👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (294 words)
To:
From:
Sent: Mon 6/12/2017 1:56:13 PM
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein
thank you.. .1 will relay...
On Jun 12, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Dawn Henry 'rote:
Hi
The best way to answer that question is to send proposed language.
Dawn
From
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 201710:06 AM
To: Dawn Henry
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Commissioner Henry...below response to your email is from Jeffrey:
Can we sign a more comprehensive release on both sides .
On Jun 11 2017 at 12:22 PM, Dawn Henry
wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the email. I explained in a previous email to Mr. Epstein that
the changes made to DPNR's draft consent agreement is not only
substantive, but also does not fall within the language of "SEP". I was
asked and I agreed to allow for a SEP in lieu of a penalty. The language
DPNR drafted is the correct language. I can tweak the language, but the
language can not read like the Respondent is making a donation to settle
this matter. As before I was told about a specific issue and language was
worked out. I requested that Great Jim, indicate with specificity the issue
to see if language can be worked out. However, the draft document that
Mr. Epstein signed, I can not sign. Finally, there will continue to be delays,
with every suggested language change.
Dawn Henry
Fro
Sent: Thursday, June , :
To: Dawn Henry
Subject: Jeffrey Epstein
EFTA_R1_00945206
EFTA02216242
Hello Commissioner Henry. Please see message and attachment from
Jeffrey Epstein.
Thank you,
Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein
Please see the attached. It essentially expands the release.
The $160K grant is also being sent to your office today.
I was hoping to meet with JP to review future plans on June 17, if possible
EFTA_R1_00945207
EFTA02216243
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
ccebc177827731e6a7bd8d344df059c5c15ddaf10d4cb183129be5bb7fe55244
Bates Number
EFTA02216242
Dataset
DataSet-11
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0