Search / DataSet-10 / EFTA00615939.pdf

EFTA00615939.pdf

Dataset DataSet-10
File Type Unknown
Pages 31
Words 4,693
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 31




UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CASE NO.: 1:17-CV-00616
JANE DOE 43,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JEFFREY EPSTEIN GHISLAINE MAXWELL,

AND

Defendants.
/

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff JANE DOE 43, by and through her undersigned counsel, for her

claims against Defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell,

, and , alleges upon personal knowledge with

respect to her own acts and status, and upon personal knowledge, information and

belief as to all other matters, as follows:

1. This cause of action arises under federal statutes and jurisdiction is proper

under 28 U.S.C. section 1331.

2. Plaintiff files this Complaint under a pseudonym in order to protect her

identity because this Complaint makes allegations of a sensitive sexual nature the

disclosure of which, in association with her name, would cause further harm to her.



I



EFTA00615939
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 2 of 31




3. At all times material to the events alleged in this cause of action the Plaintiff

was

4. At all times material to this cause of action Defendant Jeffrey Epstein had

multiple residences, including in New York, New York (within the Southern

District of New York) and the United States Virgin Islands. He is currently a

citizen of the United States and claims to be a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands.

5. At all times material to this cause of action Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was an

adult male born in 1953.

6. At all times material to this cause of action Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell

was residing in in New York, New York and was a citizen of Great Britain and

France.

7. At all times material to this cause of action




8. At all times material to this cause of action




9. A substantial part of the acts, events, and omissions giving rise to this cause

of action occurred in the Southern District of New York; venue is proper in that

District. 28 U.S.C. section 1391(b)(2)


2




EFTA00615940
Case 1:17-cv-00616-3GK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 3 of 31




10. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendants Jeffrey Epstein,

Ghislaine Maxwell, and owed a duty to Plaintiff to treat

her in a non-negligent manner and not to commit or conspire to commit

intentional, criminal, fraudulent, or tortious acts against her, including any acts in

violation of 18 U.S.C. §1595.

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

11. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was

an adult male over 50 years old. Defendant Epstein is widely recognized as a

billionaire who uses his extraordinary wealth to commit illegal sexual crimes in

violation of federal and state statutes and to employ and conspire with a group of

numerous others, including each of the named Defendants, to assist in committing

those crimes and additional torts as well as to conceal the crimes and torts of the

Epstein sex trafficking group from being discovered.

12. Defendant Epstein displays his enormous wealth, power and influence to his

employees; to the victims procured for sexual purposes; and to the public in order

to advance and carry out his crimes and torts. At all relevant times, Defendant

Epstein owned and continues to own, directly or through nominee individuals used

to conceal his interests, a fleet of airplanes, motor vehicles, boats and one or more

helicopters. For example, he owned (directly or indirectly) a Boeing aircraft (of

make and model B-727-31H with tail number N908JE) and a Gulfstream aircraft


3




EFTA00615941
Case 1:17-cv-00616-3GK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 4 of 31




(of make and model G-1159B with tail number N909JE). He also owned

numerous properties and homes, including a 51,000-square-foot mansion in

Manhattan; a $30 Million, 7,500-acre ranch in New Mexico; a 70-acre private

island formerly known as Little St. James in or near St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin

Islands; a home in Paris, France; and a mansion in Palm Beach County, Florida.

The allegations herein primarily concern the defendant's conduct while at his

townhouse in New York; on one or more of his private airplanes; and on his

private island in the United States Virgin Islands. Epstein used all of the real and

personal property described in this paragraph to facilitate the illegal sex trafficking

venture and enterprise described in this Complaint and in furtherance of that

venture and enterprise.

13. Defendant Epstein has a compulsive sexual preference for young females as

young as 13 and as "old" as 25. Through information and belief Defendant Epstein

engages in sexual acts with this age range every day and developed, through the

employment of and conspiracy with the other Defendants, a sex trafficking venture

and enterprise designed to fulfill his sexual desires and conceal the operation of the

venture and enterprise and conduct of its participants. As part of the venture and

enterprise, Epstein also provided young females for sexual purposes to his friends

in order to secure social, business, and other contacts as well as other things of

value.


4




EFTA00615942
Case 1:17-cv-00616-3GK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 5 of 31




14. Defendant Maxwell was for decades the highest-ranking employee of the

Defendants' sex trafficking venture and enterprise. She herself recruited young,

including underage, females; oversaw and trained other recruiters on how best to

recruit girls for sex; developed and executed schemes designed to recruit young

females; and ensured that all participants of the Defendants' sex trafficking scheme

acted in certain specific ways in order to advance the purposes of the scheme,

including providing young females to Epstein for sexual purposes on a daily basis,

and concealing these activities from law enforcement.




5



EFTA00615943
Case 1:17-cv-00616-3GK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 6 of 31




Recruiters were taught by Defendants Epstein, Maxwell =II to inform

targeted victims that Epstein possessed extraordinary wealth, power, resources and

influence; that he was a philanthropist who would help female victims advance

their careers and lives; and that the recruits needed only to provide Epstein with

body massages in order to avail themselves of his financial assistance and

influence. In fact, however, these representations were fraudulent.



and the Defendants did not help nor intend to help advance the victims'

careers. Victims were also paid to bring Epstein other young females for sex and

were told by Defendants Epstein, Maxwell, and that those young females

who brought other females would further benefit from bringing other girls.




6



EFTA00615944
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 7 of 31




18. The Defendants, led primarily by Defendants Epstein and Maxwell, fulfilled

Epstein's compulsive need for sex with young females by preying on their

personal, psychological, financial, and related vulnerabilities. The Defendants'

tactics included promising the victims money, shelter, transportation, gifts,

employment, admission into educational institutions, educational tuition,

protection, and other things of value in exchange for sex. Defendants also took

possession of the victims' passports to coerce compliance with their demands.

Defendants also trafficked young females to Epstein's friends and acquaintances in

order to secure financial and other benefits as well as social, educational, and

business connections.

19. Defendants' sex trafficking venture and enterprise operated in a hierarchal

structure with Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at the top.

Defendants Epstein and Maxwell operated the sex trafficking scheme dating back

to at least the mid-nineties, and over the years perfected their roles and the roles of

others, both in terms of the ability to increase the volume of young females

recruited for sex and in insulating the enterprise from criminal investigation or

prosecution.


7



EFTA00615945
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 8 of 31




Underlings unnamed co-

conspirators such as various housekeepers and butlers; an airplane pilot; and

various employees, assistants and associates. Wittingly and unwittingly, such

underlings performed their respective roles with the purpose and effect of insuring

that the enterprise supplied young females to Defendant Epstein and others for

sexual purposes. At all times materials to this complaint, the venture and

enterprise was a group of two or more individuals associated in fact and deed.

20. Defendants Epstein and Maxwell, with help from assistants, associates and

underlings, recruited and procured hundreds of girls over the decades of the

operation of their scheme. Such recruitment and procurement included fraud,

coercion, threats, intimidation, fear, the threat of coercion, and a combination of

these and similar tactics. Following the Defendants' recruitment and procurement

of the young females to join Epstein in New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands, the

Defendants used fraudulent promises, coercion, and threats of coercion in order to

entice and coerce the females into sex and, once sexual activities ensued, to cause

them to remain in the enterprise. The Defendants also transported females in


8



EFTA00615946
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 9 of 31




interstate and foreign commerce and in ways that affected interstate and foreign

commerce. The sex acts were commercial in nature, because the Defendants

promised to provide financial and other compensation to the females in exchange

for providing sex acts to Epstein.




22. Additionally, Defendants always made clear to every young female that they

were wealthy, well-connected and could either help or hurt the females depending

on their degree of cooperation. In fact, Defendants Epstein and Maxwell have

been known to threaten young females with physical harm. It is unknown exactly

how long the Defendants' criminal and illegal venture and enterprise operated,

although it was at least continuously and actively in operation from the mid-1990's

through and including the calendar year 2007.

23. Defendant Epstein has continued the venture and enterprise up to the present

time in some form or another and with additional co-conspirators and participants.

24. In 2005, Defendant Epstein and numerous co-conspirators within the venture

and enterprise were the subjects of a Palm Beach, Florida Police Department

criminal investigation which revealed that Defendant Epstein had engaged in




9



EFTA00615947
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 10 of 31




25. In 2006, the Palm Beach Police Department investigation was turned over to

the FBI and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of

Florida. The United States Attorney's Office investigated Defendant Epstein and

his co-conspirators for their violations of numerous federal statutes, including 18

U.S.C. Section 1591, one of the statutory bases for this complaint.

26. The United States Attorney's investigation continued from 2006 through

September 2007, at which time a Non-Prosecution Agreement was signed between

Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Attorney's Office deferring federal

prosecution of Defendant Epstein and his numerous co-conspirators,



for identified federal sex crimes against more than 30 minors.

27. From late 2006 through September 2007, Epstein's team of lawyers

negotiated with the federal government in an effort to avoid a fifty-three-page

Federal felony indictment from being filed against Epstein. During these


10




EFTA00615948
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 11 of 31




negotiations, Defendant Epstein decamped from Palm Beach to New York and the

U.S. Virgin Islands in order to convey an image to prosecutors that he and his co-

conspirators had stopped committing sex crimes.

28. Remarkably, however—as this case will highlight—Defendant Epstein and

his co-Defendants, including the other defendants named herein, did not abandon

their sex trafficking venture and enterprise even while they were under state and

federal investigation for crimes committed in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1591,

among other laws, and even as Defendants and their attorneys were busy arguing

Epstein's innocence and publicly defaming his victims as liars. Rather, Defendants

merely changed their location. Instead of targeting local Palm Beach Florida

school girls, the Defendants transported young females from other places in the

U.S. (including the Southern District of New York) and abroad and brought them

to Defendant Epstein's mansion in New York City and his private island in the

Virgin Islands.

29. In June of 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to Florida state felony sex offenses

for procuring a minor for prostitution and soliciting prostitution by minors and

registered as a Sex Offender for Life.

30. Defendants Epstein and Maxwell developed and implemented a

sophisticated system designed to insulate them from criminal and civil liability by

protecting them from potential testimony of knowledgeable subordinates.


II




EFTA00615949
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 12 of 31




31. In 2005, Defendant Epstein and other co-conspirators, aware that law

enforcement officials were preparing imminently to execute a search warrant for

his home, removed computer systems that logged information about Epstein and

his co-conspirators' illegal and criminal conduct; the identities of witnesses; nude




12




EFTA00615950
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 13 of 31




photographs of young females; scheduling books; message pads; tangible items

such as vibrators and toys; and other incriminating matter.

32. The sex recruiting and trafficking venture and enterprise designed to procure

young females for sexual purposes and to conceal those activities was developed

and fine-tuned over time, and each of the named Defendants had a well-defined

role and improved in his/her role over time, with practice and experience. By the

time Plaintiff was recruited into victimization, each Defendant had years of

experience perfecting methods of coercion, understanding Epstein's requirements,

and becoming more loyal to the continuance and survival of the venture and

enterprise. All of the Defendant's knew about the activities of the venture and

enterprise and worked in concert for the goals of the venture and knowingly

benefitted, financially and by receiving things of value, from their participation in

the venture and enterprise.

33. A typical ■ the Defendants procured young females for sex with

Defendant Epstein was to make false promises of a modeling opportunity, offer a

better life, offer payment for a formal education, or offer other money or

consideration.

34. Beginning in approximately October 2006 and continuing through April

2007,




13




EFTA00615951
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 14 of 31




14




EFTA00615952
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 15 of 31




39. Defendant Maxwell told Plaintiff she would need to provide Defendant

Epstein with body massages in order to reap the benefits of his and Maxwell's

connections.

40. All Defendants, including Maxwell, Epstein, and knew that

Plaintiff was actually being recruited for sexual purposes, and each knowingly and

deliberately made false representations to ensure that Plaintiff would cooperate in

fulfilling Epstein's sexual desires. These false and flaudulent representations

included Defendants' telling Plaintiff that Epstein would use his connections to

have her admitted into . or a similar institute, college, university or school of

higher learning and provide her with employment opportunities. Plaintiff

reasonably relied on these representations and had a credible basis for such

reliance, including the credible representations of Epstein and the other Defendants

that they possessed extensive political, business, financial, social, and educational

influence and connections. Epstein and the other Defendants represented to

Plaintiff in manners that were persuasive, credible, and reasonable to Plaintiff, as

they would have been to any other person similarly situated, that they had the

political, business, financial, social, educational, and other influence and




15




EFTA00615953
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 16 of 31




connections sufficient to arrange for and insure her admission into . or a

similar school of higher learning.

41. Maxwell and Epstein also threatened Plaintiff that. while they had the ability

to advance her education and career, they also had the ability to make sure that

Plaintiff would not obtain formal education f she

failed to provide the sexual favors desired by Defendant Epstein or abide by the

instructions given her by Defendants Epstein, M, and Maxwell.

42. Plaintiff reasonably believed that her compliance with Defendants' demands

was crucial to her physical, psychological, financial. and reputational well-being

and survival.




44. Maxwell and Epstein informed Plaintiff that other young females in

Epstein's company were there also to perform sexual acts for Epstein and his

friends.




16




EFTA00615954
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 17 of 31




The Defendants all participated in arranging for Plaintiff

to be transported in interstate and foreign commerce, and affecting interstate and

foreign commerce, for these sexual purposes. The Defendants Epstein, Maxwell,

and



46. During many sexual encounters, Defendant Epstein gave Plaintiff no option,

opportunity, or choice not to participate in the prescribed sexual acts.

47. Defendant Maxwell frequently controlled the assignment, or "rotation," of

Plaintiff and the other young females concerning the time, place and manner of the

sex acts they were told to provide to Defendant Epstein.




17




EFTA00615955
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 18 of 31




50. Defendant Epstein's wealth, influence, power and connections were used by

Defendants Maxwell, and M, both as an inducement to provide sex (in

exchange for promises of support to Plaintiff) and as a means of threatening

punishment (in the event Plaintiff refused to comply with Defendants' instructions

to provide sex to Epstein and others).

51. In addition to Plaintiffs being trafficked on Epstein's private airplane,

Defendants IM, Maxwell and , with the knowledge of and instruction by

Defendant Epstein,


18




EFTA00615956
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 19 of 31




53. The relationship between Plaintiff and Defendants Epstein and Maxwell was

defined and characterized by Defendant Epstein's and Defendant Maxwell's

frequent and persistent fraudulent representations that they would provide Plaintiff

with a formal education and career advancement if she provided sex to Defendant


19



EFTA00615957
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 20 of 31




Epstein and others in the times, places and manners demanded by Defendants.




Plaintiff reasonably relied

on these representations. In fact, however, these representations were knowingly

false, were not acted upon by Defendants, and were made by Defendants Epstein,

M , =, and Maxwell solely for the purpose of maintaining Plaintiffs

financial dependence on, emotional vulnerability to, and sexual compliance with

Defendant Epstein's demands. The other Defendants intentionally repeated these

representations and intentionally made statements designed to convince Plaintiff

that the representations were true and could be relied upon. These representations

and statements were made to Plaintiff in furtherance of the sex trafficking venture

and enterprise for which they were each employed.




20




EFTA00615958
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 21 of 31




55. In January 2007, as part of their illegal venture and enterprise, Defendants

sent Plaintiff from New York City, in the Southern District of New York, to

o recruit, for a promised fee, one or more aspiring female models

supposedly for Epstein to use as a personal assistant. The Defendants did not care

whether the prospective female was qualified to work as a personal assistant

because each knew that the female recruit would be immediately placed into the

same sexually vulnerable position as Plaintiff (and the dozens of other victims of

the sex trafficking enterprise) and would be induced and coerced into being used

for sex through fraudulent representations and other means.




21




EFTA00615959
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 22 of 31




57. As part of their ongoing scheme, Defendants inflicted serious emotional and

psychological harm on Plaintiff as a means of coercing her to continue engaging in

commercial sex acts with Epstein and others. While Plaintiff was in South Africa,

Defendants Epstein and Maxwell informed Plaintiff that she would not be

permitted to return to the United States to receive her promised education unless

she underwent a diet and lowered her body weight




22




EFTA00615960
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 23 of 31




58. As part of their scheme, Defendants Epstein and Maxwell called Plaintiff's

parents in South Africa to tell them that Defendant Epstein would take good care

of Plaintiff when she returned to the United States, and that Defendants Maxwell

and Epstein would use their connections and influence to have her admitted to

or another well-regarded fashion school or school of higher learning.

59. As part of their scheme, Epstein and told Plaintiff that she should fill

out an application for admission to , and supporting essay, and send it to

Epstein for his review. Pursuant to these instructions, Plaintiff completed an

application, and supporting essay, and sent it to Epstein. As part of his scheme,

Epstein told Plaintiff that he had reviewed these materials. His statements were

intended to convince Plaintiff, and had the effect of convincing plaintiff (as they

would have convinced any reasonable person), that her admission to was a

"done deal" if she would comply with his instructions. also made the same

representations to plaintiff on Epstein's behalf. Plaintiff reasonably relied on these

representations by Epstein and

60. As part of their scheme, Epstein and Maxwell told Plaintiff that they had

contacts at and at modeling agencies who could ensure her admission to

and advance Plaintiff's career. As part of their scheme, Epstein and

Maxwell told Plaintiff about Epstein's vast wealth and specifically identified him

as a billionaire. Epstein and Maxwell told Plaintiff that they had extensive


23




EFTA00615961
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 24 of 31




contacts, in addition to those identified above, throughout New York City and

elsewhere.

61. In February of 2007, in reliance on promises made by the Defendants,

Plaintiff




ainti Plaintiff knew that if she did not comply, Defendants

Maxwell and Epstein would use their power, influence and connections in order to

ensure that Plaintiff was unable to gain admission to . or a comparable school,

and that they would destroy her career, just as they had destroyed the careers of

others who had failed to comply with their demands.

62. Defendants Epstein and Maxwell continued to provide Plaintiff with things

of value in exchange for Plaintiff's continued compliance with Epstein's sexual

demands; however, they failed and refused to perform their promises to help

Plaintiff be admitted to or another school, or to provide financial support for


24




EFTA00615962
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 25 of 31




college admission or on-going education, false promises they repeatedly made in

order to coerce her into commercial sex acts.

63. Defendants' sexual demands on Plaintiff continued while she was in New

York City, in the Southern District of New York, or in other locations in close

proximity to the Defendants.




64. In May, 2007, Plaintiff left the United States and did not return. Between

returning from in February 2007 and leaving in May 2007,




65. In and after May 2007, Defendants actively concealed and covered up what

they had done to Plaintiff and other similarly situated females. Defendant's cover-

up included efforts to intimidate witnesses who might provide corroborating

testimony to Plaintiff as well as destruction of documents and other evidence

regarding what they had done.


25




EFTA00615963
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 26 of 31




66. Unknown to Plaintiff, Defendants' representations and promises to Plaintiff

were all false and fraudulent. Plaintiff reasonably relied on the representations and

promises of the Defendants. Plaintiff also considered the Defendants' threats

against the current and future well-being and safety of Plaintiff to be real and

credible. All such representations, promises, and threats were made solely for the

purpose of coercing and otherwise inducing Plaintiff into prolonged sexual

compliance. Defendants knowingly benefitted financially and received things of

value as a result of coercing and inducing Plaintiff into sexual compliance and

otherwise participating in their illegal venture and enterprise.

COUNT I
CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
1595

67. Plaintiff adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 66 above.

68. Defendants individually and together, within the special maritime and

territorial jurisdiction of the United States, in interstate and foreign commerce,

and/or affecting interstate and foreign commerce, knowingly recruited, enticed,

harbored, transported, provided, maintained, patronized, solicited, threatened,

forced, and coerced Plaintiff to engage in commercial sex acts. Such actions by

Defendants were undertaken with knowledge and/or reckless disregard of the fact

that their threats of force, fraud, coercion, and combinations of such means would




26




EFTA00615964
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 27 of 31




be used, and were in fact used, in order to cause Plaintiff to engage in commercial

sex acts. In so doing, Defendants violated 18 U.S.C. §1591.

69. Additionally, Defendants Epstein, Maxwell, and individually and

together, knowingly




doing, Defendants violated 18 U.S.C. § 1592. These Defendants also obstructed,

and attempted to obstruct and to interfere with the enforcement of 18 U.S.C. §

1592.

70. Additionally, Defendants knowingly benefitted, financially and by receiving

things of value, from participating in a venture (the Epstein sex trafficking venture

enterprise) which had engaged in acts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1592 and

1595(a), knowing that the venture had engaged in such violations. In so doing,

Defendants violated 18 U.S.C. § 1593A.

71. Additionally, Defendants attempted to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1591. In so

doing, Defendants violated 18 U.S.C. § 1594(a).


27




EFTA00615965
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 28 of 31



72. Additionally, Defendants conspired with each other, and with other persons

known and unknown, to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1592. In so doing, Defendants

violated 18 U.S.C. § 1594(b).

73. Additionally, Defendants conspired with each other, and with other persons

known and unknown, to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1591. In so doing, Defendants

violated 18 U.S.C. § 1594(c).

74. By virtue of their violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 1592, 1593A, and 1594,

Defendants are subject to civil causes of action under 18 U.S.C. § 1595 by

Plaintiff, who is a victim of their violations.

75. Certain property of Defendant Epstein's was essential to the commission of

the federal crimes and torts described herein, including the use of multiple private

aircraft including a Boeing aircraft (of make and model B-727-31H with tail

number N908JE) and a Gulfstream aircraft (of make and model G-1159B with tail

number N909JE). Such aircraft, along with other of Defendants' property, were

used as means and instruments of Defendants' tortious and criminal offenses and,

as such, are subject to forfeiture.

76. Additionally, Defendant Epstein's New York mansion, located at 9 East 71st

Street, New York, New York, in the Southern District of New York, and his

private island located in the United States Virgin Islands, were used as means and




28



EFTA00615966
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 29 of 31




instruments of Defendants' tortious and criminal offenses and, as such, are subject

to forfeiture.

77. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' commission of the

aforementioned criminal offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 1591, 1592, 1593A,

and 1594, and the associated civil remedies provided in § 1595, Plaintiff has in the

past suffered and will continue to suffer injury and pain; emotional distress;

psychological and psychiatric trauma; mental anguish; humiliation; confusion;

embarrassment; loss of self-esteem; loss of dignity; loss of enjoyment of life;

invasion of privacy; and other damages associated with Defendants' actions.

Plaintiff will incur further medical and psychological expenses. These injuries are

permanent in nature and Plaintiff will continue to suffer from them in the future.

In addition to these losses, Plaintiff has incurred attorneys' fees and will he

required do so in the future.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants for

compensatory and general damages, attorney's fees, punitive damages and such

other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. Plaintiff hereby

demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury.

Dated: June 5, 2017.

Respectfully Submitted,

FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING. EDWARDS,
FISTOS, LEHRMAN,.


29




EFTA00615967
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 30 of 31



By: /s/ Bradley J. Edwards
Bradley J. Edwards




PRO HAC VICE

BOLES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
David Boies
Boles Schiller & Flexner LLP




Sigrid McCawley
Meredith Schultz
Boles Schiller & Flexner LLP




PRO HAC VICE


Paul G Cassell
S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of
Utah




PRO HAC VICE




This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is
not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah for this private representation

30




EFTA00615968
Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 31 of 31




CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 5th day of June, 2017, I electronically filed the

foregoing document with the Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system. I also certify that the

foregoing document is being served this day on the individuals identified below via transmission

of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.



STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP
Michael C. Miller
Justin Y.K. Chu



Attorneys for Defendants
Jeffrey Epstein &




By: /s/ Bradley J. Edwards




31




EFTA00615969