Correct The Record Friday November 14, 2014 Morning Roundup

podesta-emails 8,026 words email

P17 D6 P22 V11 P19

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Friday November 14, 2014 Morning Roundup:* *Headlines:* *CNN: “Hillary Clinton's favorite home state(s)” <http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/14/politics/hillary-clinton-from/>* “‘Hillary Clinton's roots in Arkansas run deep, and many Arkansans still consider her their hometown girl,’ said Adrienne Elrod, a former Clinton aide from Arkansas. ‘As a native Arkansan, I could not be more proud to call her one of us.’” *Politico: “Elizabeth Warren gets rock-star reception at liberal donors confab” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/elizabeth-warren-liberal-donors-112888.html>* “Priorities USA, a super PAC that’s part of a robust Clinton shadow campaign that dwarfs anything supporters of Warren or other prospective candidates have built, threw a cocktail party late Wednesday night in a roped-off area of the Mandarin bar, which offers sweeping views of the Tidal Basin. The hosts were a virtual all-star team of Democratic figures who are backing a prospective Clinton campaign and are helping lead Priorities USA…” *Salon: “R.I.P., Elizabeth Warren ’16 fantasy: Why she’s really (probably) not running for president now” <http://www.salon.com/2014/11/14/r_i_p_elizabeth_warren_16_fantasy_why_shes_really_probably_not_running_for_president_now/>* “So one of the party’s top fundraisers is being given a more visible perch. […] The biggest signal that this sends is that Warren, who has said she’s not running for president about 50 million times but you never know, is … still not running for president.” *Bloomberg: “Should Democrats Obstruct or Compromise?” <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-14/should-democrats-obstruct-or-compromise>* “Assuming she runs for president, [Democratic pollster Peter] Hart said, ‘I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary Clinton in 2016 talks more about her Senate record and her ability to work within the congressional dynamic than she does about her Secretary of State's record.’” *Bloomberg: “Does Bill de Blasio's Populist Critique Apply to Hillary Clinton?” <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-14/does-bill-de-blasios-populist-critique-apply-to-hillary-clinton>* Bill de Blasio: “Oh, absolutely. … Clearly, throughout the 2016 election cycle there will be a call for what we often call populism. But what I really think is [there will be] sort of a sharp truth-telling about the reality of the economy and the need for more profound answers, and I think [Clinton will] be able to speak to that.” *CNN opinion: CNN contributor Ruben Navarrette: “Presidential candidates: Don't apply if you're over 60” <http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/13/opinion/navarrette-age-limit-for-presidency/>* “In 2016, the message to both parties should be: ‘Go young — or go home.’” *Washington Times: “Joe Biden: Middle class was devastated during Clinton years” <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/13/joe-biden-middle-class-devastated-clinton-years/>* “Vice President Joseph R. Biden took a swipe Thursday at the Clinton administration — and at possible presidential rival Hillary Rodham Clinton — by saying the middle class declined ‘all through the ‘90s.’” *Talk Business Arkansas: “Banker, Attorney, Political Confidante Bill Bowen Dies At 91” <http://talkbusiness.net/2014/11/banker-attorney-political-confidante-bill-bowen-dies-at-91/>* “President Bill Clinton also provided a statement on the passing of Bowen. ‘I was saddened to hear of the death of my good friend Bill Bowen, whose fascinating life was a serial Arkansas success story,’ said Clinton.” *Articles:* *CNN: “Hillary Clinton's favorite home state(s)” <http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/14/politics/hillary-clinton-from/>* By Dan Merica November 14, 2014, 6:04 a.m. EST Washington (CNN) -- Hillary Clinton is a New Yorker. And an Arkansan. And an Illinoisan. And at times also even a Pennsylvanian. While the question -- Where is Hillary Clinton from? -- may seem simple, the answer was made harder as Clinton traveled the country over the last six months stumping for Democratic candidates during the midterms and peddling her memoir. People from at least four states like to lay claim to Clinton, and the former secretary of state never shied away from those signs of citizenship. Born in Park Ridge, Illinois in 1947, Clinton rose to prominence during her 20-year stay in Arkansas from 1974 to 1992. After living in Washington, D.C., for eight years as first lady, Clinton moved to Chappaqua, New York and represented the Empire State for eight years in the Senate. Geographical identity politics are a core part of the American campaign trail from local offices all the way up Pennsylvania Avenue -- just ask Dick Lugar or Scott Brown -- and having home roots that are considered authentic by voters is a key part of messaging for any presidential hopeful, and that includes Clinton. At times, she plays up her Arkansas roots and slight southern accent. In other forums, she is the former senator from New York and resident of Chappaqua. And when she is anywhere in the Midwest, Clinton is the Chicago Cubs-loving child from Park Ridge, Illinois. The Clintons currently maintain their primary residence in New York and another home in the Washington, D.C. Clinton's returning to one of these "home" states this weekend -- Arkansas -- for a 10th anniversary celebration of the Clinton Presidential Center in Little Rock. Here is how Clinton is linked to four states -- Illinois, Arkansas, New York and Pennsylvania -- and why it matters. Illinois: In Chicago, Clinton is heralded as a native daughter. Giving her an introduction at an October event in Chicago, Lester Knight said he was "welcoming her home." Mayor Rahm Emanuel said in June that Clinton "still and will forever be a Chicagoan at heart." Clinton spent her first eighteen years of life in Park Ridge, Illinois, a middle class neighborhood a few miles from downtown. Clinton, however, left the state in 1965 to attend Wellesley College in Massachusetts and since then has not lived in Illinois for any considerable time. Clinton maintains a small group of Park Ridge friends to this day. When she visited the city in June, she had a small dinner with many of them and reminisced about their years in at school and in their Methodist church group. "It is always great to be back in Chicago," Clinton said in October. "This is where I was born, where I grew up. Where I made so many life long friends and it is wonderful to be part of an extended community such as Chicago represents." Arkansas: More than any other state, the Clinton family is most closely associated with Arkansas. Hillary Clinton moved to Fayetteville, Arkansas in 1974 to marry Bill Clinton, a native son of the state and rising political star. For the next 18 years, the Clintons came to dominate the state's political scene. Bill Clinton served one term as Attorney General before serving five terms as governor. Hillary Clinton was a high profile first lady in the state, but Arkansas was never really home for her. Even her closest friends acknowledge that Hillary was never in love with Arkansas and was at times put off by how women were viewed. Hillary Clinton does, however, occasionally returns to the state, as she did when she spoke at two Little Rock events in July. And longtime Democrats in the state still lay claim to the former first lady. "Hillary Clinton's roots in Arkansas run deep, and many Arkansans still consider her their hometown girl," said Adrienne Elrod, a former Clinton aide from Arkansas. "As a native Arkansan, I could not be more proud to call her one of us." New York: When Hillary Clinton decided to run for Senate in 2000, she had no connection to New York. And Republicans knew it was a weakness. "Name me three things Hillary Clinton has ever done for the people of New York," Sean Hannity, then a New York radio host, proclaimed regularly during his show at the time. Aware of the challenges, Clinton traveled the state on a "listening tour" and talked with voters in schools, labor halls and community buildings. She also established residency in the Empire State by moving to Chappaqua, the small hamlet that the Clintons still consider home today. "I think I have some real work to do, to get out and listen and learn from the people of New York and demonstrate that what I'm for is maybe as important, if not more important, than where I'm from," Clinton told the New York Times in 1999. Clinton even played up her sporting allegiances to become closer to New York. "I am Cubs fan," she told an audience in Chicago before noting that because she "couldn't stay hitched with a losing team" she "became a Yankees fan." Clinton's supporters argue she was a Yankees fan as a child and photos from 1992 published in her 2003 memoir "Living History" show the first lady in a New York hat. "I'm wearing the hat of my lifelong favorite American League team," says the description under the photo. Today, Clinton identifies most with New York. She lives there, votes there and her office is in Manhattan. Pennsylvania: Of the states that have laid claim to Clinton, Pennsylvania is the most random. Clinton's father -- Hugh Rodham -- was born in Scranton, a city in the Northeast corner of the state. The Rodham family has deep ties to the region and even after moving to Chicago, Hillary and her family would spend summers at a rustic cabin on Lake Winola on the city's outskirts. (If Scranton sounds familiar, that's because it's also from where another potential 2016 Democratic hopeful Vice President Joe Biden.) "The rustic cabin had no heat except for the cast-iron cook stove in the kitchen, and no indoor bath or shower," Clinton wrote in her memoir "Living History." "To stay clean, we swam in the lake or stood below the back porch while someone poured a tub of water onto our heads." So when Clinton campaigned for Pennsylvania Democrats in 2014, many used those roots to tie her with the state. Tom Wolf, the governor-elect of the state, said, "coursing through [Hillary Clinton's] veins is blood that's tinged with Pennsylvania values and Pennsylvania ideas." At the event, Clinton also played up those roots and talked about her father's side of the family, their interest in politics and her time on the lake. "I spent every summer of my growing up years traveling on the turnpike going up to Scranton and often times during Christmas coming back," Clinton said. "The state has been very good to my family and to my husband and to me." Clinton's ties to the state also came in handy when Clinton ran for president in 2008. Because Clinton was able to better identify with the hard scrabble, predominately white Democrats of central and North East Pennsylvania, she won the state's primary. "She's tough," Christopher Doherty, Scranton's mayor at the time told the New York Times. "That's a real Scranton trait." *Politico: “Elizabeth Warren gets rock-star reception at liberal donors confab” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/elizabeth-warren-liberal-donors-112888.html>* By Kenneth P. Vogel November 13, 2014, 9:56 p.m. EST Elizabeth Warren insists she has no interest in running for president in 2016, but the rich liberals to whom she spoke Thursday afternoon seemed unwilling to take ‘no’ for an answer. The Massachusetts senator got a rock stars’ welcome during a closed-door speech to major donors, one of whom interrupted her by yelling “Run, Liz, Run!” Warren drew multiple standing ovations during her talk, held in a banquet room at Washington’s Mandarin Oriental hotel during the annual winter meeting of the Democracy Alliance, a club of major liberal donors. Throughout the day, donors repeatedly broached the question of whether Warren would run to Paul Egerman, a Democracy Alliance board member who was the national finance chairman of her Senate race and introduced Warren for her speech Thursday. He patiently but firmly told each that she would not seek the Democratic presidential nomination. That didn’t stop a donor from asking Warren herself with the first question during a question-and-answer session following her speech, according to a Democracy Alliance source who was in the room. She also answered definitively in the negative, said the source. Yet the continued interest in a Warren 2016 campaign from the ranks of the Democracy Alliance could, at the least, hint at trouble for Hillary Clinton, the presumed Democratic front-runner, when it comes to winning over liberal donors and activists. The Democracy Alliance has had an outsized influence in Democratic politics. It works to leverage its donors’ massive bank accounts to steer the party to the left on causes dear to liberals — including fighting to reduce economic inequality and the role of money in politics. Warren has emerged as a standard-bearer for those fights, and her address on Thursday dealt with economic inequality. Another attendee asked Warren after the speech why Senate Democrats didn’t aggressively push the liberal economic policies she champions. “The fight is to frame the issues for the next few elections,” she said, according to the source in the room. “We have moved the Democrats over the last four years.” Earlier Thursday, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid tapped Warren for a leadership position that will utilize her appeal by making her an official liaison to the liberal base. Reid is set to talk to donors Friday morning on the sidelines of the Mandarin Oriental conference at a session hosted by a group called iVote, which raises cash to try to elect Democratic secretaries of state. Reid’s office did not respond to a request for comment on his participation in the event. The Democracy Alliance has suggested it is considering opening up some of its activities and funding recommendations to the media, but all of the sessions on Thursday were closed to the press. Democracy Alliance staff and private security retained by the club stood sentry outside the basement banquet room where Warren spoke, preventing reporters from getting too close. And she avoided the media gathered for the conference by utilizing a side door to enter and exit the room. POLITICO caught up with her as she made her way to a car waiting outside. But she ignored a question about whether her appearance — a closed-door speech to major donors who write huge checks, sometimes anonymously, to influence the political process — conflicted with her public denunciations of the role of conservative big money in politics. “Excuse me,” an aide said, blocking access to Warren as she slid into the front passenger seat. Democracy Alliance partners, as the group calls its members, pay annual dues of $30,000 and are required to contribute a total of at least $200,000 a year to recommended groups. Since its inception in 2005, the club’s partners have combined to give more than $500 million to recommended groups, and they played a pivotal early role in boosting Barack Obama during his 2008 Democratic presidential primary bid against Clinton. In addition to Warren, Vice President Joe Biden, who is considering challenging Clinton in the 2016 presidential primary, is set to appear Friday night at a Democracy Alliance gala at the Newseum with donors. Clinton was not invited to any part of the Mandarin meeting, which some of her supporters interpreted as a snub. Democracy Alliance staff and board members rejected that characterization, asserting the meeting was about the future of the progressive movement generally, and not the 2016 presidential race specifically. “I don’t think who speaks here and who does not speak here is illustrative of anything,” said David desJardins, an engineer who was one of the first 20 people hired by Google, and also was an early Obama backer. He said Clinton would be welcome to speak to the group anytime and called a POLITICO article highlighting the fact that she wasn’t invited this time “dumb.” Clinton would be considered the prohibitive frontrunner for the 2016 Democratic nomination if she entered the race, as she is widely expected to do. But Democracy Alliance members have expressed concerns that she would be insufficiently liberal on the issues dear to their hearts. At the Mandarin, Democracy Alliance partners told POLITICO they’d like to see Clinton challenged in 2016 – even if it’s only to push her to become more aggressive on liberal issues – and several suggested that Warren should be the one to do it. Her issues match up well with those of Democracy Alliance partners, said Boston philanthropist Charles Rodgers, who shrugged suggestively when asked if he’d support Warren over Clinton. “I am from Massachusetts,” said Rodgers, who co-owned a Watertown, Massachusetts, consulting firm and was an early Democracy Alliance partner. “We love her,” real estate mogul Lawrence Hess said, when asked about a possible Warren presidential campaign. Erica Sagrans, who runs a super PAC called Ready for Warren seeking to draft Warren into the race, spoke in the hotel lobby with multiple donors, including desJardins. “There’s a lot of support here,” she said. “Post-midterms, there are a lot of depressed Democrats. Warren gives them something to get excited about. I don’t have any doubt that if she were to run, tons of donors and activists would be behind her.” To be sure, there were plenty of folks at the Mandarin who have supported Clinton, including some who argue that she and her more centrist bearing offer the brightest future for the Democratic Party. Center for American Progress president Neera Tanden, who was a top adviser to Clinton’s 2008 campaign and has remained in the inner circle, is set to speak on a Friday morning panel entitled, “The Well-Funded Push by the Religious Right that Threatens the Progressive Movement.” She is highly regarded among DA members, who help fund her think tank, and she mingled in the hotel lobby bar on Thursday, but declined requests for comment. Priorities USA, a super PAC that’s part of a robust Clinton shadow campaign that dwarfs anything supporters of Warren or other prospective candidates have built, threw a cocktail party late Wednesday night in a roped-off area of the Mandarin bar, which offers sweeping views of the Tidal Basin. The hosts were a virtual all-star team of Democratic figures who are backing a prospective Clinton campaign and are helping lead Priorities USA — longtime strategist and Clinton loyalist Paul Begala, former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, Obama 2012 campaign manager Jim Messina and conservative-turned-liberal attack dog David Brock. He oversees a fleet of non-profit groups that intend to be supportive of a Clinton 2016 campaign — the flagship of which, Media Matters, has long been blessed by the Democracy Alliance. Priorities USA intends to raise big checks to air ads blistering Clinton’s presidential rivals – including possibly in the Democratic primary. Some Clinton backers asserted a primary could actually help her by allowing her to hone her message and become battle tested. “I’m for Hillary, so whatever is best to get her to the point where she can win, I’m for it,” said Jack Martin, a Democracy Alliance partner who is the Chief Executive Officer of the international consulting firm Hill+Knowlton Strategies. Still other partners said Democrats would be wise to focus on the issues on which the party should concentrate before picking politicians who may or may not run for president. “We got our butts kicked last week and until we get our stuff together it doesn’t matter,” said Democracy Alliance member Nick Hanauer, who was one of the first investors in Amazon.com and has warned of worsening inequality. “What matters more is for progressives to unite around an affirmative theory of growth that the American people can benefit from rather than just who we stick up.” Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.), a liberal firebrand who is also a Democracy Alliance partner, said the lusty response to Warren is what “normally what happens when she addresses this crowd.” But he added that it comes at a moment when Democrats should be embracing more populist and progressive policies like those Warren espouses, which he said should be the lesson of the party’s midterm thrashing. “When someone like Sen. Pryor loses by 18 points and when someone like me wins by 11 points that should tell people something,” he said. *Salon: “R.I.P., Elizabeth Warren ’16 fantasy: Why she’s really (probably) not running for president now” <http://www.salon.com/2014/11/14/r_i_p_elizabeth_warren_16_fantasy_why_shes_really_probably_not_running_for_president_now/>* By Jim Newell November 14, 2014, 7:00 a.m. EST [Subtitle:] The liberal star will now be an official Senate Democratic message-maker. Here's why Hillary can breathe easier now Congratulations to Elizabeth Warren! She has been knighted as a member of the Senate Democratic leadership, just in time for Democrats to hand over power to the Republican Party. She will serve in a newly created position as a “liaison to liberal groups.” Her official title will be “strategic policy adviser to the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee,” where she will “[help] craft the party’s policy positions and priorities.” (Just in time for the Democratic Senate leadership to bring up a vote on building the Keystone XL pipeline.) What does this mean? First thing is that “Elizabeth Warren raises a lot of money for the Democratic Party and is being rewarded with a title.” As it happens, she addressed the Democracy Alliance of wealthy liberal donors yesterday, and this time, it was as an emissary from the Senate Democratic leadership. So one of the party’s top fundraisers is being given a more visible perch. But how influential will she be? She’ll still rank behind Sens. Harry Reid, Dick Durbin and Chuck Schumer, the sort of people who feel plenty confident in their own abilities to “craft the party’s positions and priorities.” The main positions and priorities that the new Senate minority will have to decide is: do we filibuster this thing or not filibuster this thing? No small task, but the question of determining which bills to bring to the floor no longer rest in this leadership’s hands. The biggest signal that this sends is that Warren, who has said she’s not running for president about 50 million times but you never know, is … still not running for president. In accepting this leadership position, she’s helping craft the party’s top position and priority, all right, ensuring smooth sailing for Hillary Clinton to win the Democratic presidential nomination. You don’t set the groundwork for an outsider campaign against the Democratic establishment by moving further inside the Democratic establishment. Especially right now, when we’re nearing form-an-exploratory-committee season. As Vox writes, “if she intended to challenge the powerful front-runner Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination, she’d really have to start planning about now.” Warren’s decision to improve her standing within the Senate, rather than start building a groundwork for a presidential campaign, may represent an overall shift within the “liberal groups” with whom she intends to liaise. Rather than rally around an alternative to Hillary Clinton, the goal ahead of 2016 may now be to get some assurances from Hillary Clinton on progressive issues. Consider this statement today from the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, a group that’s made its name by affixing itself to the Warren brand: “‘As Elizabeth Warren advocates for big ideas like reforming Wall Street, making college affordable, and expanding Social Security benefits, her voice will now be even louder — because she’ll be at the Democratic leadership table,’ the PCCC said in an email to supporters on Thursday.” So Elizabeth Warren can do her Elizabeth Warren stuff from the Democratic leadership table. This comes a few days after MSNBC reported that the PCCC is trying to open some sort of diplomatic channel with Clinton. There are conversations about conversations and meetings about meetings in the works! “Adam Green, the co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, one of the groups most closely associated with the so-called ‘Warren wing of the Democratic Party,’ said his organization reached out to Clinton’s camp before the election and that a meeting was coming ‘very soon.’ “He declined to name the Clinton advisers with whom he’s been in contact, saying discussions have so far been limited to ‘conversations about having conversations.’ ‘We want to keep as open a line of communication with Hillary Clinton and her team as possible,’ he told msnbc. [...] “Their message is that Clinton should adopt the kind of economic inequality issues championed by Warren, both for substantive and political reasons. ‘This is the path to victory in the primary and general election,’ Green and co-founder Stephanie Taylor wrote in an Op-Ed in The Hill.” These are indications that the organized left is moving toward making a peace treaty with Clinton and the Democratic Party leadership at large, rather than going all-in and trying to defeat her. The terms of the peace treaty are that Warren — who seems like the only person with a potential to put a real scare in Clinton — will stay in the Senate and get a leadership role there, from which she will help the party Craft Its Messaging. Maybe a Bernie Sanders or someone similarly unthreatening will be thrown into the race in order to keep Clinton on-point, message-wise. It’s all being sorted out, in conversations about conversations. *Bloomberg: “Should Democrats Obstruct or Compromise?” <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-14/should-democrats-obstruct-or-compromise>* By Margaret Talev November 14, 2014, 5:46 a.m. EST [Subtitle:] Senate Democrats weigh their options as the incoming minority. To obstruct or not? It's the question churning inside the Democratic Party after its historic Senate losses a week ago. Add to that a secondary one: Just how much legitimate, ideological resistance to Republican proposals will voters tolerate? "The reason for Democrats to filibuster isn't obstruction for its own sake. It's to stick up for millions of everyday people who will be harmed by right-wing politics," said Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee. His sinking fear is that Democrats will play it too safe and lose anyway. "Is the theory about winning in 2016 that passing Republican bills that hurt Americans will do it?" Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat who represents swing-state Virginia, advocates a more nuanced approach. "I came here to do stuff. I didn't come here to novel-y figure out new ways not to do stuff. I'm just going to be looking for partners to find solutions. I'm sure that a Republican majority will have some things they want to do that I don't want to do, but my goal is not to obstruct them. I'll probably vote no if I don't like it. But I hope and I fully expect" that "we'll be able to find a number of areas" for compromise. Those intraparty calculations were evident Thursday when Senate Democrats tapped a hero of the progressive movement and leading critic of Wall Street, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, as the caucus' strategic policy adviser, while making Jon Tester of Montana, a proponent of the Keystone XL pipeline project who has bragged about how he would cross party lines to help Republicans fend off filibusters, chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. That means Tester's prime mission will be to recruit and helped elect enough senators in 2016 to retake the majority. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, who will stay on as minority leader despite divisions within his caucus' ranks, is taking the high road—for now. "I do not intend to run the Democratic Caucus like the Republican Caucus has been run in the minority. I am not going to do that. We want to legislate. We’re not for stalling. We want to move on to the next Congress with a record of accomplishment." Despite those assurances, at least five senators who voted in a secret ballot against his re-election as their caucus leader made their objections public: Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Mark Warner of Virginia, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Mary Landrieu, the Louisiana senator who faces a Dec. 6 runoff. Democrats have many factors to consider as they seek a balance between serving the demands of a liberal base, middle-class voters and a shrinking fan base among the white working class. "Each cycle the voters have been saying, 'Please change,'" Democratic pollster Peter Hart said Thursday at a breakfast panel organized by the Wall Street Journal. "I think if the perception is that this is another cycle where nothing gets done and there's 'gridlock,' I think the voters will once again try and look for somebody that is going to provide a sense of the coalition, a sense of being able to work across the party aisle." Assuming she runs for president, Hart said, "I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary Clinton in 2016 talks more about her Senate record and her ability to work within the congressional dynamic than she does about her Secretary of State's record." While progressive activists praised Democrats' move to elevate Warren, they are fretting over how the leadership will respond when faced with Republican legislation they oppose on taxes, health care, Social Security and the environment. "The reason voters didn't vote was because Democrats didn't stand for a big, bold, populist agenda like the one Elizabeth Warren is pushing Democrats to adopt," Green said. "There is some tension," he added. "The large majority of the Democratic caucus agrees we need to fight but there are certainly some that crazily believe voters want Washington to pass something—anything—even if it means cutting Social Security for Grandma." Republicans, who went through their own Civil War between the Tea Party and business wings of their base coalition in the run-up to the 2014 midterms, are monitoring the debate with bemused curiosity. The move with Warren shows that Reid is "worried about his left flank," said Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican. "We've had people drive our party into a ditch at times. Nobody likes being in the 'right' ditch; I doubt they're going to like being in the 'left' ditch. My belief is that people on the Democratic side are probably going to get the message from the election that working together is good politics." "If Harry Reid continues the pattern of the last two years, then we would have to assume he will use every tool available to obstruct and shut the Senate down," said Senator Ted Cruz of Texas. "If, however, Senate Democrats heard the message of the voters on election day, which is they were tired of a U.S. Senate under Democratic control that does nothing and that ignores the priorities of the American people, then they won't obstruct." *Bloomberg: “Does Bill de Blasio's Populist Critique Apply to Hillary Clinton?” <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-14/does-bill-de-blasios-populist-critique-apply-to-hillary-clinton>* By Arit John November 14, 2014, 5:31 a.m. EST [Subtitle:] The New York mayor says Democrats will lose if they don’t embrace progressive ideas. Bill de Blasio, New York City’s progressive mayor, has some too-little-too-late advice for all the red-state Democrats who lost last week: embrace progressivism. But while the mayor has been lecturing the Alison Lundergan Grimes and Kay Hagans of the party, he might also want to address his good friend Hillary Clinton. Over the last few days de Blasio has—in a Huffington Post op-ed, a press conference and an appearance on MSNBC’s “All In With Chris Hayes”—criticized red-state Democrats for not focusing on income inequality “These clear messages of addressing economic reality, and … being proud, progressive Democrats—folks are gonna vote for the real thing,” he told Hayes. “Democrats who ran from those angles got paid back for it.” That message, he said, will stay true heading into the presidential election. Hayes countered with the most obvious weak point in the mayor’s argument: “So what category is Andrew Cuomo in?” he asked. De Blasio has been attacked by his fellow liberals for embracing Cuomo’s policies and candidates, but Hayes could have easily asked the same thing about Hillary Clinton. The red-state candidates the mayor mentioned in his op-ed—who, according to de Blasio, lost because they didn’t focus on income inequality or go after Wall Street—are all candidates Hillary and Bill Clinton campaigned for over the last few months. De Blasio was the campaign manager for Hillary Clinton’s Senate run in 2000, and has stayed close ever since. But despite that closeness, the two belong to opposing wings of the Democratic party. De Blasio is part of the Elizabeth Warren/anti-Wall Street side, and Clinton is a centrist who’s been knocked for being too hawkish and too closely aligned with the wealthy. The Clintons know that, which is why they buddied up to de Blasio when he was sworn into office earlier this year. As Politico reported in December: “At a time when the Democratic Party is tacking to the populist left, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren is galvanizing the base by taking on Wall Street, Clinton will need to show she’s in sync with the liberal grass roots should she wage another bid for the White House. There aren’t many figures who could do more to shore up her progressive cred than de Blasio, who swept into office on an unabashedly populist message. “‘As church people say, he can ‘witness’ for them,’ said James Carville, the longtime Democratic strategist and former Bill Clinton adviser. ‘He can go up, talk about her, how she stands up for people. It could be very, very helpful.’” De Blasio has been happy to witness for his former boss. This fall Politico magazine called him “The New Icon of the Left,” and, in an accompanying interview, asked him if he thinks Hillary Clinton is a “true progressive.” He replied: “Oh, absolutely. … Clearly, throughout the 2016 election cycle there will be a call for what we often call populism. But what I really think is [there will be] sort of a sharp truth-telling about the reality of the economy and the need for more profound answers, and I think she’ll be able to speak to that.” Regardless of your stance on his assessment of her progressivism, Hillary Clinton will need to protect herself from attacks on the left if she runs in 2016. The New Yorker profiled three possible nominees who might try to do just that: former Senator Jim Webb, Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley and Independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders. Senator Warren, meanwhile, the populist’s dream candidate, was just given a leadership position in the Senate. In a column for The New Republic on Wednesday, Noam Scheiber argued that, in 2016, Democrats need someone who can make “economic populism the party’s centerpiece” to get white working class, minority and college educated liberal voters to turn out, both in 2016 and 2018. Clinton might manage that, he writes, or her “extensive ties to the one percent will strangle the populist project before it ever gets going” and the challengers from the left start looking pretty good. *CNN opinion: CNN contributor Ruben Navarrette: “Presidential candidates: Don't apply if you're over 60” <http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/13/opinion/navarrette-age-limit-for-presidency/>* By Ruben Navarrette November 13, 2014, 4:10 p.m. EST "Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans -- born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage ..." — John F. Kennedy, inaugural address, 1961 At the risk of being accused of ageism, let me suggest that the Republican Party should set its mind in 2016 to nominating a presidential candidate who is young enough to make their likely Democratic opponent look, well, not so young. In November 2016, Hillary Clinton — who won't be the only Democrat running in the primaries, but will surely be the frontrunner — will be 69 years old. Already, we've seen one headline that spells out what a lot of Americans may be thinking: "Is Hillary Clinton Too Old to be President?" We're not supposed to ask that question or mention Hillary's age. That's because she's a woman and a Democrat and we're only allowed to bring up a candidate's age when we're talking about men and Republicans. Besides, Clinton is a baby Boomer, and that demographic of 70 million Americans is determined -- by virtue of sheer size -- to redefine every stage of life. We can expect to read plenty of articles in the months to come, green lit by baby boomer editors, about how 70 is the new 40. Or something like that. All spinning aside, here's the bad news for Democrats: While Americans have come to expect that being president tends to prematurely age whomever occupies the office, when it comes to electing a president, they still seem prefer to vote for people for whom the aging process isn't already too far along. That's a polite way of saying that voters often prefer younger candidates to older ones. In the field of politics -- as in sports and entertainment -- many people worship at the altar of youth and what President Kennedy used to call "vigor." Even in the best of times -- economic prosperity, a healthy job market, no threats to our national security and so on -- being president is a tough gig. The job is intellectually taxing, emotionally draining, and physically demanding. I would imagine that just the daily terror briefings alone, where the president is informed of all the plots that were foiled by authorities the night before, is enough to turn one's hair white. There have been exceptions. In 1984, President Reagan -- at 73 -- famously quipped during a debate with his 56-year-old Democratic opponent, Walter Mondale, that he wouldn't "exploit for political purposes my opponent's youth and inexperience." In his runaway bid for re-election, Reagan carried 49 states. But there are lots of examples of youth carrying the day. -- Kennedy had no qualms about exploiting youth for political purposes. In 1946, the Massachusetts Democrat vied for the state's 11th congressional district. Campaign posters offered the slogan: "A New Generation Offers a Leader." Kennedy won; he was just 29 years old. It was 15 years later, at 44, as he was sworn in as president, that he talked about how the "torch" of leadership had been passed to his cohort -- the fabled "World War II Generation." -- In 1992, 46-year-old Bill Clinton went on MTV, played the saxophone on "The Arsenio Hall Show" and told Americans -- in the words of Fleetwood Mac -- "don't stop thinking about tomorrow." In that race, Clinton defeated the incumbent president, 68-year-old George H.W. Bush. In 1996, a 50-year-old Clinton beat Sen. Bob Dole of Kansas, who was 73 years old. -- In 2008, after a campaign full of whispers about his opponent's health and vitality, 47-year-old Barack Obama handily defeated Sen. John McCain of Arizona, who was 72 at the time. Four years later, in 2012, a 51-year-old Obama cruised to victory over 65-year-old Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor. Now imagine how 2016 could shape up. By then, a 69-year-old Hillary Clinton could find herself slugging through a tougher-than-expected Democratic primary against a 73-year-old Joe Biden or Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who will then be 67 years old. Democrats should take a good hard look at more youthful candidates such as New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who will be 58 years old, or a 53-year-old Martin O'Malley, the governor of Maryland. Meanwhile, Republicans should definitely be looking for a younger candidate on the assumption that Clinton will be the nominee. In fact, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus should just flat-out declare that -- for this job -- anyone over 60 years old need not apply. Some might consider this requirement unfair, even tantamount to age discrimination. Not so. All sorts of jobs have mandatory age limits attached to them. Why not the presidency? It's true that, in 2016, there will be millions of Americans who are older than 60. But I would wager that more of them will -- at that stage of life -- be interested in easing into retirement than running for president. Older voters don't necessarily vote for older candidates, just as younger voters don't always support younger candidates. A GOP age limit would still leave an opening for what will be, in 2016, a pair of promising 45-year-old Hispanic senators — Ted Cruz of Texas and Marco Rubio of Florida. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky would also make the cut since he'll only be 53 years old. Rounding out the top tier of GOP hopefuls, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker will be 49 years old, and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie will be 54 years old. The bad news: Capping applicants at 60 would exclude one of the best Republican prospects — former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who will be 63 in 2016. The good news: It'll also spare the country another Quixotic presidential campaign by Mitt Romney, who would be 69. This isn't about ability. It's about electability. So the question isn't whether a given candidate is too old to serve as president. It's whether voters are willing to hand the presidency over to someone who they perceive as too old. In 2016, the message to both parties should be: "Go young — or go home." *Washington Times: “Joe Biden: Middle class was devastated during Clinton years” <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/13/joe-biden-middle-class-devastated-clinton-years/>* By Dave Boyer November 13, 2014 Vice President Joseph R. Biden took a swipe Thursday at the Clinton administration — and at possible presidential rival Hillary Rodham Clinton — by saying the middle class declined “all through the ‘90s.” “The middle class started to get into trouble in the late ‘80s, all through the ‘90s with the exception of two years, the middle class was declining,” Mr. Biden told an audience of unionized teachers in Washington. “We need to deal with income inequity.” The vice president, who is still considering a bid for the White House in 2016, also told the gathering that manufacturing jobs during the Obama administration are growing “more than any time, even the ‘90s.” “The bridge to the middle class was absolutely blown away by the great recession,” Mr. Biden said. “When we came into office, we knew we had to build the foundation to the middle class just like a bridge. We knew we literally had to rebuild the economy from the ground up.” As Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Massachusetts Democrat, is gaining popularity among progressives with her rhetoric against big banks and income inequality, Mr. Biden is seeking to downplay the fact that income disparity has grown during the Obama administration. In his address Thursday, the vice president said the gap between rich and poor has been expanding for decades. “When you have 24.5 percent of all the income going to one percent of the people, and 17 percent of income going to 50 percent of the people, it doesn’t work, man,” Mr. Biden said. “We haven’t seen this since 1921. It’s not anybody’s fault — not like anybody set out to do this. This is not any cabal. It’s just how it’s drifted.” “Cabal” has a negative connotation in the history of anti-Semitism. Mr. Biden got in trouble with the Anti-Defamation League earlier this year for using the word “shylock” to describe people who make unfair loans to U.S. service members. The vice president said Washington needs to address tax reform to boost the fortunes of the middle class. “Why should a hedge fund manager — and by the way, a lot of them support me — gambling with somebody else’s money in New York or anywhere else, making $700-800 million a year pay 17 percent, when … one of your schoolteachers making $56,000 pays at 24.5 percent,” he said. “I’ve not seen any rationale. We’re going to start to see discussions about it.” In a reference that sounded vaguely like former President George W. Bush’s call to “make the pie higher,” Mr. Biden said the middle class needs to gain a larger slice of overall income. “When ordinary people aren’t making money, the pie does not expand,” he said. “The pie does not expand.” *Talk Business Arkansas: “Banker, Attorney, Political Confidante Bill Bowen Dies At 91” <http://talkbusiness.net/2014/11/banker-attorney-political-confidante-bill-bowen-dies-at-91/>* [No Writer Mentioned] November 13, 2014 Little Rock banker, attorney, veteran and political confidante William H. “Bill” Bowen has passed away at the age of 91. Bowen was known as one of the most powerful men in Arkansas through his business and political connections. Born in Altheimer, Arkansas (Jefferson County), Bowen was a World War II veteran of the U.S. Naval Reserve. He earned his law degree from New York University and eventually practiced law in Little Rock with what is now the Friday, Eldredge and Clark law firm. The University of Arkansas at Little Rock named its law school, the William H. Bowen School of Law, after him in 2000. He served as the law school’s dean in the 1990’s. Bowen had a distinguished career in the banking arena, where he was lured away from his prestigious legal work. Bowen became president of Commercial National Bank and helped transform the financial institution into a major statewide operation known as First Commercial Bank. Eventually, the bank sold to Regions Corp. Bowen was a 2008 inductee in the Arkansas Business Hall of Fame. With a knack for remembering people instantly and his business influence, Bowen was also active in politics. His name was frequently mentioned as a possible gubernatorial candidate, but as an ally to then Governors Dale Bumpers, David Pryor and Bill Clinton, Bowen never seemed to have the opening. When Clinton ran for President in 1991-92, Bowen served as his chief of staff and kept state government running on schedule despite Clinton’s lengthy travels out-of-state on the campaign trail. Bowen also served a short stint as an appointee to the Arkansas Supreme Court. Attorney General Dustin McDaniel released a statement on Thursday morning saying, “With the death of William H. Bowen, Arkansas has lost a man who was without equal in Arkansas in terms of his success, kindness and commitment to public service. Bill will be missed, but his legacy will live on forever, and through that legacy, Arkansas will be a better place.” McDaniel added, “When I met Bill Bowen, I was a first-year law student, and he was the dean of the law school that now bears his name. I was inspired simply to be in his presence. In the years that followed, I learned more about his accomplishments and service to his state and nation, and was honored to build a friendship with him. I am a proud graduate of the William H. Bowen School of Law, and I am even more proud to have been able to call Bill my friend.” Bowen is survived by his wife, Connie, three children, and 12 grandchildren. UPDATE: President Bill Clinton also provided a statement on the passing of Bowen. “I was saddened to hear of the death of my good friend Bill Bowen, whose fascinating life was a serial Arkansas success story,” said Clinton. “From his humble beginnings in Altheimer to his service as a Naval fighter pilot in World War II, to his distinguished career in law and banking, to his public service as a tireless advocate for education and economic development, and as Chief of Staff in the governor’s office when I ran for President, something I couldn’t have done without him. Arkansas is a better place because of Bill Bowen’s fine mind, larger-than-life spirit, and true service. My thoughts and prayers are with Connie, his children, and his entire family.” *Calendar:* *Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official schedule.* · November 14 – Little Rock, AR: Sec. Clinton attends picnic for 10thAnniversary of the Clinton Center (NYT <http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2014/10/17/?entry=2674&_php=true&_type=blogs&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&_r=0> ) · November 15 – Little Rock, AR: Sec. Clinton hosts No Ceilings event (NYT <http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2014/10/17/?entry=2674&_php=true&_type=blogs&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&_r=0> ) · November 19 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton is honored by the National Breast Cancer Coalition (Breast Cancer Deadline <http://www.breastcancerdeadline2020.org/donate/fundraising-events/2014-NY-Gala-Evite.html> ) · November 21 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton presides over meeting of the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves (Bloomberg <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-02/clinton-aides-resist-calls-to-jump-early-into-2016-race> ) · November 21 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton is honored by the New York Historical Society (Bloomberg <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-02/clinton-aides-resist-calls-to-jump-early-into-2016-race> ) · December 1 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton keynotes a League of Conservation Voters dinner (Politico <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hillary-clinton-green-groups-las-vegas-111430.html?hp=l11> ) · December 4 – Boston, MA: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Massachusetts Conference for Women (MCFW <http://www.maconferenceforwomen.org/speakers/>) · December 16 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton honored by Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights (Politico <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/hillary-clinton-ripple-of-hope-award-112478.html> )