📄 Extracted Text (13,379 words)
From: Gregory Brown
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Bcc• [email protected]
Subject: Greg Brown's Weekend Reading and Other Things.... 11/10/2013
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 14:49:59 +0000
Attachments: 15 Ways_The United_Statesis_Thefiest_At_Being_The_Worse_Maxwell_Strachan_Huff
POst_10 29j013.docx;
I WouldJump_Atitionathan Cohen_New_Republic_November_3,2013.docx;
ITow Republicans_Have_TrasheTd_The_Economy_in_l_Chart_Mark_Gongloff_Huff_Post
1154_2013.docx;
rtaising_the Medicare Age„A Popular_Idea_With_Shockingly_Few_Benefits_Matthew_O
'Brien The:Atlanticfict. 25, j013.docx;
The Definitive_Answerjo_20_Of_Your_Biggest_Health_Questions_BUSINESS_INSIDE
R flg_14,203.docx; Bill Moyers_Essay_-
6bamacare,The_Right Wings Alamo_Moyers_&_Company_PBS November 1„2013.d
ocx; Bill Maher's New_TI.ules_clichele Bachmann_and_the_Deviljl_11_2013Tdocx;
Hany_Chapin_bio.docx
Inline-Images: image.png; image(1).png; image(2).png; image(3).png; image(4).png; image(5).png;
image(6).png; image(7).png; image(8).png; image(9).png; image(10).png; image(11).png;
image(12).png; image(13).png; image(14).png
DEAR FRIEND
As many of you know I am a huge fan of Bill D. Moyers (born June 5, 1934), who is an American
journalist and liberal public commentator. He served as White House Press Secretary in the Johnson
administration from 1965 to 1967. He also worked as a network TV news commentator for ten years.
Moyers has been extensively involved with public broadcasting, producing documentaries and news
journal programs. He has won numerous awards and honorary degrees for his investigative
journalism and civic activities. He has become well known as a trenchant critic of the U.S. media
(particularly modern, corporately structured news media). Since 1990, Moyers has been President of
the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy. And for the past decade he has hosted a
weekly social commentary television show Moyers & Company on PBS.
EFTA01141522
He ends each show with an essay and last week (November 1, 2013) the essay was — Obamacare: The
Right Wing's Alamo - in which Bill took on the Republican Party for their relentless attempts to
kill the Affordable Care Act. Citing that as Republican members of Congress demand apologies and
administration officials dutifully offer up mea culpas for the botched Obamacare roll-out, he
asked wouldn't it be fair to expect just a morsel of apology from the right as well.
The right has been relentless in its battle against the Affordable Care Act — as if it's their version of
the Alamo, Bill says. Despite the law's passage and its constitutionality upheld by the Supreme Court,
they refuse to give up, even shutting down the government to try to force a delay of funding: "And yet,
the darn thing survived, despite the administration's own serious mistakes." What's more, Bill points
out, this isn't the first time a major government initiative hasn't gone according to plan. Where are the
apologies from the other side for the war in Iraq? "Mission Accomplished" indeed.
Web Link: http://billmoyers.cornisegmentibill-moyers-essay-obamacare-the-right-wings-alamoN.UnIzIEUAC04.gmail
SHOW ESSAY TRANSCRIPT
BILL MOYERS: During the Republican hearings on the meltdown of ObamaCare's website,
Representative David McKinley of West Virginia knew what he wanted.
REP. DAVID McKINLEY: I haven't heard one of you apologize to the American public. [...] Are
apologies not in order? [...] I've just, I've not heard the word, I'm sorry. [...] Apologize. [...] I don't
understand why there's not an apology. [...] But, I apologize. I haven't heard that from any one of the
four of you.
BILL MOYERS: He got it.
MARILYN TAVENNER: I want to apologize to you that the website has not worked as well as it
should.
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS: You deserve better. I apologize.
BILL MOYERS: Considerate, appropriate, and futile. The apology didn't squelch the partisan tirades
or quench the Republican thirst for revenge, their outrage that the Affordable Care Act, that is,
ObamaCare, even got this far. But it did provoke some of us to wonder, isn't it fair to also expect at
least a tiny bit of remorse, just a morsel of apology, from the Republicans? As NPR's astute health
care reporter Julie Rovner reminded us recently.
EFTA01141523
JULIE ROVNER: When it became clear that HHS would need more money to build the federal
exchange than had been allocated in the original law, Republicans in Congress refused to provide it.
BILL MOYERS: So to get it started, officials had to scrape together money from a variety of other
offices. This happened back in the thirties after congress passed Social Security but failed to
sufficiently fund the board that was supposed to run it. Republican opponents of ObamaCare have
gone further. After it passed they stalked it like Jack the ripper. In the states, through the courts, all
the way to the Supreme Court, which, uh-oh, ruled it constitutional. In last year's election, when they
lost again. But quit? Never. For Republicans, this has become their Alamo. In July, less than three
months before scheduled launch, the speaker of the House, Republican John Boehner, drew one more
line in the sand.
REP. JOHN BOEHNER: ObamaCare is bad for America. We're going to do everything we can to make
sure that it never happens.
BILL MOYERS: And yet, the darn thing survived, despite the administration's own serious very
mistakes. As Rovner reported, Obama's people naively figured Republican states couldn't resist all
that cash coming down from the federal government and would decide to create their own insurance
exchanges and expand their Medicaid programs. Not so. Republicans, it seems, have their principles,
and health care for poor people is not one of them. Ideology trumped money.
Republicans aside, ObamaCare had its own built-in problem, born of original sin. And some of us have
to resist the temptation to say, "We told you so?' Four years ago we said the public option in health
care, a kind of Medicare for all, would be easier to launch and simpler to operate than the Rube
Goldberg contraption that came to be known as ObamaCare. Rube Goldberg, for those of you under a
certain age, was the fellow who designed machines that made simple tasks much more complicated.
Back in 2009, when Obama first became president, polls showed the public option was a popular idea.
Lots of Americans were fed up with paying bloated premiums to giant insurance companies that
charged us for their plutocratic salaries and excessive profit margins . We wanted an alternative. And
once upon a time, so did candidate Barack Obama.
SEN. BARACK OBAMA: Now, if I were designing a healthcare system from scratch, I would probably
move more in the direction of a single payer plan.
BILL MOYERS: But as President, Obama buckled when conservative Senate Democrats, yes,
Democrats, threatened to join Republicans in a filibuster if his plan included a public option.
SEN. BLANCHE LINCOLN: --that I'm prepared to move against moving to the next stage of
consideration as long as a government run public option is included.
EFTA01141524
BILL MOYERS: The biggest pill among those corporate Democrats was industry lapdog Max Baucus
of Montana, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. At one point Baucus even had advocates
thrown out of his hearings:
SEN. MAX BAUCUS: I'm sorry. There will be order. Can we have a recess until order can be restored?
ADVOCATE: --want a single payer system. Why do you insist on spending more money when the
single payer will give it to us at the price we're spending now?
BILL MOYERS: Still, ObamaCare made its way through the gauntlet of mercenary senators, predatory
lobbyists, and greedy corporations to become law. Rube Goldberg would have been a very happy man.
His principle, why do something simple when it can always be made harder, carried the day. And by
the time it became law the Affordable Care Act was a monstrosity of complexity. Sure enough, on
opening day, what the Republicans couldn't accomplish happened anyway. Screens froze. Error
messages flew. Data was corrupted. The system broke down, and ObamaCare stalled at the starting
gate.
Supporters gaped at the wreckage of their best-laid plans, opponents gloated, and Republicans, of
course, called hearings, which any opposition party would have done. But you must note the irony
here, the party that had thrown roadblock after roadblock wherever they could and had just shut the
government down to stop health care reform, now loudly complained that government wasn't working
and people couldn't get, you guessed it, health care reform.
REP. DAVID McKINLEY: Apologize. [...] Apologize [...] An apology.
BILL MOYERS: Ok, Representative McKinley, you got it. But wouldn't a little humility would be in
order here? Democracy is imperfect, and we need to work with what we've got. And what we've got is
the Affordable Care Act. We also need to remember that at the outset, big ventures often go awry. Not
just in the public sector. Remember when Apple introduced the iPhone4 in June of 2010?
STEVE JOBS: We're having a little problem here.
BILL MOYERS: Steve Jobs couldn't get it to connect to the internet. Embarrassing, but they worked it
out. When Facebook went public last year a "technical error" in NASDAQ's system delayed the start of
trading, resulting in a loss to market makers of half a billion dollars. And those of you old enough to
know who Rube Goldberg was may recall the roll-out of the Edsel, a Ford motor company automobile
so awful its name still is synonymous with a costly flop. And let's not talk about Lehman brothers,
Bear Stearns, MG, JPMorgan Chase. The crash of '08. Beside those calamities, ObamaCare's
computer problems pale.
EFTA01141525
Oh, yes, mistakes are made by big corporations and big government. And although I was for
something else, something simpler and easier to manage, I'm betting this will get fixed. As for those
strident partisan voices crowing over ObamaCare's first bad round, ask yourself if those weren't some
of the same voices cheering on the invasion of Iraq and promising victory would be swift and easy. Ten
years. Trillions of dollars. And all those lost and wrecked lives. Have we heard any apology?
Need I say anymore? Greg Brown
15 Ways The United States Is The Best (At
Being The Worst)
We hear it all the time, from every corner of the political sphere: There's no other country on the
planet quite like the United States of America. Such pronouncements are typically of the rah-rah
variety, and it's indisputably true that this country is exceptional in a large number of ways. But that is
not always necessarily a good thing. Here's what we mean:
The U.S. joins Lesotho, Swaziland and New Guinea as the only country in the world not to mandate
paid leave for mothers of newborns.
We are the only advance country that doesn't require companies to give workers paid vacations. And
we don't even mandate that workers receive paid sick days.
• We spend the most per student on education, but outcomes aren't great.
• We spend the more on our military than any other country.
• We also export more weapons than any country in the world.
• We incarcerate more of our population than any other country in the world.
• No other country has nearly as many guns as people.
• Americans consume more calories from sweeteners on an average day than anywhere else in the
world.
• We also consume the most calories — a whopping 3770 on average a day.
• The United States spends more on healthcare than any other industrialized country in the world.
• Prescription drug costs are just one reason healthcare cost so much.
• More babies die the day that they are born in the U.S. than in any industrialize country.
• We're the best at creating super-rich people, at the expense of everyone else.
• Inequity in the U.S. is the worst in the industrialized world.
EFTA01141526
The U.S. is in the top left corner in the above chart -- showing how the country stands out when it
comes to income gains by the top 1 percent of earners since 1960. The gains are plotted against
changes in marginal income tax rates. The U.S. comes in second (just behind Britain) when it comes to
handing these tax breaks out to our highest earners.
The next time a Republican tells you government spending is out of control, the chart below is all you
need to prove otherwise. The Financial Times had a story on Monday that is not all that surprising to
anybody who has been watching Republicans squeeze the life out of the economy for the past four
years or so. Still, ifs a story worth telling again and again, and it can be summed up in its opening
paragraph: "Public investment in the US has hit its lowest level since demobilisation after the second
world war because of Republican success in stymieing President Barack Obama's push for more
spending on infrastructure, science and education: write Robin Harding, Richard McGregor and
Gabriel Muller. And they have a helpful chart to illustrate this, which I have reproduced here using
data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (story continues after chart):
Gross Government Investment, % Of GDP
0
N DI a aon 00
at a
a, N a a
0
ID Lb Tg I 0
0
IN
0 0 ON
00
ON N g§§gg,§§
Government investment is what the government sector spends on buildings and equipment and
research and development. It fell in the second quarter of 2013 to 3.6 percent, the lowest level since
1948. This is because, driven by Republicans' newfound religion about deficits, a conversion that
miraculously occurred on Inauguration Day 2009, the U.S. government has slashed spending by the
largest amount since the end of the Vietnam War, The New York Times reported earlier this year. That
is austerity, and it's a big reason -- maybe the big reason -- the recovery has been so sluggish. Yet
Republicans still aren't satisfied, wanting another round of cuts, which is why we'll probably have
another destructive budget fight all over again early next year.
EFTA01141527
Ex Pharmaceutical Sales Rep speaks the truth: - Big Pharma doesn't want to cure
you.
Activist, Speaker, and Author of:
Confessions '1"13cDrug Pusher
See the Youtube video on this Weblink: http://www.youtube.corn/watch?
feature=player_embedded&v=Ulm8fHxqUAM
A 15 year pharmacist and ex-pharmaceutical Representative speaks out about Big Pharma and their
real motivations and lack thereof to cure, heal and care for you or your best interests. Only to cure the
space in their pockets not yet filled with your cash. Having worked for health care giants including
Johnson & Johnson, Syntex Labs, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abbott Laboratories and Forest Laboratories.
Gwen offers an insider's knowledge of dangers from the pharmaceutical industry. Her autobiography
— Confessions of an Rx Drug Pusher is a poignant autobiographical journey through the darkness of
mental illness and the catastrophic consequences that lurk in medicine cabinets around the country
offers an honest glimpse into alarming statistics and a health care system ranked last among nineteen
industrialized nations worldwide.
Gwen Olsen brings together the knowledge of an "insider" trained to sell doctors on the merits of pills;
the personal experience of having taken psychiatric medications and seen how they altered her life;
and the deep grief of having lost her niece—following her treatment with psychiatric medications—to
suicide. As a mental health activist, Gwen has testified before the Food and Drug Administration's
Psycho-pharmacology committee, as well as many legislative committees, and has led rallies and
marches in protest against psychiatric abuse. Gwen's message is a call to action and a plea for each of
us to step up and do our part to help create a medical system that serves all and does harm to none!
*****
A FRIEND FOUND THIS INTERESTING AND CONCERNING.
How much choice does the mainstream US media really offer? The infographic belows lays out the
extent of media consolidation in the US, where just six media giants now control go% of all TV, news,
radio and film.
RMedia Consolidation Infographic
How Banks Got Too Big to Fail
EFTA01141528
g2,Big Bank Theory
37 banks have merged to become just four — JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and
CitiGroup in a little over two decades, according to this Federal Reserve map. The nation's to largest
financial institutions hold 54% of our total financial assets; in 1990, they held 20%. As MotherJones
reports, the number of banks has dropped from more than 12,500 to about 8,000. The numbers are
stark, and the charts visualize the mind-bending reality. This is the world we live in. Do you think that
this is choice? And is this good for the country? Or its people?
As most of you know, New Jersey's brash larger-than-life tough-talking Republican Governor Chris
Christie handily won re-election on Tuesday night against Democratic challenger Barbara Buono.
Despite being a Republican in a blue state, Christie has enjoyed strong popularity numbers, and
delivered a triumphant victory speech. Christie won 60.4% (1,252,100 votes) verses Buono 38.1%
(790,245 votes). Grabbing an impressive 57% of the female vote and winning all age groups other than
those 18-29. Christie also took a fifth of the African-American vote and half - 51% - of Latinos, a much
better performance than most Republicans in recent elections. Republican strategist and CNN
contributor Alex Castellanos called Christie's address "an announcement speech." And it will only
serve to stir up more speculation that despite his saying that he's seriously considering a run in 2016,
his mind is already made up.
POLITICO attributes Christie's impressive win to superior ads, his crossover support from unions,
and the weakness of his Democratic rival. And that Christie's path to victory — one that his supporters
would love to see shatter the record margin for a New Jersey Republican in the historically blue state
and propel an all-but-assumed bid for president — started on Oct. 29, 2012 - the day that Hurricane
Sandy touched down on the Jersey Shore. Since then his favorability numbers soared above 70
percent. And unlike other Republicans, Christie embraced President Obama touring together with
Barrack Obama, which caused many Republicans to brand him as a traitor, but which played well with
voters in his own state.
High taxes, with state property taxes rising by 2096 in the past four years under Christie, NJ lags
behind in unemployment (8.6%), foreclosures (ranking New Jersey higher than Florida in the
percentage of homes in foreclosure handled through the courts) and credit ranking (one of the lowest
in the country made worse by continual budget battles), even though state fees rose and government
spending increased. Poverty has hit a 52-year high under Christie. An astonishing 24.796 of the state's
population is categorized as poor. And much like Rudy Giuliani, who used every opportunity possible
to mention "9/11", Christie can't stop saying "Sandy"and I am not talking about Richie Haven's 1967
song, "Sandy." And even though Sandy was more than a year ago, Christie never mentions that only a
handful o New Jersey families that have received money the $600 million from federal funding for the
state's Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, Elevation and Mitigation program, which is
responsible for distributing money from the federal Department of Housing and Urban
Development through grants of up to $15o,00.
As a result, NJ's middle class shrank in the past four years. He voted against marriage equality and was
mostly silent on women's issues even though a majority of most people in NJ supported both. One
example of cuts in women's health care; Gov. Christie cut $7.5 million from health clinics that provide
physical exams, mammograms, life-saving pap smears, and other vital and basic medical screenings.
EFTA01141529
Because of this, family planning clinics saw at least 33,000 fewer patients in 2010 than in 2009,
representing a 24 percent drop. The number of clinical breast exams given fell more than 3o percent.
Six clinics closed, and others statewide had to cut back on hours or increase waiting periods. This
means fewer regular checkups for poor and uninsured women, only creating higher health care costs in
the future. Today almost one in ten are still unemployed in New Jersey. During Christie's first term
more than a billion dollars was cut from New Jersey's education funding, making as Christie himself
describes the state's public schools, "failurefactories."
In September 2013, Tom Moran, a columnist for the New Jersey Star-Ledger, noted the oft-made
comparison between New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and TV's Tony Soprano: both hyper-masculine,
Catholic, conservative, loud-mouthed, and enjoying a reputation built upon bravado. "It's his larger-
than-life personality that keeps Christie viable both as a governor and a presidential candidate. "At
town hall meetings, Christie is relaxed,funny and persuasive. He usually looks to pick afight at the
end, like an entertainer singing the crowdfavorite as an encore. It's compelling stuff But it's thin
gruel, in the end. Because the substance doesn't remotely measure up to the spin." In electoral
politics, rather than the real world of high taxes and rising poverty, that might not really matter. As
governor of California in the 1970s, Ronald Reagan raised taxes at least ro times. Yet he still won
election as a conservative, tax-cutting, cowboy Republican in 1980. He was to John Wayne what
Christie is to Soprano: a couple of stars who rose above the details."
Another New Jersey journalist wrote, " many conservatives might be looking at Christie and making
a canny calculation: "Here is a Republican candidate who can win a blue state despite having a mixed
record and a reputationfor pickingfights. He is someone who middle-class voters seem to identify
with and like - and there arefew other national Republicans around like that right now." It's a
tempting pitch, but GOP supporters watching Christie's success in New Jersey ought to bear a few
things in mind. First, that mixed record in office may come back to haunt the governor and be used
against him, much as inmate furloughs were used against Michael Dukakis or policy reversals against
Mitt Romney. Second, Christie might find he doesn't convince conservatives at a national level that he
is truly one them."
Tuesday night in his acceptance speech, Chris Christie played down partisanship, pledging to do
whatever he can to as he said, "to get the job done." The result is that a blue state embraced a loudly
pragmatist Republican with Presidential ambitions. And no better evidence is his acceptance speech
below. I wish that more Republicans had the pragmatic backbone and good sense of Chris Christie,
who still will not be receiving my vote should he survive the next Republican Party primaries, because
his core conservative principals are not mine. And although he is not an ideologue, even his moderate
stance on many issues such as women's rights, social security and government spending is definitely
left of my own. As such, should she run, I am definitely voting for Hillary. Still, I urge everyone to
enjoy Governor Christie's acceptance speech, especially you Republicans because his message is
undeniable attractive to most people — whomever you are and whatever you believe — because the
core of his message is a wonderful one.
Chris Christie Delivers Election Night
Victory Speech
EFTA01141530
November 3, 2013
Video Weblink: http4/youtu.be/vFdmrcGpOEc
Ladies and gentlemen, tonight I stand here as your governor and I am so proud to be a governor. Born
in Newark and raised in Livingston, made my wife from Pennsylvania a real Jersey girl and raised our
family, right here in this amazing state that I love just as much as my mother and father raised me to
love it. You see what people have never understood about us, I didn't need any introduction to all of
you, I know you because I'm one of you. So tonight first and foremost I want to say, thank you New
Jersey for making me the luckiest guy in the world and the only honor and privilege better than being a
one term governor of New Jersey is being a two term governor of New Jersey. You got to meet my
kids tonight and Mary Pat and I are so proud of them, Andrew, Sarah, Pat and Bridget, I love you all.
and over the last four years in a specially this year New Jersey got to know what a special first lady that
they have, I love you Mary Pat.
I spoke to Senator Bouno a while ago, (over partisan jeers from the crowd) no, no she congratulated
me it was gracious. She was gracious with her congratulations and I thanked her for spirited campaign
and for her 20 years of public service to the state.
You know we came to office for years ago and we stood behind a podium like this and said that people
were tired of politics as usual, they wanted to get things done and we promise that we were going to go
to Trenton and turn it upside down and I think we've done just that. The people of New Jersey four
years ago we're downhearted and dispirited, they didn't believe the government could work for them
anymore and in fact what they thought, was that government was just did it take from them but not to
give to them, not to work with them, not to work for them. Well its four years later and we stand here
tonight showing that it is possible to put doing your job first, to put working together first, to fight for
what you believe in and still stand for your principles and get something done for the people who
EFTA01141531
elected you. The biggest thing that I've learned over the last 4 years about leadership is that leadership
is much less the less about talking then it is about listening, about bringing people around the table
and listening to each other and showing them respect and doing what needed to be done and to bring
people together to achieve what we needed to achieve to move our state forward. Now listen, I know
that if we can do this in Trenton New Jersey, maybe the folks in Washington DC should tune in the TVs
right now to see how it's done.
Listen we are New Jersey we still fight. We still yell but when we fight we fight for those things that
really matter in people's lives and while we may not always agree, we show up, we show up
everywhere, we just don't show up at the places with people vote for us a lot, we show up and the
places that vote for us a little, we just don't show up at the places that we are comfortable we show up
at the places where we are uncomfortable because when you lead you need to be there you need to
show up, you need to listen and then you need to act and you don't just show up to 6 months before an
election. You show up for us before day one. And you just don't take no for an answer the first time no
happens, you keep going back and trying more because when I was elected 4 years ago I was elected by
the people voted for a for me, I was the governor of all the people and tonight overwhelmingly those
people have said, come on-board, its fine here and let's have one people support the governor and now
we've had a big big win tonight.
What people have told me over the last 4 years more and more they want the truth. You know we don't
always agree with each other in New Jersey, some folks don't agree with some of the things that I do
and certainly they don't agree with some of the things I say sometimes. What they know, they know
that they never have to wonder. When they walked into the voting booth today, they didn't say I
wonder who this guy is and what he stands for, what is willing to fight for, what is willing to do when
the chips are down. You can agree with me and you can disagree with me, but I will never stop leading
the state I love.
People across the country have asked me, how we've been able to do what we've achieved and I'm in
reminded of a story that Pastor Joe Carter of the New Hope Church told just one week ago today on the
one year anniversary of Hurricane Sandy, He called what happen in New Jersey last year the Spirit of
Sandy. He spoke about people coming together. He said that when the lights went out no one cares
what color skin was. He said when you didn't have any food no one kid if it was a Republican or
Democrat offering you the food and when you didn't have one place for your family because of what
happened in the storm you didn't care if it was someone who thought the government should be big or
small, because at that moment the spirit of send the infected all of us.
Reverend Carter was right and you prayed that day that's the Spirit a Sandy would stay with us well be
on the days that recovery will take. My place to you tonight is that I will govern with Spirit of Sandy.
It's true in New Jersey and all the people that live here they are ready to live that way too. As your
Governor it has never mattered to me where someone was from, whether they voted for me or not, the
color of their skin or the political party. For me being governor has always been about getting the job
done first. This doesn't mean that we don't have principles, we have many of them and we have stood
and fought every day to cut taxes to reduce the size of government spending, to reform pension and
benefits to reform a broken education system and to make sure that we create opportunities again for
New Jerseyans. And for the next four years we will fight to make those changes permanent and we
will fight to make them bigger. I did not seek a second term to do small things, I saw the second term
to finish the job so what we do it.
EFTA01141532
I want to think a few people in addition to my family before we go tonight. I want to tell you that over
the last year I've had the greatest campaign team than any guy could ask for. And they were in a
flawless campaign and I sent them for it. and I want to thank my cabinet and senior staff. Who
especially over the last year have worked tirelessly with me to help bring back the great state of New
Jersey from the second worst natural disaster hit this country. And I want to thank the second one
who said yes to me when I ask, New Jersey lieutenant governor Kim Gauadagno.
I use to tell folks all the time that I have the greatest job in the world, set for Jersey kids to be elected
governor of the state that you were born and raised is the greatest job but you could have been your life
and I love it every day. I would get up and know that I had a chance to do something great. I didn't do
something great everyday but I had a chance to do something great for people who I would probably
never meet and certainly never know. But on October the 29th of last year that job changed. It's no
longer job for me, it's a mission. You see a mission is different than a job, ifs a secret trust that was
thrust upon me and you on October 29th of last year. And that mission is to make sure that everyone
in New Jersey that was affected by Sandy return to normalcy in their life and I want to promise you
tonight, I will not let anyone, anything, any political party, any governmental entity or any force get
between me and the completion of my mission. You see for those veterans out there tonight you know
how sacred mission is, the sacredness a mission of a soldier is that no one ever is left behind. No one is
ever left behind on the battlefield and on the battlefield that Sandy turn the state into, New Jersey will
never leave any New Jerseyans behind.
I am resolved to complete this mission. Not because of me but because of you. For the last year I've
had a lot of people asking me for hugs, a lot of people and I can tell you this people ask me for hugs to
comfort them. Hugs to make sure that I wouldn't forget them. People ask me for hugs just to know
that the leader of the state cared about them. and people came up to me all the time during the
aftermath, saying "governor what did you get the energy, day to day to day after day to do this."
And I told them, you don't understand those hugs gave more to me than I could ever give back to
them. They gave me hope and faith and optimism for our future. The people of New Jersey have given
me much more than I could ever hope to give back to them. They have given me hope it give me faith.
And they've given me their trust. And it is with that hope. That optimism. That faith. And that trust.
That we together can front the next four years of opportunity for our state.
I know that tonight a dispirited America, angry with their dysfunctional government in Washington
looks to New Jersey to say what I think is happening is really happening? Are people really coming
together? Are we really working African Americans and Hispanics, suburbanites and city dwellers,
farmers in teachers? Are we really all working together? Let me give the answer to everyone who's
watching tonight. Under this government our first job is to get the job done. And as long as I'm
Governor that job will always, always be finished.
I think tonight most particularly, I know my dad my brother and my sister who are here tonight with
me share the same view. I think tonight most particularly about my mother. All of you who have
known me over the last four years, know that she was and still is the dominant influence in my life. As
I said on the video my mom used to say to me all the time, "Christopher be yourself so tomorrow you
won't have to remember who you pretended to be yesterday." Powerful words from a woman who I
miss every day. But tonight I know that my mom is looking down on New Jersey and saying to me I
can feel it, "Chris the job is not done yet get back to work and finish the job for the people of New
Jersey." And that's exactly what I will do. I Love New Jersey and thank you very much.
EFTA01141533
As many of you know I am also a huge fan of political satirist Bill Mayer, whose HBO show Real
Time With Bill Maher, is one of my television staples, because although Bill sentiments are
Progressive like my own, he is willing to call out misgivings by Democrats with the same wit and
voracity that he employs when attacking the crazy policies on the hard right. He is a liberal Democrat
who personally owns a gun for self-protection and at the same time understands that something is
wrong when a 28 year-old man can profile a teenager, stalk, pursue, accost and kill him on a rainy
winter night and somehow it is the teenager's fault. He is someone who called Democrats punks when
they lose their spine and are rolled by Republicans. And at the same time, he invites Republicans on
the show's guest panels to state their case. And whether it is Anthony Weiner sending photos of his
private parts or U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia proclaiming that the Devil is real and the
only reason why we don't see him now is because he is wilier, he is willing to call both idiots. And there
is no better example of this idiocy then when several weeks ago when he ended a show during his New
Rules summary, illuminating that Scalia is no different than Michele Bachmann, who equates almost
everything that President Obama does as the work of the Devil. Below please find a video web link and
transcript, as it is both hilarious while at the same time scary.
Bill Maher's New Rules - Michele Bachmann and the Devil
Web Link: Intudivoutu.be/oPEM_QXbfXo
And, finally, New Rule: [slide of Michele Bachmann] I know we can't establish a religious test for
office, but if you believe we're living in the End Times like Michele Bachmann does, we get to take
away the car keys. Yes, let Jesus take the wheel. If you think the world is about to end, that's your
right. But, you don't get to vote on next year's budget, because it DOESN'T CONCERN YOU! Now,
this past Saturday, Congresswoman Michele Bachmann announced that President Obama is sending
arms to terrorists, and said, "Rather than seeing this as a negative, we need to rejoice. Maranatha
come Lord Jesus' day is at hand." Of course, if Michele is right, and Jesus is on his way back, he'll be
the first man she ever saw coming. But, she's not the only person in Washington who'd be more
comfortable on "American Horror Story." In an interview this week, Supreme Court Justice Antonin
Scalia says he believes the Devil is a real person who's running around getting people to not believe in
God. What can I say? I started to blush.
Blush and laugh, because reasonable people -- you know them — they usually see Michele Bachmann
as a total loon, but Scalia as a serious intellectual. When, actually, they're the exact same idiot. Scalia
says in the interview that he's puzzled that the Devil is all over the New Testament, but we don't see
him around anymore. Oh, yeah, back in the old days, Satan was like Miley Cyrus's tongue: he was
EFTA01141534
everywhere. But, you know, this Devil not being anymore thing, it's not something that puzzles me. In
fact, usually, when I hear someone talking like this, it's because I'm dropping change in their cup. But,
somehow, the lack of Beelzebub sightings positively mystifies the leading legal mind in conservative
America. Scalia says: [slide of quote] "In the Gospels, the Devil is doing all sorts of things. He's
making pigs run off cliffs. He's possessing people, and whatnot. And that doesn't happen very much
anymore." I kept waiting for the transcript to say, "Ha-hah! JustPeking with you!" Pigs running off
cliffs? Hey, leave the debt ceiling deniers out of this.
And, what is Justice Scalia's theory as to why we don't see the Devil anymore? Is it the logical answer
that fictions like the Devil are in the Bible because it was written before the age of science, when
humans didn't know where the sun went at night, and is obviously a reflection of mankind's thinking
in his intellectual infancy? Of course not! That makes sense! What Scalia said about the Devil is, "He
used to be all over the New Testament. What happened to him? He got wilier." Motherf"cker. Of
course, wilier! He may be evil, but he's always looking to improve himself.
Antonin Scalia once said that people like him who adhere to traditional beliefs were, quote, "regarded
as simpleminded. We are,"he said, "fools for Christ." You know, whether you're 'foolsfor Christ" or
"Cuckoofor Cocao Puffs," I really don't care why someone acts like a fool; just that they do, and that
when they do, we keep them away from decision making. It would be one thing if Mr. Scalia sold pizza
for a living, but this is a man we go to, to interpret our laws. It's like smelling a gas leak and calling an
exorcist. Antonin Scalia put George Bush in the White House, and he believes the Devil went down to
Georgia. He gets to decide when life begins, and he thinks "evil" is a person, you know, like a
corporation. Here's the problem with believing the Devil exists. It means you see the world divided
into teams of good and evil, and suspect the "wiley one" may be on the side of "them." And when you
start seeing compromising with your opponents as a compromise with evil, well, there's your Tea
Party.
THIS WEEK's READINGS
EFTA01141535
Early in a coronary artery bypass surgeryduring vein harvesting from the legs (left of image) and the
establishment of bypass (placement of the aortic cannula) (bottom of image). The perfusionist and heart-lung
machine(HLM) are on the upper right. The patient's head (not seen) is at the bottom.
Coronary artery bypass surgery, also coronary artery bypass graft (CABG, pronounced "cabbage')
surgery, and colloquially heart bypass or bypass surgery is a surgical procedure performed to relieve
angina and reduce the risk of death from coronary artery disease. Arteries or veins from elsewhere in
the patient's body are grafted to the coronary arteries to bypass atherosclerotic narrowings and
improve the blood supply to the coronary circulation supplying the myocardium (heart muscle). This
surgery is usually performed with the heart stopped, necessitating the usage of cardiopulmonary
bypass; techniques are available to perform CABG on a beating heart, so-called "off-pump" surgery.
giFile:Blausen 0466 Heart Bypass Surgery.png
Illustration of a typical coronary artery bypass surgery. A vein from the leg is removed and grafted to the
coronary artery to bypass a blockage.
The first coronary artery bypass surgery was performed in the United States on May 2, 1960, at the
Albert Einstein College of Medicine-Bronx Municipal Hospital Center by a team led by Dr. Robert
Goetz and the thoracic surgeon, Dr. Michael Rohman with the assistance of Dr. Jordan Haller and Dr.
Ronald Dee. In this technique the vessels are held together with circumferential ligatures over an
inserted metal ring. The internal mammary artery was used as the donor vessel and was anastomosed
to the right coronary artery. The actual anastomosis with the Rosenbach ring took fifteen seconds and
did not require cardiopulmonary bypass. The disadvantage of using the internal mammary artery was
that, at autopsy nine months later, the anastomosis was open, but an atheromatous plaque had
occluded the origin of the internal mammary that was used for the bypass.
EFTA01141536
Single Double Triple Quadruple
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)
Illustration depicting single, double, triple, and quadruple bypass
Russian cardiac surgeon, Dr. Vasilii Kolesov, performed the first successful internal mammary artery—
coronary artery anastomosis in 1964.
However, Goetz's has been cited by others, including Kolesov, as the first successful human coronary
artery bypass. Goetz's case has frequently been overlooked. Confusion has persisted for over 4o years
and seems to be due to the absence of a full report and to misunderstanding about the type of
anastomosis that was created. The anastomosis was intima-to-intima, with the vessels held together
with circumferential ligatures over a specially designed metal ring. Kolesov did the first successful
coronary bypass using a standard suture technique in 1964, and over the next five years he performed
33 sutured and mechanically stapled anastomoses in St. Petersburg, Russia.
Single Double Triple Quadruple
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)
Three coronary artery bypass grafts, a LIMA to LAD and two saphenous vein grafts — one to the right coronary
artery (RCA) system and one to the obtuse marginal (OM) system.
EFTA01141537
Dr. Rene Favaloro, an Argentine surgeon, achieved a physiologic approach in the surgical management
of coronary artery disease — the bypass grafting procedure — at the Cleveland Clinic in May 1967. His
new technique used a saphenous vein autograft to replace a stenotic segment of the right coronary
artery. Later, he successfully used the saphenous vein as a bypassing channel, which has become the
typical bypass graft technique we know today; in the U.S., this vessel is typically harvested
endoscopically, using a technique known as endoscopic vessel harvesting (EVH). Soon Dr. Dudley
Johnson extended the bypass to include left coronary arterial systems. In 1968, Doctors Charles
Bailey, Teruo Hirose and George Green used the internal mammary artery instead of the saphenous
vein for the grafting.
Bypass Surgery Might Be History Soon
In a ground breaking discovery that may eventually render bypass surgery history, researchers at
TelAviv University have shown that an injected protein can regrow blood vessels in the human heart.
In heart disease, blood vessels are either dogged or die off, starving the heart of oxygen and leaving it
highly susceptible to a cardiac attack. Dr. Britta Hardy of TAM Sadder School of Medicine and her
team of researchers have developed a protein-based injection that when delivered straight to muscles
in the body, sparks the regrowth of tiny blood vessels.
The new vessels in the heart could give millions of people around the world a new lease on life. "The
biotechnology behind our human-based protein therapy is very complicated, but the goal is simple
and the solution is Straightforward. We intend to inject our drug locally to heal any oxygen-starved
tissue. Sofar in animal models, we've seen no side effects and no inflammation following our
injection of the drug into the legs. The growth of new blood vessels happens within a few weeks,
showing improved blood circulation," said Hardy.
The protein solution can also be added as a coating to a stent. Usually, the implantation of a stent is
accompanied by a high risk for blood dots, which necessitates the use of blood thinners. "We could
coat a stent with our peptide, attracting endothelial stem cells to form a film on the surface of the stent.
These endothelial cells on the stent would eliminate the need for taking the blood thinners that prevent
blood clots from forming," said Hardy. If investment goals are met, the researchers are hoping that
toxicity studies and Phase I trials could be complete within two years.
The researchers began the study for preventing leg amputations, positing that proteins from the
human body could be used to trigger the growth of new blood vessels.
Hardy started by studying a library of peptides and testing them in the laboratory and later confirmed
initial results. She then took some of the isolated and synthesized peptides and tested them in diabetic
mice whose legs were in the process of dying. Although diabetes is known to decrease blood
circulation, Hardy found that her therapy reversed the decrease. "Within a short time we saw the
formation of capillaries and tiny blood vessels. After three weeks, they had grown and merged
together with the rest of the circulatory system," she said. In mice with limited blood circulation, she
was able to completely restore blood vessels and save their legs.
EFTA01141538
It was then a short step to studying the applicability of the research to cardiac patients. "It"s pretty
obvious if there is regrowth or not.
Our technology promises to regrow blood vessels like a net, and a heart that grows more blood
vessels becomes stronger. It's now imaginable that, in the distantfuture, peptide injections may be
able to replace bypass surgeries," concluded Hardy. The study has been published in Bioche mic al
Pharmacology.
To delegitimize the Affordable Healthcare Act, opponents of the program and the President first
labelled it Obamacare, telling people that it was Socialism run-a-muck that would end in catastrophe
eventually destroying the country as we know it. To illustrate their case Jan Crawford of CBS News
identified Dianne Barrette, a 57-year-old Florida realtor who was paying $54 a month for a Blue Cross
insurance plan and was informed that the plan would not be available after December. And while
FloridaBlue offered her a new plan, the company told her t
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
ccf8dfbd22861cd78e426ef4de0f093bc955c29bd409a3108a8d23b2c3f50496
Bates Number
EFTA01141522
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
33
Comments 0