📄 Extracted Text (182 words)
To: [email protected][[email protected]]
From: Jes Staley
Sent Mon 2/1/2010 6:45:57 AM
Against the history of my 30 years with the bank, the current state of debate
with Washington, is actually not that bad.
The greatest problem with Glass Steagal, was that it separated Morgan from our
clients as our clients increasingly choose the capital markets over traditional
bank products; they selected MM funds over deposits and debt issues over bank
loans. There is, thankfully, no discussion in Washington of reinstating that
wedge.
That said. We should accept a tight limit on private equity investing with bank
capital. Then we should reassert, and accept, the separation of bank capital with
Fiduciary money.
We should fight to maintain our ability to service our clients as a fiduciary,
irrespective of how they choose to manage their money, so long as it is
responsible.
My thoughts today.
Jes
This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
EFTA_R1_01500995
EFTA02430918
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
c32c5539e0e69129b73b680ad12a75ee1f47708ed97e88bccd9445a110659af7
Bates Number
EFTA02430918
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0