podesta_email_18697.txt

podesta-emails 1,381 words email

P17 D6 P19 V16 V10

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Professor Podesta & Judge Leon, I am in your Congressional Investigations class and was hoping to get your advice on what I was considering for my paper topic for the class. I was thinking about addressing the limits to the Benghazi Committee’s authority (statutorily and, perhaps more interestingly, constitutionally) to subpoena (potentially all) e-mails on Hillary Clinton’s private server, mostly analyzing the balance between the right to investigate legitimate topics against the complicated issues of Clinton’s right to and expectations of privacy in her e-mails, given the amount of personal information also contained on her server. Specific topics could include: - who makes the determination of what is private and what is not in response to a subpoena and how that determination is conveyed (e.g. refusal to produce, going to court, etc.) if the determination is made not to subpoena all e-mails but select ones; - issues related to the authority to withhold e-mails based on national security concerns and who makes that determination, the State Department, Clinton, or the Committee; - an analysis of if there is a diminished expectation of privacy to Clinton’s personal communications because there are work-related e-mails on the server as well (and the potential ramifications of this for other federal employees who ever use their personal e-mails for even minor work issues) and if all her private e-mails could be subpoenaed as well under this theory; - issues related to separations of powers concerns due to requesting such a large swath of e-mails from an executive branch department head (and the unique concerns that may possibly arise from Clinton being a presidential candidate); and - if it is within the statutory scope of the Committee’s authority to issue such a subpoena and, if so, if that scope is a proper and constitutional one (or, if it is not, if it could be subpoenaed by the House as a whole instead or some other similar scheme to avoid these legal questions). I would greatly appreciate your advice on if this would be an appropriate paper topic. Thank you, Trent Holbrook Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by 10.25.88.78 with SMTP id m75csp752331lfb; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 06:44:33 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.25.209.73 with SMTP id i70mr2098536lfg.0.1456065873672; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 06:44:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com (mail-lb0-x233.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c04::233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qy1si3323012lbb.11.2016.02.21.06.44.33 for <[email protected]> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 21 Feb 2016 06:44:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::233; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::233 as permitted sender) [email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected] Received: by mail-lb0-x233.google.com with SMTP id x1so68913113lbj.3 for <[email protected]>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 06:44:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=georgetown.edu; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Lgm1kyFW7YGSLqM9pf5M0lDF79YcH7bEGlV5wWewS2Y=; b=npH3fcfgNPU+wBfvoICzr8XrgZqHlrL56DdxfEISi0T1Ns5LM0sx2HtGYpgs5XbsoY bGk5io7QgHiQHTSwDINQrLv0egoN8lWsC9Jca3Ld6/QrRl3uPzC0BT7XDVz+T69xgg06 uNLR4cSfkPrK9GSqlrto67/0r4fF7+mo1g7Y4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; bh=Lgm1kyFW7YGSLqM9pf5M0lDF79YcH7bEGlV5wWewS2Y=; b=jQP56AsA168UhoLoyyHQ10d7wFVg0KVy++uOly13Dh/P6+HaCim613c2K76+cFzev3 XI24MEt2yi+tLqTIx+kBYNJ9XhDaTTILRzG9LS4ujx4nDCU8mtzo+ttbatSeOEsj1d2h tW/PUSsfakZgh6KtqfuhjfRVIuRjxHjsz7hyflB+deNjWwns72ONQRGsDXH15SafpSQz CLYJ0aZbfIMmuaeBC2PQ5ADGH9PNar9mW5uApYWt/Sn0IwIsTZYPoo1GxMjyQI979xcM YEdgHqGTZmzlpVlfLB6T1zctunRROviQEaDORLUn/mWinXqq2KDQ7BD90E9ec+IjE002 YyxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTEn5qA7VxyHIMvuRNUNYfRu9BNB2u3dOPK5t2JrIpHqo++4kgdmlO9fIlBCW10NdX9zTWMNM1E4rM+dTtf MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.63.200 with SMTP id i8mr8408119lbs.5.1456065873050; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 06:44:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: [email protected] Received: by 10.112.151.167 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 06:44:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:44:33 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0UBI59GjWuNkoUL-nwyHs22985Y Message-ID: <CAAEAAs1SQj5q0F6XwqMvYX11dGyNp-2Qm_F5UiAaLA=MWg=CWA@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Congressional Investigations class paper topic From: Trent Holbrook <[email protected]> To: [email protected], [email protected], John D Podesta <[email protected]>, Richard J Leon <[email protected]> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3efde221372052c48c1ad --001a11c3efde221372052c48c1ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Professor Podesta & Judge Leon, I am in your Congressional Investigations class and was hoping to get your advice on what I was considering for my paper topic for the class. I was thinking about addressing the limits to the Benghazi Committee=E2=80=99s au= thority (statutorily and, perhaps more interestingly, constitutionally) to subpoena (potentially all) e-mails on Hillary Clinton=E2=80=99s private server, most= ly analyzing the balance between the right to investigate legitimate topics against the complicated issues of Clinton=E2=80=99s right to and expectatio= ns of privacy in her e-mails, given the amount of personal information also contained on her server. Specific topics could include: - who makes the determination of what is private and what is not in response to a subpoena and how that determination is conveyed (e.g. refu= sal to produce, going to court, etc.) if the determination is made not to subpoena all e-mails but select ones; - issues related to the authority to withhold e-mails based on national security concerns and who makes that determination, the State Department= , Clinton, or the Committee; - an analysis of if there is a diminished expectation of privacy to Clinton=E2=80=99s personal communications because there are work-related= e-mails on the server as well (and the potential ramifications of this for other federal employees who ever use their personal e-mails for even minor wor= k issues) and if all her private e-mails could be subpoenaed as well under this theory; - issues related to separations of powers concerns due to requesting such a large swath of e-mails from an executive branch department head (= and the unique concerns that may possibly arise from Clinton being a presidential candidate); and - if it is within the statutory scope of the Committee=E2=80=99s authori= ty to issue such a subpoena and, if so, if that scope is a proper and constitutional one (or, if it is not, if it could be subpoenaed by the House as a whole instead or some other similar scheme to avoid these leg= al questions). I would greatly appreciate your advice on if this would be an appropriate paper topic. Thank you, Trent Holbrook --001a11c3efde221372052c48c1ad Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"> <p class=3D"MsoNormal">Professor Podesta & Judge Leon,</p><p class=3D"M= soNormal"><br></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal">I am in your Congressional Investi= gations class and was hoping to get your advice on what I was considering for my paper topic for the class.=C2=A0 I was thinking about addressing the limits to the Benghazi Committee=E2=80=99s authority (statut= orily and, perhaps more interestingly, constitutionally) to subpoena (potentially all) e-mails= on Hillary Clinton=E2=80=99s private server, mostly analyzing the balance betw= een the right to investigate legitimate topics against the complicated issues of Cl= inton=E2=80=99s right to and expectations of privacy in her e-mails, given the amount of pe= rsonal information also contained on her server.=C2=A0 Specific topics could include:</p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"></p><ul><li><span = style=3D"text-indent: -0.25in;">who makes the determination of what is priv= ate and what is not in response to a subpoena and how that determination is conveyed (e.g. refusal to produce, going to court, etc.) if the determinati= on is made not to subpoena all e-mails but select ones;</span><br></li><li>= <span style=3D"text-indent: -0.25in;">issues related to the authority to wi= thhold e-mails based on national security concerns and who makes that determination, the S= tate Department, Clinton, or the Committee;</span><br></li><li><span style=3D"te= xt-indent: -0.25in;">an analysis of if there is a diminished expectation of privacy to Clinton=E2=80=99s personal communications because there are w= ork-related e-mails on the server as well (and the potential ramifications of this for other federal employees who ever use their personal e-mails for even minor = work issues) and if all her private e-mails could be subpoenaed as well under th= is theory;=C2=A0</span></li><li><span style=3D"text-indent: -0.25in;">issue= s related to separations of powers concerns due to=C2=A0requesting such a l= arge swath of e-mails from an executive branch department head (and the uni= que concerns that may possibly arise from Clinton being a presidential cand= idate); and</span><br></li><li><span style=3D"text-indent: -0.25in;">if it = is within the statutory scope of the Committee=E2=80=99s authority to issue such a subpoena and, if so, if that scope is a proper an= d constitutional one (or, if it is not, if it could be subpoenaed by the Hous= e as a whole instead or some other similar scheme to=C2=A0avoid these legal ques= tions).</span></li></ul><p></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal">I would greatly appre= ciate your advice on if this would be an appropriate paper topic.</p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><br></p><p class=3D"M= soNormal">Thank you,</p><p class=3D"MsoNormal">Trent Holbrook</p><p class= =3D"MsoNormal"></p> </div> --001a11c3efde221372052c48c1ad--