📄 Extracted Text (754 words)
Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/08/2013 Page: 1 of 5
Nos. 13-12923, 13-12926, 13-12928
IN THE
tiniteb ibtateo Court of appeato
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2,
Plaintiffs-Appellees
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee
ROY BLACK ET AL.,
Intervenors-Appellants
MOTION TO POSTPONE DUE DATE FOR FILING APPELLEE BRIEF
UNTIL COURT RULES ON PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK
OF JURISDICTION
Bradley J. Edwards Paul G. Cassell
FARMER, JAFFEE, WEISSING S. J. Quinney College of Law at
EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. the University of Utah
425 North Andrews Ave., Suite 2 332 S. 1400 E., Room 101
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2
EFTA01128695
Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/08/2013 Page: 2 of 5
MOTION TO POSTPONE DUE DATE FOR FILING APPELLEE BRIEF
UNTIL COURT RULES ON PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK
OF JURISDICTION
INTRODUCTION
This case involves a discovery order concerning certain correspondence that
the district court has ordered the Government to produce to two crime victims,
appellees Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (hereinafter "the victims"). On July
2, 2013, this Court docketed the appeal of limited intervenors-appellants' Roy
Black, Jeffrey Epstein and Martin Weinberg (collectively referred to as "Epstein")
challenging that discovery order. On July 2, 2013, the victims filed a motion to
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, contending that this Court did not have
jurisdiction to review the discovery order under Mohawk Industries v. Carpenter,
558 U.S. 100 (2009). On July 12, 2013, Epstein responded in opposition to the
motion to dismiss, and on July 16, 2013, the victim's replied in support of the
motion to dismiss.
On August 5, 2013, even though no briefing schedule had been set by this
Court, Epstein filed his opening brief on the merits. The Clerk's Office has
advised the victims that their brief on the merits is now due in thirty days, i.e., on
September 5, 2013.
2
EFTA01128696
Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/08/2013 Page: 3 of 5
Under Local Rule 31-1(d), if the Court had raised the jurisdictional question
on its own motion, that question would have automatically postponed the date for
the victims to file any response brief until the Court determined the jurisdictional
question. The victims respectfully assert that they have raised a substantial
jurisdictional issue and that they should not have a deadline to file their brief on the
merits until this Court resolves that issue or otherwise determines that it wants the
victims to file a brief on the merits. Accordingly, the victims move this Court to
postpone the deadline for filing their brief on the merits until the Court resolves the
jurisdiction issue or otherwise sets a schedule directing the victims to file their
appellee brief.
POSITION OF THE PARTIES
Epstein objects to the Court considering the motion to dismiss without also
considering the merits of the appeal. Epstein notes that he has filed his merits brief
and does not object to the court ordering expedited briefing on the remaining briefs
(response brief and reply brief) and an expedited oral argument schedule.
The Government has informed the victims that it does not intend to
participate in this appeal.
3
EFTA01128697
Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/08/2013 Page: 4 of 5
CONCLUSION
For all the foregoing reasons, the Court should postpone the deadline for the
victims to file their merits brief until it resolves the jurisdictional question or
otherwise directs the victims to file a brief on the merits.
DATED: August 8, 2013
Respectfully Submitted.
Paul G. Cassell
S.J. Quinney College of Law at the
University of Utah
332 S. 1400 E.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Telephone
Facsimile:
E-Mail:
and
Bradley J. Edwards
FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING,
EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN,
P.L.
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Telephon
Facsimile
Florida Bar No.: 542075
E-mail:
Attorneysfor Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2
4
EFTA01128698
Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/08/2013 Page: 5 of 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The foregoing document was served on August 8, 2013, on the following
using the Court's CM/ECF system:
Dexter Lee
A. Marie Villafatia
Assistant U.S. Attorneys
500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Attorneys for the Government
Roy Black, Esq.
Jackie Perczek, Esq.
Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A.
201 South Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 1300
Miami, FL 33131
Martin G. Weinberg
Martin G. Weinberg, PC
20 PARK PLZ STE 1000
Boston, MA 02116-4301
Paul G. Cassell
5
EFTA01128699
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
d358feafdca3174703ee372004675a3835a54be658d418a0f9988d28a02f8050
Bates Number
EFTA01128695
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
5
Comments 0