EFTA01996317.pdf
👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (132 words)
To: jeevacation©gmail.con[[email protected]];
jeevacation mail.com['[email protected]]
From:
Sent: Tue 1/25/2011 2:59:47 PM
Subject: profit
Jeffrey,
Nick told me that his profit on the projector alone was $6,200
his price to us was $58,500 and he paid 552,300 for the DPI,.
according to his last email, I interpret as Nick upgrading to the 3D projector at his cost with no profit to him,.
I would like to speak to DPI tech's and find out if the 3D projector displays a better screen since its using a 3D
lens capable, which according to Dawn. should be a better picture, since its a higher technology lens..not sure if
that is true, but makes sense to me,,,l think you and I agreed that the 3D projector was a brighter sharper
display, just my opinion,
thanks
Larry
EFTA_R1_00490911
EFTA01996317
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
c5dc730368589ad75e7d64ce86d70d489a71502ee735f19dc89ffc73b14588ce
Bates Number
EFTA01996317
Dataset
DataSet-10
Type
document
Pages
1
💬 Comments 0