EFTA00718744.pdf

SEARCY DENNEY Iwtst PALM npAcm nprict SCAROLA ETALLABASSELOMCL 2139 PALM REACH LAKES BLVD. WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33409 BARNHART THE TOWLE HOUSE 517 NORTH CAUTOUN STREET TALLAHASSEE. FL 3230/1231 P.O. BOX 3628 WEST PAIL BEACH. FLORIDA 33402 er---SHIPLLYpA Spanish VIA EMAIL and CERTIFIED MAIL-RRO June 14, 2012 ATTORM-YS AT LAW: CSALYS SA EAKERaMINEE Ton'a Haddad Coleman, Es uire or GREGORY BARNHART T HARDEE BASS.• LAUREA MOOS apeAN R. ODNEY aw ces o onja d, P.A. enuaDA E.NUMB MARIANO OARE9A 524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N JamE5w. GPSTAPEOH. JR. JACK V HU Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 DAVID K KELLEN'. CAMERON IA SEWER WALLAM 8 IONG7 DAPRTL L LEWIS' Jack A. Goldberler, Es . uire 'WILLIAM &NORTON PATRICt E. CAANLANI EDNARO V FECCI 'JOHN SCAROLA 'CHRISTIAN D. SEARCY Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 'JOHN A. SHIP/ EY III OlAYSTOPHER K. SPEED IP 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 BRAIIP SJI.I.IVASI 241 WW1 t TERRY West Palm Beach, FL 33401 OCANAI 0 F WARD III CALVE/ N'ARM£RM cirri NSFL Re: Edwards adv. Epstein 'EARL L OENNEVALF Our File No.: 291874 SHAREHOLDERS •BOARD CERTIFIEO AI SO A/DATIPO Dear Ms. Coleman and Mr. Goldberger: '/eITLCKY LIMMF 2 itiPITIAND • I/ASSCEJSETTS F AA SSSSEPI The sworn testimony given today by Scott Rothstein has now confirmed far beyond ° NOV RALIPSHRF 'KEW JERSEY any doubt that Brad Edwards had no participation in and no knowledge of any use of /VIRGIMA WASH/WON DO the legitimate claims that Mr. Edwards prosecuted against your admittedly guilty sex PARALEGALS' offender client, Jeffrey Epstein. Indeed, you have had no reasonable basis to support VNUVIAYANTEXDA any contrary belief at any time in the past, but now even baseless suspicion has been RANDY IA DUFRESNE ONAD Vl EllIA/011t conclusively put to rest. JOH. C./OPENS DEBORAH M.lean VICEM L MBAR°. JR. /AMESPETER LOVE The multiple withdrawals from Mr. Epstein's representation by your predecessors ROBERT W.PITCHER Tan P pony( KATHLEEN UCH strongly suggest that even before Scott Rothstein's deposition, they recognized that it STEVE M smiTH FiceacE S. STARK would be unethical for them to continue to prosecute claims against Mr. Edwards that %COSA A STEIN had absolutely no evidentiary support and were intended from the outset to serve Jeffrey Epstein's extortionate purposes. While you may have chosen to turn a blind eye to that conclusion before, it is now inescapable. Notice that was previously given pursuant to F.S. §57.105 has proved to be no deterrent, and so I am obliged to inform you that if you choose to continue the EFTA00718744 Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Edwards adv. Epstein June 14, 2012 Page 2 prosecution of your pending claims in the face of the irrefutable proof of Bradley Edwards' total innocence of any wrongdoing, I have been authorized to initiate and vigorously prosecute claims against YOU and your law firms for malicious prosecution. In addition, I will take such other action as may be appropriate to address conduct that at this point will have far exceeded the bounds of ethical propriety. You have ten days in which to respond before we proceed as described. Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire at EFTA00718745