📄 Extracted Text (1,303 words)
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
To: Stephen Hanson
Subject: Re: Privileged and Confidential
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:42:53 +0000
The best thing woudl be to have barry on the phone and work out final issues . any chance. we should ask at the
end of email ? triiger event, terriroty, you should decide what you are going to tell people reason for your
resignation.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:25 AM, < wrote:
Actually have that on my notes. Glad I got at least one before u mentioned it- like to add. And the 15 days
extra they added sb- june 15
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
From: jetioti@grrtn
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 03:49:48 -0400
To: >
Subject: Re: Privileged and Confidential
Should we add restrictions go away with a trigger event ..sale
Sony for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 11, 2013, at 10:27 PM, wrote:
So darrens notes are good. Now what- in am I send what ??
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:49:38 -0400
To: Stephen Hanson<
Subject: Fwd: Privileged and Confidential
Forwarded message
From: Darren Indyke
Date: Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:46 PM
Subject: Privileged and Confidential
To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
In addition to my comments from earlier today which continue to apply to the new draft, my additional
thoughts (marked on the attached pdf of the Separation Agreement and the word version of the Assignment):
Separation Agreement:
I. The Separation Agreement continues to contemplate a consulting term in Section 3, including a de facto
consulting term through June 30, 2014 in Section 4(d), Under Section 3(b) and 4(d), Consulting services are
EFTA00979049
now subject to reasonable discretion rather than sole discretion
2. Note the new carve-out in Section 5(b)(i) providing that "the restrictions set forth in clauses (A) - (D) of this
paragraph shall not apply to two (2) restaurants, in the aggregate with respect to all or any of such restrictions. that are not
located in New York City. New York and/or Atlantic City. New Jersey. ' Why iS the carve-out only for "restaurants"
and not "restaurants and restaurant businesses", when the restrictions relate to "restaurants and
restaurant businesses". Does this mean that Steven cannot be involved in 2 "restaurant business"
outside of NYC and AC during that 6 month period. I know that the concept of restaurant business
is not defined, but it would seem to me that it is broader than just a restaurant. Now that the
territory is the US, is limiting the carve-out from Steve's non-complete to 2 non-NYC or non-AC
restaurants enought? Note that the restriction period now ends on June 30, 2014 and not June 15,
2014.
3. In addition to my comments from earlier today, the exceptions to the non-disclosure obligations
in Section 5(c) should also include exceptions for disclosure in litigation that Steve or his entities
prosecute or defend.
4. Section 11 - Steve's Guaranties. Note that now the obligation to remove Steve's guaranty is
limited to commercially reasonable efforts, but there is an indemnity by the Company and
Starwood. Assuming that the Company and Starwood are good for this obligation which could be
in excess of $500K in the aggregate, should the additional damages provisions in Section 12 (the
obligation to pay the prevailing party $500k) be expanded to include an award to the prevailing
party in arbitration to enforce the indemnity obligation in Section 11?
5. Section 12 - note that the obligations to pay $250K and $500k to prevailing party in litigation
remains in the revised draft. Consider expanding coverage to include payment to the prevailing
party in arbitration to enforce the indemnity under Section 11.
6. In addition to comments regarding Schedule IX., note that the preamble on Schedule IX
provides that Confidential Information does not include: "what is known by Executive without reference to any
documents comprising any of such Covered Items so long as such knowledge is used solely for Executive's
own or his controlled affiliates' business use" Seems to me that this phrase in bold could be read to mean that Steve can't use
what he knows if it is in these Covered Items at Restaurants that employ him or in business that he becomes a partner in.
Regarding the Assignment:
My few comments are marked on the attached Assignment, but generally:
1. Why is this just formulated as an assignment and not an assignment and an assumption.
2. Why does the assignment not include in addition to the Interests, all rights and obligations in respect of the interest, including
all rights and obligations under the LLC agreement.
3. Why is there not a mutual agreement by Starwood to purchase, and an acceptance and assumption of the interest, and all
rights and obligations with respect thereto, including all rights and obligations under the LW Agreement. Without reading the LLC
Agreement I can't confirm (and I doubt) that it is sufficient that there is an agreement in the assignment that references to Steve's
entities in the LLC Agreement will be replaced with Starwood.
4. There is typically in assignment and assumption agreements relating to Membership Interests, an indemnity by the Assignee in
favor of the assignor for obligations and claims that arise under the LLC Agreement after the date of assignment. That is missing
here.
DARREN K. INDYKE
DARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, New York 10022
EFTA00979050
Telephon
Telecopie
Mobile: (8
Is
email:
**********************************************************************************************
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client
privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Darren K. Indyke, PLLC. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication
or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this
communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.
Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - © 2011 Darren K.
Indyke, PLLC — All rights reserved.
******************************************* ***** **** ***** ******************************* *******
On Dec 11, 2013, at 4:47 PM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote:
territory, work for nikash, . ? after resrictvie period? . cure, ? notice of breach, ?
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
EFTA00979051
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00979052
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
ba9f90d6745edcec96bcd0b43b921fc4c884f623f63619db9f8638b474bd255c
Bates Number
EFTA00979049
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
4
Comments 0