👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (757 words)
From: Peter Fenwick
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 3:27 PM
To: jeffrey E.
Subject: FW: Sunday experiment
Results of the Sunday =xperiment analysed by Fabio. 4 Subjects 18 trials and the =orrelation matrix.
We will try and do another this Saturday. =ou mentioned a dual pen recorder to confirm timing. That I will leave =o the
main experiment as we will have plenty of timings available in =hat. This is a simple experiment, is it Cult or is it
=nteresting? Looks interesting!
Let me know if you want =nything else for Saturday.
Peter
From: Fabio Babiloni =mailto
Sent: 07 May 2018 =0:14
To: Peter iuseppe Bersani •‘ >; Corazza,
Ornella =1
Andreas loannides Viirre, Erik
rget
°
Subject: R: =undayexperiment
Dear Peter,
thank you for sending such numbers to me. Indeed, it seems =hat something is moving there ©
I have to state several =hings:
1. If the number of correlation tests performed is 4 (e.g. =lain against the four students) then the level of r to be
taken into =onsideration by using Bonferroni correction is as follows (r = =,57)
From this point of view we are quite close the same to the =ignificance for some of them.
EFTA_R1_01918755
EFTA02667128
2. However, Bonferroni =orrection is something that is quite harsh but it is indeed appropriate =or multiple
execution of unilateral tests. Maybe Holm will be more =ppropriate (resulting maybe in a lower threshold).
3. If you run the =orrelation everybody as everybody we obtained
e.g a correlation also between MC and =E which is slightly superior to those demonstrated between AF and MC. =/span>
Thus, the evidence in this first round =1 just imagine exausting for AF) is interesting and encouraging for AF =nd MC and
FE. In fact, the correlation is along the statistical =ignificance, although not definitively higher. It could be investigated
=ore.
I would like to know who established =he sequence of AF and if sequence could be determined "a =riori" the next time
you will run an experiment.
I suggest another day =when possible) with the same subjects, again 18 trials. Also, with a =equence predetermined for
AF to be generated (maybe Andy could deliver =o Peter the binary sequence to be read by AF the day of the
=xperiment).
Those data could be concatenated with =his actual data, giving a longer sequence of further significance for =ur
investigation.
I also suggest to run an =xperiment:
1. without the presence of AF =/span>
2. with AF forced to generate all Os. =/span>
This will set the "actual =ero" level of correlation (other than random binomial =istribution) of our experiment also.
Although is very unpleasant to =uggest, is just to be sure that we remove further cricitisms from =eviewers by exploring
the natural "noise" level of the =xperiment.
All the best from Dubai
Fabio
2
EFTA_R1_01918756
EFTA02667129
Prof. Fabio Babiloni, PhD
Ass. Editor of IEEE Transaction on =eural System & Rehabilitation Engineering
Ass. Editor of IEEE Transaction on =iomedical Engineering
Editor in Chief of International =ournal of Bioelectromagnetism
Dept. Molecular Medicine, University =f Rome Sapienza
Scientific Director of BrainSigns srl, =a =refehttp://www.brainsigns.comr>www.brainsigns.com
Da: Peter Fenwick <
Inviato: lunedi 7 maggio 2018 =0:14
A: 'Fabio Babiloni' < >; 'Corazza, Ornella'
ore
=Viirre, Erik' lain rorgets <
Oggetto: Su
Hi all,
Thanks Fabio for =our data analysis of the random data. I used the same data for =Ian and it is labelled AF, only one set
so they are all the same.
Sundays experiment =as carried us forward. There are two outstanding subjects, and two =ubjects about chance. Is that
correct Fabio. If it is then it =eans that we will have to select people up the experiential chain and =ossibly those who
have evidence of the Siddhis as they are likely to =how the most exciting neurophysiology.
That will limit us =o about six subjects.
Sundays group all signed informed consent.
The number of years =eeing the light is in the table below.
Do we now know =nough to go forward. Comments please and Fabio what does the =nalysis show. Kevin and Andy any
views.
3
EFTA_R1_01918757
EFTA02667130
Setting. A =lanket obscured AF from the subjects. Epoch length was 1 minute. =here was no noise in the giving or not
giving of energy. 1min then 30 =econds to rate data. If you would like to see the sheets I can =end them to you.
A great bank holiday w/e.
Best wishes,
Peter
=/p>
II tuo 5 diventa 1000
Fai crescere la tua =niversita
Dona it 5 per mille alla =apienza
<1=iv>
4
EFTA_R1_01918758
EFTA02667131
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
d23f80f8d48ce2ae188eb706010337ba6b881caee869e20b7e28aa47f54b8866
Bates Number
EFTA02667128
Dataset
DataSet-11
Type
document
Pages
4
💬 Comments 0