podesta-emails

podesta_email_00644.txt

podesta-emails 4,177 words email
P17 V11 P21 V15 P22
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *Main Topics:* Fundraising, offshore drilling, 527 attack ads, GOP albatross * Summary of Shift:* Every network and cable station made sure to cover a recent competition to find America's ugliest dog. Saudi Arabia blames high prices on oil speculation and offers to increase supply without specifications as to how much. Roundtable discussions revolved mainly around Obama's change of positions on public finance. (Nina Totenberg: "They're both flip-floppers! That's what politicians do!") News segments also contained several side-by-side comparisons of Obama's and McCain's energy policies. Highlights: 1) McCain surrogates on the airwaves a. Lindsey Graham debates Joe Biden b. Holtz-Eakin: Bush has disappointed Americans for eight years c. Carly Fiorina alleges MoveOn is currently airing McCain 2) McBush on offshore drilling 3) McCain's huge GOP obstacles Clips: Highlight #1 *Graham and Biden Debate over Drilling, Iraq and NAFTA on "Meet the Press"*(NBC 06/22/08 10:46am) LINDSEY GRAHAM: It means his word is broken forever on this issue. […] You tell people you're going to change this country. […] Senator McCain supported campaign finance reform, to his detriment, with Senator Fiengold on our side. It did not go over well but John did it anyway. He took a beating to try to change the campaign finance system. Senator Obama […] literally signed his name to I will accept public finance. And know for whatever reason he has broken his word. And is it 1.4 million donors that allow you to break your word. This is reinforcing everything that is wrong with politics. […] JOE BIDEN: Obama did say, I'm going to be a game changer. He has been a game changer. Big money is not influencing his campaign. […] GRAHAM: I would argue that MoveOn.org has played him like a fiddle on Iraq. He said we will never to cut off funding. It was a mistake to go into Iraq, but they're there and they need the equipment. MoveOn.org laid down the law and the next supplemental, there should be times tables for withdrawal. Within two or three days he's changed his position on Iraq. He has played very much to the left. He has been told what to do by the hard left. There are a million times […] how he is captive to the left. BIDEN: That is not true. BRIAN WILLIAMS: […] On campaign fundraising, you say he did this for whatever reason. We know the reason it's because the Internet appeal. That his campaign found out half way through. GRAHAM: *He can out raise John.* WILLIAMS: Had that been the McCain campaign wouldn't it have been just as easy […] to make this same decision? GRAHAM: John supported campaign finance reform and paid a heavy political price […] the bottom line about Barack Obama whatever the position, whether it be Iraq, campaign finance reform or public financing. […] BIDEN: *We haven't even gotten to John's flip-flopping yet. Wait till we get to oil. Talk about big influence*. WILLIAMS: […] What's broken about NAFTA? BIDEN: No Environmental protection […] and not giving the workers in Mexico […] to work for very little wages without protection giving another advantage that not only hurt the Mexicans but hurts American workers […] GRAHAM: I don't want anyone running for president telling the Unions what they want to hear […] it hurts the United States for us, someone in his position to be telling our neighbors we're going to withdraw from this deal. America doesn't do it that way. BIDEN: […] this has nothing to do with Unions; this has to do with middle class jobs. […] WILLIAMS: *Positions mostly similar between John McCain and President George W. Bush.* […] Senator John McCain called for an end of the Federal ban on offshore oil drilling. His announcement is a reversal […] The environmentalist came out […] they see this as a gift, this current energy crisis, $4 a gallon at the pump, a gift given to the United States to change the way the country does business. […] GRAHAM: […] I think it gets you some immediate relief. […] The democratic solution here is to tax at home and get Saudi Arabia to drill more. […] BIDEN: *This is a gift. A gift to the oil companies from John McCain*. […] 79% of all the offshore oil available […] lies within those acres that they now have. Why are they not pumping? […] Why are these greedy fellows deciding they want to go beyond that? They want to get it in before George Bush leaves the presidency. They're not pumping the oil to keep the price up. […] GRAHAM: […] If you're looking for a difference on energy between Obama and Senator McCain he will allow American companies to go extract off our coasts with state consent. […] To get this country into energy independence and reduce the price of gas. BIDEN: They can do that already! GRAHAM: No they can't. There's a Federal moratorium on off coast drilling. BIDEN: NO NO No! This is off coast. Where do you think the 40 million acres are Lindsey? They are off the coast. Off the coasts. 40 million acres off the coasts. They want to get to the other 600 million acres that are not included in that. 79% of the reserves they already have access to. […] BIDEN: *You're entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts*. […] […] [Visual of Graham's Quote against drilling from 2005] "The Senate . . . may consider lifting bans on exploring for oil and natural gas along the East and West coasts of the United States. … 'I feel terrible about that,' Graham said 'the worst thing we can do as a nation is taking the easy way out. … If you start opening up offshore drilling, then you are buying time and you are not addressing the fundamental problem with fossil fuels.' '' GRAHAM: […] $4 a gallon has changed my mind. […] WILLIAMS: […] We are just back from Afghanistan. […] More than one American commander, while I was there, showed me what they call a HAV a High value target and then said right *now I don't have […] the assets, the fighters, the bombers, the predators to go get these high value targets in Afghanistan because, as they put it, the resources are going to the other war.* […] BIDEN: […] The commanding General in Afghanistan said to me "I do not have the forces I need here to deal with where Al Qaeda lives, where Al Qaeda resides, where the real threat of terror exists." […] John McCain is viewing this like he is the commander and chief of Iraq. The President of the United States has larger security concerns than just Iraq. And there needs to be a balance here […] GRAHAM: *The central battlefront of the war on terror according to General Petraeus is Iraq. […] NATO is in charge of Afghanistan. […]* <https://issuealliance.box.net/shared/static/g5vt5s5kww.mov> *Holtz-Eakin: Bush is an Eight-Year Disappointment* *to Americans* (CNN 06/22/08 11:15am) WOLF BLITZER: […] John McCain is warning that Barack Obama's economic policy would take the United States back to the 1970s and the troubles of Jimmy Carter's administration. […] this is a major reversal on the part of John McCain who earlier had opposed offshore drilling off the coast of Florida and California and elsewhere [and] now supports it. Is that right? DOUGLAS HOLTZ-EAKIN: John McCain's always supported the state's ability to make this decision. When the states had no protection he wanted the federal moratorium in place. Now that there has been a deal, Louisiana has some drilling in the Gulf, Florida wants some protection, he thinks it's appropriate to get the Feds out of the way entirely and let the states make this decision. BLITZER: How long after they start drilling off the coast of California and elsewhere, how long would it be before there was a real significant additional supply that could have an effect? Because Senator Obama and others say it could be ten years. Is that we're talking about? HOLTZ-EAKIN: Well, *it would take about five years to get the oil on shore and begin getting the real impacts in the supply and demand* but it will send a signal to the world markets and send a signal to the futures markets and will send a signal, in particular, to futures markets that the United States is going to take control of its energy destiny *and not have to go as the Bush Administration has hat in hand to the Saudis and ask for more oil*. The truth is Barack Obama has no plan in energy He's opposed to lowering gas taxes. He's opposed to additional exploration. He's opposed to nuclear power. He thinks higher gas prices are just fine. The just happened too quickly for his taste. BLITZER: Well you heard [on an earlier segment] the whole litany of what Governor Richardson just said [Obama] wants to do to reduce America's addiction on imported oil. HOLTZ-EAKIN: It's important. John McCain believes that we have to get rid of the strategic weapon that is oil. We have to stop being held victim to this around the world so what do we do? We take care of our business. Control a little bit at home and then move on to more nuclear power, renewables, alternatives. He's laid this all out. BLITZER: The Saudis announcing they will increase oil production, oil exports, is that something you welcome? HOLTZ-EAKIN: It's important to have greater global supply, but it would be better if the United States controlled its energy destiny. That's what John McCain wants to do. BLITZER: Are you concerned about the United States simply going to become even more addicted to Saudi and other foreign oil sources? HOLTZ-EAKIN: We've seen a bipartisan failure for 30 years, you know. In the 1970s we imported 30% of our oil and now we import 60% of our oil and our national security is at risk. Our economy is at risk and our environment is at risk. It's time to have some bipartisan leadership, take control of our destiny. BLITZER: Would it be wise, because Iraq is now exporting a lot and pumping a lot of oil, much more than it was with a relative quiet that's developed in certain parts of the country over the past year. They are exporting and pumping more oil. Should the Iraqis be selling oil to the United States at a discounted price? HOLTZ-EAKIN: Oil should occur on the world market at market prices. BLITZER: Why not—given the hundreds of billions of dollars the United States has spent to rebuild that country and try to bring some stability to the Iraqis, why not have them export oil to the United States at a reduced price? They would still make some money, but they wouldn't make as much as they are making right now. HOLTZ-EAKIN: As Senator McCain, who has gone there and seen the conditions on the ground eight times correctly pointed out, we had to bring a new strategy to Iraq. We had to get some peace, a path to prosperity for the Iraqis, but that path doesn't lie in the U.S. being dependent on Middle Eastern oil. The entire strategy was built around getting the United States to be able to exit with peace and build energy security for ourselves at home. BLITZER: So Senator McCain believes the Iraqis should export oil to the United States at the going international price, which right now is about $135 a barrel? HOLTZ-EAKIN: Senator McCain believes there should be an international oil market but believes the United States should not leave itself dependent on that from the Iraqis or anyone else. BLITZER: Here's the latest A.P./Ipsos poll asking this question: 'Which track is the economy heading?'76% of the American people said the U.S. is heading in the wrong economic track and 17% said they are heading in the right track. That's a pretty disproportionate number. Give me an example of what—other than pork barrel spending ear marks—a different strategy that John McCain would take on economic policy than President Bush is taking right now? HOLTZ-EAKIN: Well, *this is more than the Bush Administration which has disappointed Americans for eight years.* This is about a democratic congress that cannot address great issues. It's about Washington being broken. BLITZER: What would Senator McCain do differently, in the short term, if he were President of the United States, differently than what's already being done by President Bush, and I know you're going to say he would find ways to eliminate pork barrel spending, the so-called ear marks, but beyond that what would he do? HOLTZ-EAKIN: Well that would be step one in reforming Washington. Senator McCain is a person who reached across the aisle that needed judicial appointments and got it done. When we recognized the importance of immigration he stood with Senator Kennedy [and] tried to solve this great problem. We'll see someone who wants to actually help America, not pursue partisan politics. […] HOLTZ-EAKIN: Well, Senator Obama has a problem with his own in that he talks a lot about taxes, says he's going to cut taxes for 95% of Americans. BLITZER: Is this true, the suggestion that he's saying you want to give a huge tax break to those Americans making $2.8 million a year and more. That's true, right? *HOLTZ-EAKIN: No.* Senator McCain, if you examine the facts on the ground, right now the top marginal tax rate in America is 35%. Under Senator McCain's plan it would be 35%. Dividends, capital gains, the access for capital to small businesses: right now [is] 15%. Under Senator McCain's create jobs first plan 15%. Mr. Obama is talking about tax cuts for the wealthy. They're not anywhere. What John McCain would do is reduce the corporate tax rate that Is sending jobs with pension benefits and health benefits and important security for Americans, he's cutting rates— BLITZER: You want to cut capital gains rate. HOLTZ-EAKIN: 15%. BLITZER: You want to cut it? HOLTZ-EAKIN: It'll be 15% under John McCain. This is flowing rhetoric but reality on the ground is that John McCain wants to create jobs in this country, he doesn't want to burden small businesses, he wants to keep jobs from going overseas. He's got a plan to do that. Senator Obama, the one person who will raise taxes in this race is going to tax small businesses, put employer mandates on for health insurance they can't afford and really threaten the jobs that Americans need right now. John McCain has jobs first. Senator Obama has talk first. *Fiorina and Richardson Square off on Candidate 'Flip-Flops'* (CBS 06/22/08 10:36am) CARLY FIORINA: I think the record is pretty clear that Barack Obama has, in fact, said that all along he would accept public financing and now he's changed his mind. He certainly has the right to do that. […] *The truth is there are more 527s gearing up and currently attacking John McCain than exist to attack Barack Obama *[…]. […] FIORINA: […] John McCain is on the record as having asked a couple of 527s to stand down and *it's been well-documented, just in the last week, that there are far more 527s gearing up and already announcing, for example, they're gonna spend $53million to attack John McCain. MoveOn.org is the one I reference. *[…] […] FIORINA: I think a good leader is influenced by the facts on the ground. Whether those facts are in Iraq or those facts are right here in the United States and the reality is we have never before faced a situation where a gallon of gas is over $4 and is likely to remain over $4. We've never before faced a situation where the price of a barrel of oil has doubled in the last 12 months. So what John McCain has said is that we now need to take control of our own energy future and that involves, among other things, tapping our own resources whether that's clean coal or natural gas (Barack Obama would tax both coal and natural gas) or whether it's approaching the subject of offshore drilling in a sensible way. [McCain] would continue to maintain that ANWR is a pristine wilderness that shouldn't be touched but we have very sizable reserves of oil off our shores and now is the time to take control of our own energy future. We must. It's a matter of national security, economic security and environmental security as well. Highlight #2 *Reliable Sources Scrutinizes Media Response to McBush Endorsement of Offshore Drilling* (CNN 06/20/08 10:18am) HOWARD KURTZ: […] The first time John McCain ran for president […] he opposed offshore oil drilling and blamed Washington special interests for pushing the idea. Three weeks ago he said it would be temporary fix, at best, for our energy problems. This week McCain flipped, coming out for offshore oil-drilling and joined the next day by President Bush. The media's reaction kind of seemed to be a collective yawn: 'Ho-hum, he changed his position.' ANN KORNBLUT: Well, I think the national media's reaction might have been that. My understanding is that the local media reaction in places like Florida where this has obviously been a big deal was somewhat greater but […] it's another example of an issue that seems to be very policy, detail-oriented that people don't really care about […]. KURTZ: And *McCain trying to position himself as not the typical republican on the environment and yet comes out with this position on offshore oil-drilling*, which […], if you're in California or, if you're in Florida, it's a local issue. […] Is this the wrong scorecard to be using? Politicians are entitled to change their positions as new facts come in or they re-think something but what bothers me is they never admit changing their positions. They always try to rationalize it with some excuse. LOLA OGUNNAIKE: Because, if they admit changing their positions, they're vilified. […] So they decide they'd rather dance around the subject then address it straight on. KURTZ: Why are they vilified? Because the media likes to play gotcha? You said this then and you're saying this now and therefore you're not sincere? OGUNNAIKE: Exactly. There's no room for evolution of thought. There's no room for, 'You know, I might have just changed my mind. Upon further investigation I've decided this as opposed to this.' There's no room for that. It's very black and white. There's no room for shades of grey anymore in the media at all. KURTZ: Do reporters go a little easier on McCain, on issues like this because of the coziness that's built up among those who are riding the Straight Talk Express? JULIE MASON: I think there is. I mean, I certainly think there's the perception that there is, which exacerbates the fact that there is some of that. Now there appears to be a lot of that. In the case of this flip-flop, you know, Bush did come out the next day and endorse that plan, which sort of blew that second-day story out of the water, which would have been the flip-flop. You know, that would have made a nice second-day follow on McCain's story, which he made in Houston, which was a huge story for us [at the *Houston Chronicle*]. Then Bush comes out and endorses the plan and that becomes the story and then the debate becomes offshore drilling or not offshore drilling instead of McCain flip-flop? KURTZ: Wasn't it your sense and [for] people at the *Houston Chronicle* that this was all very orchestrated. The president was going to come out the day after [the] republican nominee suddenly changes his position on offshore oil drilling? MASON: Yes! Yes! Absolutely. Sure. Yeah, there was a clear sense of that. KURTZ: And yet I have the impression that more attention was paid to Cindy McCain's cookie recipe, which was ripped off by an intern and turned out to be from some food network site. KORNBLUT: […] That's easier to summarize in 30 seconds than to talk about the merits—pro and con—of offshore drilling and what the effect will be on gas prices 30 years from now, but nonetheless, there actually was a treatment of a serious issue. The campaign certainly took it seriously and *we even heard the Obama campaign describing the McCain campaign as 'the Double-Talk Express,'* trying to re-brand the Straight Talk Express. So I think actually that something has changed with this position this week, even if it didn't dominate the news coverage. Highlight #3 *May Be "Impossible to Believe that Another Republican Could get Elected" * (NBC 06/22/08 10:09am) CHRIS MATTHEWS: The situation right now, it really does take a Houdini to get out of. It's almost like he is belted up with all these chains around him and he's in some safe at the bottom of the Atlantic. He's got to get out of the gas tax problem and defend that. He's got to defend himself against a recession, against a dollar that's worth like an Old Portuguese escudo right now. He's got every problem in the world economically, your laughing but its true. Everything is wrong and he's gonna say you think this is bad. KATTY KAY: *Every single number is going in the wrong direction. And at a time win 82% of American's think the country's on the wrong track it is almost impossible to believe that another Republican could get elected*. But here is his silver lining, the Republican's ratings are going down but John McCain's ratings in comparison to his party are doing pretty well. MATTHEWS: How do you masquerade yourself as not the defender of status quo if you're John McCain? How do you just avoid all the hell that just comes with just being in the incumbent party this time? KATHLEEN PARKER: *Well he is clearly no longer the Maverick. He's the mainstream candidate*. But I think what McCain is trying to do is paint Obama as the Jimmy Carter candidate and he's trying to leapfrog over Bush and over Clinton to Reagan, and attach himself to that legacy. And he's likely to do that well because he does have a taxpayer friendly economic plan. The problem is getting hurt at all. Because even if you say that the class warfare is over Obama's platform is being perceived as the poor people vs. the rich people. He wants to make it hard on corporate America. He's going to raise the taxes on corporate America. Which does, 140 million American's go to work in corporate America every single day. KAY: But *there are plenty of Republican's that don't trust John McCain on taxes either. Look how long it took Grover Norquest, the tax cuter of the Republican Party to come out and support John McCain. It took him a pretty long time. It's not as if John McCain is a completely solid pro-business candidate anyways*. […] JIM CRAMER: Not at all, No one trusts him. […] ANDREW SULLIVAN: *The conditions are so overwhelming that it's very hard for him to get out of this Republican taint*. But as a said before I do think the fear, the fear of a new young president raising taxes is an important fear […] MATTHEWS: […] John McCain has to pay the piper for the bad times. KAY: I just keep coming back to this 82% number, and I just find it very had to see how there is another term of the same party when so many people in the country, across the board, and these are Democrats and Republicans, are both saying that its going in the wrong direction. MATTHEWS: Speak for the investor class […] CRAMER: Investor class is sick of it. Investor class is sick of Republicans. They're sick of them. We have stagflation, it's the worst. It's the worst for the rich, it's worst for poor, It's worst's for the middle class. We need a new broom. MATTHEWS: […] If Obama wins does the stock market go up? CRAMER: Yes. […] -- Jacob Roberts Media Analyst PMUSA (c) 208.420.3470 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "big campaign" group. To post to this group, send to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] E-mail [email protected] with questions or concerns This is a list of individuals. It is not affiliated with any group or organization. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
👁 1 💬 0
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
bedc6a25b1066baf46c3e63250ef1d3ae62ee730d1ff96c990b00275a9509564
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!