podesta-emails
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----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=5a6T
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
*Main Topics:* 'Appeasement' controversy, Hamas hypocrisy, McCain and
lobbyists, Huckabee's "joke," surrogate battles
Summary of Shift:
Bush traveled to Saudi Arabia and tried to get Saudis to increase oil
output; they agreed, but oil prices still hit new high today. Osama bin
Laden released a new audio tape. Barack Obama shot back at Bush and McCain
for their "naïve and irresponsible" foreign policy, leading many pundits to
remark that the general election is upon us and Barack is looking relatively
good. Hillary spoke out in Obama's defense, though she is being increasingly
talked about as being on the sidelines. McCain gave a speech to the NRA
today in Louisville, KY.
Highlights:
1. On bus, McCain outlines his rules for talking to Hamas
2. McCain's foreign policy cred debated in light of 'appeasement'
controversy and Hamas hypocrisy
a. "Countdown" does 'Double Talk Express' segment on 'McBush diplomacy'
b. James Rubin: McCain's "going to have trouble" with national security
because he's taken "two very different positions"
c. "Hardball" panel suggests Obama came out on top of McCain in this
scuffle
d. Was McCain's reaction to 'appeasement' controversy a smart move?
3. Networks cover McCain's lobbyist problems
a. Hume discusses McCain's re-vetting of his staff
b. "Hardball" panel discusses McCain's today's McLobbyist stories
c. MSNBC interviews Adam Green about new MoveOn ad featuring Charlie
Black
4. Pfotenhauer defends McCain
a. Schuster presses Pfotenhauer on the difference between "talking with"
and "dealing with" Hamas
b. Pfotenhauer defends McCain against Obama counterattack and on Charlie
Black
c. Pfotenhauer: Obama trying to redefine himself as a moderate with
"hysterical diatribe"
5. MSNBC analyzes McCain's speech to NRA
6. NBC Pentagon correspondent doubts McCain's predictions for capturing
Bin Laden
7. Huckabee's "joke" about Obama falls flat
8. Romney confused by Obama's response to McCain
9. McCain reaches out to liberal bloggers
10. Obama responds to McCain
a. Obama shakes off McCain and Bush's attacks on his foreign policy
b. CNN reports on Obama firing back
11. Local news summarizes Obama-McCain-Bush back-and-forth
12. John Edwards emphasizes McSame
Clips:
Highlight #1
*McCain Outlines His Rules for Talking to Hamas *(FNC 05/16/08 6:19pm)
JOHN MCCAIN: If they abandon their terrorist commitment to the destruction
of the state of Israel, to all of the terrorist activities they're engaged
in. Then we would have a different relationship.
Highlight #2
*"Countdown" Asks Whether McBush's Diplomacy Is Manufactured Pandering or
Authentic and Out of Touch* (MSNBC 05/15/08
RACHEL MADDOW: […] In our fourth story tonight, simplistic, jingoistic,
fear-mongering presidential wannabe John McCain of today versus that
soft-on-terror, naïve appeaser John McCain of 2003 and 2006.
[…]
MADDOW: Who was that guy? He had a sophisticated nuanced view of foreign
relations.
CHRIS HAYES: I know. This is the question everyone has been asking of where
did that guy go? And not just on an issue like this. What he said in 2006 is
in some Senses not in the spectrum of debate in this election in 2008. And
it's not just on that issue. It's on almost every issue, from opposing the
Bush tax cuts to calling Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell agents of
intolerance before embracing them. *There's a whole kind of greatest hits
album you could put together of moments of Sensibility from John McCain that
he's just thrown off the boat as he's rowing as fast as he can go into the
arms of the right-wing sector of the Republican party.*
MADDOW: Well Chris, which do you think that McCain at greater risk ofhere?
The perception he's a flip-flopper, that he's changed his positions back and
forth over time? Or is he more at risk of the perception that he's
incoherent on a lot of stuff, including foreign policy, that he doesn't
appear to have any guiding compass for his stance on America's place in the
world and a lot of other policy matters?
HAYES: I think it's a tough call. Because flip-flopper is this kind of
operating concept that we have in American presidential politics, I would
say it's probably going to be that in many cases. But in some Senses, right,
the whole thing that he's built his reputation on issues is this sort of
integrity. *And if you look at his positions and compare them now to what
they were in the past, you have two options: Either he believes now what he
says he believes—and those beliefs are in direct contradiction to vast
majorities of the American electorate. Or, he's just esSentially pandering,
and he's shamelessly adopting views he doesn't hold, which cuts against the
rationale of the sort of maverick John McCain who has such integrity he's
willing to champion unpopular views.*
MADDOW: My Sense is that there was a time when the sort of unilateral,
go-it-alone, with-us-or-against-us, Bush v. World stance was actually
politically advantageous to Republicans for a while. I don't think that's
true anymore, particularly after the GOP got their clock cleaned in '06. […]
Is McCain, do you think, emulating a Bush image that's time has passed? Or
could this sort of stance on this appeasement issue—this don't talk to
anybody issue—is this still something that could this have political potency
for the GOP this year?
HAYES: You know, I think there's vestigial potency and I would never
underestimate the power of fear in any kind of political campaign. But what
we're seeing in the last few days, which is really remarkable, are the
diminished returns of that. In fact, *we're seeing McCain play defense on
foreign policy.* *He was so panicked about the '100 years' comment that he
had to rush out and actually reduce that by 95% and say oh we're going to
get out in 5 years. I mean, if we give him a little more time, maybe he'll
be down to 3 months.* The point is we haven't seen this in the last 8 years.
We haven't seen Republicans running away from this sort of cowboy image
because they've found it so politically beneficial to don that mantel. And I
think we're beginning to see a sea change in the electorate right now.
*Rubin Says McCain's "Going to Have Trouble" with National Security Because
He's Taken "Two Very Different Positions"* (MSNBC 05/16/08 1:19pm)
UBIN: The reality is that foreign policy and national security is going to
be a big, big portion of this general election for the very simple reason
that the country has a big decision to make. Whether we continue to do what
we've been doing for 6 years in Iraq and keep our troops there for an
indefinite period or whether we begin to withdraw […] . John McCain has many
views on national security as we've learned. And I think we're going to
discover that it's going to be extremely hard for him to sustain his current
posture, which is some sort of tough guy, when in the past, he's said very
different things. […]
ANDREA MITCHELL: […] You wrote today in your op-ed that in fact John McCain
suggested dealing with Hamas after the Palestinian elections.
[…]
MITCHELL: The McCain camp has responded […] by issuing a series of
statements showing that McCain has made it clear that he would not
unconditionally negotiate with enemies or so-called radicals or terrorists
like Hamas. And apparently that he's making a distinction between Hamas, the
terror group, and Hamas, the elected government of the Palestinians. Your
reaction to that?
RUBIN: Well, they have to say something, don't' they? John McCain was
putting forward, two years ago, […] the realist view in the Republican Party
[…] that we have to do business with Hamas. He told the NPR […] that a year
ago. That's one view. There's a very different view, and that is the view of
President Bush and the new version of john McCain, which is that we
shouldn't negotiate, talk to or deal with Hamas, iran, syria, any of these
countries. And i think John McCain is going to have trouble with this
because he's been part of both camps. […] He's taken two very different
positions. They can find all the quotes they want, but it's clear that at
that time in Europe, when it was perhaps thought of as cool to talk about
Hamas in this forward-leaning way, […] a lot of them did talk in that way.
[…] So that fashionable kind of phrase that he was using in Davos reflected
a position in the Republican Party that, as I said, others have held, and
it's not going to be easy for him to take these cheap shots at Barack Obama
when he's held both positions. […]
*"Hardball" Panel Suggests Obama Came Out On Top of McCain This Week* (MSNBC
05/16/08 5:58pm)
CHRIS CILLIZZA: […] It seems like it was a month ago, but McCain, out in
Washington and Oregon talking about global warming and climate change. You
know, he is systematically stepping away from the President and criticizing
the President on a number of issues.
CHRIS MATTHEWS: […] Is this the dime's worth of difference we're looking at?
[…] Is that the door-opener for him: you know, I can answer questions; Bush
can't?
MICHELLE BERNARD: […] I think his speech in Oregon this week doesn't help
him. He's trying to reach out to independents, he's trying to reach out to
Reagan Democrats. But I don't think this was a great week for him because
that climate change speech in Oregon completely disaffected his base.
[…]
CHRIS MATTHEWS: […] There's only one area where Bush comes out on top, and
that's protecting us from terrorism. Here you have Barack Obama taking him
on in his strong suit.
CILLIZZA: I just wrote down 2 words here that Barack Obama said: "naïve" and
"irresponsible." Those are the words that John McCain is trying to paint
Barack Obama with on foreign policy. I think you are seeing Barack Obama say
[…] you want to fight on foreign policy? Let's fight on foreign policy!
*"Hardball" Panel Asks Whether McCain's Reaction to 'Appeasement'
Controversy Was a Smart Move *(MSNBC 05/16/08 6:34pm)
RICHARD WOLFFE: […] Obama's going after the whole straight-talk notion. So
look this is a problem for McCain in the Sense that whether or not these
comments are clear, you have to contextualize it. You have to explain it. It
doesn't sound like straight talk. And on top of that, you have McCain not
taking the opportunity to break with Bush[…] So he missed an opportunity and
he handed this gift over to Obama. I don't think it was a good play for
McCain.
DAVID GREGORY: […] The real opportunity here and the challenge for both
candidates to lay out a vision for diplomacy in the post-Bush era in the
Middle East. And it's going to be a more complicated game. And we see that
in the way the Bush administration has handled their diplomacy. They're
talking to Iran, as it applies to IRaq. They're talking with the North
Koreans […] Petraeus has talked to Sunni terrorists […]
PAT BUCHANAN: It is indeed. And Bush himself had a great success talking to
Libya, a character that blew up Pan Am 103 and killed all those schoolkids
[…] Substantively I agree with Obama that we gotta talk to people like
Hamas, maybe back-channel. And I agree with him that there's hypocrisy here.
But politically I'm telling you, when you tie Barack to Hamas on a very
simple headline level, it is a real problem for […] Obama […] and
Republicans are going to work this. […]
EUGENE ROBINSON: *John McCain is spending a lot of time arguing with
himself, arguing with his former self at least on the Hamas issue. Now he
says we can wrap up this little war issue in 5 years as opposed to 100
years. He has some explaining to do.*
BUCHANAN: He is moving on Iraq. He's moving to 4 years. You're right. He's
getting off a wicket. 100 years and endless war—he's gotta get off that. And
he's made a smart move.
Highlight #3
*McCain Re-vets Staff* (MSNBC 05/16/08 6:24pm)
BRITT HUME: Well the McCain campaign is also looking into the relationships
between its staffers and lobbyists. Campaign manager Rick Davis e-mailed a
memo out today that includes a questionare about previous professional
activities. The move comes after the departure of two aides who had lobbied
for the Burmese junta back in 2003 and a third who also works with a
political advocacy group opposing Barack Obama.
*MSNBC Panel Discusses Today's McLobbyist Stories* (MSNBC 05/16/08 6:36pm)
DAVID GREGORY: The McCain camp will re-vet its entire staff to look for
conflicts of interest or connections to lobbyists. Politico's Ben Smith
reports this: […] The campaign is requiring all staff to disclose all
connections to lobbyists according to the Atlantic.com's Marc Ambinder […]
What this underscores to me is the duality of the McCain campaign. He is
part lone-wolf, part maverick and part conventional Republican politician.
He's trying to reconcile those 2 things as we proceeds here.
SUSAN MOLINARI: […] Please find me anybody who runs for office, particularly
presidential, who doesn't have lobbyists who are supporting them!
GREGORY: […] That's true, but McCain has carved out a unique niche as a
political identity that is not the conventional typical politician. I don't
think that's how he would answer that question, saying Name me a politician
who doesn't work with lobbyists!
[…]
MOLINARI: And you know what the difference for John McCain is? And I'm a
lobbyist. He doesn't change his position for lobbyists. Lobbyists know that
they can go talk to him once in a while but he has never done what lobbyists
or what conventional wisdom wants him to do. John McCain follows one person,
and that's John McCain. So I don't really think he's got anything, if you
look at his record, to prove based on where he takes his issues and who
influences John McCain. The people influence John McCain in his years in the
Senate have shown that.
[…]
RICHARD WOLFFE: Remember the lesson of South Carolina in 2000. […] What was
really successful for the Bushies in 2000 in SC was to portray McCain as a
Washington insider, the Chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee with all
these ties to big business and lobbyists. And it worked!
*MSNBC Questions Adam Green on MoveOn Charlie Black Ad *(MSNBC 05/16/08
4:36pm)
CONTESSA BREWER: John McCain is taking incoming fire on two fronts today
from Barack Obama and also from MoveOn.org. Listen to this new ad they just
released on the internet.
[ad plays]
BREWER: . . .do you think that's fair? In essence you're basically linking
McCain with murderers?
ADAM GREEN: Well, what we're saying is this: We're making clear that as John
McCain holds himself out to the public as someone who will be a reformer,
who will change the ways of Washington that his campaign is actually run by,
literally, over a hundred lobbyists. And chief among them is this guy,
Charlie Black, who is not just his top political advisor but who has lobbied
for foreign dictator after foreign dictator.
BREWER: . . . that's a fear inducing ad. It's full of emotion in this case
Adam. Do you think MoveOn might have pushed the envelope just a little bit?
GREEN: No, no, I think pushing the envelope is representing dictators that
killed thousands of their own people . . . our point is this, there are some
things that are fair game and there are some things that are untouchable.
And people who have been the PR arm and the influence peddling arm of
foreign dictators in Washington DC have no role at the top of John McCain's
campaign. And our point to him is this: He can be a straight talker or a
double talker. And if he wants to be a straight talker, he needs to say to
Charlie Black, "You're fired."
BREWER: The GOP spokesman calls the ad an outrageous personal smear and goes
on to say, "Barack Obama's failure is evidence of his weak leadership and
undermines everything his campaign is supposed to be about." . . . do you
worry that any of this could form a backlash against Barack Obama?
GREEN: . . . if you're going to poll people about do you support lobbyists
who support foreign dictators or not, I imagine it would be nearly a hundred
to zero. There won't be a backlash . . .
Highlight #4
*Schuster Presses Pfotenhauer on the Difference Between "Talking With" and
"Dealing With" Hamas* (MSNBC 05/16/08 3:34pm)
[…]
DAVID SCHUSTER: Nancy, has the United States been made more safe or less
safe by Iraq?
NANCY PFOTENHAUER: Well, I think it's undeniable at least recently, since we
adopted the surge approach that we have seen real progress that's been made.
And I think any fair coverage of the debate needs to at least acknowledge
the fact that John McCain was the primary instigator getting us to change
our policy there. More importantly, when you look back at what Senator Obama
had to say today, I think it is pretty clear that he has – it's basically
all rhetoric. He has a lot of air and not a lot behind it.
SCHUSTER: Nancy, let's talk about rhetoric. Does John McCain stand by—it's a
simple yes or no—does John McCain stand by the President's remarks yesterday
when the President said that talking to our enemies in the Middle East is
the same as appeasing Hitler?
PFOTENHAUER: Senator McCain responded directly himself and said he took the
President at his words, that those comments were not directed toward Senator
Obama. I have to take issue a little bit, David, with -- I have been
watching this segment or listening to this segment for the last 10 or 15
minutes, and I've heard you reference three times something that's
completely untrue and misleading to your viewers. And that's the so-called
reference to Senator McCain saying that he would speak to Hamas. And that is
absolutely not the case.
SCHUSTER: […] Nancy, does the McCain campaign believe that talking to our
enemies is the same as appeasing them?
PFOTENHAUER: We have never used the term 'appeasement,' and you know that.
SCHUSTER: But the president did. An argument that historians said was
intellectually dishonest when the president said that talking to our enemies
is the same what Chamberlain did with Nazi Germany by giving them
Czechoslovakia. You know that's not accurate!
PFOTENHAUER: B-b-b-b-but
SCHUSTER: Sen McCain knows that's not accurate!
PFOTENHAUER: Sen McCain is responsible for what he says, no responsible for
what Pres Bush says. And we have specifically not used the term
'appeasement.' However, it is absolutely legitimate to discuss the fact that
Barack Obama has said unconditionally that he is willing to sit down and
talk to leaders of rogue nations without setting the conditions that would
be, you know, tantamount to showing that real progress could be made.
Whereas, Senator McCain has said, point blank, that there are certain
conditions that would have to be in place. And Senator Obama's judgment is,
I think, at issue here. It's legitimate. It's what should be debated between
now and November. Because I think he has shown himself to be lacking in good
judgment in foreign policy.
SCHUSTER: Nancy, why shouldn't we take it as a flip-flop when Senator McCain
was asked two years ago by jamie rubin about Hamas being in charge of the
palestinian government and Senator McCain implicitly saying, yes, at some
point, we are going to have to have some dialogue with them. *How is that
not a flip-flop from what he is saying now?*
PFOTENHAUER: David, what he said is that we would have to deal with Hamas.
And that's what I take serious issue with the treatment in this segment just
today where *you keep saying, he's said he would talk with them. He did not.
He said he would deal with*—
SCHUSTER*: What's the difference between dealing and talking with them?*
PFOTENHAUER: *Ok David, dealing can be anything from bombing to a bed of
roses. *And the way we deal with Hamas right now is we isolate them
diplomatically. We try to slow down and stop their financial and military –
SCHUSTER: So John McCain is saying we should go ahead and bomb the
Palestinian government when he said we'll have to deal with them in the
context of a question of them being in charge of the Palestinian
territories?
PFOTENHAUER: David, David, David, this is ridiculous way to have this
conversation. There is no -- what I'm saying is that dealing with is very
different from saying you are going to sit down and talk to them. We are
dealing with them right now through diplomatic isolation, through trying to
stop efforts or slow down the efforts that are primarily driven by Iran to
provide Hamas this financial and military support. And we are energetically
supporting Israel's right to defend themselves. That is one way you could
deal with Hamas. It is in fact the way we are dealing with them right now.
And it doesn't involve sitting down with terrorist organizations or state
sponsors of terrorists.
SCHUSTER: Nancy Pfotenhauer, even though we disagree, you argue very well.
We appreciate you coming on.
PFOTENHAUER: Thank you, David.
[Note: For anyone who's counting, Schuster says "Nancy" 5 times. Pfotenhauer
says "David" 7 times.]
Nancy Pfotenhauer Defends McCain after Obama Counterattack on Iran and on
Charlie Black
GREGG JARRETT: . . .you know, it may be a fair point by Barack Obama, and he
is making it repeatedly, that Kennedy and Nixon and Reagan all met with the
leaders of the evil empire and surely those presidents were guilty of
appeasement. How is meeting Ahmadinejad any different?
PFOTENHAUER: meeting with the President of Iran when he is advocating openly
the eradication of Israel is a very, very different proposition. I think one
of my favorite statements that was made during a Republican Presidential
debate . . . by Mayor Guiliani and he said, yeah, Reagan talked to Gorbachev
and he did it when we had 21,000 missiles pointed at him. Now, I mean, we
have to really focus here on how dangerous and, I think, almost bizarre this
judgment call is from Obama . . .
JARRETT: Why is it bizarre?
PFOTENHAUER: It's bizarre because he is talking about sitting down with
terrorists or state sponsors of terrorism without any signal that those
talks are going to be productive.
JARRETT: Is there any difference between an evil empire that's got thousands
of nukes aimed at us . . . and a guy who's trying to develop nukes . . .?
PFOTENHAUER: . . . the signaling of the President of the United States
sitting down with the President of Iran who is a radical who's obviously
trying to achieve goals that are directly at odds with the United States.
The signaling to the people of Iran would be horrible.
[. . .]
JARRETT: Look, I want to move on because John McCain has repeatedly tried to
portray Barack Obama as the friend of Hamas and you know, McCain is vowing,
you know, I'll be Hamas's worst enemy. That's not what he said two years ago
in an interview . . . "They're the government . . . sooner or later we're
going to have to deal with them one way or another." Obama says he will not
meet with Hamas. Is John McCain guilty of hypocrisy Nancy?
PFOTENHAUER: Not at all. In fact, one of the things that just drives me
crazy is . . . that statement keeps being repeated and the implication is
that it's the same as what Sen. Obama has stated. And that couldn't be
further from the truth. And Sen. McCain has been constant in his . . .
articulation of how he would approach terrorists and . . . state sponsors of
terrorism from the day that he issued the press release after that election
. . . he said we have to deal with. To deal with Hamas. . .
JARRETT: . . . Charlie Black is of course a chief political advisor, a long
time lobbyists, there's this MoveOn.org ad that basically portrays Charlie
Black as working with and for some of the world's worst dictators,
mass-murderers, terrorists and tyrants. Does this underscore a vulnerability
for John McCain? His very close ties to controversial and perhaps comprised
lobbyist.
PFOTENHAUER: You know what, we at least have a policy at the McCain campaign
about disclosing who you've worked for and what interests you've
represented. I would like to see a similar scrutiny of the Obama campaign
which has been kind of under this veil if you will—
JARRETT: They say they don't have any lobbyists.
PFOTENHAUER: Oh, that. Do you believe that Gregg?
*Pfotenhauer: Obama Trying to Redefine Himself as a Moderate with
"Hysterical Diatribe" *(FNC 05/16/08 12:41pm)
JANE SKINNER: . . . the headline out of that certainly was this, "I'm going
to make it perfectly clear," Barack Obama said, "if George Bush and John
McCain want to debate about protecting the United States of America,
anytime, anyplace. I will win because they have a lot to answer for."
STEVE MURPHY: . . . John McCain has said we've got to do in Pakistan what
Musharrif tells us to do. When a year ago Barack Obama said that he's going
to go get the terrorists in Pakistan, John McCain said no way we can't do
that . . .
SKINNER: . . . the Democrats say we've got John McCain right where we want
him, we've got him aligned with George Bush just like this.
NANCY PFOTENHAUER: Well, I think it's pretty clear, anybody who's actually
been a student of foreign policy over the last eight years knows where John
McCain agrees and disagrees with President Bush . . . but let me just back
up a little bit on this. I think what we heard from Barack Obama today was a
vaguely hysterical diatribe that shows how desperate he is to move and try
and move himself from the hard-left position he's held during the primary
position. And he's trying to reposition himself more moderately during the
general election season. He has said frequently . . . that he is willing to
meet unconditionally with the leaders of rogue nations. That, in my opinion,
shows a very dangerous judgement and deserves to be thoroughly debated in
there's nothing we'd be more happy to do.
[. . .]
SKINNER: . . . how does this work as a Democratic approach to this? One of
the first things that Barack Obama said out of the gate there today was,
"This is the kind of attack . . . that has divided our country . . ." He is
going to use that . . . saying this is fearmongering . . . are you guys
vulnerable to that kind of attack?
PFOTENHAUER: Barack Obama defines anything as fearmongering or divisive if
it questions his judgment. And let me tell you right now, that is probably
the most significant that needs to be debated as Americans move forward to
cast their votes in the fall. Here you have an individual who, when he was a
member of the . . . Illinois legislature voted present more than a hundred
times . . . that is the profile of someone who ducks critical issues. That
is not the profile of someone who goes after our problems with a single
minded determination to solve them. Which, by the way is the record of John
McCain. You cannot find anybody in our nations capitol . . . who would ever
describe John McCain as someone other than the type of person who goes after
both hands. Now I don't see a lot of . . . there there with Barack Obama . .
. and that's why we'd love to go face to face . . . and debate these issues
because we've got a ton of substance and Sen. McCain has a record of having
improved the lives of Americans.
Highlight #5
*MSNBC Airs Post Speech Analysis *(MSNBC 05/16/08 4:52pm)
CONTESSA BREWER: . . . McCain said earlier today that he would have the
troops home by 2013 but you heard him there promising that he would not risk
America's security by brining home our men and women before he thinks that
the area there is secure and stable . . . we heard McCain there making a
very strong argument . . . about Iraq. Karl Rove says the way that
Republicans have got to operate to win this election . . . is to convince
the American people that staying the course in Iraq is the right move.
Haven't they been trying to do that?
JOE WALKIN: John McCain has been winning points for some months now because
of the fact that he's all about straight talk. Let's face it, a year ago
John McCain wasn't given any chance by any of the political pundits . . . of
being the Republican nominee . . . and the reason why he won all those
newspaper endorsements and he's won the strong support of Americans is that
. . . he just tells it like it is. He hates war, Contessa, he's not a
warmonger. . .
BREWER: But the straight talk Joe, then includes these remarks from the
McCain campaign . . .:"Barack Obama's hysterical diatribe in response to the
speech in which his name wasn't even mentioned . . .[was] the same tired
partisan rants." David, what do you make of all of this?
DAVID GOODFRIEND: Well I think that what we see in John McCain is somebody
who is not just embracing George Bush but running to and kissing George Bush
. . . the fact of the matter is that if you go over every single public
opinion poll in the United States today and you ask people, "Do you think
that the Iraq War has made the world safer?" They'll say no. "Do you think
it has made the United States safer?" They'll say no. . .
WALKIN: . . . whoever the president is, Democrat or Republican, they're
going to have to deal with the issue of our men and women in Iraq . . .
GOODFRIEND: . . . what we're arguing about is whether the president of the
United States is going to do everything in his or her power to end the war
in a timely fashion. . .
Highlight #6
*NBC Senior Pentagon Correspondent Doubts McCain's Predictions for Capturing
Bin Laden *(NBC-WRC-DC 05/16/08 6:14pm)
JIM VANCE: […] You know the presumptive Republican […] presidential nominee
said that he'd go to the ends of the earth […] in order to capture Osama bin
Laden. Any reason that you've seen or know of to think that Mr. McCain might
be able to do that where President Bush has not been able to do so?
JIM MIKLASZEWSKI: Well and John McCain so much as predicted that Al-Qaeda
would be defeated totally and that Osama Bin Laden would either by killed or
captured by the year 2013. *But I can tell you that U.S. military and
intelligence officials won't touch that with a 10-foot pole. They say
they're not willing to make those kinds of predictions.* Particularly
because, even though AQ, as an organization, has been seriously degraded to
the point where it's believed they cannot carry out the kinds of attacks,
the scope of attacks, as they did on 9/11; they still have the uncanny
ability to regenerate themselves, albeit in smaller cells, and still have
the capability to carry out terrorist attacks, pretty much at will in many
cases. And McCain also said that AQ no longer has a safe haven, but clearly
Bin Laden, Zawari, his #2, and many AQ elements do in fact have a safe haven
well dug-in to the areas of western Pakistan along the Afghanistan border.
Highlight #7
*Huckajoke Falls Flat *(MSNBC 05/16/08 8:20pm)
RACHAEL MADDOW: Senator McCain's speech today was possibly not the most
shocking thing said at the NRA convention in Louisville. That honor goes to
former Republican candidate Mike Huckabee who responded to a sharp noise in
the hall . . . by joking that perhaps something bad happened to Sen. Obama.
[plays clip]
MADDOW: Gov. Huckabee realizing exactly how inappropriate his joke was.
Issuing a statement just moments ago saying, quote, "I had made an offhand
remark that was in no way intended to offend or disparage Sen. Obama. I
apologize that my comments were offensive. That was never my intention."
*MSNBC Questions Adam Green on MoveOn Charlie Black Ad *(MSNBC 05/16/08
4:36pm)
CONTESSA BREWER: John McCain is taking incoming fire on two fronts today
from Barack Obama and also from MoveOn.org. Listen to this new ad they just
released on the internet.
[ad plays]
BREWER: . . .do you think that's fair? In essence you're basically linking
McCain with murderers?
ADAM GREEN: Well, what we're saying is this: We're making clear that as John
McCain holds himself out to the public as someone who will be a reformer,
who will change the ways of Washington that his campaign is actually run by,
literally, over a hundred lobbyists. And chief among them is this guy,
Charlie Black, who is not just his top political advisor but who has lobbied
for foreign dictator after foreign dictator.
BREWER: . . . that's a fear inducing ad. It's full of emotion in this case
Adam. Do you think MoveOn might have pushed the envelope just a little bit?
GREEN: No, no, I think pushing the envelope is representing dictators that
killed thousands of their own people . . . our point is this, there are some
things that are fair game and there are some things that are untouchable.
And people who have been the PR arm and the influence peddling arm of
foreign dictators in Washington DC have no role at the top of John McCain's
campaign. And our point to him is this: He can be a straight talker or a
double talker. And if he wants to be a straight talker, he needs to say to
Charlie Black, "You're fired."
BREWER: The GOP spokesman calls the ad an outrageous personal smear and goes
on to say, "Barack Obama's failure is evidence of his weak leadership and
undermines everything his campaign is supposed to be about." . . . do you
worry that any of this could form a backlash against Barack Obama?
GREEN: . . . if you're going to poll people about do you support lobbyists
who support foreign dictators or not, I imagine it would be nearly a hundred
to zero. There won't be a backlash . . .
Highlight #8
*Romney Confused by Obama's Response to McCain *(CNN 05/16/08 4:27pm)
MITT ROMNEY: With regards to the President's comment, the President said
that we should not negotiate with terrorist that is nothing unusual. I was
frankly surprised to have Barack Obama say that that was leveled at him. I
guess I am kind of speechless at him saying that that was something that was
directed towards him. The president is saying what presidents have said time
and time again… With regards to Senator McCain, look you have a very big
difference between Barack Obama and John McCain with regards on how you are
going to deal with the state sponsors of terror. John McCain like President
Bush and others recognize that we are going to talk these other nations but
we are not going to have the dignity of the office of the President of the
United States bestowed upon Ahmadinejad or Asad so they can have propaganda
bananza. That is just not going to happen.
WOLF BLITZER: The reason the Presidents comments at the Knesset were seeing
as being directed at Senator Obama and other democrats is because White
House officials traveling with the President told that to reporters after
they spotted that paragraph in the speech so it wasn't as if Governor this
was something that just the Barack Obama campaign came up with the news
media traveling with the president they were specifically making that
connection
ROMNEY: Well I wasn't with the white house press corps there so I can't I
can't comment on that. I can tell you that the comment by the president that
we should not have direct discussions, we should not have negotiations
rather with terrorist that is something that has been said time and time
again and I think it is entirely spot on.
BLITZER: There was a video tape that came out today that by Jamie Rubin a
Clinton adviser he used to work for Sky television in London he interviewed
John McCain a few years ago right after, couple of years ago after Hamas won
the Palestinian elections… McCain said that soon or later we are going to
have to deal with them. It seemed, at least the excerpt that was released
today it seemed to suggest that John McCain himself was ready to deal with
quote terrorists.
ROMNEY: Actually when I was growing up my dad said to me Mitt I am going to
have to deal with you one way or the other that did not mean he was planning
on sitting down with me in an official state dinner and having a nice chat
it meant he was planning on some kind of punishment … It is pretty clear
what the intent was of his comment which is that he feels that we just can't
stand by and watch Hamas Hezbollah to continue to fight against the well
being of our own citizens as well as the well being of our allies around the
world.
Highlight #9
*McCain Reaches Out to Liberal Bloggers *(FNC 05/16/08 6:34pm)
BRITT HUME: Senator McCain is taking his campaign message ot liberal and
non-political bloggers. The Washington Times reports McCain invited
non-conservative bloggers to join Thursday's regular conference call. McCain
fielded questions from the environmental blog Grist.org and the women's
sites Punditmom and Her.com. The New York Times reports the effort has
started what it calls a war among liberal bloggers on how to react to
McCain's overture. The McCain campaign says the effort is a logical
extension of his ongoing attempts to reach beyond the conservative
Republican base. It says McCain will even reach out to sports bloggers as a
way to humanize the candidate and break the mold of what it calls, "a carbon
copy politician running for office delivering talking points." But some
observers caution that McCain will have to pick and choose which bloggers to
invite to the conference calls because some sites will not treat him fairly.
Highlight #10
*Barack Obama Shakes Off McCain and Bush's Attacks on his Foreign Policy *(FNC
05/16/08 2:40pm)
BARACK OBAMA: The notion that you would go before the Israeli Knesset on the
60th anniversary of Israel's independence and use term like appeasement and
suggest somehow that Democrats, people like myself, who believe that should
have a tough diplomacy to accompany our military power in dealing with
problems in the region, is wrong. And for Senator McCain to then compound it
by somehow suggesting that I couldn't protect the safety of the United
States when it is George Bush' s policies, supported by John McCain, that
have empowered Iran. And that is undisputed. There is not an observer of
Middle East politics that would not say that the biggest contributor to
Iran's expanding power in the Middle East is George Bush's policies and our
invasion of Iraq. And for them to somehow suggest that they the ones who
have been keeping Iran at bay, is ridiculous. One last point. Senator McCain
has really enjoyed over the last several weeks enjoyed repeating this
comment about how Hamas supports Obama, implying or suggesting that I would
talk to Hamas, despite the fact that I have been crystal clear, time and
time again, that until they renounced violence, recognized Israel abided by
agreements, we should not negotiate with them. And then we find out that on
the same day that he made some of those statements, that in a previous
interview, he suggested well maybe we might have to deal with Hamas. So not
only was he not truthful about my policies, but it turns out that he is on
record suggesting a much more friendly policy towards Hamas than I have. And
those are the kind of distortions that people are tired of and they
certainly contradict the kind of civility that John McCain suggested in the
morning that he wanted to pursue.
*CNN Reports on Obama Firing Back *(CNN 05/16/08 4:08pm)
WOLF BLITZER: Obama says that McCain is guilty of something McCain accuses
Obama of doing. It involves the United States dealing with a group it
considers to be a terrorist organization
DANA BASH: This was supposed to be his message of the day, John McCain the
outdoorsman. Then came a democratic accusation of hypocrisy on John McCain
position on Hamas Jamie Rubin a Hillary Clinton supporter released this
interview he conducted with McCain two years ago… Barack Obama seized on
that blasting McCain for attacking him for wanting to sit down with the
leader of Iran.
[Clip of Obama's response]
BASH: Riding on his bus, McCain insisted his position on Hamas has always
been the same no negotiation till they renounce wanting to destroy Israel.
Highlight #11
*Local News Summarizes Obama-McCain-Bush Back-and-Forth* (NBC-WRC-DC
05/16/08 5:59pm)
STEVE HANDELSMAN: . . .Democrats say they learned their lesson from the last
time, 2004, John Kerry vs. the Swift Boaters, to never turn the other cheek.
To hit back hard and fast. And today, the apparent 2008 Democratic nominee
did.
[. . .]
HANDELSMAN: Called naïve on foreign policy by John McCain yesterday Barack
Obama said today in effect, bring it on.
[. . .]
HANDELSMAN: Obama says Bush and McCain have to answer. For the Iraq war that
McCain now says he would win by 2013. Have to answer for not getting Osama
bin Laden. Obama says Bush let Hamas take over Gaza and let Iran work on
nukes and threaten Israel.
BARACK OBAMA: Those are the failed policies that John McCain wants to double
down on because he still hasn't spelled out one substantial way in which
eh'd be different than George Bush.
HANDELSMAN: The President said in Israel yesterday that sitting down with
Iranian President Ahmedinajad would be like appeasing the Nazis. Obama today
called that fearmongering.
Highlight #12
*John Edwards Emphasizes McSame *(CNN 05/16/08 6:06pm)
JOHN EDWARDS: Luckily, we are now in a very different place. We know what
the American people think of George Bush, we know what they think of this
mess of a war in Iraq and his foreign policy, Wolf, has been a complete and
utter disaster. Moving to the more important thing fo this election, Bush is
not running in this election, is John McCain embraces it. I mean, the McCain
foreign policy is virtually identical to the Bush foreign policy. And, if
you think about those two things in combination and compare it to what's
happened over the last eight years, anybody in America paying attention
knows we need a change.
--
Sara DuBois
Deputy Director, Tracking/Media Monitoring
Progressive Media USA
[email protected]
202-609-7681 (office)
410-967-7306 (cell)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "big campaign" group.
To post to this group, send to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
E-mail [email protected] with questions or concerns
This is a list of individuals. It is not affiliated with any group or organization.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
c0d2cd2da3422554040033ba06adcd9baf9f2f817c1b062277ece82c5c800329
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email
Comments 0