adult when she worked there?
A. Right. She was over the age of 18, right, let's put it that way.
Q. And she was not listed by you as a victim as part of this case, right?
A. Correct, because it was between two consenting adults.
Q. Exactly. And so that's , and then the other individual, I think you
said ; is that right?
A. . She's a –
Q. Adult masseuse, correct?
A. Yes. I remember she had lots of tattoos.
Q. Tatts, right. But the 17 individuals that you listed in Exhibit 1, none of those
individuals ever said the word -- the words "Ghislaine Maxwell" during the
course of this investigation to you, correct?
A. I don't believe so. It would be on the tapes if they did.
(Tr. 194-195).
4.
5. “Mr. Rizzo’s testimony about how Defendant took the passport of a 15-year-old
Swedish girl and threatened her when she refused to have sex with Epstein” (Reply at 4).
Plaintiff’s continued reliance on the testimony of Mr. Rizzo is tantamount to suborning perjury.
4
Mr. Rizzo’s testimony is vehemently denied by all individuals involved, including his former
employers, a respected medical professional and her husband a well-respected businessman. His
account does not accord with any reports made to law enforcement (Mr. Rizzo himself did not
make any reports to law enforcement regarding the events that he says occurred 12 years ago).
Further, Mr. Rizzo said the events were so “shocking” that he quit his job, but he later admitted
he returned to the same job a short time later. Mr. Rizzo has been in litigation against his
employers and admitted he contacted Mr. Edwards to represent him hoping he could make more
money from this case.
6. “Mr. Alessi’s testimony about how Defendant brought girls over for Epstein”
(Reply at 4). In truth, Mr. Alessi testified that the massage therapists for Mr. Epstein were over
the age of 18 and that he only assisted Ms. Maxwell in hiring adult massage therapists from high
end spas such as Breakers Hotel, Mar-a-Lago, or Boca Raton Resort and Hotel. The only
underage person he saw at the house was and she was never naked or participating
in massages. (Tr. at 165, 182, 188).
7.
5
8. “Defendant and/or Her Joint Defense Partners Previously Fed [Plaintiff’s False
Claims of Sexual Assault] to the Media” (Reply at 9). Ms. Maxwell, and her “joint defense
partners,” have never “fed” to the media anything about Plaintiff’s various false claims of sexual
abuse. To the contrary, all of the email exchanges between Ms. Maxwell, , Mr. Epstein
and others indicate Ms. Maxwell’s extreme reluctance to be involved with the media. The email
quoted by Plaintiff in her Reply at page 5 simply shows that picked up on the media’s
6
independent reports of Plaintiff’s false allegations of sexual assault and sent that information to
Ms. Maxwell. There is nothing in email then or afterwards which suggests he or Ms.
Maxwell or anyone else they know “leaked” the story. Indeed, there is nothing to suggest that
Ms. Maxwell had access to Plaintiff’s police reports in February 2015. The police reports were
obtained, by Plaintiff’s admission, in April 2016. This is pure unsupported speculation and
slander on the part of Plaintiff’s counsel, ironically, the very people who misrepresented to the
press the contents of the police reports and hid from production all of the other instances of
Plaintiff’s contact with law enforcement.
ARGUMENT
None of these factual assertions bear on the issue before the Court -- whether Plaintiff’s
publicly available criminal files should be deemed “confidential” under the Protective Order.
None of the witnesses has anything to do with Plaintiff’s false claims of sexual assault as a child,
nor her domestic violence. Indeed, in what is an almost daily occurrence in this case, Plaintiff
has selectively misquoted portions of deposition transcript testimony in an effort to mislead the
Court into believing there is evidence of Ms. Maxwell’s guilt, a topic in the exclusive province
of the jury, so as to improperly influence the Court’s discovery rulings.
Ms. Maxwell cannot stand idly by while Plaintiff misrepresents to the Court and says, for
example, that she
It is a violation of candor to the Court to claim otherwise. Likewise,
Detective Recarey never concluded in his investigation that Ms. Maxwell “procured underage
girls for Epstein.” In fact, quite the opposite, Detective Recarey found no evidence that Ms.
Maxwell ever even met any of the underage girls he interviewed.
7
Ms. Maxwell seeks leave of the Court to file a Sur-Reply to refute these baseless, false
misrepresentations to the Court that Plaintiff included within her Reply, if Plaintiff does not
honor her obligations under Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3 to withdraw them of her own
accord.
Dated: August 25, 2016.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Laura A. Menninger
Laura A. Menninger (LM-1374)
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca (pro hac vice)
HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C.
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: 303.831.7364
Fax: 303.832.2628
[email protected]
Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell
8
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on August 25, 2016, I electronically served this Defendant’s Motion For Leave To
File A Sur-Reply Or, Alternatively, To Strike Plaintiff’s Misrepresentations Of Fact To The
Court via ECF on the following:
Sigrid S. McCawley Paul G. Cassell
Meredith Schultz 383 S. University Street
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP Salt Lake City, UT 84112
401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 [email protected]
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
[email protected]
[email protected]
J. Stanley Pottinger
Bradley J. Edwards 49 Twin Lakes Rd.
FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, South Salem, NY 10590
FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. [email protected]
425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
[email protected]
/s/ Nicole Simmons
Nicole Simmons
9
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
b991ffbf027e385d6c455889568f66a22ece401d4587ea6bfe2d7a5dddeb9adf
Bates Number
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1257.23
Dataset
giuffre-maxwell
Type
document
Pages
10
💬 Comments 0