📄 Extracted Text (273 words)
an agreement that requests for similar documents will be treated in a similar manner. The
fact that Highbridge responds or objects to a particular document request shall not be
interpreted as implying that Highbridge acknowledges the propriety of that request.
l-lighbridge submits these General Responses and Objections without conceding the
competency, relevancy, materiality or admissibility of the subject matter of any document
or information requested by the Subpoena.
12. Flighbridge's Responses and Objections to the Subpoena shall not
constitute a waiver of any applicable objection and is without prejudice to Highbridge's
right to object later that the production of any such document was inadvertent.
13. Highbridge objects to the Subpoena to the extent that it calls for the
production of information equally available from another source, or is currently or was
previously in the possession, custody, or control of any party to the arbitration.
Highbridge shall not furnish such information. Without limiting the foregoing,
Highbridge shall not produce any documents exchanged by the parties in connection with
the matter entitled Zwim v. Corbin Capital Partners, L.P. et al., Index No. 08/603382.
Objections to Definitions
I. Highbridge objects to the Definitions to the extent that they purport to
impose obligations on Flighbridge not required by the New York Civil Practice Law and
Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules
and Procedures, or any other applicable statute, rule or case law.
2. Highbridge objects to the definition of "Glenn Dubin" as vague,
overbroad, and unduly burdensome, particularly insofar as it includes "any
representative, agent or anyone else acting on his behalf"
5
Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase JPM-SDNY-00061123
EFTA01581718
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
d393f9816c42bc96740bcb82f73706d7e2d04b0c1966876495bd3c3305f3644a
Bates Number
EFTA01581718
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0