EFTA00728683.pdf

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 187 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2009 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, EFTA00728683 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 187 Entered on FLSD Docket 07,06.2009 Page 2 of 4 Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-8081I -CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, 2 EFTA00728684 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 187 Entered on FLSD Docket 07)06.2009 Page 3 of 4 Defendants. DOE II, CASE NO.: 09- 80469-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09- 80591-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 102 CASE NO.: 09- 80656-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RESET TRIAL DATES AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES FOR CASES 08-80811 AND 08-80893 THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant Epstein's Motion to Strike Cases from Current Trial Docket and Motion to Continue Case and/or Alternative Motion to Modify 3 EFTA00728685 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 187 Entered on FLSD Docket 07 06;2009 Page 4 of 4 Trial and Scheduling Order Deadlines for C.M.A, Jane Doe (80893), and Jane Does 2-7, filed May 19, 2009. (DE 104). The Court has reviewed the motion, responses, and replies, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Epstein's Motion to Continue (DE 104) is DENIED as to Plaintiffs C.M.A and Jane Doe (80893). After reviewing the parties' submissions and the record, the Court finds that Defendant's motion to continue is premature. These cases were filed nearly a year ago and there are still several months before the respective December 2009 and February 2010 trial dates. If discovery disputes have precluded the ability of counsel to prepare for trial, the Court will consider a short extension to the discovery deadlines, but under the present circumstances, the trial dates will not be delayed. Counsel should conduct themselves accordingly. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 5ih day of July, 2009. KENNETH A. MARRA Copies furnished to: United States District Judge all counsel of record 4 EFTA00728686