EFTA00087338
EFTA00087354 DataSet-9
EFTA00087356

EFTA00087354.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 411 words document
P17 V16 D6 V11 V12
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (411 words)
From: Man McDona To Subject: The Spectator - Prince Andrew story Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:12:17 +0000 Dea l Our writer Dominic Green has written about Prince Andrew's correspondence with the Southern District of New York, and how it is being characterized by Geoffrey Berman. I was wondering whether you would be prepared to comment on the following excerpts from Mr Green's story. He attempted to contact the press office earlier today but was not able to get through to anyone: 'Berman has actively misled the global media and the global audience, 'my source alleges. 'The Duke's legal team has dozens ofemail exchanges with the Southern District, proving that there has beenfull cooperation.' On January 27, Berman denounced the Dukefrom the steps ofEpstein's Manhattan townhouse. Berman claimed to befacing a 'wall ofsilence' and 'zero co-operation 'from Andrew. But this, my source tells me, wasn't true: 'Berman must have known we had an email trail.' *** ...the DOJmade no effort to contact Prince Andrew durin Je re E stein's lifitime. Only after Epstein's death in August 2019 and the BBC's broadcast o accusations in November 2019, did the DOJ approach the Prince — not as a suspect, but as a witness. 'The lawyers responded immediately,'I'm told. In early January, the Prince's new legal team suggested that they draft a proposalfor how Andrew would deliver his witness statement. The DOJ, my source reports, accepted this approach. Although the DOJ wanted to talk with Andrew as a witness, Berman seemed to imply that Andrew had aided Epstein's crimes: Epstein couldn't have done what he did without the assistance ofothers.' This, I'm told, was an 'overt breach ofthe DOJ:s own rules on how to engage with witnesses, and the need to maintain privacy and confidentiality'. After Berman's attack in January, there was a everyfrank exchange ofviews' between Andrew's lawyers and the Southern District. But Andrew's team played by the rules and didn t release entails that wouldprove they were negotiating with the Southern District in goodfaith. We plan to publish the story at 3pm ET, but can update the story to include any response. If this request for comment should be directed towards your press office, I'd appreciate it if you could pass it onto them - there is EFTA00087354 no way of contacting them on the SDNY site as their mailbox is full and no one is in the office. Yours sincerely, Matt McDonald Matt McDonald Managing Editor The Spectator US YID EFTA00087355
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
c3dcb252f55e29790ad45e19d4181179178193577c329f4922cd993edbfdf97b
Bates Number
EFTA00087354
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!