📄 Extracted Text (3,609 words)
Eye on the Market I June 27. 2011 J.P.Morgan
It's that time of year again (Final Exam); the IEA's release of strategic petroleum reserves; the D-word (derivatives)
As we wrote a few weeks ago, this is the kind of market we expected this year: a tug of war between private sector profits and
public sector problems. The chart below shows how some things (profits, capital spending, high end retail sales, credit spreads)
improved over the last two years in the US, recovering most of what was lost during the recession. Other things haven't (almost
anything having to do with employment, compensation or housing). Financial markets usually lead the economy in a recovery,
but these gaps are too wide. One thing this chart does not capture: a doubling of net Federal debt/GDP since June 2007.
Share of peak-to-trough decline recovered in the US since 2007
Percen
100'Y,
90% Sources: Standard &Poors, Bureau of Economic
80% Analysis, Deutsche Boerse, Federal Reserve Bank,
70% US Can sus Bureau. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
1 IIE
Real Capital Analytics, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC,
60% J.P. Morgan Private Bank. Empirical Research Partners.
50%
40%
30%
20% -
10%
0%
High end S&P500 Corp. Inv.Grade Small SW500 US CBD row•End Stale Tax Agg. Sperdng on Nonfarm Unem• Avg. HrV.
Retail Earnings Capex Spreads Business index Industrial Office Cap Retail Revenue Work durables/ Payrolls ployment Earnings
Income Production Rates Week homes rate Growth
In January, we laid out a view that entails a single digit return year for stocks and other risky assets, with a lot of volatility. To
get an understanding of why, please take the following closed-book exam. The answers appear at the end of the note.
On the United States
We expect a modest rebound from Q2 weakness, given the recent decline in energy prices, and the end of Japanese supply chain
disruptions. However, issues related to government debt, weak labor markets and the fact that credit markets already price in all
the good news tempers our enthusiasm. For each question, circle the best answer; no Google allowed.
1. What might it take to stabilize the US federal debt, and return to a 3% budget deficit in 2015?
(a) 2001 Bush tax cuts expire for everyone; agreed-upon cuts to physician Medicare reimbursement get implemented; AMT
relief ended; personal exemption phase-outs and itemized deduction haircuts applied as previously agreed
(b) Forget about tax hikes and spending cuts, go for growth: achieve 6.5%-7.0% annual nominal growth (without interruption)
(c) Eliminate all non-defense discretionary spending
(d) Any of the mutually exclusive choices shown above
2. Current US Federal debt held by the public is around $10 trillion. In a speech Richard Fisher of the Dallas Fed gave in
2008, he estimated the present value of all unfunded entitlement obligations (e.g., the debt of the future) to be:
(a) another $10 trillion (c) a "gazillion"
(b) another $99 trillion (d) Same as the maximum damages the recording industry is suing Limewire for, $75 trillion
3. Debt ceiling talks have reportedly broken down again over differences regarding the need for higher taxes. Partisanship in
the House and Senate, measured by the frequency of legislators only voting for their own party's bills, is now:
(a) High, but not as high as during the Nixon era (recall that Nixon sent his Enemies List to the IRS so they'd be audited)
(b) Medium, and considerably lower than during the Great Depression when the gap between rich and poor widened
(c) High, but lower than the period following the Civil War, an internal conflict with 6x the casualty rate as WWII
(d) Higher than at any time since 1879
4. While the profits boom in the US has been impressive, it is heavily reliant on two things: weak labor markets, and rising
non-US demand linked to abnormally low policy rates in the emerging world. During the 1980's and 1990's, post-recessionary
profits recovered at 4x the rate of nominal US GDP growth. In the current recovery, that ratio peaked at:
(a) 2x (b) 8x (c) 12x (d) Infinite, since there has been no recovery in nominal GDP
5. During the recession, 75% of all high yield bonds traded below a dollar price of $80. Strong corporate balance sheets and
easy Fed policy then contributed to a massive rally in credit. The percentage of HY bonds now trading below $80 is:
(a) 31% (b) 14% (c) 2% (d) 0%, since with interest rates at zero, anything with a coupon must be worth par
1
EFTA01069677
Eye on the Market I June 27. 2011 J.P.Morgan
It's that time of year again (Final Exam); the IEA's release of strategic petroleum reserves; the D-word (derivatives)
6. Household debt, which was 90% of disposable income in the year 2000, peaked at 130% of disposable income in 2007.
After the last 3 years of defaults and de-leveraging, this ratio is now:
(a) 141% (b) 114% (c) 102% (d) 85%
7. Some suggest a tax holiday for companies repatriating offshore profits (taxing them at 5% instead of 35%). When a tax
holiday was enacted in 2004 (American Jobs Creation Act), the # of jobs created per $1 million of foregone tax revenue was:
(a) 50 (b) 200 (c) 1,000 (d) negative; repatriating companies cut jobs in a rising job market & raised dividends
On Europe
The EU/IMF is trying to push through one more round of financing for Greece, assuming Greece agrees to more austerity and
commits to asset sale targets (see EoTM two weeks ago for more details). This saga has been going on for 18 months, making it
the Berlin Alexanderplatzi of sovereign debt crises. Based on Greek borrowings from the ECB, it looks like Greek capital flight
accelerated substantially in May2. We appear to be in 1986-87 on the Mexico sovereign default timeline shown last week.
8. From the inception of the Euro, labor cost differentials between Germany and Spain diverged by 29%. Over the same time
frame, the widest labor cost differential across any two of the 9 US regions was:
(a) 5% (b) 8% (c) 10% (d) 12%
9. German manufacturers are reporting labor shortages (coincident with the lowest German unemployment rate since
reunification), while Spain's unemployment rate is over 20%. According to the EU Commission, what is the cross-border labor
mobility of the EU-15 (ex-Luxembourg), compared to the 2.3% interstate labor mobility measured in the US?
(a) 1.5% (b) 0.6% (c) 0.1% (d) 0.0%; German food makes moving there unappetizing regardless of job prospects
10. In 2006, the head of the Greek National Statistics Service announced that a small part of its 25% upward revision to Greek
GDP included contributions from which of the following items:
(a) alcohol smuggling (b) prostitution (c) money laundering (d) all of the above
11. In 1989, after 7 years of delaying the inevitable, Mexico finally received debt forgiveness from its creditors (its debt peaked
at half of what Greece owes now). What radical firebrand led the charge, demanding creditor participation: "Mexicans have
made such enormous adjustments, accepted such a large reduction in living standards, that any package without an extensive
and visible contribution by external creditors is not acceptable domestically/11r
(a) Che Guevara (c) Zapatista leader Subcomandante Marcos
(b) Communist painter Diego Rivera (d) The World Bank's lead economist covering Mexico
12. EU/IMF loan facilities were designed to allow Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Greece ("SPIG") to bilaterally refinance all
bonds maturing from 2011-2013, as well as estimated fiscal deficits in those years, so that they do not have to issue debt in the
capital markets. If these facilities (EFSF, EFSM, etc) were fully drawn by these four countries, what would Germany's
maximum exposure be as a percentage of its GDP, assuming a 50% ultimate write-off on its exposure?
(a) 3%-5% (b) 8%-10% (c) 15%-20% (d) 20%-25%
13. From the inception of the EMU, peripheral Europe lost competitiveness: since 2002, SPIG country exports as a % of total
world exports fell by 35%. How much of this has been recovered, after large declines in real wages and structural reforms?
(a) None of it (b) None of it (c) None of it (d) None of it
14. Countries like Spain and Ireland had clean fiscal accounts before the crisis, but then took ownership of banking sector
problems. Ireland's government debt/GNP is headed over 120% if the country ultimately agrees to bail out its banks. What was
Ireland's sovereign debt/GNP ratio in 2007?
(a) 20% (b) 30% (c) 50% (d) 60%
15. Regulators apply similar risk-weighted asset ratios to US and European banks, but they are only applied to risk-weighted
assets. JP Morgan's risk weighted assets are —75% of its tangible assets. UBS and Credit Suisse claim risk-weighted assets of:
(a) 0% of tangible assets; there are no risky assets in Europe (b) —35% (c) —50% (d) same as JPM, —75%
At 15.5 hours, the longest cinematic feature film ever made. It is often shown to viewers in one sitting, with a 2-hour dinner break.
2Greek flight capital is mostly going to foreign banks outside Greece, and into their mattresses. Some high net worth European individuals,
when withdrawing Euros from European banks, now insist on banknotes with serial numbers indicating they were not printed in Greece.
2
EFTA01069678
Eye on the Market I June 27. 2011 J.P.Morgan
It's that time of year again (Final Exam); the IEA's release of strategic petroleum reserves; the D-word (derivatives)
On China
16. The US is relying on zero interest rates, given its high unemployment and large output gap. But China, growing at 10%, is
of course running a more normal monetary policy, right? One-year bank deposit rates in China, net of headline inflation, are:
(a) 3% (b) 1.5% (c) 0% (d) -2%
17. China has aggressively raised bank reserve requirements to slow things down, but this policy action mostly affects credit
extended by banks. In 2002, 92% of all Chinese credit was created by banks, with the rest by China's shadow banking system.
What percentage of all Chinese credit was extended by its banks in 2010?
(a) 92% (b) 87% (c) 75% (d) 56%
18. China announced a "victory over inflation" last week. To accomplish this, China relies on administrative controls over
private sector prices} and costs, affecting corporate profitability. Where does China rank over the last decade out of 25
emerging countries in terms of equity market returns per unit of GDP growth? [1=best, 25=worst]
(a) 3`d, ahead of Peru (b) le, behind Korea (c) 24ih, ahead of only Saudi Arabia (d) 25th
On Gold
19. After all the excitement and hyperbole, gold prices have risen to $1,500 per ounce. What is the current value of US
government gold reserves as a percentage of the US monetary base? From 1917 to 2011, it ranged from 11% to 125%.
(a) 125% (b) 50% (c) 25% (d) 15%
On Oil
20. Brazil made some large oil finds in its Tupi fields, prompting Lula to claim that "God is Brazilian". These fields lay 2-3
kilometers below the water's surface and another 3-4 kilometers below rock, sand and a salt canopy. What analogy did a head
geologist at Schlumberger use when describing to me the difficulty and cost of extracting oil from lower Tertiary horizons?
(a) it's like having to make gold from straw (c) it's like having to watch the Avatar movie and pretending to like it
(b) it's like putting a man on the moon (d) it's like having to make wind energy competitive with natural gas
Wrap-up. Compliance restrictions prevent me from rewarding anyone who scores well (anything over 15 is pretty good), but
since this is the era of social media, consider yourself rewarded with virtual gifts of some kind, which have no real value.
On the eloballv coordinated release of strategic petroleum reserves ("SPR")
The best way to read what happened: from Q2 to Q3, global oil demand tends to rise by 2 mm barrels per day, and with
economic data weakening around the world, the IEA's member countries and the Saudis apparently decided that a
repeat of 2008's oil spike was not in anyone's interest. The IEA announced that its member countries would release up to 60
million barrels from their respective strategic reserves; around half will come from the US, given the loss of light-sweet crude
from the market. This is not a large number by itself; offline Libyan production is —1 mm barrels per day, so this is a 2-month
reprieve from the loss of Libyan production. But like Central Bank intervention in FX markets, it's the signal that counts, since
there's more behind the initial amount if necessary. Total government and commercial reserves worldwide are 4 billion
barrels's, which is enough (in theory) to offset Libyan production losses for 11 years. But that's not what strategic reserves are
meant for (they are meant for broader emergencies like Hurricane Katrina and Iraq's invasion of Kuwait), so I think we should
consider this a temporary exercise to cap oil prices given recent economic weakness. Eventually, the IBA countries will
probably seek to replenish their reserves, hopefully at lower prices.
In a broader sense, the LEA's decision may also signal doubt on their part regarding the pricing intentions of OPEC, and
the ability of the Saudis to unilaterally drive prices down if they wanted to. There may be other geopolitical aspects to this
decision, such as the Saudis wanting to demonstrate to other OPEC members that it does not want to (a) stifle growth in the
OECD, (b) further accelerate R&D spending into alternative fuels, or (c) give further ammunition to Saudi opponents to finance
possible insurgencies in Bahrain.
3
After a 60% increase in coal input prices over the last 3 years, Chinese utilities were granted a 15% increase in prices charged to
commercial customers, and an even smaller one for residential customers.
4
The definition of what constitutes strategic petroleum reserves is complicated. There are 1.5 bn barrels of government-controlled stocks
globally. Total strategic and commercial reserves are 4 bn barrels. Part of the 2.5 bn barrels of commercial stocks are effectively
government-directed, so the real government-influenced number is higher than 1.5 bn barrels
3
EFTA01069679
Eye on the Market I June 27. 2011 J.P.Morgan
It's that time of year again (Final Exam); the IEA's release of strategic petroleum reserves; the D-word (derivatives)
In the wake of these developments, we have seen firms cut their Q3 2011 oil price targets to $100 from $120-$130 (on Brent).
Brent is currently at $105. Why not cut estimates lower? Some major OPEC producers have difficulty financing themselves in
global markets, and need high oil prices to balance their budgets. We estimate that it takes around $85 to $95 on Brent to
balance many OPEC country budgets, reducing their tolerance for much lower prices.
The SPR release represents a significant injection of Primary energy consumption
stimulus at a time when Qe2 and US payroll tax cut Million tons.oil-equivalent
Non-OECD
benefits are fading, and supports the notion of a rebound 6.500
in US consumer spending in the second half of the year. 6.000
However, we see the benefit of oil intervention fading as
we head into 2012, as supply-demand imbalances reassert 5,500
themselves, and oil markets tighten again. Existing fields
are experiencing a faster rate of depletion than previous 5,000
forecastss, and oil demand growth in the emerging world, 4,500
as shown in the chart, continues to climb.
4,000
Michael Cembalest 3,500
Chief Investment Officer 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Source BA.
Appendix: Derivatives and Disinformation
Articles in the New York Times and other venues are hyperventilating about the risk of credit default swap (CDS) contracts
written on Greece. There are a lot of things to worry about right now on Europe, and we have been chronicling them in
gruesome detail since February 2010; the derivatives issue is not one of them.
• I can understand that three years ago, analysts and journalists might not have had enough information to distinguish
between (or understand) gross versus net CDS exposure. However, since that time, the Depository Trust and Clearing
Corporation makes this information available on its web site. There is $78-79 billion of gross exposure written on Greece,
and the net exposure is $5-6 billion. Net exposure is what you get once each counterpatty, such as JP Morgan Securities,
nets all of the buys and sells it has executed. Net exposure is the maximum loss to the system between counterparties after
a default of a given entity on which protection was bought and sold (absent a default by CDS counterparties themselves).
• $5-6 billion in CDS exposure pales in comparison to $480 billion in Greek debt outstanding. If there is a fox in the
henhouse, as we have discussed endlessly, it was the EU policy of not constraining debt issuance of member
countries, and informing EU banks that this debt was risk-free, and not subject to a risk weighted capital charge.
• As Greek debt spreads have risen, CDS counterparties involved with this net exposure of $5-$6 billion have been posting
collateral to satisfy rising exposures to their counterparties. Unlike loans, bonds and other financial contracts, CDS
contracts require exposures to be frequently settled.
• The irony is that there is much more information on Greek CDS contracts than anything else about the entire
Greek situation, including the issue of who owns Greek bonds, the ECB's actual Greek bond holdings, the collateral
backing the ECB's repo facilities, the rate of Greek deposit outflows (reported on a 3 month lag), etc.
• The ratio of 15:1 between gross and net CDS exposure written on Greece is almost identical to the $72/$5 billion in gross
and net CDS exposure written on Lehman. CDS written on Lehman was not a major factor in the financial crisis; losses
sustained by money market funds on Lehman commercial paper was the bigger issue.
• I wrote an Eye on the Market in October 2008 entitled, "The Trouble With Trillions", which focused on misconceptions
about derivatives risk. It's worth reviewing for anyone interested in the subject matter. The bottom line is that most
derivative losses were linked to the entry of undercapitalized insurance companies into these markets, writing contracts
that were not subject to high-frequency collateral-posting, and linked to home prices rather than the solvency of corporate
or sovereign issuers.
s A recent analysis of global depletion rates of existing oil fields estimates this number at 5.5%-6.5% per annum, a bit higher than estimates
from ExxonMobil and Cambridge Energy Research Associates. The implication: the world needs 4-7 million barrels a day of new
discoveries each year to keep oil supplies constant. "Depletion rate analysis — a guide to future oil production", Mikael Hook, Uppsala
University, Sweden, September 2010.
4
EFTA01069680
Eye on the Market I June 27, 2011 J.P.Morgan
It's that time of year again (Final Exam); the IEA's release of strategic petroleum reserves; the D-word (derivatives)
The material tantalised harm is intended as a general minket commentary. Opinions expressed herein are those orfMichael Cembalest and may differfrom those of other J.P. Morgan
employees and affiliates. This information in no way constitutes J.P. Morgan research and should not be treated as such. Further. the views expressedherein may differfrom that
contained in J.P. Morgan research reports. The above summanipriceiltsioteststatistics have been obtainedfrom sources deemed to be reliable. but undo not guarantee their accuracy or
completeness, any yield referencedis indicative and subject to change. Past performance it not a guarantee offuture results. References to the performance or character ofour portfolios
generally refer to our Balanced Model Portfolios constructed byJ.P. Morgan. his a proxyfor client performance and may not represent actual transactions or investments in client
accounts. The modelportfolio can be implemented across brokerage or managed accounts depending on the unique objectives of each client and is serviced through distinct legal entities
licensedfor specific activities. Bank trust and investment management services are provided by J.P. Morgan Chase Bank. N.A. and its affiliates. Securities are offered through J.P.
Morgan Securifies LLC (JPMS). Member NYSE F/NRA and S/PC. Securities products purchased or sold through !PAIS are nor insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
("FDIC,: are not deposits or other obligations ofits bank or thrift affiliates and are not guaranteed by its bank or thrift affiliates: and are subject to investment risky, including possible
loss ofthe principal invested. Nor all investment ideas referenced are suitablefor all investors. These views may not be suitable for all investors. Speak with your AP. Morgan
Representative concerning your personal situation. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitationfor the purchase or sale ofanyfinancial instrument. Prime Investments may
engage in leveraging and other speculative practices that may increase the risk ofinvestment loss, can be highly illiquid. are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuations to
investors and may involve complex tax structures and delays in distributing important tax information. Typically such investment ideas can only be offered to suitable investors through a
confidential offering memorandum whichfully describes all terms. conditions. andrisks.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not provide tax advice. Accordingly. any discussion of U.S. tax matters contained herein (including any
attachments) is not intended or written to be used. and cannot be used. in connection with the promotion. marketing or recommendation by anyone unaffiliated with JPAlorgan Chase &
Co. ofany ofthe matters addressedherein orfor the purpose ofavoiding U.S. tar-relatedpenalties. Note that !.P. Morgan is not a licensed insurance provider.
0 2011JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.
(4)-0Z *4-61 40)111 (P)-LI 414-91. 4(0
-s :(q)-v (p) 1O la) lq) '(ey£1 `(e)-Z t(P)-1 t( 3)-01. (3)-6 !Kull (1))-1. 4q)-9 !(O)-S 40-4 (P)-£ !(c1)-Z !(1))- I :amtasuy
5
EFTA01069681
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
beef98ec594c1ed0b2772954961273b9c62556efed1d626f7c7f26168f7bd5b9
Bates Number
EFTA01069677
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
5
Comments 0