EFTA00223748.pdf
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: hursda ua '
To: N.:
Subject: ist o names
From: (USAFLS)
Ser riii.1:43111 .
To:t N.;
Subject: List of names
Here are the names of people I am intending to keep in the indictment:
eyewitness info only)
- initials only. not' listed Jane Doe
Not all will be in substantive counts, but they will be mentioned in the oven acts.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1668
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014604
EFTA00223748
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: h r February 14 2 8 2. P
To: N.:
Subject: I now you hate d when I o this,but. . .
I always seem to notice something new when I go through these records. In notes, he shows 'payment to
Golden Cab on 6/17/05. Can you call and see if they have any reco s or any trips tcrEl Brillo Way? Or a Dennis
working there? And that long string of unknown numbers on cell phone. Could those be 'group of lines for
Yellow Cab?
Thanks.
I am almost finished with the changes to the girls we are keeping. I will send that to you and then when I finish the new
girls, I will send that portion.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1670
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014605
EFTA00223749
(USAFLS)
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Here are the names of people I am intending to keep in the indictment:
eyewitness info only)
— initials only, not 'listed Jane Doe
II
Not all will be in substantive counts, but they will be mentioned in the overt acts.
I
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1672
08-80736-CV-MARRA •014606
EFTA00223750
. (USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent:
To:
Subject: RE DOBs
Hi guys - sorry to bother you. On some of the new girls I don't have dobs.
Martell
Dicenso (the 302 says her dob is 84 5/2007)
and do we have 'phone number?)
Have you guys ever talked to or Should I include them?
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1674
08-80736-CV-MARRA ♦014607
EFTA00223751
M, Ann Marie I. (USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: hursda February 14. 2008 1:21 PM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
I In - I didn't send the indictment yet. I was just asking tor input on who to include and who to exclude.
How old was w hen she went Vl jilt
From:
Sen 14, 2008 1:00 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: RE: Epstein Indictment
Hey Marie,
There was no indictment attached to your email. Can you send it again.
In addition to the two calls from
we have two telephone calls from
%I to on her cell /04 at 1:35 pm and 5/2/04 at 10:32 am,
to Shawn Haught's (boyfriend) telephone on 03/04/2004 at
9:46 am and 2:30 pm.
Message pads reflect 10 Inning 03/11/2003 ending 03/01/2006. Individuals identified as
taking the messages are and Alfredo Rodriguez.
From: (USAFLS) [Ann.Marie. j.gov]
Sen 1 AM
To: N.;
Subject: RE: Epstein Indictment
F Y I jell me what you think. Also. can you pu i u essages from and see if you can tell
what the dates are and ‘s.ho took the messages?
at we has only two phone calls with ' 4/23/04 and 5/2/04
rue>
561
From: (USAFLS)
Sen ruary 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
1678
08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014608
EFTA00223752
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for 'few hours this morning. so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted
to talk about which iris we should drop.
and I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought by . here are my thoughts. We c and S.
very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. ill S. is good witness
because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't
want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative
nature outweighs its plie s
I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be completely zuthful about the amount of
sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as 'I virgin on graduation
day.")
That only leaves . the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth
keepisWe have such good documents evidence related to her - message bads, car rental records. 156 calls
with . and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with =, so this is
M).
What do vou think?
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1679
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014609
EFTA00223753
. (USAFLS)
From:
Sent: hursda Febru r 14. 2008 1 00 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: pstein Indictment
■
Hey Marie,
There was no indictment attached to your email. Can you send it again.
In addition to the two calls from on her cell 10/04 at 1:35 pm and 5/2/04 at 10:32 am,
we have two telephone calls from to Shawn Haught's ( boyfnend) telephone on 03/04/2004 at
9:46 am and 2:30 pm.
Message pads reflect 10 messa es from beginning 03/11/2003 ending 03/01/2006. Individuals identified as
taking the messages are and Alfredo Rodriguez.
From: (USAFLS) [Ann. 1
Sen • ru • 1 AM
To: N.;
Su act: RE: Epstein Indictment
FYI -fell me ■ you think. Also. can you pull the messages from and see if you can tell
what the dates arc and who took the messages? Thanks.
And • ) • at we have only two phone calls with MP 4/23/04 and 5/2/04
From: (USAFLS)
Ton ruary 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for' few hours this morning. so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted
to talk about which we should drop.
and I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought by M. here are my thoughts. We c and S.
very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. S. is good witness
because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't
want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative
nature outweighs its pie
I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be completely zuthful about the amount of
sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as virgin on graduation
day.")
That only leaves . the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth
keeping. We have such good documentary evidence related to her — message pads. car rental records, 156 calls
1686
08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014610
EFTA00223754
with and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with M, so this is
key).
hat do ou think?
I
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561
1687
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014611
EFTA00223755
(USAFLS)
From:
Sent: Thur F 14, 2008 12:37 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: Epstein Indictment
I'm not supposed to be involved in n tantive decisions until I get word from on h h'. However, my gener
thoughts are that you are correct 5 of th Vence and will be I good witness, although
reluctant one. Am I correct to assume that and I. are still in? Their past history of commitment will
have to be dealt with and it won't be easy. but I agree that they should be lite fact that their commitments were
post-Epstein is good but his going to try to destroy them. Is in as well? I thought that she was
truthful. What about M 7
'
From: (USAFLS) [mailto
Sen 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Su • ect: Epstein Indictment
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for I few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted
to talk about which girls we should dro .
and I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought by . here arc my thoughts. We can dm and S.
very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. good witness
because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity. Epstein stops the massage and doesn't
want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative
nature outweighs its prejudice.
I think we should drop I because 1 don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of
sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as'i virgin on graduation
day:')
That only leaves the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth
keep' such good documentary evidence related to her — message pads, car rental records, 156 calls
with . and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with . so this is
key).
What do you think?
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1690
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014612
EFTA00223756
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: Thur d Februa 14 20 81 41 M
To: N,
Subject: RE. EpsteinIndictment
FYI - len me you think. Also. can you pull the messages from and see ilyou can tell what the
dates are and 11. oak the messages? Thanks.
And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with M.' 4/23104 and 5/2/U4
ssistant .S,
56I 209-1047
From: .IICSAFLS)
ruary 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for' few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk
about which girls we should drop.
M and I are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought by . here are my th e cal drop I.T eld MI S. very easily.
Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. S. is good witness ause s e shows that, if
you aren't willing to do more sexual activity. Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems
like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice.
I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual
activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as 'i virgin on graduation day.")
That only leaves Il.. the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be wort in .
We have such g document evidence related to her — message pads, car rental records. 156 calls with.
and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with • so this is key).
What do you think?
SLY
1702
08-80736-CV-MARRA •014613
EFTA00223757
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
FYI — Tell me what >nu think. Also. cairtill the messages from il and see if you can tell what the
dates are and who took the messages?
And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with 4/23/04 and 5/2/04
I. Mark VAIN&
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561 209-1047
From: (USAFI.S)
Sen • February 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
Hi Myesha - Our server was down for' few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. 1 wanted to talk
about which girls we should drop.
and I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought by , here are my th e c drop and S. very easily.
Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. S. is I good witness because she shows that, if
you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems
like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice.
I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be cornuietely truthful about the amount of sexual
activity that occurred. !Ps the girl that one of the witnesses described as' virgin on graduation day.")
That only leavesoo the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be wo
We have such g documentary evidence related to her — message palmnal records, 156 calls with
and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with so this is key).
What do you think?
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1794
08-80736-CV-MARRA II-014614
EFTA00223758
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: illhursc ruary . 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for' few hours this morning. so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk
about which girls we should drop.
and are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought byM.
here are my th e cal drop and S. very easily.
Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. S. is I good witness because she shows that, if
you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems
like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice.
I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual
activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as 1 virgin on graduation day.")
That only leaves the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth pin .
We have such good document evidence related to her - message pads. car rental records, 156 calls with
and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with so this is key).
What do you think?
I Marie Villafatia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1706
08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014615
EFTA00223759
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: February 12, 2008 4:33 PM
To: N.
Subject: Te ne numbers
Can you 'mail me your summary chart, too? The Excel spreadsheet.
Thanks.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561 209-1047
1713
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014616
EFTA00223760
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: Tuesday February 12. 2008 4 33 PM
To: N
Subject: elephone numbers
Can you e-mail me your summary chart, too? The Excel spreadsheet.
Thanks.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1714
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014617
EFTA00223761
. (USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: U M. ri iary -i l 2008 3 19 PM
To:
Subject: Telephone charts and phone records
Hi 11- Im im i get thiament package finalized. C's to me the final telephone charts for all of
the d . and Also, do you have all o f records electronically? Maybe we can
search for phone numbers for some of the new girls, even though we don't have their phone records yet.
Also, can you check on the lead to New York? Ideally. I would like to turn the package in on Thursday, so I need to know
if we can include any of those girls.
When you have I chance. please give me I call. I am in the U.S. Attorney's Office
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561 sai
1717
08-80736-CV-MARRA ♦014618
EFTA00223762
.(USAFLS)
From:
Sent: r 08208 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: e. hone call info
Ill fax it in 5 min(what fax U?)
Fro (USAFLS) <
To: N.
Sent: Fri Feb 22 14:07:06 2008
Subject: Phone call info
Hi - Can you "nail or
the ni dictment today. I think
air the dates of the calls? I can add them to
is going to try to finish her review over
the weekend.
Thanks.
II Marie
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax
156n
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014619
EFTA00223763
USAFLS
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: lila
i.wi
eb rt ,t082.10 PM
To: N
Subject: : hone ca info
Thanks
y
500 S. Austra Ian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm h FL 33401
Phone 5
Original Messa
From: Kuyrkendall, IN.
Sent. • Fliiiiiiiiiii2008 2:08 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: Re: Ph!!!M!!!!Millo
I11 fax it in 5 min(what fax II)
From: (USAFLS) <
To: Kuyrkendall, N.
Sent: Fri Feb 22 14:07:06 2008
Subject: Phone call info
Hi - Can you l[mail or the dates of the calls? I can add them to
the in is ment today. I think is going to try to finish her review over
Illr
the weekend.
Thanks.
II Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax
1562
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014620
EFTA00223764
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: n ry , 2:07 PM
To: N.
Subject: one ca m o
Hi Nesbitt — Can you Imail or fax me the dates of the calls? I can add them to the indictment today. I think
is going to try to finish her review over the weekend.
Thanks.
IAssistant
Marie Villafatla
U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach. FL 33401
Phone
Fax
1564
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014621
EFTA00223765
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject: of the FedEx records
last name is or and her phone number is (this may be an office number, not
ce phone number). They also show another corporate name: "Max Hotel Services Corp."
They show' phone number for Epstein and Eric Gany as
They have an Imail address for as: and show her phone number as
The notes show that the Max Hotel Services Corp credit card was declined and then they shos n
a with company name "NYSG LLC"
They want us to be more specific about individual shipment records. so we will have to comb through what they
gave us to identify specific shipments.
lam running to lunch but will be back this afternoon.
Thanks.
I Marie VillafaAa
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400
West Palm Beach. FL 33401
Phone
Fax
1567
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014622
EFTA00223766
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: n aiiiiriary 25. 2008 11 24 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: uestion regarding use of Grand Jury
Thank you. &reline. It is most appreciated.
I Mark' rub:law
Assistantli.S. Atturne)
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400
West Palm Beach. FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax
From: M, (USAFLS)
Sett : nd F 5, 2008 11:23 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Sub ect: RE: Question regarding use of Grand Jury
Marie:
I see no need to change grand juries. Indeed, changing grand juries might suggest that something untoward
occurred, which is not the case.
Nor do I see' requirement to give 1404(b) tape instruction. Let's not forget dig the role of the grand is to
investigate, and it is wholly apEropriate that I grand jury in good faith pursued I line of investigation that does
not lead to indictment. That is very different matter from presenting information pursuant to 404(b), to prove
motive, lack of accident, etc.
I share your instinct that just dropping six victims, and the draft proposed indictment, might call for some
explanation, or at least acknowledgement, to the grand jury. It's always dicey, and not really desirable, to
explain and share legal strategies with the grand jury. Perhaps you can simply tell them that the old draft
proposed indictment is being withdrawn, and II ifferent set of facts is being pursued, and ask them if they can
set aside what they heard previously, and base determination of probable cause solely on the new evidence. If
any of them indicat inability to do so, perha they should li excused from consideration of this case; if that
leaves you without I quorum, then you have I basis to go to I new grand jury.
I hope this helps; I'm available by phone as well.
Cctralitie,
1546
08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014623
EFTA00223767
From: (USAFLS)
Son
bli ruary 25, 2008 9:59 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Su Question regarding use of Grand Jury
Hi — I have received two conflicting points of view regarding this question, so I thought I should ask
the..Here
exp is my situation:
1 have been involved in' long-term investigation of I ild exploitation case. Throughout the investigation, I
have prese ed evidence and testimony to Grand Jury I Some of that evidence and testimony related to six
r
victims (ofI total of 19 victims), including the live testimony of one of those victims. I also began presenting
evidence related to what I called '"draft proposed indictment." For various reasons, the indictment has been
delayed about 9 months. And, r other strategic reasons, we have decided to drop the six victims referenced
above, and replaced them with different six victims.
The question is now raised as to whether I should continue presenting to Grand Jury', with' 404(b)-type
instruction related to the evidence of the six dropped victims and some sort of instruction regarding the initial
"draft proposed indictment", or whether I should presenti Grand Jury B, excluding any testimony regarding
those six victims. One other consideration — Grand Jury is due to expire in August, and I anticipate that the
investigation will continue for quite some time after indi ant. It is possible that the 6 dropped victims will be
re-added in 'superseding indictment.
Thank you.
I Marie Villafafia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
Tracking:
1547
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014624
EFTA00223768
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: Monde Februa 25 2008 11 23 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: uestion regarding use of Grand Jury
Marie:
I see no need to change grand juries. Indeed, changing grand juries might suggest that something untoward
occurred. which is not the case.
Nor do I see 'requirement to give' 404(6) 'Ape instruction. Let's not forget thil the role of the grand is to
investigate, and it is wholly aprpriate that 'grand jury in good faith pursued I line of investigation that does
not lead to indictment. That is very different matter from presenting information pursuant to 404(b), to prove
motive, lack of accident, etc.
I share your instinct that just dropping six victims, and the draft proposed indictment, might call for some
explanation, or at least acknowledgement. to the grand jury. It's always dicey, and not really desirable, to
explain and share legal strategies with the grand jury. Perhaps you can simply tell them that the old draft
proposed indictment is being withdrawn, and lil ifferent set of facts is being pursued, and ask them if they can
set aside what they heard previously, and base determination of probable cause solely on the new evidence. If
any of them indicatt inability to do so. perhags they should lif excused from consideration of this case; if that
leaves you without I quorum, then you have I basis to go to I new grand jury.
I hope this helps: I'm available by phone as well.
Cc:wait/4e.
From: (USAFLS)
Sonjilt• February 25, 2008 9:59 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Su : Question regarding use of Grand Jury
Hi - I have received two conflicting points of view regarding this question. so I thought I should ask
the . Here is my situation:
ir i
I have been involved in' long-term investigation ofI ild exploitation case. Throughout the investigation. I
have presc d evidence and testimony to Grand Jury Some of that evidence and testimony related to six
victims (of total of 19 victims), including the live testimony of one of those victims. I also began presenting
evidence re ated to what I called '"draft proposed indictment." For various reasons, the indictment has been
delayed about 9 months. And, for other strategic reasons. we have decided to drop the six victims referenced
above, and replaced them with' different six victims.
1552
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014625
EFTA00223769
The question is now raised as to whether I should continue presenting to Grand Jury'. with' 404(b)-type
instruction related to the evidence of the six dropped victims and some sort of instruction regarding the initial
"draft proposed indictment", or whether I should presenti Grand Jury B. excluding any testimony regarding
those six victims. One other consideration — Grand Jury is due to expire in August, and I anticipate that the
investigation will continue for quite some time after indi ment. It is possible4hat the 6 dropped victims will be
re-added in 'superseding indictment.
Thank you.
I Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
1553
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014626
EFTA00223770
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: n a ary 25. 2008 9 59 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: Question regarding use of Grand Jury
Ili — I have received two conflicting points of view regarding this question, so I thought I should ask
the . Here is my situation:
I have been involved in 'long-term investigation ofI 1 ild exploitation case. 'Throughout the investigation. I
have preseled evidence and testimony to Grand Jury Some of that evidence and testimony related to six
victims (of 'total of 19 victims), including the live testimony of one of those victims. I also began presenting
evidence related to what I called tdraft proposed indictment." For various reasons, the indictment has been
delayed about 9 months. And, for other strategic reasons, we have decided to drop the six victims referenced
above, and replaced them with 'different six victims.
The question is now raised as to whether I should continue presenting to Grand Jury', with' 404(b)-type
instruction related to the evidence of the six dropped victims and some sort ofinstruction regarding the initial
"draft proposed indictment", or whether I should presentIL Grand Jury B, excluding any testimony regarding
those six victims. One other consideration — Grand Jury is due to expire in August. and I anticipate that the
investigation will continue for quite some time after indi ent. It is possible that the 6 dropped victims will be
re-added in, superseding indictment.
Thank you.
I Marie Villajafia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
Tracking:
1556
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014627
EFTA00223771
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: lionc , ary 25, 2008 12:00 PM
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS). Garcia. Rolando (USAFLS), Mi.
Karen (USAFLS)
Cc: Braden, Myesha
Subject: Epstein
Hi all —I wanted to raise an issue with you regarding the presentation of the Epstein indictment. 1 have been
Il e West Palm Beach Tuesday grand jury in the past. which has included presentation of testimony from
and agent testimony regarding girls who will no longer be referenced in the indictment.
I have conferred %ith and Heck regarding whether to stay with the same grand
jury or present to Id), gran jury. They agree that I should present to the same grand jury with some sort
of instruction regarding not relying on evidence/testimony regarding those girls.
That is my intention. I would like to present on March I l a'. Epstein will be in town on March 10'h foliate
court hearing and hopefully we will be able to keep track of his whereaboup until the following day. is
reviewing the package now, so it should be in Miami by Monday, March 3"
Also. I invited Myesha to be present for the grand jury proceedings, but she is waitin
a. about her level of involvement in the case. She is available on that date, so, if
this, she will be able to attend.
decide
Thank you.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
Tracking:
1542
08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014628
EFTA00223772
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: ry 26, 2008 10 05 AM
To:
Subject: paten'
Hi Myesha — I won't even tell you about how today is starting off badly on this case (politics, of course, not
facts). But, in any event, the word is that CEOS is going to undertake an "independent review" of the case and
meet with Epstein's attorneys some time next week. My supervisor is finishing tI review of the indictment
package and I know she caught some typos. Wls .i I finish those revisions, I will mail to you the entire
indictment package, and you can find out what = wants to look at. I have one real concern, however. As
you know, there are several girls that are still unknown to the defense. I want to avoid trait possibility that those
names might be disclosed. Should 1 redact the names of all of the girls from the pros memos that I send to you?
Thank you. Myesha.
I
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
t520
08-80736-CV-MARRA .014629
EFTA00223773
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: gr ay, xuary 2 . 2008 9:41 AM
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)
Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS)
Subject: RE: Confidential
Why would we possibly let him keep the same deal after all he has put us through? And after we have
discovered 6 new girls. plus another 3 probable victims in New York?
UFO* Pala&
Assistant U.S.
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400
w est Palm Beach. Fl. 33401
l'h, me 561 209-1047
I :IN 561
From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, •
To: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); (USAFLS)
Subject: Confidential
FYI
From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:43 PM
To: JLefkowit2@kirkland.com
Cc: Oosterbaan, Andrew
Subject: Epstein
Jay,
The Section Chief of DOJ's Child Exploitation Obscenity Section (CEOS) notified me today that
he will review the matter involving your client Jeffrey Epstein. The Section Chief has indicated
that he is ready to proceed immediately, and I understand you are in the process of providing
him this week with' summary of issues to be reviewed, and expect to meet with him next
week.
The Section Chief also indicated that you would be calling this Office regarding the upcoming
March 3, 2008 court date in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County. As you
know, the Agreement entered into by your client originally provided that the United States
1522
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014630
EFTA00223774
Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (this Office) would defer prosecution if
your client pled guilty to enumerated state charges by October 26, 2007. Since then, that date
has been postponed for' number of reasons. At this juncture, it would not be reasonable to
keep the current March 3ldate as I deadline for compliance with the Agreement. That said,
this Office is very concerned about additional delays. Despite this concern, I want to assure
you that if counsel for Mr. Epstein meets with CEOS next week (the week of March 3$, this
Office will extend the time for compliance with the Agreement to provide CEOS time to
engage in' thorough review.
It goes without saying that in the event that CEOS decides that' federal prosecution should
not be undertaken against Mr. Epstein, this Office will close its investigation. However, should
CEOS disagree with Mr. Epstein's position, Mr. Epstein shall have one week to abide by the
terms and conditions of the September 24, 2007 Agreement as amended by letter from United
States Attorney Acosta to Jay Lefkowitz.
Jeffrey,. Sloman
First Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of Florida
Tracking:
1523
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014631
EFTA00223775
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: 008 428 PM
To:
Cc: (U AFL )
Subject: To the Civil Rights Chief
That is fine. Just please send licopy to me for my file.
II Marie Villafaha
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
From: Weinstein, David (USAFLS)
Sent. 7, 2008 4:22 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Cc: enior, obert USAFLS
Subject: Re: To the Civil Rights Chief
IMP If
Bob have you had
and I discussed this yesterday. Jeff made some edits to your
a wants to send it out under Bob's signature.
chance to review Jeff's email?
From: (USAFLS)
To: Weinstein, David USAFLS
Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS)
Sent: Wed Feb 27 16:16:36 2008
Subject: RE: To the Civil Rights Chief
Hi David -- Have you had chance to talk to Bob about this? I think my window
It
is close to "opening" and don't want the bad guys to come up with another
reason for delay.
Thank you.
II Marie
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phon
Fax 47
1499
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014632
EFTA00223776
Original Message
From: Weinstein, David (USAFLS)
Sent 2008 5:03 PM
To:
Cc: enior, USAFL ; (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Subject: Re: To the Civil Rights Chief
Timing is everything. Right now I am at the NAC attending the Criminal Civil
Rights Seminar.
Your letter seems to cover everything, but I want to chat with Bob about it
before we send it out. It should probably be addressed to Stephan Curran, who is
the Deputy assigned to cover our District.
Bob an talk Monday when I get back and w can send out the letter.
Since shop is involved and has been for il while, they will hopefully agree
with our your conclusion.
DSW
From: (USAFLS)
To: Weins ein, USAFLS
Cc: Senior, Rober SAFLS); (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Sent: Thu Feb 21 15:56:01 2008
Subject: To the Civil Rights Chief
Hi David - I was just perusing the U.S. Attorney's Manual looking for an answer
on another case and I noticed that Section 9-75.030 (regarding Coordination of
Child Sex Abuse cases) says that cases involving violations of 18 USC 1591
(related to child sex trafficking) are supposed to be coordinated with CEOS and
the Civil Rights Division.
According to Section 8-3.120, prior to presentation to the grand jury, the U.S.
Attorney is supposed to advise the Civil Rights Division in writing of the
following:
Identity of the targets of the investigation;
The factual allegations to be investigated;
The statutes which may have been violated;
The United States Attorney's assessment of the significance of the case and
w ther the case is one of "national interest," and
( The U.S. Attorney's proposed staffing of the matter (including whether
C it Rights Division attorney should be assigned to work directly on the
matter).
Here is my proposal for such 'written notification:
Dear : Pursuant o USAM Section 8-3.120, I write to inform
you of an ongoing investigation child exploitation matter that may result in
charges of violat' f 18 U.S. Large
stein, Marcinkova, and W
eirPO*I
The investigation
Ili t has revea ed a effrey pstein would use his
Mg
•
:500
08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014633
EFTA00223777
assistants (Kellen, Marcinkova, and to arrange appointments with minors to
engage in commercial sexual activity. ommunications were made via telephones.
Once appointments were made, stein would travel to the Southern District of
Florida, where he maintained residence, and the minors would travel to his home
in Palm Beach where the sexualractivity would occur. The Office anticipates
charges of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371, 2422, 2423,
and 1591. The investigation of the case by the City of Palm Beach Police
Department has resulted in press coverage because of the titillating nature of
the facts, but we see t s case as similar to other "sex tourism" cases charged
by our office, and not matter of "national interest" as' defined by the U.S.
Attorney's Manual. WitIrrespect to staffing, the Office has consulted with the
Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, and we anticipate that the case will be
staffed by at least one Assistant United States Attorney from our West Palm Beach
office and at least one CEOS Attorney.
If we determine that the case should be presented for an indictment, I copy will
be provided to you.
David - If you need any more info, please let me know. Also, the indictment is
currently being reviewed by my supervisor. If you want to send the draft to
Civil Rights now, please let me know.
Thank you.
ll Marie
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
1501
08-80736-CV-MARRA FO14634
EFTA00223778
(USAFLS)
From: Weinstein. David (USAFLS)
Sent: Wednesda Februa 27, 2008 422 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Cc: enior. o e ( S)
Subject: Re: To the Civil Rights Chief
Bob, Jeff, Alex and I discussed this yesterday. Jeff made som edits to your
proposed letter a wants to send it out under Bob's signaturI.
Bob have you had
Ifchance to review Jeff's email?
From: (USAFLS)
To: WeIns ein,
Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS)
Sent: Wed Feb 27 16:16:36 2008
Subject: RE: To the Civil Rights Chief
Hi David -- Have you had chance to talk to Bob about this? I think my window
II
is close to "opening" and don't want the bad guys to come up with another
reason for delay.
Thank you.
llMarie Villafaha
ssistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phon - 47
Fax
Original Message
From: Weinstein, David (USAFLS)
Sent , 2008 5:03 PM
To:
Cc: !Ttl,,Tobert USAFLS ; (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Subject: Re: To the Civil Rig is ie
Timing is everything. Right now I am at the NAC attending the Criminal Civil
Rights Seminar.
Your letter seems to cover everything, but I want to chat with Bob about it
before
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: hursda ua '
To: N.:
Subject: ist o names
From: (USAFLS)
Ser riii.1:43111 .
To:t N.;
Subject: List of names
Here are the names of people I am intending to keep in the indictment:
eyewitness info only)
- initials only. not' listed Jane Doe
Not all will be in substantive counts, but they will be mentioned in the oven acts.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1668
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014604
EFTA00223748
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: h r February 14 2 8 2. P
To: N.:
Subject: I now you hate d when I o this,but. . .
I always seem to notice something new when I go through these records. In notes, he shows 'payment to
Golden Cab on 6/17/05. Can you call and see if they have any reco s or any trips tcrEl Brillo Way? Or a Dennis
working there? And that long string of unknown numbers on cell phone. Could those be 'group of lines for
Yellow Cab?
Thanks.
I am almost finished with the changes to the girls we are keeping. I will send that to you and then when I finish the new
girls, I will send that portion.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1670
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014605
EFTA00223749
(USAFLS)
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Here are the names of people I am intending to keep in the indictment:
eyewitness info only)
— initials only, not 'listed Jane Doe
II
Not all will be in substantive counts, but they will be mentioned in the overt acts.
I
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1672
08-80736-CV-MARRA •014606
EFTA00223750
. (USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent:
To:
Subject: RE DOBs
Hi guys - sorry to bother you. On some of the new girls I don't have dobs.
Martell
Dicenso (the 302 says her dob is 84 5/2007)
and do we have 'phone number?)
Have you guys ever talked to or Should I include them?
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1674
08-80736-CV-MARRA ♦014607
EFTA00223751
M, Ann Marie I. (USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: hursda February 14. 2008 1:21 PM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
I In - I didn't send the indictment yet. I was just asking tor input on who to include and who to exclude.
How old was w hen she went Vl jilt
From:
Sen 14, 2008 1:00 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: RE: Epstein Indictment
Hey Marie,
There was no indictment attached to your email. Can you send it again.
In addition to the two calls from
we have two telephone calls from
%I to on her cell /04 at 1:35 pm and 5/2/04 at 10:32 am,
to Shawn Haught's (boyfriend) telephone on 03/04/2004 at
9:46 am and 2:30 pm.
Message pads reflect 10 Inning 03/11/2003 ending 03/01/2006. Individuals identified as
taking the messages are and Alfredo Rodriguez.
From: (USAFLS) [Ann.Marie. j.gov]
Sen 1 AM
To: N.;
Subject: RE: Epstein Indictment
F Y I jell me what you think. Also. can you pu i u essages from and see if you can tell
what the dates are and ‘s.ho took the messages?
at we has only two phone calls with ' 4/23/04 and 5/2/04
rue>
561
From: (USAFLS)
Sen ruary 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
1678
08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014608
EFTA00223752
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for 'few hours this morning. so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted
to talk about which iris we should drop.
and I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought by . here are my thoughts. We c and S.
very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. ill S. is good witness
because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't
want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative
nature outweighs its plie s
I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be completely zuthful about the amount of
sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as 'I virgin on graduation
day.")
That only leaves . the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth
keepisWe have such good documents evidence related to her - message bads, car rental records. 156 calls
with . and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with =, so this is
M).
What do vou think?
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1679
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014609
EFTA00223753
. (USAFLS)
From:
Sent: hursda Febru r 14. 2008 1 00 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: pstein Indictment
■
Hey Marie,
There was no indictment attached to your email. Can you send it again.
In addition to the two calls from on her cell 10/04 at 1:35 pm and 5/2/04 at 10:32 am,
we have two telephone calls from to Shawn Haught's ( boyfnend) telephone on 03/04/2004 at
9:46 am and 2:30 pm.
Message pads reflect 10 messa es from beginning 03/11/2003 ending 03/01/2006. Individuals identified as
taking the messages are and Alfredo Rodriguez.
From: (USAFLS) [Ann. 1
Sen • ru • 1 AM
To: N.;
Su act: RE: Epstein Indictment
FYI -fell me ■ you think. Also. can you pull the messages from and see if you can tell
what the dates arc and who took the messages? Thanks.
And • ) • at we have only two phone calls with MP 4/23/04 and 5/2/04
From: (USAFLS)
Ton ruary 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for' few hours this morning. so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted
to talk about which we should drop.
and I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought by M. here are my thoughts. We c and S.
very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. S. is good witness
because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't
want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative
nature outweighs its pie
I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be completely zuthful about the amount of
sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as virgin on graduation
day.")
That only leaves . the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth
keeping. We have such good documentary evidence related to her — message pads. car rental records, 156 calls
1686
08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014610
EFTA00223754
with and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with M, so this is
key).
hat do ou think?
I
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561
1687
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014611
EFTA00223755
(USAFLS)
From:
Sent: Thur F 14, 2008 12:37 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: Epstein Indictment
I'm not supposed to be involved in n tantive decisions until I get word from on h h'. However, my gener
thoughts are that you are correct 5 of th Vence and will be I good witness, although
reluctant one. Am I correct to assume that and I. are still in? Their past history of commitment will
have to be dealt with and it won't be easy. but I agree that they should be lite fact that their commitments were
post-Epstein is good but his going to try to destroy them. Is in as well? I thought that she was
truthful. What about M 7
'
From: (USAFLS) [mailto
Sen 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Su • ect: Epstein Indictment
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for I few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted
to talk about which girls we should dro .
and I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought by . here arc my thoughts. We can dm and S.
very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. good witness
because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity. Epstein stops the massage and doesn't
want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative
nature outweighs its prejudice.
I think we should drop I because 1 don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of
sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as'i virgin on graduation
day:')
That only leaves the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth
keep' such good documentary evidence related to her — message pads, car rental records, 156 calls
with . and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with . so this is
key).
What do you think?
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1690
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014612
EFTA00223756
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: Thur d Februa 14 20 81 41 M
To: N,
Subject: RE. EpsteinIndictment
FYI - len me you think. Also. can you pull the messages from and see ilyou can tell what the
dates are and 11. oak the messages? Thanks.
And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with M.' 4/23104 and 5/2/U4
ssistant .S,
56I 209-1047
From: .IICSAFLS)
ruary 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for' few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk
about which girls we should drop.
M and I are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought by . here are my th e cal drop I.T eld MI S. very easily.
Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. S. is good witness ause s e shows that, if
you aren't willing to do more sexual activity. Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems
like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice.
I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual
activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as 'i virgin on graduation day.")
That only leaves Il.. the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be wort in .
We have such g document evidence related to her — message pads, car rental records. 156 calls with.
and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with • so this is key).
What do you think?
SLY
1702
08-80736-CV-MARRA •014613
EFTA00223757
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
FYI — Tell me what >nu think. Also. cairtill the messages from il and see if you can tell what the
dates are and who took the messages?
And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with 4/23/04 and 5/2/04
I. Mark VAIN&
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561 209-1047
From: (USAFI.S)
Sen • February 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
Hi Myesha - Our server was down for' few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. 1 wanted to talk
about which girls we should drop.
and I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought by , here are my th e c drop and S. very easily.
Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. S. is I good witness because she shows that, if
you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems
like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice.
I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be cornuietely truthful about the amount of sexual
activity that occurred. !Ps the girl that one of the witnesses described as' virgin on graduation day.")
That only leavesoo the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be wo
We have such g documentary evidence related to her — message palmnal records, 156 calls with
and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with so this is key).
What do you think?
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1794
08-80736-CV-MARRA II-014614
EFTA00223758
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: illhursc ruary . 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for' few hours this morning. so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk
about which girls we should drop.
and are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought byM.
here are my th e cal drop and S. very easily.
Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. S. is I good witness because she shows that, if
you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems
like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice.
I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual
activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as 1 virgin on graduation day.")
That only leaves the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth pin .
We have such good document evidence related to her - message pads. car rental records, 156 calls with
and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with so this is key).
What do you think?
I Marie Villafatia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1706
08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014615
EFTA00223759
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: February 12, 2008 4:33 PM
To: N.
Subject: Te ne numbers
Can you 'mail me your summary chart, too? The Excel spreadsheet.
Thanks.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561 209-1047
1713
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014616
EFTA00223760
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: Tuesday February 12. 2008 4 33 PM
To: N
Subject: elephone numbers
Can you e-mail me your summary chart, too? The Excel spreadsheet.
Thanks.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1714
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014617
EFTA00223761
. (USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: U M. ri iary -i l 2008 3 19 PM
To:
Subject: Telephone charts and phone records
Hi 11- Im im i get thiament package finalized. C's to me the final telephone charts for all of
the d . and Also, do you have all o f records electronically? Maybe we can
search for phone numbers for some of the new girls, even though we don't have their phone records yet.
Also, can you check on the lead to New York? Ideally. I would like to turn the package in on Thursday, so I need to know
if we can include any of those girls.
When you have I chance. please give me I call. I am in the U.S. Attorney's Office
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561 sai
1717
08-80736-CV-MARRA ♦014618
EFTA00223762
.(USAFLS)
From:
Sent: r 08208 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: e. hone call info
Ill fax it in 5 min(what fax U?)
Fro (USAFLS) <
To: N.
Sent: Fri Feb 22 14:07:06 2008
Subject: Phone call info
Hi - Can you "nail or
the ni dictment today. I think
air the dates of the calls? I can add them to
is going to try to finish her review over
the weekend.
Thanks.
II Marie
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax
156n
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014619
EFTA00223763
USAFLS
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: lila
i.wi
eb rt ,t082.10 PM
To: N
Subject: : hone ca info
Thanks
y
500 S. Austra Ian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm h FL 33401
Phone 5
Original Messa
From: Kuyrkendall, IN.
Sent. • Fliiiiiiiiiii2008 2:08 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: Re: Ph!!!M!!!!Millo
I11 fax it in 5 min(what fax II)
From: (USAFLS) <
To: Kuyrkendall, N.
Sent: Fri Feb 22 14:07:06 2008
Subject: Phone call info
Hi - Can you l[mail or the dates of the calls? I can add them to
the in is ment today. I think is going to try to finish her review over
Illr
the weekend.
Thanks.
II Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax
1562
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014620
EFTA00223764
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: n ry , 2:07 PM
To: N.
Subject: one ca m o
Hi Nesbitt — Can you Imail or fax me the dates of the calls? I can add them to the indictment today. I think
is going to try to finish her review over the weekend.
Thanks.
IAssistant
Marie Villafatla
U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach. FL 33401
Phone
Fax
1564
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014621
EFTA00223765
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject: of the FedEx records
last name is or and her phone number is (this may be an office number, not
ce phone number). They also show another corporate name: "Max Hotel Services Corp."
They show' phone number for Epstein and Eric Gany as
They have an Imail address for as: and show her phone number as
The notes show that the Max Hotel Services Corp credit card was declined and then they shos n
a with company name "NYSG LLC"
They want us to be more specific about individual shipment records. so we will have to comb through what they
gave us to identify specific shipments.
lam running to lunch but will be back this afternoon.
Thanks.
I Marie VillafaAa
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400
West Palm Beach. FL 33401
Phone
Fax
1567
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014622
EFTA00223766
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: n aiiiiriary 25. 2008 11 24 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: uestion regarding use of Grand Jury
Thank you. &reline. It is most appreciated.
I Mark' rub:law
Assistantli.S. Atturne)
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400
West Palm Beach. FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax
From: M, (USAFLS)
Sett : nd F 5, 2008 11:23 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Sub ect: RE: Question regarding use of Grand Jury
Marie:
I see no need to change grand juries. Indeed, changing grand juries might suggest that something untoward
occurred, which is not the case.
Nor do I see' requirement to give 1404(b) tape instruction. Let's not forget dig the role of the grand is to
investigate, and it is wholly apEropriate that I grand jury in good faith pursued I line of investigation that does
not lead to indictment. That is very different matter from presenting information pursuant to 404(b), to prove
motive, lack of accident, etc.
I share your instinct that just dropping six victims, and the draft proposed indictment, might call for some
explanation, or at least acknowledgement, to the grand jury. It's always dicey, and not really desirable, to
explain and share legal strategies with the grand jury. Perhaps you can simply tell them that the old draft
proposed indictment is being withdrawn, and II ifferent set of facts is being pursued, and ask them if they can
set aside what they heard previously, and base determination of probable cause solely on the new evidence. If
any of them indicat inability to do so, perha they should li excused from consideration of this case; if that
leaves you without I quorum, then you have I basis to go to I new grand jury.
I hope this helps; I'm available by phone as well.
Cctralitie,
1546
08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014623
EFTA00223767
From: (USAFLS)
Son
bli ruary 25, 2008 9:59 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Su Question regarding use of Grand Jury
Hi — I have received two conflicting points of view regarding this question, so I thought I should ask
the..Here
exp is my situation:
1 have been involved in' long-term investigation of I ild exploitation case. Throughout the investigation, I
have prese ed evidence and testimony to Grand Jury I Some of that evidence and testimony related to six
r
victims (ofI total of 19 victims), including the live testimony of one of those victims. I also began presenting
evidence related to what I called '"draft proposed indictment." For various reasons, the indictment has been
delayed about 9 months. And, r other strategic reasons, we have decided to drop the six victims referenced
above, and replaced them with different six victims.
The question is now raised as to whether I should continue presenting to Grand Jury', with' 404(b)-type
instruction related to the evidence of the six dropped victims and some sort of instruction regarding the initial
"draft proposed indictment", or whether I should presenti Grand Jury B, excluding any testimony regarding
those six victims. One other consideration — Grand Jury is due to expire in August, and I anticipate that the
investigation will continue for quite some time after indi ant. It is possible that the 6 dropped victims will be
re-added in 'superseding indictment.
Thank you.
I Marie Villafafia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
Tracking:
1547
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014624
EFTA00223768
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: Monde Februa 25 2008 11 23 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: uestion regarding use of Grand Jury
Marie:
I see no need to change grand juries. Indeed, changing grand juries might suggest that something untoward
occurred. which is not the case.
Nor do I see 'requirement to give' 404(6) 'Ape instruction. Let's not forget thil the role of the grand is to
investigate, and it is wholly aprpriate that 'grand jury in good faith pursued I line of investigation that does
not lead to indictment. That is very different matter from presenting information pursuant to 404(b), to prove
motive, lack of accident, etc.
I share your instinct that just dropping six victims, and the draft proposed indictment, might call for some
explanation, or at least acknowledgement. to the grand jury. It's always dicey, and not really desirable, to
explain and share legal strategies with the grand jury. Perhaps you can simply tell them that the old draft
proposed indictment is being withdrawn, and lil ifferent set of facts is being pursued, and ask them if they can
set aside what they heard previously, and base determination of probable cause solely on the new evidence. If
any of them indicatt inability to do so. perhags they should lif excused from consideration of this case; if that
leaves you without I quorum, then you have I basis to go to I new grand jury.
I hope this helps: I'm available by phone as well.
Cc:wait/4e.
From: (USAFLS)
Sonjilt• February 25, 2008 9:59 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Su : Question regarding use of Grand Jury
Hi - I have received two conflicting points of view regarding this question. so I thought I should ask
the . Here is my situation:
ir i
I have been involved in' long-term investigation ofI ild exploitation case. Throughout the investigation. I
have presc d evidence and testimony to Grand Jury Some of that evidence and testimony related to six
victims (of total of 19 victims), including the live testimony of one of those victims. I also began presenting
evidence re ated to what I called '"draft proposed indictment." For various reasons, the indictment has been
delayed about 9 months. And, for other strategic reasons. we have decided to drop the six victims referenced
above, and replaced them with' different six victims.
1552
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014625
EFTA00223769
The question is now raised as to whether I should continue presenting to Grand Jury'. with' 404(b)-type
instruction related to the evidence of the six dropped victims and some sort of instruction regarding the initial
"draft proposed indictment", or whether I should presenti Grand Jury B. excluding any testimony regarding
those six victims. One other consideration — Grand Jury is due to expire in August, and I anticipate that the
investigation will continue for quite some time after indi ment. It is possible4hat the 6 dropped victims will be
re-added in 'superseding indictment.
Thank you.
I Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
1553
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014626
EFTA00223770
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: n a ary 25. 2008 9 59 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: Question regarding use of Grand Jury
Ili — I have received two conflicting points of view regarding this question, so I thought I should ask
the . Here is my situation:
I have been involved in 'long-term investigation ofI 1 ild exploitation case. 'Throughout the investigation. I
have preseled evidence and testimony to Grand Jury Some of that evidence and testimony related to six
victims (of 'total of 19 victims), including the live testimony of one of those victims. I also began presenting
evidence related to what I called tdraft proposed indictment." For various reasons, the indictment has been
delayed about 9 months. And, for other strategic reasons, we have decided to drop the six victims referenced
above, and replaced them with 'different six victims.
The question is now raised as to whether I should continue presenting to Grand Jury', with' 404(b)-type
instruction related to the evidence of the six dropped victims and some sort ofinstruction regarding the initial
"draft proposed indictment", or whether I should presentIL Grand Jury B, excluding any testimony regarding
those six victims. One other consideration — Grand Jury is due to expire in August. and I anticipate that the
investigation will continue for quite some time after indi ent. It is possible that the 6 dropped victims will be
re-added in, superseding indictment.
Thank you.
I Marie Villajafia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
Tracking:
1556
08-80736-CV-MARRA F014627
EFTA00223771
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: lionc , ary 25, 2008 12:00 PM
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS). Garcia. Rolando (USAFLS), Mi.
Karen (USAFLS)
Cc: Braden, Myesha
Subject: Epstein
Hi all —I wanted to raise an issue with you regarding the presentation of the Epstein indictment. 1 have been
Il e West Palm Beach Tuesday grand jury in the past. which has included presentation of testimony from
and agent testimony regarding girls who will no longer be referenced in the indictment.
I have conferred %ith and Heck regarding whether to stay with the same grand
jury or present to Id), gran jury. They agree that I should present to the same grand jury with some sort
of instruction regarding not relying on evidence/testimony regarding those girls.
That is my intention. I would like to present on March I l a'. Epstein will be in town on March 10'h foliate
court hearing and hopefully we will be able to keep track of his whereaboup until the following day. is
reviewing the package now, so it should be in Miami by Monday, March 3"
Also. I invited Myesha to be present for the grand jury proceedings, but she is waitin
a. about her level of involvement in the case. She is available on that date, so, if
this, she will be able to attend.
decide
Thank you.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
Tracking:
1542
08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014628
EFTA00223772
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: ry 26, 2008 10 05 AM
To:
Subject: paten'
Hi Myesha — I won't even tell you about how today is starting off badly on this case (politics, of course, not
facts). But, in any event, the word is that CEOS is going to undertake an "independent review" of the case and
meet with Epstein's attorneys some time next week. My supervisor is finishing tI review of the indictment
package and I know she caught some typos. Wls .i I finish those revisions, I will mail to you the entire
indictment package, and you can find out what = wants to look at. I have one real concern, however. As
you know, there are several girls that are still unknown to the defense. I want to avoid trait possibility that those
names might be disclosed. Should 1 redact the names of all of the girls from the pros memos that I send to you?
Thank you. Myesha.
I
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
t520
08-80736-CV-MARRA .014629
EFTA00223773
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: gr ay, xuary 2 . 2008 9:41 AM
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)
Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS)
Subject: RE: Confidential
Why would we possibly let him keep the same deal after all he has put us through? And after we have
discovered 6 new girls. plus another 3 probable victims in New York?
UFO* Pala&
Assistant U.S.
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400
w est Palm Beach. Fl. 33401
l'h, me 561 209-1047
I :IN 561
From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, •
To: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); (USAFLS)
Subject: Confidential
FYI
From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:43 PM
To: JLefkowit2@kirkland.com
Cc: Oosterbaan, Andrew
Subject: Epstein
Jay,
The Section Chief of DOJ's Child Exploitation Obscenity Section (CEOS) notified me today that
he will review the matter involving your client Jeffrey Epstein. The Section Chief has indicated
that he is ready to proceed immediately, and I understand you are in the process of providing
him this week with' summary of issues to be reviewed, and expect to meet with him next
week.
The Section Chief also indicated that you would be calling this Office regarding the upcoming
March 3, 2008 court date in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County. As you
know, the Agreement entered into by your client originally provided that the United States
1522
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014630
EFTA00223774
Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (this Office) would defer prosecution if
your client pled guilty to enumerated state charges by October 26, 2007. Since then, that date
has been postponed for' number of reasons. At this juncture, it would not be reasonable to
keep the current March 3ldate as I deadline for compliance with the Agreement. That said,
this Office is very concerned about additional delays. Despite this concern, I want to assure
you that if counsel for Mr. Epstein meets with CEOS next week (the week of March 3$, this
Office will extend the time for compliance with the Agreement to provide CEOS time to
engage in' thorough review.
It goes without saying that in the event that CEOS decides that' federal prosecution should
not be undertaken against Mr. Epstein, this Office will close its investigation. However, should
CEOS disagree with Mr. Epstein's position, Mr. Epstein shall have one week to abide by the
terms and conditions of the September 24, 2007 Agreement as amended by letter from United
States Attorney Acosta to Jay Lefkowitz.
Jeffrey,. Sloman
First Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of Florida
Tracking:
1523
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014631
EFTA00223775
(USAFLS)
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: 008 428 PM
To:
Cc: (U AFL )
Subject: To the Civil Rights Chief
That is fine. Just please send licopy to me for my file.
II Marie Villafaha
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
From: Weinstein, David (USAFLS)
Sent. 7, 2008 4:22 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Cc: enior, obert USAFLS
Subject: Re: To the Civil Rights Chief
IMP If
Bob have you had
and I discussed this yesterday. Jeff made some edits to your
a wants to send it out under Bob's signature.
chance to review Jeff's email?
From: (USAFLS)
To: Weinstein, David USAFLS
Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS)
Sent: Wed Feb 27 16:16:36 2008
Subject: RE: To the Civil Rights Chief
Hi David -- Have you had chance to talk to Bob about this? I think my window
It
is close to "opening" and don't want the bad guys to come up with another
reason for delay.
Thank you.
II Marie
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phon
Fax 47
1499
08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014632
EFTA00223776
Original Message
From: Weinstein, David (USAFLS)
Sent 2008 5:03 PM
To:
Cc: enior, USAFL ; (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Subject: Re: To the Civil Rights Chief
Timing is everything. Right now I am at the NAC attending the Criminal Civil
Rights Seminar.
Your letter seems to cover everything, but I want to chat with Bob about it
before we send it out. It should probably be addressed to Stephan Curran, who is
the Deputy assigned to cover our District.
Bob an talk Monday when I get back and w can send out the letter.
Since shop is involved and has been for il while, they will hopefully agree
with our your conclusion.
DSW
From: (USAFLS)
To: Weins ein, USAFLS
Cc: Senior, Rober SAFLS); (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Sent: Thu Feb 21 15:56:01 2008
Subject: To the Civil Rights Chief
Hi David - I was just perusing the U.S. Attorney's Manual looking for an answer
on another case and I noticed that Section 9-75.030 (regarding Coordination of
Child Sex Abuse cases) says that cases involving violations of 18 USC 1591
(related to child sex trafficking) are supposed to be coordinated with CEOS and
the Civil Rights Division.
According to Section 8-3.120, prior to presentation to the grand jury, the U.S.
Attorney is supposed to advise the Civil Rights Division in writing of the
following:
Identity of the targets of the investigation;
The factual allegations to be investigated;
The statutes which may have been violated;
The United States Attorney's assessment of the significance of the case and
w ther the case is one of "national interest," and
( The U.S. Attorney's proposed staffing of the matter (including whether
C it Rights Division attorney should be assigned to work directly on the
matter).
Here is my proposal for such 'written notification:
Dear : Pursuant o USAM Section 8-3.120, I write to inform
you of an ongoing investigation child exploitation matter that may result in
charges of violat' f 18 U.S. Large
stein, Marcinkova, and W
eirPO*I
The investigation
Ili t has revea ed a effrey pstein would use his
Mg
•
:500
08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014633
EFTA00223777
assistants (Kellen, Marcinkova, and to arrange appointments with minors to
engage in commercial sexual activity. ommunications were made via telephones.
Once appointments were made, stein would travel to the Southern District of
Florida, where he maintained residence, and the minors would travel to his home
in Palm Beach where the sexualractivity would occur. The Office anticipates
charges of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371, 2422, 2423,
and 1591. The investigation of the case by the City of Palm Beach Police
Department has resulted in press coverage because of the titillating nature of
the facts, but we see t s case as similar to other "sex tourism" cases charged
by our office, and not matter of "national interest" as' defined by the U.S.
Attorney's Manual. WitIrrespect to staffing, the Office has consulted with the
Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, and we anticipate that the case will be
staffed by at least one Assistant United States Attorney from our West Palm Beach
office and at least one CEOS Attorney.
If we determine that the case should be presented for an indictment, I copy will
be provided to you.
David - If you need any more info, please let me know. Also, the indictment is
currently being reviewed by my supervisor. If you want to send the draft to
Civil Rights now, please let me know.
Thank you.
ll Marie
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
1501
08-80736-CV-MARRA FO14634
EFTA00223778
(USAFLS)
From: Weinstein. David (USAFLS)
Sent: Wednesda Februa 27, 2008 422 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Cc: enior. o e ( S)
Subject: Re: To the Civil Rights Chief
Bob, Jeff, Alex and I discussed this yesterday. Jeff made som edits to your
proposed letter a wants to send it out under Bob's signaturI.
Bob have you had
Ifchance to review Jeff's email?
From: (USAFLS)
To: WeIns ein,
Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS)
Sent: Wed Feb 27 16:16:36 2008
Subject: RE: To the Civil Rights Chief
Hi David -- Have you had chance to talk to Bob about this? I think my window
II
is close to "opening" and don't want the bad guys to come up with another
reason for delay.
Thank you.
llMarie Villafaha
ssistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phon - 47
Fax
Original Message
From: Weinstein, David (USAFLS)
Sent , 2008 5:03 PM
To:
Cc: !Ttl,,Tobert USAFLS ; (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Subject: Re: To the Civil Rig is ie
Timing is everything. Right now I am at the NAC attending the Criminal Civil
Rights Seminar.
Your letter seems to cover everything, but I want to chat with Bob about it
before