EFTA00215600
EFTA00215601 DataSet-9
EFTA00215603

EFTA00215601.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 436 words document
P17 V11 V16 P19 P23
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (436 words)
From: To: Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:30:59 +0000 Importance: Normal The motion has been taken under advisement. The parties are conferring to determine if an evidentiary hearing is necessary. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:25 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Perfect — I will forward to her. So, in a nutshell, what was the result of the hearing on Friday? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:24 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Here is the scanned file-stamped copies of our filings. Along with the filings of the Jane Does from PACER. « File: DE2_080707_Cert of Emergency.pdf » « File: DE1_080707_Petition.pdf » « File: DE9_080711_Reply Brief.pdf » « File: In Re Jane Doe001.pdf » From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:22 PM To: (USAFLS) EFTA00215601 Cc: WAILS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News Ok — just got off the phone with her. Can you send me copies of the does, which I will fonvard to her? thanks,. From: USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:15 PM To: USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: In Re Jane Doe - Call from Palm Beach Daily News • I just received a phone call from Maggie Kacoha of the Palm Beach Daily News, asking about the Jane Doe case. She told me they were tied up on Friday and unable to attend the hearing before Judge Marra. She said she had read the Sun Sentinel article and wanted to confirm that : (1) the government argued the court had no jurisdiction; and (2) the district court agreed. I gave her your name and said someone would be calling her back. I told her that the filings had all been unsealed and she could access them through PACER. I did confirm that the government argued the court did not have jurisdiction, but said the case was not over. I declined to make any other comments. When the hearing concluded last Friday, Judge Marra left it up to the parties to advise the court whether an evidentiary hearing was needed. If the answer is yes, then the court will schedule a hearing. If the answer is no, then I assume the court will go ahead and rule on the papers filed. If you need copies of what the government filed, please let me know. Thanks. EFTA00215602
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
ce5278b4b2765496beedb13364e66449aca2087a9e96a3aa03b90cf1add1040a
Bates Number
EFTA00215601
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!