podesta-emails
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----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=5a6T
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
I wanted to flag this article brought to my attention by Anna.
The way the Fund was represented here is exactly what we dont want to see in
print.
The "Fund Official" was neither Katherine or myself. We are following up
from the Board Meeting discussion to reach out to some key reporters to have
the Fund accurately represented.
Please let me know if you have questions.
Amy
David Cohen
Mother Jones
TOOLS
[image: Email] <javascript:email_article()>E-mail
article<javascript:email_article()>
[image: Print] <javascript:print_article()>Print
article<javascript:print_article()>
Digg<http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2008/03/527s-election-money-mudslingers.html&title=Meet
the New Mudslingers>
del.icio.us<http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2008/03/527s-election-money-mudslingers.html&title=Meet
the New Mudslingers>
Reddit<http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2008/03/527s-election-money-mudslingers.html&title=Meet
the New Mudslingers>
Yahoo MyWeb<http://myweb.yahoo.com/myresults/bookmarklet?u=http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2008/03/527s-election-money-mudslingers.html&t=Meet
the New Mudslingers&ei=UTF>
BACKTALK
E-mail the editor <[email protected]?subject=Backtalk: Meet the New
Mudslingers>
StumbleUpon<http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2008/03/527s-election-money-mudslingers.html&title=Meet
the New Mudslingers>
Newsvine<http://www.newsvine.com/_tools/seed&save?u=http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2008/03/527s-election-money-mudslingers.html&T=Meet
the New Mudslingers>
Netscape<http://www.netscape.com/submit/?U=http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2008/03/527s-election-money-mudslingers.html&T=Meet
the New Mudslingers>
[image: Google]
Google<http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=add&bkmk=http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2008/03/527s-election-money-mudslingers.html&title=Meet
the New Mudslingers>
[image: Ad: Sponsored by Mother
Jones]<http://oascentral.motherjones.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/motherjones.com/news/outfront/2008/03/527s-election-money-mudslingers.html/304856695/x03/MJones/36_MoJoSponsor_200701/88x31_MJ_logo.gif/33666630633933333437633266343830?>
[image: MoJo Blog]
If the Army Had Wanted You to Have a Family, it Would Have Issued You One,
Soldier!<http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/02/7328_if_the_army_had.html>
US and Iraqi Women Reporting from Baghdad Win Awards. Thank Goodness They
Lived to Collect
Them<http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/02/7327_us_and_iraqi_wo.html>
What Are Progressives to Think of Ralph
Nader?<http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/02/7326_what_are_progre.html>
Proto Political
Correctness<http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/02/7325_proto_political.html>
Fox News Asks: "Who Would Usama Want as
Prez?"<http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/02/7303_fox_news_asks_w.html>
Charlie Black, John McCain Aide and
Super-Lobbyist<http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/02/7302_charlie_black_j.html>
The CIA's Constant Confesser: Michael Hayden Just Can't Stop Admitting
Stuff<http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/02/7299_cia_confessiona.html>
Green Salt and Nuclear Laptop: New IAEA Report Says Iran Answers Some
Questions, Still Has Others to
Answer<http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/02/7298_green_salt_and.html>
Kennedy Canta!<http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/02/7297_kennedy_canta.html>
Debate's Final Moment —
Transformative?<http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/02/7296_the_debates_fin.html>
Forget Swift Boats; this election year could become the battle of the
armadas. Thanks to the success of misleading ads against John Kerry in
2004—as well as recent Supreme Court and Federal Election Commission
actions—the current presidential contest promises to be more cacophonous and
mud strewn than any in recent history, with a record number of
down-and-dirty ads financed on the sly by big-money interests. Attacks
bankrolled by "independent" groups—businesses, unions, and millionaires—and
amplified by YouTube and reporters starved for news "will play a much
greater role than ever before," predicts a top gop strategist.
There's just one catch: Groups that make it their express aim to influence
federal elections—campaign and party committees, for example—are limited to
$5,000 contributions from individuals and can't take money from corporations
or unions. But recruiting enough $5,000 donors to underwrite a
multimillion-dollar ad buy is a chore. So for those hoping to destroy a
candidate with a clever spot or a cheap shot, the key question is which
campaign-finance loophole to use.
In 2004, the answer was 527 committees, named after the tax-code provision
covering them. These groups can take unlimited donations. Billionaire George
Soros alone gave nearly $24 million to 527s that year, including America
Coming Together and the Media Fund, which together netted about $140 million
in support of John Kerry. On the gop side, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth
and the Progress for America Voter Fund raised about $58 million, of which
T. Boone Pickens pitched in $4.5 million.
The Federal Election Commission recently ruled that these four 527s had
violated campaign-finance law—that they essentially were campaign groups in
disguise and should have abided by the $5,000 limit. Yet for what amounted
to nearly $200 million in illegal spending, the groups were fined, in total,
only $2.4 million, three years after the fact—a punishment easy to dismiss
as "the cost of doing business," in the words of Fred Wertheimer, president
of the clean-campaign advocacy group Democracy 21.
Nevertheless, the fec action has made some donors think twice about 527s,
says Wertheimer—which is why political operatives are busy cooking up other
stratagems. One involves funneling money to nonprofit advocacy groups like
MoveOn and the nra, known as 501(c)(4)s after another tax provision, for
voter organization efforts and election-related ads. (Donations to these
organizations, unlike those to educational and charitable nonprofits known
as 501(c)(3)s, aren't tax deductible; many groups, such as the Sierra Club,
have both a (c)(3) and a (c)(4) arm.) Under the 2002 McCain-Feingold act,
these advocacy groups were banned from running "issue ads" directed at
candidates within two months of a general election. But the Supreme Court
modified that ban last June. Now a nonprofit could, say, run a spot just
before election time noting that Candidate X once voted against building a
wall on the Mexico border, warning that—cue the ominous music!—X is willing
to let terrorists sneak into the United States, and exhorting viewers to
call X to register their outrage. So long as the ad hasn't (officially) been
coordinated with X's opponent and doesn't outright say "vote against X,"
it's fine. And here's the best part: There are no limitations on the size of
a contribution to a (c)(4), nor do its donors have to be disclosed.
Moreover, due to that same Supreme Court decision, unions and corporations
can now directly finance their own issue ads, expanding the number of
players who can slam—or slime—the candidates in 2008.
Wertheimer identifies a few outfits likely to emerge as major independent
spenders this year. On the gop side, a likely big player is Freedom's Watch,
a (c)(4) founded last summer. In 2007 the group—whose top donor has been
casino mogul Sheldon Adelson—spent at least $15 million to support the surge
in Iraq, and according to spokesman Jake Suski, it plans to expand its
operations in 2008. (See "Betting on Red" in our last issue or at
MotherJones.com.) In the Democratic camp, strategists including Clinton
White House chief of staff John Podesta and Service Employees International
Union (seiu) official Anna Burger have launched a 527 named the Fund for
America to raise money and distribute it to (c)(4)s doing voter organization
in 10 to 12 key states; a parallel entity headed by Tom Matzzie, the former
head of MoveOn's Washington office, will produce issue ads aimed at
undercutting the Republican nominee. The Fund for America is hoping to raise
at least $100 million.
The legality of this circuitous strategy, admits one Fund for America
official, is not fully tested: "We've built into the budget a little money
in the expectation that we're unintentionally going to go beyond the
boundaries of the law. We know we'll get challenged and will have people
watching us every step of the way." The good news for the independent
spenders is that a congressional tussle over the appointment of
commissioners left the fec with four of its six seats vacant at the start of
the year, effectively shutting it down. "If you believe there's no sheriff
in town," Wertheimer says ruefully, "anything goes."
Sure enough, the primary season has already seen some sneaky independent
action. Prior to January's Iowa caucuses, a (c)(4) called Common Sense
Issues set up the website TrustHuckabee.com to recruit pro-Huckabee precinct
captains—a blatant and probably prohibited scheme to create a parallel
campaign infrastructure. ("They are looking at a lot of litigation," says a
former fec official who asked not to be identified. "This is way beyond
anything anybody should try.") And a 527 named Alliance for a New America,
financed in part by seiu affiliates, ran issue ads in Iowa hailing John
Edwards' anti-lobbyist proposals. The Alliance received $495,000 from Rachel
"Bunny" Mellon, the 97-year-old daughter-in-law of industrialist Andrew
Mellon. A lawyer holding power of attorney for Mellon is an Edwards
supporter, and he refused to explain how the generous contribution had come
about.
Clearly, political operators weren't very fearful of the fec or irs. The
recent rule changes, though, could make Swift-Boat-style character
assassination tougher this year. If a 527 or (c)(4) group funded by
unlimited contributions produces ads attacking a candidate's past or fitness
for office, it will be difficult for the group to claim them as issue ads.
"I suppose a group can say, 'We'll file as a 527 not for the purpose of
influencing the election, but to educate the public on the quality of the
candidates,'" says Jan Baran, a veteran Republican campaign-finance lawyer.
"But that would be skating on thin ice."
Which leaves the diy option: There are no restrictions on how much an *
individual* can spend to influence an election, as long as she or he doesn't
coordinate efforts with a candidate or party. Though most big-money people
prefer a degree or two of separation from bare-knuckle politics, this year's
high stakes could nudge some in that direction. "There is the possibility a
billionaire will spend $100 million on the presidential campaign 'just
because I feel like it,'" says Democratic consultant Guy Molyneux. "There's
the potential for a huge ratcheting up. And we will see some pretty tough
stuff." After all, the lesson of 2004 was that it only takes one good ad
campaign to undo a candidate.
"We're looking at an enormous shift in control from parties and candidates
to outside groups," says the former fec official. "For a candidate, this can
mean a loss of control of your message. And this also covers congressional
candidates. Imagine if three weeks before the election, someone dumps
$600,000 into your House race and you have no idea who it is." Candidates,
he adds, "should be scared. Very scared." Maybe voters, too.
*David Corn is Mother Jones' Washington, D.C., bureau chief*
--
Amy K. Dacey
Executive Director
Fund for America
202-730-7727
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
bebf3e284bbf1375cf2c7779a8bd092a2020d3189195745a015630263ed0ccf1
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email
Comments 0