📄 Extracted Text (781 words)
7/3/2014 Daily Tax Report
Bloomberg Daily Tax Report®
BNA
Source: Daily Tax Report: News Archive > 2014 > July > 07/01/2014 > Tax Decisions & Rulings > Accounting: Switch
From Treating Basket Transactions As Options an Accounting Change, CCA Says
126 DTR K-2
Accounting
Switch From Treating Basket Transactions
As Options an Accounting Change, CCA Says
June 30 — The Internal Revenue Service Office of Chief Counsel in a chief counsel
advice memorandum said that when a taxpayer stops treating certain securities
transactions as "options," and thus no longer defers associated gains, losses,
income or deductions, it is a change in accounting method under tax code
Section 446.
Section 481(a) applies in such a situation, the office said in CCA 201426025,
released June 30, so computation and recognition of an appropriate adjustment is needed to
eliminate any distortions in income or deductions caused by the accounting method change.
The CCA considered a situation where a limited liability company, treated as a partnership for federal
tax purposes, conducts daily trading in securities positions, mainly through various basket
transactions with a broker and investment bank. Typically, the taxpayer makes an up-front payment
of 10 percent of the notional amount of the basket of securities and the bank provides the remaining
90 percent. The year-plus contract describes the LLC's investment as a "premium" giving the LLC the
"option" to receive a cash settlement from the bank when the contract expires or is terminated.
The cash settlement amount is determined by formula and generally reflects the increase or decrease
in the securities' value, less expenses, interest and fees payable to the bank for its services and
capital.
The taxpayer doesn't recognize gains, losses, income or deductions as it trades the securities within
the basket, instead deferring recognition until the contract is ended. The taxpayer recognizes gain
equaling the difference between the cash settlement received and the up-front payment made.
On examination, the IRS field agent determined the transactions lack the requirements to be treated
as options for tax purposes —that the LLC should be treated as beneficial owner of the basket of
securities for tax purposes and shouldn't defer reporting of the resulting income. The CCA didn't
examine those conclusions and assumed that result is correct.
Change in Timing Versus Total
The Office of Chief Counsel said the field agent's adjustment constitutes a change in accounting
method under Section 446 and Section 481 "because it impacts the timing (amounts and tax years) of
taxable income, but does not change the total amount of taxable income recognized over the lifetime
of Taxpayer."
The amount of taxable income recognized by the LLC under its current practice when a basket
transaction expires or otherwise terminates is the same as the cumulative amount of taxable income
recognized for the basket over multiple taxable years under the practice imposed by the IRS field
agent, the office explained. "Accordingly, a change between these practices is an accounting method
change."
The office rejected the taxpayer's argument that the change creates a permanent difference in
lifetime taxable income because the adjustments require it to recognize amounts it never intended to
recognize —like gains and losses on individual securities transactions within the basket. The taxpayer
argues the issue is "whether" such amounts are taxable, rather than "when" they are taxable.
The office said the taxpayer's argument "elevates form over substance and places undue significance
on the labeling of amounts."
Different Labels
"While it may be strictly true that Taxpayer never intended to recognize gains, losses, income, or
deductions from Basket Transactions, Taxpayer did intend to recognize an option gain (loss)
htlpfinews.bna.canialnklisplaybetch_print display.adp 1/2
EFTA_R1_02124660
EFTA02711177
7/32014 Daly Tax Report
whenever a Basket Transaction ended, and such gain (loss) effectively included the gains, losses,
income, and deductions asserted in adjustment by Field Operations. Thus, Taxpayer intended to
include (and actually did include) these amount in gross income, albeit under a different label," it said.
In addition, it said, the adjustment includes the corresponding removal of gains recognized by the
taxpayer when the basket transaction has ended. "Thus, when seen in its overall context, the
adjustment merely impacts the time when taxable income would be recognized; it does not propose
to recognize amounts that Taxpayer never intended to recognize."
The office also rejected treating the change as an error correction.
The CCA was dated Ian. 17.
For More Information
Text of CCA 201426025 is in TaxCore.
Contact us at http://www.bna.com/contact/index.html or call 1-800-372-1033
ISSN 1522-8800
Copyright © 2014, The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.. Reproduction or redistribution, in whole or in part,
and in any form, without express written permission, is prohibited except as permitted by the BNA Copyright
Policy.
http./Incms txia.conVddNdispaybatchyrirn dispayatp 212
EFTA_R1_02124661
EFTA02711178
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
cd25723a2402bbf43826ea7f1c043e7274d5d71276114d5d8a03161ab29e7b98
Bates Number
EFTA02711177
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0