👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (387 words)
From: Paul Morris
Sent: 3/21/2016 8:03:06 PM
To: 'Jeffrey Epstein' ([email protected]
Subject: FW: The FMV Valuation Alert - Estate of Sarah D. Holliday v. Commissioner
---Original Message---
From: Lance S. Hall, ASA [info®fmv-value.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 07:46 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Paul Morris
Subject: The FMV Valuation Alert - Estate of Sarah D. Holliday v. Commissioner
Please click here if you cannot view this page.
First Reminder of 2016 that Section 2036
Continues to Have Teeth
(Estate ofSarah D. Holliday v. Commissioner)
By Carsten Hoffmann, ASA, TEP
Preamble
In 2011 I wrote a FMV Alert that an asteroid had narrowly missed the earth, which was the only way
to get your attention when the real topic was another 2036 IRS victory in the Estate of Paul H.
Liljestrand. Five years later there is still no asteroid in sight, but we do have the Estate of Sarah D.
Holliday ("Estate") v. Commissioner ("Service"); T.C. Memo. 2016-51; No. 8143-1 to remind us that
2036 still has teeth.
Background
Sarah D. Holliday ("Decedent" or "Mrs. Holliday") had acquired significant assets due to her
husband's HVAC business and real estate activity. Her husband had passed in 1999. Failing health had
caused Mrs. Holliday to move into a nursing home in 2003. In 2006, Mrs. Holliday formed the Oak
Capital LP ("Partnership") and funded it one week later with approximately $6 million of marketable
securities. The decedent received a .1 percent general partner interest and a 99.9 percent limited
partner interest in the Partnership. On the same day, the Decedent assigned her .1 percent general
partner interest to her two sons as well as gifting a 10 percent limited partner interest to an irrevocable
trust for the benefit of her two sons. Mrs. Holliday passed on January 7, 2009, holding an 89.9 percent
majority interest in the Partnership.
Issues raised by the IRS
The IRS issued a determination of deficiency in the amount of $785,000 under a ection 2036(a)
argument that the assets transferred by the Decedent were includable in her gross estate.
The purpose of Section 2036(a) is to include in a decedent's gross estate the values of inter vivos
transfers that are essentially testamentary in nature. Section 2036(a) applies when three conditions are
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0120734
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY GM_00266918
EFTA01459939
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
cc1e3c7652b7bfdfd8fdd1910b51df7faaef11d4888f5fd1d6f14e2bb759bce3
Bates Number
EFTA01459939
Dataset
DataSet-10
Type
document
Pages
1
💬 Comments 0