gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1309.0
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.131.0 giuffre-maxwell
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1310.0

gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.131.0.pdf

giuffre-maxwell 3 pages 446 words document
P17 V9 V16 V13 P19
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (446 words)
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 131 Filed 05/01/16 Page 1 of 3 United States District Court Southern District of New York Virginia L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ________________________________/ PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO SUBMISSION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT MATERIALS FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre, by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response to Defendant’s Objection to Submission of Law Enforcement Materials for In Camera Review, and states as follows: In her objection, Defendant Maxwell failed to cite all portions of the transcript where this Court addressed the issue of submission of law enforcement material. Specifically, in response to Defendant’s demand for law enforcement documents the Court stated as follows: “I don’t know whether there are such. Is it possible that nothing in this lawsuit is clear? Well, I tried to make it clear what should be produced and what shouldn’t. Anything that has been submitted to any law enforcement officer by the plaintiff I will take in camera. Anything other than that with respect to any law enforcement should be produced.” See McCawley Declaration at Exhibit 1, April 21, 2016 Hearing Transcript at pg. 24:1-7. Ms. Giuffre believes that her submission for in camera review complies with this Court’s Order. To the extent the Court finds that Ms. Giuffre has misinterpreted the Court’s order, Ms. Giuffre 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 131 Filed 05/01/16 Page 2 of 3 respectfully requests that the Court stay its ruling for twenty (20) days to allow Ms. Giuffre an opportunity to consult with others about how to proceed. CONCLUSION Based upon the foregoing, Ms. Giuffre respectfully requests that this Court overrule Defendant’s objection to the submission of Law Enforcement Materials for In Camera Review. Dated: May 1, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP By: /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid McCawley (Pro Hac Vice) Meredith Schultz (Pro Hac Vice) Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 356-0011 David Boies Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 2 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 131 Filed 05/01/16 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 1st day of May, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on the individuals identified below via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel: (303) 831-7364 Fax: (303) 832-2628 Email: [email protected] [email protected] /s/ Sigrid S. McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley 3
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
ce7279d1443f226e089d4bd507b322273f7b4f7fa971fae11fcbabf5ab56f0c7
Bates Number
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.131.0
Dataset
giuffre-maxwell
Document Type
document
Pages
3

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!