📄 Extracted Text (232 words)
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject: Revised Notification to Victims regarding right to see Epstein agreement.
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:18:36 +0000
Importance: Normal
HAM- In light of the complaint of Mr. Epstein's counsel regarding my earlier notification language, I have
revised it as follows:
"In addition, there has been litigation between the United States and two other victims regarding the disclosure
of the entire agreement between the United States and Mr. Epstein. Mr. Josefsberg can provide further guidance
on this issue or, if Ms. has selected another attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that
attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-
CIV-MARRA, and advise her accordingly."
What do you think? This was my original language:
"In addition, a judge has ordered that the United States make available to any designated victim (and/or her
attorney) a copy of the actual agreement between Mr. Epstein and the United States, so long as the victim (and/or
her attorney) reviews, signs, and agrees to be bound by a Protective Order entered by the Court. If Ms.
would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for
her signature."
Thanks.
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax 561 820-8777
EFTA00067375
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
c978844d5b8ebbc04eb97a031e02dab2af9d9fcba5d62a4bca2925a683276eef
Bates Number
EFTA00067375
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0