EFTA02393400.pdf

From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2015 8:12 PM To: effre E. Cc: Subject: RE: Busy week, lots of talks. Best time for us would be the 16th. Have a talk at Harvard at noon, but free after that. Your computer guy reminds me of the first time I met Carnap. He couldn't understand why people talked languages, with all their irregularities and complexity. Why doesn't everyone just talk Esperanto (which, he didn't realize, just uses standard Romance grammar with very minor changes)? Or better, why don't we all talk predicate calculus? Frege, Tarski, and others also thought that human language wasn't worth studying. One can even construct paradoxes in it. Quite a departure from a rich tradition which in the modern period goes back to Galileo and the great figures of modern science. Noam From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2015 1:46 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: I told ehud , how you and valeria were both thoughtful and kind, . He agreed if convenient for you. to accompany me to cambridge on the 16th or 17th. .fyi, my computer guys asked why teach a language to a machine that is so ambiguous and filled with illogical compnents? cute please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA_R1_01421901 EFTA02393400